This is Lanning's fault
This MFER should have lost at least three games this year, then does Alabama want him? He walked on the tightrope all year, then cashed in bigly, then pulled the fire alarm on the way out.
Shit evens out in life, the football gods are going to Reign Down on KFD.
Comments
-
If he lost those games we wouldn't want him anyway. He fucked us with (not) recruiting, so we were fucked either way. Either he wins all those close games and gets hired away, or he loses them and he's a shit coach with shit recruiting.
It's not Lanning's fault, but it's sad that he is building the ucks for the future while the DB was setting our future up for failure. -
Post of the DaySeven_Eleven said:If he lost those games we wouldn't want him anyway. He fucked us with (not) recruiting, so we were fucked either way. Either he wins all those close games and gets hired away, or he loses them and he's a shit coach with shit recruiting.
It's not Lanning's fault, but it's sad that he is building the ucks for the future while the DB was setting our future up for failure. -
Lanning was playing 4d chess per @SFGbob .
Lost 3 in a row to get Oregon into this position of dominance over UW. -
Oregon is always building for the futureSeven_Eleven said:If he lost those games we wouldn't want him anyway. He fucked us with (not) recruiting, so we were fucked either way. Either he wins all those close games and gets hired away, or he loses them and he's a shit coach with shit recruiting.
It's not Lanning's fault, but it's sad that he is building the ucks for the future while the DB was setting our future up for failure.
Next years champs
Lanning has a shot to beat UW now
Imagine thinking that means something -
Just wait till muhammad shows up at Oregon workouts in 10 daysYellowSnow said:Lanning was playing 4d chess per @SFGbob .
Lost 3 in a row to get Oregon into this position of dominance over UW.
I will say it is fucking annoying we? won’t get a shot at redemption over deboer next year. Like race says, beating whatever roster UW trots out next year after how bad kdb set them up post 2023 will not come close to feeling like any sort of revenge -
After all we have seen now.... Do we still want him??
When people show you who they really are, believe them.
DeBag is a snake, forever will be. -
I heard he murdered someoneYellowSnow said:Lanning was playing 4d chess per @SFGbob .
Lost 3 in a row to get Oregon into this position of dominance over UW. -
It's a bit of a Catch 22. You either have to say Lanning is not a good coach (no argument from me) because he lost with a better team (which I don't believe), or you have to say he's a good coach who lost to a better team. One of those has to be right. Or, I guess, since the games were close you could write it all off as unlucky duckies, which is in line with the OP. Shrug.RaceBannon said:
Oregon is always building for the futureSeven_Eleven said:If he lost those games we wouldn't want him anyway. He fucked us with (not) recruiting, so we were fucked either way. Either he wins all those close games and gets hired away, or he loses them and he's a shit coach with shit recruiting.
It's not Lanning's fault, but it's sad that he is building the ucks for the future while the DB was setting our future up for failure.
Next years champs
Lanning has a shot to beat UW now
Imagine thinking that means something
I don't know what kind of coach Lanning really is, but he seems to have won over most on this board as a solid coach. But then again, it supported the Dwag narrative to build up Oregon after beating them. So there's that. Anyway, like Debore, he didn't exactly inherit a rebuilding project. But UW beat UO in the Portal Olympics with Penix. There's hardly any debate about that. I suppose that's the game today, but if he had stayed, would he have outcoached Lanning by a wide enough margin to make up for what he's losing? There is no debating that almost all of the other parts were brought here by Peterman.
The good news is that it can forever be said that Lanning is lucky he doens't have to face Deboar again ... at least not in the Big 10.
I think I'm still right. -
Is what it is. Specifically in that rivalry take the wins. Is there some long term possible route where losing those games is better? Sure, but just as easily it might not be.ReignMan said:KFD was the luckiest coach in college football this year, if Lanning doesn’t go full retard they lose that game, pick six against Arizona State, fourth down conversion against the cougs, dropped pass by Stanford tight end, Utah, Arizona ,Oregon State, Texas…etc. One fucking play doesn’t go his way and they lose.
This MFER should have lost at least three games this year, then does Alabama want him? He walked on the tightrope all year, then cashed in bigly, then pulled the fire alarm on the way out.
Shit evens out in life, the football gods are going to Reign Down on KFD.
Bothered me for a second but mercenary gonna mercenary.ntxduck said:
Just wait till muhammad shows up at Oregon workouts in 10 daysYellowSnow said:Lanning was playing 4d chess per @SFGbob .
Lost 3 in a row to get Oregon into this position of dominance over UW.
I will say it is fucking annoying we? won’t get a shot at redemption over deboer next year. Like race says, beating whatever roster UW trots out next year after how bad kdb set them up post 2023 will not come close to feeling like any sort of revenge -
If it wasn't Alabama, it would have been the next hot chick in line, the guy was a complete fraud for personal gain. What really sucks is timing and his complete lack of recruiting, put his picture next to Howard Shultz and Clay Bennett.
-
The question for uw fans is this.creepycoug said:
It's a bit of a Catch 22. You either have to say Lanning is not a good coach (no argument from me) because he lost with a better team (which I don't believe), or you have to say he's a good coach who lost to a better team. One of those has to be right. Or, I guess, since the games were close you could write it all off as unlucky duckies, which is in line with the OP. Shrug.RaceBannon said:
Oregon is always building for the futureSeven_Eleven said:If he lost those games we wouldn't want him anyway. He fucked us with (not) recruiting, so we were fucked either way. Either he wins all those close games and gets hired away, or he loses them and he's a shit coach with shit recruiting.
It's not Lanning's fault, but it's sad that he is building the ucks for the future while the DB was setting our future up for failure.
Next years champs
Lanning has a shot to beat UW now
Imagine thinking that means something
I don't know what kind of coach Lanning really is, but he seems to have won over most on this board as a solid coach. But then again, it supported the Dwag narrative to build up Oregon after beating them. So there's that. Anyway, like Debore, he didn't exactly inherit a rebuilding project. But UW beat UO in the Portal Olympics with Penix. There's hardly any debate about that. I suppose that's the game today, but if he had stayed, would he have outcoached Lanning by a wide enough margin to make up for what he's losing? There is no debating that almost all of the other parts were brought here by Peterman.
The good news is that it can forever be said that Lanning is lucky he doens't have to face Deboar again ... at least not in the Big 10.
I think I'm still right.
When Oregon is in the playoff next year and they're playing Bama, who do you root for?
Plane crashes, natural disasters, AIDS and NOC are not options. -
Fuck off46XiJCAB said:
The question for uw fans is this.creepycoug said:
It's a bit of a Catch 22. You either have to say Lanning is not a good coach (no argument from me) because he lost with a better team (which I don't believe), or you have to say he's a good coach who lost to a better team. One of those has to be right. Or, I guess, since the games were close you could write it all off as unlucky duckies, which is in line with the OP. Shrug.RaceBannon said:
Oregon is always building for the futureSeven_Eleven said:If he lost those games we wouldn't want him anyway. He fucked us with (not) recruiting, so we were fucked either way. Either he wins all those close games and gets hired away, or he loses them and he's a shit coach with shit recruiting.
It's not Lanning's fault, but it's sad that he is building the ucks for the future while the DB was setting our future up for failure.
Next years champs
Lanning has a shot to beat UW now
Imagine thinking that means something
I don't know what kind of coach Lanning really is, but he seems to have won over most on this board as a solid coach. But then again, it supported the Dwag narrative to build up Oregon after beating them. So there's that. Anyway, like Debore, he didn't exactly inherit a rebuilding project. But UW beat UO in the Portal Olympics with Penix. There's hardly any debate about that. I suppose that's the game today, but if he had stayed, would he have outcoached Lanning by a wide enough margin to make up for what he's losing? There is no debating that almost all of the other parts were brought here by Peterman.
The good news is that it can forever be said that Lanning is lucky he doens't have to face Deboar again ... at least not in the Big 10.
I think I'm still right.
When Oregon is in the playoff next year and they're playing Bama, who do you root for?
Plane crashes, natural disasters, AIDS and NOC are not options. -
Doesn’t matter who we root for because at the end of the day we all know Lanning can’t beat DeBoer.46XiJCAB said:
The question for uw fans is this.creepycoug said:
It's a bit of a Catch 22. You either have to say Lanning is not a good coach (no argument from me) because he lost with a better team (which I don't believe), or you have to say he's a good coach who lost to a better team. One of those has to be right. Or, I guess, since the games were close you could write it all off as unlucky duckies, which is in line with the OP. Shrug.RaceBannon said:
Oregon is always building for the futureSeven_Eleven said:If he lost those games we wouldn't want him anyway. He fucked us with (not) recruiting, so we were fucked either way. Either he wins all those close games and gets hired away, or he loses them and he's a shit coach with shit recruiting.
It's not Lanning's fault, but it's sad that he is building the ucks for the future while the DB was setting our future up for failure.
Next years champs
Lanning has a shot to beat UW now
Imagine thinking that means something
I don't know what kind of coach Lanning really is, but he seems to have won over most on this board as a solid coach. But then again, it supported the Dwag narrative to build up Oregon after beating them. So there's that. Anyway, like Debore, he didn't exactly inherit a rebuilding project. But UW beat UO in the Portal Olympics with Penix. There's hardly any debate about that. I suppose that's the game today, but if he had stayed, would he have outcoached Lanning by a wide enough margin to make up for what he's losing? There is no debating that almost all of the other parts were brought here by Peterman.
The good news is that it can forever be said that Lanning is lucky he doens't have to face Deboar again ... at least not in the Big 10.
I think I'm still right.
When Oregon is in the playoff next year and they're playing Bama, who do you root for?
Plane crashes, natural disasters, AIDS and NOC are not options. -
You're so broken it's tragic.RaceBannon said:
Fuck off46XiJCAB said:
The question for uw fans is this.creepycoug said:
It's a bit of a Catch 22. You either have to say Lanning is not a good coach (no argument from me) because he lost with a better team (which I don't believe), or you have to say he's a good coach who lost to a better team. One of those has to be right. Or, I guess, since the games were close you could write it all off as unlucky duckies, which is in line with the OP. Shrug.RaceBannon said:
Oregon is always building for the futureSeven_Eleven said:If he lost those games we wouldn't want him anyway. He fucked us with (not) recruiting, so we were fucked either way. Either he wins all those close games and gets hired away, or he loses them and he's a shit coach with shit recruiting.
It's not Lanning's fault, but it's sad that he is building the ucks for the future while the DB was setting our future up for failure.
Next years champs
Lanning has a shot to beat UW now
Imagine thinking that means something
I don't know what kind of coach Lanning really is, but he seems to have won over most on this board as a solid coach. But then again, it supported the Dwag narrative to build up Oregon after beating them. So there's that. Anyway, like Debore, he didn't exactly inherit a rebuilding project. But UW beat UO in the Portal Olympics with Penix. There's hardly any debate about that. I suppose that's the game today, but if he had stayed, would he have outcoached Lanning by a wide enough margin to make up for what he's losing? There is no debating that almost all of the other parts were brought here by Peterman.
The good news is that it can forever be said that Lanning is lucky he doens't have to face Deboar again ... at least not in the Big 10.
I think I'm still right.
When Oregon is in the playoff next year and they're playing Bama, who do you root for?
Plane crashes, natural disasters, AIDS and NOC are not options.
-
We could actually blame Penix too. If he didn’t come back this year we probably lose 4 games with DMo and we’re ready to run DeBag out of town
I’m not blaming so don’t twist. Just saying you could. -
How does Oregon make the playoffs with 3 losses????46XiJCAB said:
The question for uw fans is this.creepycoug said:
It's a bit of a Catch 22. You either have to say Lanning is not a good coach (no argument from me) because he lost with a better team (which I don't believe), or you have to say he's a good coach who lost to a better team. One of those has to be right. Or, I guess, since the games were close you could write it all off as unlucky duckies, which is in line with the OP. Shrug.RaceBannon said:
Oregon is always building for the futureSeven_Eleven said:If he lost those games we wouldn't want him anyway. He fucked us with (not) recruiting, so we were fucked either way. Either he wins all those close games and gets hired away, or he loses them and he's a shit coach with shit recruiting.
It's not Lanning's fault, but it's sad that he is building the ucks for the future while the DB was setting our future up for failure.
Next years champs
Lanning has a shot to beat UW now
Imagine thinking that means something
I don't know what kind of coach Lanning really is, but he seems to have won over most on this board as a solid coach. But then again, it supported the Dwag narrative to build up Oregon after beating them. So there's that. Anyway, like Debore, he didn't exactly inherit a rebuilding project. But UW beat UO in the Portal Olympics with Penix. There's hardly any debate about that. I suppose that's the game today, but if he had stayed, would he have outcoached Lanning by a wide enough margin to make up for what he's losing? There is no debating that almost all of the other parts were brought here by Peterman.
The good news is that it can forever be said that Lanning is lucky he doens't have to face Deboar again ... at least not in the Big 10.
I think I'm still right.
When Oregon is in the playoff next year and they're playing Bama, who do you root for?
Plane crashes, natural disasters, AIDS and NOC are not options. -
We probably will start seeing 3 loss teams in the 12 team playoff.Postal91 said:How does Oregon make the playoffs with 3 losses????
-
Pussy46XiJCAB said:
You're so broken it's tragic.RaceBannon said:
Fuck off46XiJCAB said:
The question for uw fans is this.creepycoug said:
It's a bit of a Catch 22. You either have to say Lanning is not a good coach (no argument from me) because he lost with a better team (which I don't believe), or you have to say he's a good coach who lost to a better team. One of those has to be right. Or, I guess, since the games were close you could write it all off as unlucky duckies, which is in line with the OP. Shrug.RaceBannon said:
Oregon is always building for the futureSeven_Eleven said:If he lost those games we wouldn't want him anyway. He fucked us with (not) recruiting, so we were fucked either way. Either he wins all those close games and gets hired away, or he loses them and he's a shit coach with shit recruiting.
It's not Lanning's fault, but it's sad that he is building the ucks for the future while the DB was setting our future up for failure.
Next years champs
Lanning has a shot to beat UW now
Imagine thinking that means something
I don't know what kind of coach Lanning really is, but he seems to have won over most on this board as a solid coach. But then again, it supported the Dwag narrative to build up Oregon after beating them. So there's that. Anyway, like Debore, he didn't exactly inherit a rebuilding project. But UW beat UO in the Portal Olympics with Penix. There's hardly any debate about that. I suppose that's the game today, but if he had stayed, would he have outcoached Lanning by a wide enough margin to make up for what he's losing? There is no debating that almost all of the other parts were brought here by Peterman.
The good news is that it can forever be said that Lanning is lucky he doens't have to face Deboar again ... at least not in the Big 10.
I think I'm still right.
When Oregon is in the playoff next year and they're playing Bama, who do you root for?
Plane crashes, natural disasters, AIDS and NOC are not options. -
See.RaceBannon said:
Pussy46XiJCAB said:
You're so broken it's tragic.RaceBannon said:
Fuck off46XiJCAB said:
The question for uw fans is this.creepycoug said:
It's a bit of a Catch 22. You either have to say Lanning is not a good coach (no argument from me) because he lost with a better team (which I don't believe), or you have to say he's a good coach who lost to a better team. One of those has to be right. Or, I guess, since the games were close you could write it all off as unlucky duckies, which is in line with the OP. Shrug.RaceBannon said:
Oregon is always building for the futureSeven_Eleven said:If he lost those games we wouldn't want him anyway. He fucked us with (not) recruiting, so we were fucked either way. Either he wins all those close games and gets hired away, or he loses them and he's a shit coach with shit recruiting.
It's not Lanning's fault, but it's sad that he is building the ucks for the future while the DB was setting our future up for failure.
Next years champs
Lanning has a shot to beat UW now
Imagine thinking that means something
I don't know what kind of coach Lanning really is, but he seems to have won over most on this board as a solid coach. But then again, it supported the Dwag narrative to build up Oregon after beating them. So there's that. Anyway, like Debore, he didn't exactly inherit a rebuilding project. But UW beat UO in the Portal Olympics with Penix. There's hardly any debate about that. I suppose that's the game today, but if he had stayed, would he have outcoached Lanning by a wide enough margin to make up for what he's losing? There is no debating that almost all of the other parts were brought here by Peterman.
The good news is that it can forever be said that Lanning is lucky he doens't have to face Deboar again ... at least not in the Big 10.
I think I'm still right.
When Oregon is in the playoff next year and they're playing Bama, who do you root for?
Plane crashes, natural disasters, AIDS and NOC are not options. -
NGH.Postal91 said:
How does Oregon make the playoffs with 3 losses????46XiJCAB said:
The question for uw fans is this.creepycoug said:
It's a bit of a Catch 22. You either have to say Lanning is not a good coach (no argument from me) because he lost with a better team (which I don't believe), or you have to say he's a good coach who lost to a better team. One of those has to be right. Or, I guess, since the games were close you could write it all off as unlucky duckies, which is in line with the OP. Shrug.RaceBannon said:
Oregon is always building for the futureSeven_Eleven said:If he lost those games we wouldn't want him anyway. He fucked us with (not) recruiting, so we were fucked either way. Either he wins all those close games and gets hired away, or he loses them and he's a shit coach with shit recruiting.
It's not Lanning's fault, but it's sad that he is building the ucks for the future while the DB was setting our future up for failure.
Next years champs
Lanning has a shot to beat UW now
Imagine thinking that means something
I don't know what kind of coach Lanning really is, but he seems to have won over most on this board as a solid coach. But then again, it supported the Dwag narrative to build up Oregon after beating them. So there's that. Anyway, like Debore, he didn't exactly inherit a rebuilding project. But UW beat UO in the Portal Olympics with Penix. There's hardly any debate about that. I suppose that's the game today, but if he had stayed, would he have outcoached Lanning by a wide enough margin to make up for what he's losing? There is no debating that almost all of the other parts were brought here by Peterman.
The good news is that it can forever be said that Lanning is lucky he doens't have to face Deboar again ... at least not in the Big 10.
I think I'm still right.
When Oregon is in the playoff next year and they're playing Bama, who do you root for?
Plane crashes, natural disasters, AIDS and NOC are not options.
There are not 3 teams in the B1G beating Oregon next year.
Oregon or Bama? -
NOC46XiJCAB said:
NGH.Postal91 said:
How does Oregon make the playoffs with 3 losses????46XiJCAB said:
The question for uw fans is this.creepycoug said:
It's a bit of a Catch 22. You either have to say Lanning is not a good coach (no argument from me) because he lost with a better team (which I don't believe), or you have to say he's a good coach who lost to a better team. One of those has to be right. Or, I guess, since the games were close you could write it all off as unlucky duckies, which is in line with the OP. Shrug.RaceBannon said:
Oregon is always building for the futureSeven_Eleven said:If he lost those games we wouldn't want him anyway. He fucked us with (not) recruiting, so we were fucked either way. Either he wins all those close games and gets hired away, or he loses them and he's a shit coach with shit recruiting.
It's not Lanning's fault, but it's sad that he is building the ucks for the future while the DB was setting our future up for failure.
Next years champs
Lanning has a shot to beat UW now
Imagine thinking that means something
I don't know what kind of coach Lanning really is, but he seems to have won over most on this board as a solid coach. But then again, it supported the Dwag narrative to build up Oregon after beating them. So there's that. Anyway, like Debore, he didn't exactly inherit a rebuilding project. But UW beat UO in the Portal Olympics with Penix. There's hardly any debate about that. I suppose that's the game today, but if he had stayed, would he have outcoached Lanning by a wide enough margin to make up for what he's losing? There is no debating that almost all of the other parts were brought here by Peterman.
The good news is that it can forever be said that Lanning is lucky he doens't have to face Deboar again ... at least not in the Big 10.
I think I'm still right.
When Oregon is in the playoff next year and they're playing Bama, who do you root for?
Plane crashes, natural disasters, AIDS and NOC are not options.
There are not 3 teams in the B1G beating Oregon next year.
Oregon or Bama?
