"This is a big deal"
Comments
-
The Venezuelan gang members can play all the legal due process bulkshit they want.
From a prison in El Salvador.
-
More due process
-
The Supreme Court needs to stop all this judicial overreach
-
Dem strategy seems to be getting Trump to ignore these rulings and set him up for another impeachment.
It’s all about power for these authoritarians, and they always use the courts to consolidate power. The lawfare is just beginning Part 2. They don’t care about this country’s citizens succeeding.
-
100% it's the same.shit they did last term...
-
didn’t ignore it. Ludecke argued that the question of when a war terminates and wartime authorities expire is too “political” for judicial resolution. That’s why the Supreme Court upheld it in regards to Japanese internment. Because we were just at war with Japan. And yet, in 1988, during Reagan’s era, Congress apologized and provided reparations for Japanese internment. It acknowledged that the policy was rooted in “racial prejudice” and “wartime hysteria,” not valid security concerns.
So again, my question is the same: who are we at war with? When did we declare war on Venezuela? The 1798 law makes no reference to this law being applicable in situations outside of declarations of war, and against specific entities such as a gang. Not to mention sending them to another country’s prison instead of just back home. This is why it’s going to have a hard time in court. Ludecke doesn’t apply here because we aren’t currently and haven’t been at war with Venezuela, and we’re also not even sending them back there. I am sure SCOTUS will say the same thing.
Defending the rule of law isn’t the same as defending TDA, to which yet again I noticed you girls instantly went there because it’s your crutch whenever you read something you don’t like. It’s for protecting against abuse of power in the future against people who are not in gangs, say, political dissidents for example. In this case I just prefer Throbber’s explanation that he doesn’t give a fuck, because at least he’s honest. I know that’s what it really boils down to in the end. Just admit you don’t care because I can respect that a lot more than trying to legally justify this. -
You can't possibly be suggesting that more than 20 million illegal aliens, all criminals, are not a threat to our nation. Are you really this stupid?
I'm betting you are.
-
@Sledog and there it is again. citation needed. please point to where I said that. Which you won’t because you can’t read.
we have due process for a reason. It applies to everyone. Even if they’re horrible people. Without it, our entire system would collapse. -
All those words just to not understand that the third part is what applies, as has already been pointed out.
How embarrassing for you, SoccerDork.
-
Criminal illegal allien invaders don't have due process. The acr was written and used by FOUNDING FATHERS! They knew what they were doing. If a country can't protect it's borders or repel invaders we don't have a country!
Holy crap you actually are this stupid. Man you Ducks work hard on dumb. Credit where credit is due.




