Chevron Deference
Comments
-
They might actually have to read the bills they pass.
-
Likely the biggest SCOTUS decision in decades
-
It's almost like the system is broken
Like we've been saying
-
The pro-democracy side is outraged that unelected people are transferring power to elected legislators, and the authoritarian ultra-MAGA right is celebrating. What a world we live in.
-
I have bad news for the cabals that @HHusky say run the country.
-
So, your point is that you favor the sort of anarcho-capitalism I accused you all of favoring in the first place. We understand each other perfectly.
-
Now get to sun-setting old laws that aren't applicable and start trimming payrolls of the bloated Federal Government. Duplicative / redundant staffing that the States are doing would be sensible.
For instance, I'm all for education but is the size, scope, and budget of the Federal Department of Education really needed? WA State already spends something like $22,000 per student due to local, county, and state taxes.
-
Lazy argument. What is preventing legistlation from being passed? Prior to this, the court decision just allowed Congress to do nothing. Why negotiate anything if the agencies and courts just decided anyways?
-
I would say that what H calls anarcho capitalism is better than socialist capitalism heavily regulated so the party in power picks winners and losers
-
Deference could always be overcome, Chevron or no. But the idea that the agency charged with administration of a particular law develops no special expertise is belied by experience.