Pussy -
Clearly.RaceBannon said:
NOC46XiJCAB said:
NGH.Postal91 said:
How does Oregon make the playoffs with 3 losses????46XiJCAB said:
The question for uw fans is this.creepycoug said:
It's a bit of a Catch 22. You either have to say Lanning is not a good coach (no argument from me) because he lost with a better team (which I don't believe), or you have to say he's a good coach who lost to a better team. One of those has to be right. Or, I guess, since the games were close you could write it all off as unlucky duckies, which is in line with the OP. Shrug.RaceBannon said:
Oregon is always building for the futureSeven_Eleven said:If he lost those games we wouldn't want him anyway. He fucked us with (not) recruiting, so we were fucked either way. Either he wins all those close games and gets hired away, or he loses them and he's a shit coach with shit recruiting.
It's not Lanning's fault, but it's sad that he is building the ucks for the future while the DB was setting our future up for failure.
Next years champs
Lanning has a shot to beat UW now
Imagine thinking that means something
I don't know what kind of coach Lanning really is, but he seems to have won over most on this board as a solid coach. But then again, it supported the Dwag narrative to build up Oregon after beating them. So there's that. Anyway, like Debore, he didn't exactly inherit a rebuilding project. But UW beat UO in the Portal Olympics with Penix. There's hardly any debate about that. I suppose that's the game today, but if he had stayed, would he have outcoached Lanning by a wide enough margin to make up for what he's losing? There is no debating that almost all of the other parts were brought here by Peterman.
The good news is that it can forever be said that Lanning is lucky he doens't have to face Deboar again ... at least not in the Big 10.
I think I'm still right.
When Oregon is in the playoff next year and they're playing Bama, who do you root for?
Plane crashes, natural disasters, AIDS and NOC are not options.
There are not 3 teams in the B1G beating Oregon next year.
Oregon or Bama?
Pussy -
This isn’t a binary like you’re describing. Lanning is a good coach that got beat by a veteran coach with some really good pieces.creepycoug said:
It's a bit of a Catch 22. You either have to say Lanning is not a good coach (no argument from me) because he lost with a better team (which I don't believe), or you have to say he's a good coach who lost to a better team. One of those has to be right. Or, I guess, since the games were close you could write it all off as unlucky duckies, which is in line with the OP. Shrug.RaceBannon said:
Oregon is always building for the futureSeven_Eleven said:If he lost those games we wouldn't want him anyway. He fucked us with (not) recruiting, so we were fucked either way. Either he wins all those close games and gets hired away, or he loses them and he's a shit coach with shit recruiting.
It's not Lanning's fault, but it's sad that he is building the ucks for the future while the DB was setting our future up for failure.
Next years champs
Lanning has a shot to beat UW now
Imagine thinking that means something
I don't know what kind of coach Lanning really is, but he seems to have won over most on this board as a solid coach. But then again, it supported the Dwag narrative to build up Oregon after beating them. So there's that. Anyway, like Debore, he didn't exactly inherit a rebuilding project. But UW beat UO in the Portal Olympics with Penix. There's hardly any debate about that. I suppose that's the game today, but if he had stayed, would he have outcoached Lanning by a wide enough margin to make up for what he's losing? There is no debating that almost all of the other parts were brought here by Peterman.
The good news is that it can forever be said that Lanning is lucky he doens't have to face Deboar again ... at least not in the Big 10.
I think I'm still right.
I am hearing that UW isn’t considering promoting Grubb. I think that’s a mistake but just my dumb opinion. -
I doubt Oregon loses three but who knows with the portal.Postal91 said:
How does Oregon make the playoffs with 3 losses????46XiJCAB said:
The question for uw fans is this.creepycoug said:
It's a bit of a Catch 22. You either have to say Lanning is not a good coach (no argument from me) because he lost with a better team (which I don't believe), or you have to say he's a good coach who lost to a better team. One of those has to be right. Or, I guess, since the games were close you could write it all off as unlucky duckies, which is in line with the OP. Shrug.RaceBannon said:
Oregon is always building for the futureSeven_Eleven said:If he lost those games we wouldn't want him anyway. He fucked us with (not) recruiting, so we were fucked either way. Either he wins all those close games and gets hired away, or he loses them and he's a shit coach with shit recruiting.
It's not Lanning's fault, but it's sad that he is building the ucks for the future while the DB was setting our future up for failure.
Next years champs
Lanning has a shot to beat UW now
Imagine thinking that means something
I don't know what kind of coach Lanning really is, but he seems to have won over most on this board as a solid coach. But then again, it supported the Dwag narrative to build up Oregon after beating them. So there's that. Anyway, like Debore, he didn't exactly inherit a rebuilding project. But UW beat UO in the Portal Olympics with Penix. There's hardly any debate about that. I suppose that's the game today, but if he had stayed, would he have outcoached Lanning by a wide enough margin to make up for what he's losing? There is no debating that almost all of the other parts were brought here by Peterman.
The good news is that it can forever be said that Lanning is lucky he doens't have to face Deboar again ... at least not in the Big 10.
I think I'm still right.
When Oregon is in the playoff next year and they're playing Bama, who do you root for?
Plane crashes, natural disasters, AIDS and NOC are not options. -
Redundantbisonduck said:
This isn’t a binary like you’re describing. Lanning is a good coach that got beat by a veteran coach with some really good pieces.creepycoug said:
It's a bit of a Catch 22. You either have to say Lanning is not a good coach (no argument from me) because he lost with a better team (which I don't believe), or you have to say he's a good coach who lost to a better team. One of those has to be right. Or, I guess, since the games were close you could write it all off as unlucky duckies, which is in line with the OP. Shrug.RaceBannon said:
Oregon is always building for the futureSeven_Eleven said:If he lost those games we wouldn't want him anyway. He fucked us with (not) recruiting, so we were fucked either way. Either he wins all those close games and gets hired away, or he loses them and he's a shit coach with shit recruiting.
It's not Lanning's fault, but it's sad that he is building the ucks for the future while the DB was setting our future up for failure.
Next years champs
Lanning has a shot to beat UW now
Imagine thinking that means something
I don't know what kind of coach Lanning really is, but he seems to have won over most on this board as a solid coach. But then again, it supported the Dwag narrative to build up Oregon after beating them. So there's that. Anyway, like Debore, he didn't exactly inherit a rebuilding project. But UW beat UO in the Portal Olympics with Penix. There's hardly any debate about that. I suppose that's the game today, but if he had stayed, would he have outcoached Lanning by a wide enough margin to make up for what he's losing? There is no debating that almost all of the other parts were brought here by Peterman.
The good news is that it can forever be said that Lanning is lucky he doens't have to face Deboar again ... at least not in the Big 10.
I think I'm still right.
I am hearing that UW isn’t considering promoting Grubb. I think that’s a mistake but just my dumb opinion. -
Doesn’t matter who we root for because at the end of the day we all know Lanning can’t beat DeBoer.46XiJCAB said:
The question for uw fans is this.creepycoug said:
It's a bit of a Catch 22. You either have to say Lanning is not a good coach (no argument from me) because he lost with a better team (which I don't believe), or you have to say he's a good coach who lost to a better team. One of those has to be right. Or, I guess, since the games were close you could write it all off as unlucky duckies, which is in line with the OP. Shrug.RaceBannon said:
Oregon is always building for the futureSeven_Eleven said:If he lost those games we wouldn't want him anyway. He fucked us with (not) recruiting, so we were fucked either way. Either he wins all those close games and gets hired away, or he loses them and he's a shit coach with shit recruiting.
It's not Lanning's fault, but it's sad that he is building the ucks for the future while the DB was setting our future up for failure.
Next years champs
Lanning has a shot to beat UW now
Imagine thinking that means something
I don't know what kind of coach Lanning really is, but he seems to have won over most on this board as a solid coach. But then again, it supported the Dwag narrative to build up Oregon after beating them. So there's that. Anyway, like Debore, he didn't exactly inherit a rebuilding project. But UW beat UO in the Portal Olympics with Penix. There's hardly any debate about that. I suppose that's the game today, but if he had stayed, would he have outcoached Lanning by a wide enough margin to make up for what he's losing? There is no debating that almost all of the other parts were brought here by Peterman.
