Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Even if Stanford isn't great, they might still be one of the 5 best teams Pete has played against

uziuzi Member Posts: 1,298
First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
in Hardcore Husky Board

Looking back at coach Pete's record, just how many wins does he have against top 25 caliber teams? Oregon in Chip's first year? Oklahoma in the Fiesta? Georgia a couple of years ago (don't recall if they were a top 25 team back then), TCU... who else?

Sure he is 100 and 13 or something like that, but how much experience does he have facing off against teams like Oregon, Stanford, UCLA, and USC every year?

How many years does he get to win more than 6 games a year in the Pac 12?
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • Options
    TTJTTJ Member Posts: 4,795
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    We've gone over this...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes Name Dropper
    You really need to PM Irishdawg
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    uziuzi Member Posts: 1,298
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    TTJ said:

    We've gone over this...

    So has he played 5 teams better than Stanford?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary
    uzi said:

    TTJ said:

    We've gone over this...

    So has he played 5 teams better than Stanford?
    He might play five teams better than Stanford THIS YEAR.

    Stanford sucks.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,581
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Founders Club
    uzi said:

    TTJ said:

    We've gone over this...

    So has he played 5 teams better than Stanford?
    Maybe, maybe not.

    Interesting, either way.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    uziuzi Member Posts: 1,298
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    uzi said:

    TTJ said:

    We've gone over this...

    So has he played 5 teams better than Stanford?
    He might play five teams better than Stanford THIS YEAR.

    That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    uziuzi Member Posts: 1,298
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    topdawgnc said:

    You really need to PM Irishdawg

    Why?

    It doesn't seem to have helped you any.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,581
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Founders Club
    uzi said:

    topdawgnc said:

    You really need to PM Irishdawg

    Why?

    It doesn't seem to have helped you any.
    olololo
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary
    edited September 2014
    uzi said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    uzi said:

    TTJ said:

    We've gone over this...

    So has he played 5 teams better than Stanford?
    He might play five teams better than Stanford THIS YEAR.

    That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?
    Found the link for you since you are lazy:

    http://lmgtfy.com/?q=chris+petersen+top+25+wins
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    uziuzi Member Posts: 1,298
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    uzi said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    uzi said:

    TTJ said:

    We've gone over this...

    So has he played 5 teams better than Stanford?
    He might play five teams better than Stanford THIS YEAR.

    That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?
    Found the link for you since you are lazy:

    http://lmgtfy.com/?q=chris+petersen+top+25+wins
    Nobody falls for you links. Hills...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    uziuzi Member Posts: 1,298
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    EsophagealFeces said:

    uzi said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    uzi said:

    TTJ said:

    We've gone over this...

    So has he played 5 teams better than Stanford?
    He might play five teams better than Stanford THIS YEAR.

    That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?
    Your question is completely irrelevant. Bad coaches lose. 96-13.
    Okay, well at least you responded to the content.

    How long does he get to win more than 6 Pac-12 games a year?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary
    uzi said:

    EsophagealFeces said:

    uzi said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    uzi said:

    TTJ said:

    We've gone over this...

    So has he played 5 teams better than Stanford?
    He might play five teams better than Stanford THIS YEAR.

    That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?
    Your question is completely irrelevant. Bad coaches lose. 96-13.
    Okay, well at least you responded to the content.

    How long does he get to win more than 6 Pac-12 games a year?
    Three years, at best.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    uziuzi Member Posts: 1,298
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    RaceBannon said:

    uzi said:

    EsophagealFeces said:

    uzi said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    uzi said:

    TTJ said:

    We've gone over this...

    So has he played 5 teams better than Stanford?
    He might play five teams better than Stanford THIS YEAR.

    That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?
    Your question is completely irrelevant. Bad coaches lose. 96-13.
    Okay, well at least you responded to the content.

    How long does he get to win more than 6 Pac-12 games a year?
    Sark never won more than 5. Were you all butthurt the last five years?
    Way to aim for the low bar. As usual.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    EsophagealFecesEsophagealFeces Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,484
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    uzi said:

    EsophagealFeces said:

    uzi said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    uzi said:

    TTJ said:

    We've gone over this...

