CFP weak 2
Comments
-
No.
Dipshit McElroy called a top 20 Utah an "average team" -
What’s it gonna take?
-
13-0
-
Winning on the road at top 10 Beaver should do itRTD said:What’s it gonna take?
-
Oregon's greatest win???PostGameOrangeSlices said:No.
Dipshit McElroy called a top 20 Utah an "average team" -
I would go with this. Or at least 1 loss and a CCS and pray.GrundleStiltzkin said:13-0
-
He was arguing for Texas and Bama to be above Oregon which doesn't actually help UWRaceBannon said:
Oregon's greatest win???PostGameOrangeSlices said:No.
Dipshit McElroy called a top 20 Utah an "average team" -
Except that FSU plays Alabama that weekend.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Winning on the road at top 10 Beaver should do itRTD said:What’s it gonna take?
Wait, one second, actually, that is North Alabama.
So yeah, that week would leave no doubt. -
No, because when we beat a team they move out of the top 25 so it’s not a ranked win anymore. The win over SC was mentioned in passing once on the entire show. Of course the reverse doesn’t give any credit either, because Arizona wasn’t *this* Arizona when we beat them on the road.
Oregon is the obvious exception here, but they’d be favored at a neutral site so they basically won the first game. -
He's not wrong. We've been calling Utah an average team since before they joined the conference.PostGameOrangeSlices said:No.
Dipshit McElroy called a top 20 Utah an "average team" -
McElroy is a TX guysm and has touted TX from the get go and an Alabama NCS winning alum.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
He was arguing for Texas and Bama to be above Oregon which doesn't actually help UWRaceBannon said:
Oregon's greatest win???PostGameOrangeSlices said:No.
Dipshit McElroy called a top 20 Utah an "average team"
May be a little biased there. JS -
It doesn’t matter. Just win and you’re in.
-
It does matter damn it! Dawgs went from everyone suck Penix, to on the outside looking in. While using logic to put OSU on top and yet abandon that logic and leave Dawgs out of 4 hole.TheHB said:It doesn’t matter. Just win and you’re in.
-
Thanks pod!SECDAWG said:
McElroy is a TX guysm and has touted TX from the get go and an Alabama NCS winning alum.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
He was arguing for Texas and Bama to be above Oregon which doesn't actually help UWRaceBannon said:
Oregon's greatest win???PostGameOrangeSlices said:No.
Dipshit McElroy called a top 20 Utah an "average team"
May be a little biased there. JS -
I lean toward just win any line of thinking but understand the concern. The top 3 are getting name recognition bumps despite tOSU having a similar resume and Michigan and Georgia playing weak SOS.RTD said:
It does matter damn it! Dawgs went from everyone suck Penix, to on the outside looking in. While using logic to put OSU on top and yet abandon that logic and leave Dawgs out of 4 hole.TheHB said:It doesn’t matter. Just win and you’re in.
-
Thread title ain’t clear. You asking what it’s going to take at this point for WA to get in the CFP?RTD said:
It does matter damn it! Dawgs went from everyone suck Penix, to on the outside looking in. While using logic to put OSU on top and yet abandon that logic and leave Dawgs out of 4 hole.TheHB said:It doesn’t matter. Just win and you’re in.
Best answer is win out. Second best is May can with only 1 loss but a CS win.
Other than that? Out. Unless there is a lot of chaos in these last two weeks.
Louisville would be good for UW to spoil FSU or the Gators by some miracle.
Everyone in the BIG 12 to have two losses.
PAC has some cred this year by the good teams that are playing in yalls league and they are a better conference in most eyes than the BIG 12 or ACC.
SEC and BIG is in. That’s two. There’s 2 more spots…this year. Obviously a 2 loss team ain’t getting in. So the committee will look at 1 or no loss CC from the PAC(and I think they have the upper hand), the BIG 12 and ACC. There will be no undefeated teams from the BIG 12. FSU is still undefeated.
That’s kinda where we are at the moment.
