Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Just what I'm hearing...

1…6791112…14

Comments

  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,636 Standard Supporter
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EsophagealFeces
    EsophagealFeces Member Posts: 13,329
    Kingdome_Urinals said:

    Wittingham would be dope. His teams are stubborn as fuck, play defense. They have only lacked elite qbs and wrs, which I think he can access at UW.

    B1G membership would be a good selling point for him.

    Whittingham would be interesting. His teams are Pat Hill TUFF, and his style of ball would play well in the B1G. The problem is he’s 64, and who knows how much longer he wants to coach.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Joey
    Joey Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,532 Founders Club
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    If Florida sucks next year, which they probably will (insane schedule), then the AD is gone and so is Napier.

    And then Fisch is gone after one year.

    No.

    Yes yes yes
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • phineas
    phineas Member Posts: 4,732
    AtomicDawg said:

    DoogWhisperer said:

    My concern with hiring Leipold in a matter of days is that Dannen just said, “Find me someone who’s like DeBoer, quick.”

    Have you watched Kansas play at all? Dude can coach.
    not even once
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DoogWhisperer
    DoogWhisperer Member Posts: 1,035
    AtomicDawg said:

    DoogWhisperer said:

    My concern with hiring Leipold in a matter of days is that Dannen just said, “Find me someone who’s like DeBoer, quick.”

    Have you watched Kansas play at all? Dude can coach.
    No doubt. But is he the best option? Can he recruit at the level we need to rebuild? How does he handle boosters? The roster is nowhere near as talented as DeBoer got it. Do we lose anything by waiting a week to make sure we have the right guy? This class is a throwaway and most of the talent that we wanted to keep is already in the portal.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheHB
    TheHB Member Posts: 6,766
    edited January 2024
    EsophagealFeces said:

    Kingdome_Urinals said:

    Wittingham would be dope. His teams are stubborn as fuck, play defense. They have only lacked elite qbs and wrs, which I think he can access at UW.

    B1G membership would be a good selling point for him.

    Whittingham would be interesting. His teams are Pat Hill TUFF, and his style of ball would play well in the B1G. The problem is he’s 64, and who knows how much longer he wants to coach.
    Leipold is 59. Carroll is 72. Just for context.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • theknowledge
    theknowledge Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,868 Founders Club
    TheHB said:

    EsophagealFeces said:

    Kingdome_Urinals said:

    Wittingham would be dope. His teams are stubborn as fuck, play defense. They have only lacked elite qbs and wrs, which I think he can access at UW.

    B1G membership would be a good selling point for him.

    Whittingham would be interesting. His teams are Pat Hill TUFF, and his style of ball would play well in the B1G. The problem is he’s 64, and who knows how much longer he wants to coach.
    Leipold is 59. Carroll is 72. Just for context.
    I just want 8 years of stability. I feel like these older guys will stay until retirement. If UW needs to rebuild I want the coach who builds it to be here to coach the finished product and grow off that success.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EsophagealFeces
    EsophagealFeces Member Posts: 13,329
    TheHB said:

    EsophagealFeces said:

    Kingdome_Urinals said:

    Wittingham would be dope. His teams are stubborn as fuck, play defense. They have only lacked elite qbs and wrs, which I think he can access at UW.

    B1G membership would be a good selling point for him.

    Whittingham would be interesting. His teams are Pat Hill TUFF, and his style of ball would play well in the B1G. The problem is he’s 64, and who knows how much longer he wants to coach.
    Leipold is 59. Carroll is 72. Just for context.
    Thank you. I was just about to google Leipold’s age.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DoogWhisperer
    DoogWhisperer Member Posts: 1,035
    theknowledge said:

    TheHB said:

    EsophagealFeces said:

    Kingdome_Urinals said:

    Wittingham would be dope. His teams are stubborn as fuck, play defense. They have only lacked elite qbs and wrs, which I think he can access at UW.

    B1G membership would be a good selling point for him.

    Whittingham would be interesting. His teams are Pat Hill TUFF, and his style of ball would play well in the B1G. The problem is he’s 64, and who knows how much longer he wants to coach.
    Leipold is 59. Carroll is 72. Just for context.
    I just want 8 years of stability. I feel like these older guys will stay until retirement. If UW needs to rebuild I want the coach who builds it to be here to coach the finished product and grow off that success.
    What is stability? 7-9 wins?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheHB
    TheHB Member Posts: 6,766
    theknowledge said:

    TheHB said:

    EsophagealFeces said:

    Kingdome_Urinals said:

    Wittingham would be dope. His teams are stubborn as fuck, play defense. They have only lacked elite qbs and wrs, which I think he can access at UW.

    B1G membership would be a good selling point for him.

    Whittingham would be interesting. His teams are Pat Hill TUFF, and his style of ball would play well in the B1G. The problem is he’s 64, and who knows how much longer he wants to coach.
    Leipold is 59. Carroll is 72. Just for context.
    I just want 8 years of stability. I feel like these older guys will stay until retirement. If UW needs to rebuild I want the coach who builds it to be here to coach the finished product and grow off that success.
    If they’re young, they’ll leave.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter