Jake Browning vs Stanford (2016)

Comments

• biak1 Member Posts: 4,237

  January 2024

  What cunt would click this thread

  6 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,982

  January 2024

  I would love to watch the 2016 team against the 2023 team
  
  That 2016 D vs 2023 O would be fun to watch

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,717

  January 2024

  Controversial take, 2016 was better.

  5 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• CrispyEaterson Member Posts: 718

  January 2024 edited January 2024

  I’m not saying the 2016 team as a whole was better than 2023, but I think they win head to head.

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• WoolleyDoog Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,917

  January 2024

  CrispyEaterson said:

  I’m not saying the 2016 team as a whole was better than 2023, but I think they win head to head.

  It's a trade off - give 2023 2016's defense and wow. Give 2016 Penix and wow. 2023 also lacked a Ross or just a guy with Ross' speed, especially against Michigan.

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537

  January 2024

  CrispyEaterson said:

  I’m not saying the 2016 team as a whole was better than 2023, but I think they win head to head.

  2016 was a Penix away from being an all time great
  
  2023 was an entire defense, non amputated RB, and WR with no yips away

  9 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,069

  January 2024

  Thanks Taft!

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• CrispyEaterson Member Posts: 718

  January 2024

  Is Trice the only player from the 2023 defense that would actually see the field for the 2016 squad? Let that sink in.

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• WoolleyDoog Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,917

  January 2024 edited January 2024

  CrispyEaterson said:

  Is Trice the only player from the 2023 defense that would actually see the field for the 2016 squad? Let that sink in.

  The ends sucked once Mathis went down. I'd take ZTF and Tunuufi over Psalm and Connor O'Brien. Insane that's probably it.

  6 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516

  January 2024

  WoolleyDoog said:

  CrispyEaterson said:

  Is Trice the only player from the 2023 defense that would actually see the field for the 2016 squad? Let that sink in.

  The ends sucked once Mathis went down. I'd take ZTF and Tunuufi over Psalm and Connor O'Brien. Insane that's probably it.

  Maybe Eddie or Bruener post-Azeem.

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• WoolleyDoog Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,917

  January 2024

  Being able to have Muhammad as a nickel corner would be nice. Tuli would be in the rotation at DT.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• CrispyEaterson Member Posts: 718

  January 2024

  Good call on Tuli. Forgot about him. He wouldn’t be a starter, but he’d definitely be in the rotation on that team.
  
  I wonder if Byron Murphy would have been a better option as a freshman. The fact they redshirted him only to have him leave after 3 years shows how good the guys in front of him were.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• LawDawg1 Member Posts: 3,941

  January 2024

  Pretty sure 2016 defense makes the 2023 offense look like ASU, Stanford, WSU, AZ, and Michigan did.
  

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,982

  January 2024

  DerekJohnson said:

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WQtNjyEsDE

  I completely forgot about the Psalm Wooching pass at 3 minutes

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• theknowledge Member Posts: 5,555

  January 2024

  CrispyEaterson said:

  Is Trice the only player from the 2023 defense that would actually see the field for the 2016 squad? Let that sink in.

  When Azeem went down I’d take Eddy, Bruener or Goforth over Beavers. 2016 has zero LB depth.

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• theknowledge Member Posts: 5,555

  January 2024

  WoolleyDoog said:

  CrispyEaterson said:

  Is Trice the only player from the 2023 defense that would actually see the field for the 2016 squad? Let that sink in.

  The ends sucked once Mathis went down. I'd take ZTF and Tunuufi over Psalm and Connor O'Brien. Insane that's probably it.

  GrundleStiltzkin said:

  WoolleyDoog said:

  CrispyEaterson said:

  Is Trice the only player from the 2023 defense that would actually see the field for the 2016 squad? Let that sink in.

  The ends sucked once Mathis went down. I'd take ZTF and Tunuufi over Psalm and Connor O'Brien. Insane that's probably it.

  Maybe Eddie or Bruener post-Azeem.

  Just read the BBC whole thread. Great minds and stuff.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• TheHB Member Posts: 6,457

  January 2024

  It would be cool if UW could have some linebackers who hurt people and other teams feared.
  
  Been a while.

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• HairyBallsDawg Member Posts: 1,075

  January 2024

  Doogles said:

  Controversial take, 2016 was better.

  For sure when Tedford was still involved

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Postal91 Member Posts: 1,890

  January 2024

  whatshouldicareabout said:

  DerekJohnson said:

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WQtNjyEsDE

  I completely forgot about the Psalm Wooching pass at 3 minutes

  LOFL - The Cobra hides no emotion after fire juggler's drop. And LOL at them blaming that on Browning when Wooching reached for it with t-rex arms.

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• SpoonieLuv Member Posts: 5,463

  January 2024

  theknowledge said:

  CrispyEaterson said:

  Is Trice the only player from the 2023 defense that would actually see the field for the 2016 squad? Let that sink in.

  When Azeem went down I’d take Eddy, Bruener or Goforth over Beavers. 2016 has zero LB depth.

  Bruener would definitely be a #2 on the depth chart.
  
  Our* entire secondary wouldn’t even be listed in the game program let alone ever sniff the field.

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter