Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Even if Stanford isn't great, they might still be one of the 5 best teams Pete has played against

13»

Comments

  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    uzi said:

    topdawgnc said:

    You really need to PM Irishdawg

    Why?

    It doesn't seem to have helped you any.
    BUUUURRRRRN
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • uzi
    uzi Member Posts: 1,298
    topdawgnc said:

    uzi said:

    topdawgnc said:

    You really need to PM Irishdawg

    Why?

    It doesn't seem to have helped you any.
    BUUUURRRRRN
    Agreed.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,788 Founders Club
    uzi said:

    RaceBannon said:

    uzi said:

    RaceBannon said:

    uzi said:

    EsophagealFeces said:

    uzi said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    uzi said:

    TTJ said:

    We've gone over this...

    So has he played 5 teams better than Stanford?
    He might play five teams better than Stanford THIS YEAR.

    That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?
    Your question is completely irrelevant. Bad coaches lose. 96-13.
    Okay, well at least you responded to the content.

    How long does he get to win more than 6 Pac-12 games a year?
    Sark never won more than 5. Were you all butthurt the last five years?
    Way to aim for the low bar. As usual.
    You didn't answer the question
    I wasn't in favor of hiring Sark -- promoting an OC from another school as our HC. If he hadn't left, he should have been fired. USC did us a favor taking him off our hands.

    But Pete isn't a promoted OC, he is 100 and 13 as a HC with 2 BCS wins. I expect even more of him.

    How long does he get?
    More than one game. You gave Sark five years
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Vegasdawg
    Vegasdawg Member Posts: 370
    Tyrone,,the poster boy for ineptness as a head coach was given how many years by the fans? The Husky halfbrain movement began over that idiot's continued employment and fan support for him. So let's see, Peterman will get....five years to win the 6. Maybe 10.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • uzi
    uzi Member Posts: 1,298
    RaceBannon said:

    uzi said:

    RaceBannon said:

    uzi said:

    RaceBannon said:

    uzi said:

    EsophagealFeces said:

    uzi said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    uzi said:

    TTJ said:

    We've gone over this...

    So has he played 5 teams better than Stanford?
    He might play five teams better than Stanford THIS YEAR.

    That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?
    Your question is completely irrelevant. Bad coaches lose. 96-13.
    Okay, well at least you responded to the content.

    How long does he get to win more than 6 Pac-12 games a year?
    Sark never won more than 5. Were you all butthurt the last five years?
    Way to aim for the low bar. As usual.
    You didn't answer the question
    I wasn't in favor of hiring Sark -- promoting an OC from another school as our HC. If he hadn't left, he should have been fired. USC did us a favor taking him off our hands.

    But Pete isn't a promoted OC, he is 100 and 13 as a HC with 2 BCS wins. I expect even more of him.

    How long does he get?
    More than one game. You gave Sark five years
    Answer the question. How long do you give him?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Disciple_2_Hole
    Disciple_2_Hole Member Posts: 122
    uzi said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    uzi said:

    TTJ said:

    We've gone over this...

    So has he played 5 teams better than Stanford?
    He might play five teams better than Stanford THIS YEAR.

    That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?
    Brah, maybe before you crown Staford a top 5 team against Peterman you should let the season play out. They are 1-1 and got beat by Seven.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    uzi said:

    RaceBannon said:

    uzi said:

    RaceBannon said:

    uzi said:

    RaceBannon said:

    uzi said:

    EsophagealFeces said:

    uzi said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    uzi said:

    TTJ said:

    We've gone over this...

    So has he played 5 teams better than Stanford?
    He might play five teams better than Stanford THIS YEAR.

    That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?
    Your question is completely irrelevant. Bad coaches lose. 96-13.
    Okay, well at least you responded to the content.

    How long does he get to win more than 6 Pac-12 games a year?
    Sark never won more than 5. Were you all butthurt the last five years?
    Way to aim for the low bar. As usual.
    You didn't answer the question
    I wasn't in favor of hiring Sark -- promoting an OC from another school as our HC. If he hadn't left, he should have been fired. USC did us a favor taking him off our hands.

    But Pete isn't a promoted OC, he is 100 and 13 as a HC with 2 BCS wins. I expect even more of him.

    How long does he get?
    More than one game. You gave Sark five years
    Answer the question. How long do you give him?
    Personally, four years unless he's terrible in three. But I'm much more willing to give a coach with a track record the benefit of the doubt than I am a coach who's never done shit (Sark), or worse yet, been shit at other stops (Gilbyham).

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • uzi
    uzi Member Posts: 1,298
    Disciple_2_Hole said:

    uzi said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    uzi said:

    TTJ said:

    We've gone over this...

    So has he played 5 teams better than Stanford?
    He might play five teams better than Stanford THIS YEAR.

    That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?
    Brah, maybe before you crown Staford a top 5 team against Peterman you should let the season play out. They are 1-1 and got beat by Seven.
    Arguing that Furd is worse isn't making Pete's case better.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    15 games, or gtfo.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Uzi is proving why you don't let children play with guns.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter