Bruins Lose Time of Possession Battle as UCLA Continues Implosion under Mora
Comments
-
Loosers are losers who get plungered?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stats are for loosers.bananasnblondes said:Over on dawgman they are combing through the statistics to build a case that UCLA/Mora aren't as good as the score suggests and that ASU would have easily won if the ball would have bounced a little differently. Mora is still enemy #1 over there because he outperformed our beloved Sark all the years he was at UCLA
UCLA won that game because they kicked ASU's asses in all three phases.
Re: stats. If you can't see that touchdowns > first downs, this bored cant' help you. -
The most impressive part of the win is ASU might be pretty good. Their defense obviously has issues, but their offense is scary good, especially with Kelly at QB. They missed Kelly's running ability, although offense was obviously the least of their issues. Strong is a monster WR, Foster is a stud at RB, the freshman Ballage is a beast, and they have a couple more decent RB's and WR's.
If their defense can even be average, they will be a tough team. I don't see anyone in the conference stopping that offense. UCLA did what a good team does. They capitalized on ASU's mistakes and turned what could have been a great shootout into a blowout. -
I'm not sure that ASU's backup QB wouldn't be our starter here. Anyone that thinks ASU is an easy win for UW is dreaming
-
The cute little headset makes me wanna sing ... Hit me baby one more time!
-
one of ybe's, DJ
lol'd at "fell to 4-0" -
I know. I heard ya.PostGameOrangeSlices said:one of ybe's, DJ
lol'd at "fell to 4-0" -
You know, if it weren't for a few, or a dozen plays or so the game was really much closer than the score would seem to indicate. Some bad bounces and the game just got away from them there in the end.
-
ASU's defense is awful. Their were indications of that in previous games and we saw it last night. Sure, it could get better and be terrible or just bad but average is probably out of the question.RoadDawg55 said:The most impressive part of the win is ASU might be pretty good. Their defense obviously has issues, but their offense is scary good, especially with Kelly at QB. They missed Kelly's running ability, although offense was obviously the least of their issues. Strong is a monster WR, Foster is a stud at RB, the freshman Ballage is a beast, and they have a couple more decent RB's and WR's.
If their defense can even be average, they will be a tough team. I don't see anyone in the conference stopping that offense. UCLA did what a good team does. They capitalized on ASU's mistakes and turned what could have been a great shootout into a blowout.
Kelly is the 2nd best QB in the conference and a huge loss for them. It also hurts them in the run game. Foster is great but not a between the tackles guy.
Kelly won't be 100% when they play us. Its a game we should win but who knows.
ASU is the Sark of college football schools. Overrated, haven't accomplished shit, think they are better than they are, have a better reputation than their accomplishments. Throw in the coeds and thats why Sark should be their coach. -
Is that your Sark imitation?PurpleReign said:You know, if it weren't for a few, or a dozen plays or so the game was really much closer than the score would seem to indicate. Some bad bounces and the game just got away from them there in the end.
-
Huh?Homebrew_Dawg said:
I know. I heard ya.PostGameOrangeSlices said:one of ybe's, DJ
lol'd at "fell to 4-0"
