Final Transfer Portal Numbers Are In for Huskies, Ranked No. 9 Nationally
Comments
-
-
Is this a joke? Holy shit rivals. (not a comment on UW's class, which was good).
-
I concur with your assessment that this is a joke. Quantity seems to be the only factor here.
-
Thanks Taft!
DRFS trigger warning for @Mad_Son et al
-
TYFYS
-
It has to be quantity.
I don't know the transfer ratings at all. I'd assume Rogers had a decent one, as did Hunter, Coleman, Prysock and maybe Wayne. I can't remember many out of the ~34 transfers that stuck out as the kind of recruits that put you up there in the rankings.
-
Azzopardi was considered a nice get in the portal and Valdez was rated as a 4* DL for whatever that’s worth. But yeah, it’s the sheer quantity of players that pushed UW into the top 10.
-
Thanks for pointing it out. I'd rate those two guys near the top of the list of key players this year. Interior DL was already a weakness last season and the best guy is gone. OT has two first rounders to replace.
-
This is pretty terrible. 247's ratings are much more accurate and I hate 247. 247's player rankings overly value potential so you'll see a lot of guys who were highly rated recruits with a lot to prove way too high. They have Dillon Gabriel as the #77 transfer yet they seem to be one of the groups saying he's a Heisman contender.
-
I hate that 24/7 rates players on NFL potential. It’s so odd. If a kid is a great college player and transfers to another school rate him as such. Justin Flowe was rated a 4* transfer to Arizona based solely on his inflated HS rating. He spent three years at Oregon getting beat out by lower rated players. If they thought his T-Rex arms and neck roll were NFL ready they were smoking something. He’s the definition of a mid/low 3* transfer. Lots of head scratching ratings like that.