The good news is that it can forever be said that Lanning is lucky he doens't have to face Deboar again ... at least not in the Big 10.
I think I'm still right.
When Oregon is in the playoff next year and they're playing Bama, who do you root for?
Plane crashes, natural disasters, AIDS and NOC are not options. -
Hence the gleeful reappearances by certain ducks in here — the same ones who had disappeared after losing to UW for the third straight time.CrispyEaterson said:
Doesn’t matter who we root for because at the end of the day we all know Lanning can’t beat DeBoer.46XiJCAB said:
The question for uw fans is this.creepycoug said:
It's a bit of a Catch 22. You either have to say Lanning is not a good coach (no argument from me) because he lost with a better team (which I don't believe), or you have to say he's a good coach who lost to a better team. One of those has to be right. Or, I guess, since the games were close you could write it all off as unlucky duckies, which is in line with the OP. Shrug.RaceBannon said:
Oregon is always building for the futureSeven_Eleven said:If he lost those games we wouldn't want him anyway. He fucked us with (not) recruiting, so we were fucked either way. Either he wins all those close games and gets hired away, or he loses them and he's a shit coach with shit recruiting.
It's not Lanning's fault, but it's sad that he is building the ucks for the future while the DB was setting our future up for failure.
Next years champs
Lanning has a shot to beat UW now
Imagine thinking that means something
I don't know what kind of coach Lanning really is, but he seems to have won over most on this board as a solid coach. But then again, it supported the Dwag narrative to build up Oregon after beating them. So there's that. Anyway, like Debore, he didn't exactly inherit a rebuilding project. But UW beat UO in the Portal Olympics with Penix. There's hardly any debate about that. I suppose that's the game today, but if he had stayed, would he have outcoached Lanning by a wide enough margin to make up for what he's losing? There is no debating that almost all of the other parts were brought here by Peterman.
The good news is that it can forever be said that Lanning is lucky he doens't have to face Deboar again ... at least not in the Big 10.
I think I'm still right.
When Oregon is in the playoff next year and they're playing Bama, who do you root for?
Plane crashes, natural disasters, AIDS and NOC are not options.
Brave lot. -
Oregon's schedule is one of the most difficult in B1G next year, although appears to be a little easier with UW implosion.bisonduck said:
I doubt Oregon loses three but who knows with the portal.Postal91 said:
How does Oregon make the playoffs with 3 losses????46XiJCAB said:
The question for uw fans is this.creepycoug said:
It's a bit of a Catch 22. You either have to say Lanning is not a good coach (no argument from me) because he lost with a better team (which I don't believe), or you have to say he's a good coach who lost to a better team. One of those has to be right. Or, I guess, since the games were close you could write it all off as unlucky duckies, which is in line with the OP. Shrug.RaceBannon said:
Oregon is always building for the futureSeven_Eleven said:If he lost those games we wouldn't want him anyway. He fucked us with (not) recruiting, so we were fucked either way. Either he wins all those close games and gets hired away, or he loses them and he's a shit coach with shit recruiting.
It's not Lanning's fault, but it's sad that he is building the ucks for the future while the DB was setting our future up for failure.
Next years champs
Lanning has a shot to beat UW now
Imagine thinking that means something
I don't know what kind of coach Lanning really is, but he seems to have won over most on this board as a solid coach. But then again, it supported the Dwag narrative to build up Oregon after beating them. So there's that. Anyway, like Debore, he didn't exactly inherit a rebuilding project. But UW beat UO in the Portal Olympics with Penix. There's hardly any debate about that. I suppose that's the game today, but if he had stayed, would he have outcoached Lanning by a wide enough margin to make up for what he's losing? There is no debating that almost all of the other parts were brought here by Peterman.
The good news is that it can forever be said that Lanning is lucky he doens't have to face Deboar again ... at least not in the Big 10.
I think I'm still right.
When Oregon is in the playoff next year and they're playing Bama, who do you root for?
Plane crashes, natural disasters, AIDS and NOC are not options.
Ducks are one of just a few to play Michigan and OSU for starters. I think 2 losses are likely but 3 is in play.
Much easier in 2025.
