Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Alabama’s DeBoer rejected 2 Washington extensions, $9.4 million annually

12357

Comments

  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    PurpleJ said:

    HFNY said:

    PurpleJ said:

    gmo said:

    I believe UW could have offered 10.5 or 11 back in October and it wouldn't have mattered.

    You gotta make him say no. We didn’t. That’s on us.
    Huh? He slow-played things and then wouldn't agree to bigger and bigger offers. For all intents and purposes, that's saying no.
    Starting bid should have been 10 mil and then you go up to 12. We never even got there. Did not MAKE him say no.
    Disagree, you are such a fucking idiot... you are obviously still low balling him...

    Should have started at 15 mil and then go up to 30 mil if needed. Guarantee him a percentage of the ticket sales and go full ppv compensation package.

    You just have to MAKE HIM say NO!!!!
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,504
    Btw, does anyone know how much DeBoer is getting paid by Bama and what his buyout is?

    So far, he has (or is likely to) poach Mack, Brailsford, Noah Carter, and Germie Bernard.
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,504

    I think his recruiting would have picked up at UW and he could have created a culture and program a lot of kids wanted to play for.

    I think he’s a much better fit at UW than most places and could have kept on winning big.

    If he stays I don’t think it’s any worse than a 3 loss year.

    Agreed. He probably thought Alabama recruits itself and he could be in the hunt for a NC every year rather than once every 3-5 years. Oh well.
  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    PurpleJ said:

    1. No one was saying shit about his recruiting when he was still at UW. If they did they were ignored or laughed at.
    2. No one knows what his roster would look like if he were still here.

    Some of you are acting like bitter coog losers. I understand it’s a coping mechanism so I’ll let it slide.

    delusional stage...

    People were regularly stating that his recruiting was an issue, especially given the on field success. Its just that most everyone were happy to focus on this year, beating Oregon twice, beating Sark, and the championship game... rather than talk about "next year".
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,773
    edited January 2024
    Houhusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    1. No one was saying shit about his recruiting when he was still at UW. If they did they were ignored or laughed at.
    2. No one knows what his roster would look like if he were still here.

    Some of you are acting like bitter coog losers. I understand it’s a coping mechanism so I’ll let it slide.

    delusional stage...

    People were regularly stating that his recruiting was an issue, especially given the on field success. Its just that most everyone were happy to focus on this year, beating Oregon twice, beating Sark, and the championship game... rather than talk about "next year".
    Yeah and those people are fags who don’t understand this newfangled portal thing. Anyways, scoreboard baby.
  • bigcc
    bigcc Member Posts: 900

    I think his recruiting would have picked up at UW and he could have created a culture and program a lot of kids wanted to play for.

    I think he’s a much better fit at UW than most places and could have kept on winning big.

    If he stays I don’t think it’s any worse than a 3 loss year.

    Wouldn't have taken much to have picked up given how underwhelming recruiting had been

    I agree with most else you said, but 3 losses at worst?

    Wed obviously be without penix/odunze, big chunk of OL, probably one(if not two) of McMillan/Polk, likely dj to pro still (dunno if the same even if he came back)

    And the defense wasn't going to win games, especially with Trice gone (he gone either way)

    This team was going to struggle either way next year, but we're much worse off than literally anyone without inside knowledge expected going into next year
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    PurpleJ said:

    Houhusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    1. No one was saying shit about his recruiting when he was still at UW. If they did they were ignored or laughed at.
    2. No one knows what his roster would look like if he were still here.

    Some of you are acting like bitter coog losers. I understand it’s a coping mechanism so I’ll let it slide.

    delusional stage...

    People were regularly stating that his recruiting was an issue, especially given the on field success. Its just that most everyone were happy to focus on this year, beating Oregon twice, beating Sark, and the championship game... rather than talk about "next year".
    Yeah and those people are fags who don’t understand this newfangled portal thing. Anyways, scoreboard baby.</blockquote

    Pay attention to Colorado this if you’re a fan who believes the portal can cover for poor to average recruiting.

    Sanders believes he can built a contender without high level HS recruits and numbers.