I don't think Osama was an asset but more so "allowed to operate" as long as he was causing problems for the "right" people.
There's multiple operators who have talked about how they could have assassinated him easily and the cia wouldn't let them.
Then oopsie he made the US a target and had uncomfortable ties to Saudis. Can't have all that be public. Well, never let a crisis go to waste, let's usher in a massive surveillance state, pump a ton of money into the MIC, and go on the deep state's nation building wishlist in the middle east.
This CGI presentation comes from someone who got their post grad degree in 2012. Im not dismissing his explanation because of that but it has some serious flaws from the outset. Jmho..
Yes I just watched the presentation you poasted objectively..because I believe your evidence deserves consideration. I cannot say you gave me the same respect.
You however have on multiple occasions walked away from the discussion after I proved your claim incorrect and came back in different threads to claim the popular mechanics article to debunk everything again
The fact that you will listen to anything except what I present from actual engineering experts already working in the field when the event happened only proves your not going to listen to me because you don't like me.
That's fine if you have a problem with me but it's apparent the lengths you will go to to avoid pulling your head out of the sand to review ALL evidence including that which might refute your argument.
Again, I'm done trying to help you.
Believe what you will but if you claim the Popular Mechanics preemptively debunks any new evidence, (which you are now trying to present new evidence as fact)… Im going to call you out again!
I watched what you posted... didn't see the need to reply since you are so invested in it not being possible... the sound alone debunks the dynamite... there were never recorded sounds loud enough...
I am open to ALL evidence new and old, expert testimony and historical data aaand eyewitness testimony that was suppressed!
I am invested in the truth and wherever the evidence leads, not conjecture.
You didn't reply because I would have tried to have a conversation with you about specific evidence in those documentaries that directly refutes the 911 commission report.
You avoid any conversation about the evidence I have given you over and over and over
Unfortunately... That's evidence of your bias and YOUR investment, and why you dodge real discussion with me.
It’s clearly easier for you to ignore the obvious than deal with the fact that the US government participated in a false flag event that killed 3000 of its own people.
Comments
I don't think Osama was an asset but more so "allowed to operate" as long as he was causing problems for the "right" people.
There's multiple operators who have talked about how they could have assassinated him easily and the cia wouldn't let them.
Then oopsie he made the US a target and had uncomfortable ties to Saudis. Can't have all that be public. Well, never let a crisis go to waste, let's usher in a massive surveillance state, pump a ton of money into the MIC, and go on the deep state's nation building wishlist in the middle east.
Anyone who thinks kerosine (read: jet fuel) can melt steel beams is a special kind of something.
Building 7, only the third concrete and steel building to collapse due to fire in recorded history. Anyone want to guess the first two?
.
This CGI presentation comes from someone who got their post grad degree in 2012. Im not dismissing his explanation because of that but it has some serious flaws from the outset. Jmho..
Yes I just watched the presentation you poasted objectively..because I believe your evidence deserves consideration. I cannot say you gave me the same respect.
You however have on multiple occasions walked away from the discussion after I proved your claim incorrect and came back in different threads to claim the popular mechanics article to debunk everything again
The fact that you will listen to anything except what I present from actual engineering experts already working in the field when the event happened only proves your not going to listen to me because you don't like me.
That's fine if you have a problem with me but it's apparent the lengths you will go to to avoid pulling your head out of the sand to review ALL evidence including that which might refute your argument.
Again, I'm done trying to help you.
Believe what you will but if you claim the Popular Mechanics preemptively debunks any new evidence, (which you are now trying to present new evidence as fact)… Im going to call you out again!
Good day!
They didn't melt them, make them weaker.
I watched what you posted... didn't see the need to reply since you are so invested in it not being possible... the sound alone debunks the dynamite... there were never recorded sounds loud enough...
I am open to ALL evidence new and old, expert testimony and historical data aaand eyewitness testimony that was suppressed!
I am invested in the truth and wherever the evidence leads, not conjecture.
You didn't reply because I would have tried to have a conversation with you about specific evidence in those documentaries that directly refutes the 911 commission report.
You avoid any conversation about the evidence I have given you over and over and over
Unfortunately... That's evidence of your bias and YOUR investment, and why you dodge real discussion with me.
Good day
If you say so.
Physics says so
It’s clearly easier for you to ignore the obvious than deal with the fact that the US government participated in a false flag event that killed 3000 of its own people.
.
Get some air and schedule that physical.
#Concerned