Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

We need a general tweet of the day thread

1557558560562563643

Comments

  • BleachedAnusDawg
    BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,141 Standard Supporter
    edited December 2024

    The Rivian thing is that they're trying to float themselves long enough for than new plant to start production on their upcoming, smaller R2 and R3 models. The Illinois plant isn't tooled to build those models, in addition to the R1 models.

    Not saying it's a winning strategy, but the new models are supposedly athe ones that will be profitable. As long as the gub'mint and investors keep giving them cash I guess they'll have a legitimate shot to succeed.

    My understanding with VW is that they are hurting massively right now and are trying to tie in with Rivian for their EV tech as they don't have the ability to hit their targets/ requirements on their own.

    Also, isn't Tesla building Gigafactories in Texas and Germany to produce their own batteries?

  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,195 Founders Club

    Hardy har har

    I don't know a lot of details but it only lasted three hours before parliament overruled the president's actions

  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,195 Founders Club

    There was never even a trial. They needed to cover that up toot sweet

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,625 Standard Supporter
    edited December 2024

    There was never even an investigation. None. Nancy blocked it as she was in charge of capitol security as speaker of the house.

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,625 Standard Supporter
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,534 Standard Supporter

    What's the functional difference between the Stanford president and the dazzler? Compare and contrast with a student editor of the conservative Stanford Review and a supposedly elite University president. Bonus question, what is the functional difference between the Stanford Faculty Senate and the dazzler?

    https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2024/12/stanford-in-the-hot-seat.php

    Stanford in the Hot Seat

    The Stanford Review, the conservative student newspaper that Peter Thiel and others founded back in the 1980s, managed to persuade Stanford’s new president, economist Jonathan Levin, to sit down for an interview. It’s worth reading the whole thing, but in short the Stanford Review did a great job of putting Levin on the hot seat. Some excerpts, starting with the one that is getting the most attention on social media right now:

    Stanford Review: What is the most important problem in the world right now?

    President Levin: There’s no answer to that question. There are too many important problems to give you a single answer.

    Stanford Review: That is an application question that we have to answer to apply here. . .

     Stanford Review: The first two categories are the buckets of questions that I have. So I’ll move on to my first question about Stanford’s educational and political climate at the present moment. In one of my classes, I was randomly assigned a partner to work on a presentation together. He told me that he had not read a book, cover to cover since the third grade, let alone at Stanford. In June, he will graduate with a degree from Stanford. How is this possible?

    President Levin: Have you read a book at Stanford?

    Stanford Review: I actually have. I’ve read fifty. I’ve counted. Probably at sixty now.

    President Levin: I can’t speak to the particular student you worked with and exactly the way he or she has approached things. I think it’s a missed opportunity if you go through Stanford without doing a lot of reading, because at least in many fields, that’s the way to learn. Now, some fields, it’s true at Stanford, you learn in different ways that aren’t necessarily from books [like Shop?], but you know, I certainly would hope [but certainly not a requirement] that any student who came to Stanford would spend a lot of time reading and thinking and reflecting. So I think it’s a missed opportunity if that’s not how you choose to spend a good fraction of your time here. . .

    Stanford’s Ivory Tower Tyranny: Atlas Censure Vote Reveals Academia’s True Colors

    Last Thursday, the Stanford University Faculty Senate voted against repealing the 2020 censure of Dr. Scott Atlas, Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution and former Trump administration advisor on the White House Coronavirus Task Force. . .

    It reveals a troubling reality within elite academic institutions: the hollow nature of their proclaimed commitment to free speech. Initially twice postponing the vote to avoid political interpretation, the Faculty Senate has now taken the dramatic step of refusing to rescind the censure, cementing its politically motivated decision.

    The Senate’s outright rejection is particularly striking given the subsequent dismissal of several positions for which Atlas was initially censured. When Stanford faculty censured him in 2020 for questioning COVID-19 policies like lockdowns and mask mandates, they did so without even offering him an opportunity to defend his positions. Even as evidence has mounted supporting many of Atlas’s positions, the institution has doubled down on its censure.

  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,534 Standard Supporter

    The long time democratic US senator can't figure out why electric rate increases are up over 40% in three years and are scheduled for another double digit rate increase in 2025. So, he virtue signals by trying to blame the regulated public utility, Portland General Electric. Here is the playing field. PGE is a regulated utility. The electric rates charged to consumers are approved by the Oregon Public Utility Commission whose commissioners are appointed by the governor which had been a democrat since 1987. The electric rates are supposed to be established under Oregon statutes which have been approved and amended by democratic legislators for decades. The democratic legislature and Oregon dem governor have passed "renewable mandates" which require the use of expensive and non-reliable wind and solar generation. The Oregon PUC also mandated the termination of the 550 megawatt Boardman coal generation plant which was demolished in 2022. Much of the solar and wind production comes from the middle of nowhere (say eastern Wyoming) and required/requires billions of dollars in new transmission and grid updates. I wonder who we should blame?

    image.png image.png image.png
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,673 Founders Club

    Yeah Ron really cares about those working people getting fucked

    Green energy is a scam? Who knew?