    So has he played 5 teams better than Stanford?
    He might play five teams better than Stanford THIS YEAR.

    That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?
    Your question is completely irrelevant. Bad coaches lose. 96-13.
    Okay, well at least you responded to the content.

    How long does he get to win more than 6 Pac-12 games a year?
    Three years, at best.
    I hope this is correct, but I'm still not overly confident in Pool Boy. This probably deserves its own thread, but I think that Woodward would have tried to keep Sark if not for all his off the field bullshit. I could be wrong, but I think he was satisfied with the "progress" Sark was making on the field.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    WilburHooksHandsWilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,741
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes
    EsophagealFeces said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    uzi said:

    EsophagealFeces said:

    uzi said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    uzi said:

    TTJ said:

    We've gone over this...

    So has he played 5 teams better than Stanford?
    He might play five teams better than Stanford THIS YEAR.

    That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?
    Your question is completely irrelevant. Bad coaches lose. 96-13.
    Okay, well at least you responded to the content.

    How long does he get to win more than 6 Pac-12 games a year?
    Three years, at best.
    I hope this is correct, but I'm still not overly confident in Pool Boy. This probably deserves its own thread, but I think that Woodward would have tried to keep Sark if not for all his off the field bullshit. I could be wrong, but I think he was satisfied with the "progress" Sark was making on the field.
    No way Pete gets fewer years than Sark or Ty. The athletic department also sees Pete as how they want to represent the university value wise, regardless of performance. Don't underestimate that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,443
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    uzi said:

    RaceBannon said:

    uzi said:

    EsophagealFeces said:

    uzi said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    uzi said:

    TTJ said:

    We've gone over this...

    So has he played 5 teams better than Stanford?
    He might play five teams better than Stanford THIS YEAR.

    That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?
    Your question is completely irrelevant. Bad coaches lose. 96-13.
    Okay, well at least you responded to the content.

    How long does he get to win more than 6 Pac-12 games a year?
    Sark never won more than 5. Were you all butthurt the last five years?
    Way to aim for the low bar. As usual.
    You didn't answer the question
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    uziuzi Member Posts: 1,298
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    RaceBannon said:

    uzi said:

    RaceBannon said:

    uzi said:

    EsophagealFeces said:

    uzi said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    uzi said:

    TTJ said:

    We've gone over this...

    So has he played 5 teams better than Stanford?
    He might play five teams better than Stanford THIS YEAR.

    That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?
    Your question is completely irrelevant. Bad coaches lose. 96-13.
    Okay, well at least you responded to the content.

    How long does he get to win more than 6 Pac-12 games a year?
    Sark never won more than 5. Were you all butthurt the last five years?
    Way to aim for the low bar. As usual.
    You didn't answer the question
    I wasn't in favor of hiring Sark -- promoting an OC from another school as our HC. If he hadn't left, he should have been fired. USC did us a favor taking him off our hands.

    But Pete isn't a promoted OC, he is 100 and 13 as a HC with 2 BCS wins. I expect even more of him.

    How long does he get?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    EsophagealFecesEsophagealFeces Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,484
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club
    WilburHooksHands said:

    EsophagealFeces said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    uzi said:

    EsophagealFeces said:

    uzi said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    uzi said:

    TTJ said:

    We've gone over this...

    So has he played 5 teams better than Stanford?
    He might play five teams better than Stanford THIS YEAR.

    That wasn't the question. Which 5 teams before yesterday has he faced that are better than Stanford?
    Your question is completely irrelevant. Bad coaches lose. 96-13.
    Okay, well at least you responded to the content.

    How long does he get to win more than 6 Pac-12 games a year?
    Three years, at best.
    I hope this is correct, but I'm still not overly confident in Pool Boy. This probably deserves its own thread, but I think that Woodward would have tried to keep Sark if not for all his off the field bullshit. I could be wrong, but I think he was satisfied with the "progress" Sark was making on the field.
    The athletic department also sees Pete as how they want to represent the university value wise, regardless of performance. Don't underestimate that.
    I meant to mention that in my poast, but forgot to. I think you're exactly right. I fear that the current administration is far more concerned with that than they are with winning.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.