Pac12 has 7-8 legit BCS teams, big10 has 3, SEC 4-5...

There you go again...

CuntWaffle said:

I brought my flamethrower sandy vagina into this thread and then puppys argument was too overwhelming.

Well played.

The only team is the PAC that won't finnish in the Top 10 is WSU and they might make it. (Don't let the math get in the way of a sound case.)

And the Dawgs have the inside track on the National Championship game. Bring on the pussies from Tuscaloosa!

IrishDawg22 said:

CuntWaffle said:

I brought my flamethrower sandy vagina into this thread and then puppys argument was too overwhelming.

Well played.

Hey man not cool.

I hate the $EC as much as puppy corn syrup but c'mon. The PAC has two or maybe three. In reality the SEC has about the same but the espn-cbs cartel once again convincex everyone there are 6-9.

AP Preseason: 3) Oregon; 4) Stanford; 21) UCLA; 24) USC; 25) Oregon State. Preseason polls are highly political with regional biases favoring the hotbeads of collegiate football in the SEC, Big-12; ACC; and Big Ten. No Pac-12 schools ranked in the second ten and the bottom three of UCLA, USC, and Oregon State can be discounted as simply a very meager west coast bias.

The Pac-12 is more of a two-team conference than ever,...... which is what should be expected in any football association dominated by the likes of Oregon and Stanford. How many times does it have to be said that the Pac-12 (-10 or -8) can never be strong nationally until USC, UCLA, and UW are back on top of west coast collegiate football? That's just the nature of things.

DerekJohnson said:

Tailgater said:

AP Preseason: 3) Oregon; 4) Stanford; 21) UCLA; 24) USC; 25) Oregon State. Preseason polls are highly political with regional biases favoring the hotbeads of collegiate football in the SEC, Big-12; ACC; and Big Ten. No Pac-12 schools ranked in the second ten and the bottom three of UCLA, USC, and Oregon State can be discounted as simply a very meager west coast bias.

The Pac-12 is more of a two-team conference than ever,...... which is what should be expected in any football association dominated by the likes of Oregon and Stanford. How many times does it have to be said that the Pac-12 (-10 or -8) can never be strong nationally until USC, UCLA, and UW are back on top of west coast collegiate football? That's just the nature of things.

or USC, UCLA and Oregon

When thinking about or discussing Pac-whatever football as a power conference, Oregon (or Stanford) simply doesn't fit with USC and UCLA. Outside of L.A., only UW qualifies and I'm not sorry to say that's the way it is and will always be. UW can stagger along for another Husky lifetime trying to find new ways to remain mediocre and Woodward can invent more Terraces for downsizing Husky Stadium capacity by another 4000 or seats, but the power structure of Pac football where it counts on the gridiron will never change. Until it's USC, UCLA, and UW dominating conference football again, nobody on the west coast need get excited about BCS playoffs.

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

Travis Morris said:

South Carolina, A&M, Bama, LSU, and Florida win the Pac-12 rather easily.

Disagree.

Bammer could, aTM might, and the rest are frauds. Case in point: Florida barely beat Bowling Green, Louisiana Lafayette (both in Gaynesville lol), and got their asses handed to them by lowly Louisville in the Splenda Bowel last season.

One game is an aberration, but not three.

The SEC has six teams in the preseason top 13....like tailgater says its politics.

Florida also beat A&M, Florida State (they never play anyone out of conference), LSU and South Carolina. One game is an abberation, but not four.

I also like how Florida "barely" beat Bowling Green by 13 but had their asses handed to them by 10 against Louisville. Sounds like you have an agenda.