  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,534 Standard Supporter

    Ron cares the same way Bernie cares according to Ern. It's all about feelings, not actual results.

  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,534 Standard Supporter

    Denying a minor from purchasing cigarettes "consenting" to sexual mutilation is just like a violation of the 14th Amendment in banning interracial marriage or claiming that sexual mutilation has a similar risk profile to taking an aspirin. At least according to our most recent Supreme Court justice who can't define a woman or from our wise latina Justice who compared dog shit to apples. This is the modern democratic party. I'd add what is the functional difference between these two clowns on the US Supreme Court and the dazzler?

    https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2024/12/05/ketanji-brown-jackson-vs-sonia-sotomayor-whos-dumber-n4934856

    Ketanji Brown Jackson Vs. Sonia Sotomayor: Who’s Dumber?

    Matt Margolis | 11:00 AM on December 05, 2024

    On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in U.S. v. Skrmetti, a pivotal case addressing state restrictions on controversial medical interventions, including puberty blockers and hormone treatments for minors with gender confusion. At the heart of the case is a Tennessee law banning these procedures for children, with the court’s decision likely to have far-reaching consequences. Will our country protect children from these barbaric and irreversible procedures or not?

    As I previously reported, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson humiliated herself when she bizarrely tried to equate banning transgender procedures for minors with prohibiting interracial marriage. She began with a convoluted statement: “Being drawn by the statute that was sort of like the starting point, the question was whether it was discriminatory because it applied to both races and it wasn’t necessarily invidious or whatever.”

    It got worse from there.

    “But you know, as I read … the case here, the court starts off by saying that Virginia is now one of 16 states which prohibit and punish marriages on the basis of racial classifications.” While it was clear that she intended to invoke historical racial discrimination, the connection to the case at hand was tenuous at best.

    The real stretch came when she concluded, “And when you look at the structure of that law, it looks in terms of you can’t do something that is inconsistent with your own characteristics. It’s sort of the same thing.” 

    The suggestion that anyone could somehow liken laws protecting minors from irreversible and harmful gender procedures to bans on interracial marriage is downright absurd. Jackson’s argument hinged on a confusing assertion that both types of laws were based on “inconsistency” with one’s “characteristics,” a comparison that is frankly laughable and dumb.

    But she wasn't the only left-wing justice on the court to make a dumb argument.

    While speaking before the court, Tennessee's Solicitor General asked, "How many minors have to have their bodies irreparably harmed for unproven benefits?"

    And that's when Justice Sonia Sotomayor promptly jumped in.

    "I'm sorry, Counselor," she said, interrupting him. "Every medical treatment has a risk, even taking aspirin, there is always going to be a percentage of the population under any medical treatment that's going to suffer a harm."

    That's right. Sotomayor, the so-called "wise Latina," compared cutting off the healthy breasts and genitals of minors to taking aspirin.

    Which justice made the dumber argument? Jackson bizarrely compared Tennessee’s ban on gender procedures for minors to bans on interracial marriage, claiming that both involve “inconsistency” with inherent characteristics. The analogy was a spectacular failure as protecting minors from irreversible harm has nothing to do with racial discrimination.

    Meanwhile, Sotomayor trivialized the issue by likening the risks of permanent, life-altering surgeries on minors to those of taking aspirin. This flippant dismissal of the severe, irreversible consequences of such procedures demonstrates a shocking lack of seriousness.

    Both arguments are embarrassingly absurd, making it difficult to determine which is more moronic. One thing is for sure: both are an embarrassment to the court.

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,005

    Not sure whether this is necessarily a bad thing - wiping Oregon and San Francisco off the map.

    No call for genocide. Don’t twist.

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,673 Founders Club
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,534 Standard Supporter

    If only we had a massive federal department of education and spent the most money per student in the world then that level of commitment for our kids' education would pay off. The new math is working as well as our elites abandonment of phonics for reading instruction. Ern has it nailed, we just need to spend more money for administrators. Nothing says commitment to the kids education like voting for a democrat. Time for another lockdown.

    https://www.joannejacobs.com/post/u-s-math-scores-show-devastating-decline

    U.S. math scores show 'devastating' decline

    U.S. students' math scores fell sharply between 2019 and 2023 for fourth- and eighth-graders, according to new results from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study, known as TIMSS. Some countries improved, passing the U.S. in international rankings, writes Erica Meltzer on Chalkbeat.