Far as B1G, will come down to an undefeated or 1 loss champ.
SEC pretty much same.
-
The SEC bullshit secret sauce is giving losing teams votes so they stay ranked and keep SOS consolidated in the conference
-
Say again?(in a more coherent way)LoneStarDawg said:The SEC bullshit secret sauce is giving losing teams votes so they stay ranked and keep SOS consolidated in the conference
-
Prove it on the field
-
No way 😂SECDAWG said:
Say again?(in a more coherent way)LoneStarDawg said:The SEC bullshit secret sauce is giving losing teams votes so they stay ranked and keep SOS consolidated in the conference
-
The programs in the top 4 get a huge bump every week regarding how often they’re mentioned. The hype of being in the top 4 for a period of time (prior to final week) would be massively helpful for the Dawgs. In ways that don’t directly correlate to the blueblood programs that typically hold those spots and already have the national brand recognition.
-
If he’s saying the SEC is weak sauce because of their conf schedule bumping them, well, that’s kinda retarded in the big pic.Canadawg said:
No way 😂SECDAWG said:
Say again?(in a more coherent way)LoneStarDawg said:The SEC bullshit secret sauce is giving losing teams votes so they stay ranked and keep SOS consolidated in the conference
-
See how fast the espn narrative shifted from “wow the Pac12 is really good this year” to “actually these teams are all mediocre” once the sec and/or texas are in danger of getting shut out
-
The fact that you’re the only one who doesn’t understand proves my pointSECDAWG said:
Say again?(in a more coherent way)LoneStarDawg said:The SEC bullshit secret sauce is giving losing teams votes so they stay ranked and keep SOS consolidated in the conference
-
Proves what point, the SEC is in a bubble? And the committee and talking heads are “dummies”?LoneStarDawg said:
The fact that you’re the only one who doesn’t understand proves my pointSECDAWG said:
Say again?(in a more coherent way)LoneStarDawg said:The SEC bullshit secret sauce is giving losing teams votes so they stay ranked and keep SOS consolidated in the conference
The SEC is “propped” up by their weak sauce scheduling??
OR
The fact that the SEC has lost only 1(uno) CFPG in 14 or whatever since 2019 was against one another? Or has won the majority of the NCG since the inauguration …is “weak sauce?”
Weak my Dick. -
-
They gotta pump up Texas as long as they can to pump up Alabama. Sark will drop at least one more so that should go away a bit.ntxduck said:See how fast the espn narrative shifted from “wow the Pac12 is really good this year” to “actually these teams are all mediocre” once the sec and/or texas are in danger of getting shut out
-
Meh. Quit sweating. PAC has been out of the CFP since…..2016? For good fucking reason.WoolleyDoog said:
They gotta pump up Texas as long as they can to pump up Alabama. Sark will drop at least one more so that should go away a bit.ntxduck said:See how fast the espn narrative shifted from “wow the Pac12 is really good this year” to “actually these teams are all mediocre” once the sec and/or texas are in danger of getting shut out
Not this year. It don’t matter what “ESPN” says…
PAC champ is in if less than 2 losses.
IN. No one can stop that. Y’all are that good and everyone knows it.
Chop wood, gatdammit. Don’t lose.
IN. -
Pods right. When PACs bad you need to be undefeated but PACs arguably the best conference this year and we're not playing highschools in November like some conferences doSECDAWG said:
Meh. Quit sweating. PAC has been out of the CFP since…..2016? For good fucking reason.WoolleyDoog said:
They gotta pump up Texas as long as they can to pump up Alabama. Sark will drop at least one more so that should go away a bit.ntxduck said:See how fast the espn narrative shifted from “wow the Pac12 is really good this year” to “actually these teams are all mediocre” once the sec and/or texas are in danger of getting shut out
Not this year. It don’t matter what “ESPN” says…
PAC champ is in if less than 2 losses.
IN. No one can stop that. Y’all are that good and everyone knows it.
Chop wood, gatdammit. Don’t lose.
IN. -