    The declines were "steep" and "devastating," said Peggy Carr, commissioner of the National Center for Education Statistics. While high achievers held their own, low-performing students lost the most, widening achievement gaps.


    "One in five U.S. eighth graders scored below the low benchmark, meaning they lacked even basic proficiency," Meltzer writes. That's way up from earlier years.


    The drop in science scores was less extreme, but U.S. fourth-graders now score worse in science than they did in 1995.


    Singapore, South Korea, Hong Kong, and Japan topped the rankings. Poland, Sweden and Australia made the greatest gains, passing the U.S. “We have countries leapfrogging over us,” Carr said.


    It's not clear whether school closures, which lasted longer in the U.S. than in Europe or Asia, led to more learning loss. But one of the countries that raised achievement, Sweden, didn't close elementary schools or mandate masks. TIMSS now ranks Sweden 14th in math achievement, while the U.S. is ranked 24th.


    "American students’ scores actually started to decline before the pandemic for reasons that are not entirely clear," writes Meltzer.


    "The U.S. is failing to meet the challenges of academic recovery," Stanford economist Thomas Dee told Kevin Mahnken. "Nearly three decades of math achievement growth" evaporated in a few years.


    Before the pandemic, federal accountability laws were weakened, notes Dan Goldhaber, director of the Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research. That may have hurt students who were already behind, he speculates.


    Every mistake American education made regarding phonics vs whole language, it’s about to make again with math instruction," tweets Daniel Buck. "And once again a handful of gurus and education professors are about to make millions off of miseducating kids based on pseudoscientific theories and vibes."


    He's talking about groups of students struggling with problems -- standing up and with white boards! -- instead of listening to a teacher's explanation first. That's not how they do it in Singapore.

  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member Posts: 8,145

    Another nothing bergur. Like everything else in this BS US culture when they tell you there's been a massive 7.3 earthquake, 5.0's did more damage 30 years ago.

  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,534 Standard Supporter

    I'll sort of disagree. First, Fetterman seems to have made a full recovery from his stroke, which wasn't true when he was running as a candidate. Also, the New York trial for Trump was purely selective justice. A federal criminal statute which wasn't charged by even a weaponized DOJ was used to turn New York misdemeanors with an expired statute of limitations into state felonies, something that hadn't occurred before. Hunter was caught because of his laptop and a failure to report millions on his tax return. The actual prosecution was a fake prosecution with a sweatheart deal with Hunter pleading guilty to misdemeanors and no jail time and a promise of no further prosecution. That deal died when it was too much for the federal judge who called BS on the settlement. Compare that with the selective prosecution of Trump's associates with the book thrown at them or the sentences for the January 6th protestors versus the antifa/blm rioters. This was after federal prosecutors let the statute of limitations expire to minimize the criminal charges.

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,625 Standard Supporter

    Democrat, communist, same, same. Need a T shirt with that on it.

  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,534 Standard Supporter

    You don't think AOC would use the government to shut up American citizens? barry's cabal and the dementia patient had no problem censuring social media sites. We have lots of free speech repression on college campuses with firings of those who don't toe the part line. Same with big US corporations like with ESPN and Curt Shilling or Levi Strauss with Jennifer Sey. Trump was headed for jail at the behest of Soros DAs or the federal DOJ. Not one Tug leftard has spoken out about the weaponization of the US justice system. Look at the Rittenhouse trial or the current Penny trial in New York.

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/jairhilburn/2022/02/14/levi-brand-president-jennifer-sey-resigns-citing-school-closure-disagreements/

    Levi Strauss’ chief marketer Jennifer Sey has resigned from her position, claiming she was forced out after voicing her opinion that schools should remain open during the Covid-19 pandemic.

    In an essay published on writer Bari Weiss’s Substack, Sey—a 20-year veteran of Levi’s who has been global brand president since 2020—said the company’s CEO, Chip Bergh, offered her a $1 million severance package in exchange for her signature on a nondisclosure agreement. However, she said declined so she could “keep my voice.” 

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,625 Standard Supporter
    edited December 2024

    They always accuse the other side for what they are actually doing or are about to do. Always. Lawfare. Canceling free speech. Election fraud. Allowing billionaires to hire election workers and put out unofficial drop boxes etc. etc. etc. Votes don't actually show up 3 weeks later in an honest election system.

    Proof. Dazzler will say it's not proof he's an attorney!

  • BleachedAnusDawg
    BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,141 Standard Supporter

    #1 name for boys in England, and #4 for all European countries in 2023, was Muhammad.

    That entire continent is going to be lost very soon. Jihadists actually reproduce.