Good to See PAC12 Assistants Don't Understand "OKG"
Jude got the quote, I am guessing this comes from an Oregon assistant then.
Said that you need difference makers to win in the PAC12, NO SHIT SHERLOCK. Sounds like this anonymous assistant might be a doogman poster...
Comments
-
-
That chit gets me Every. Single. Time., Swaye. Keep it up, so great!
-
After reading the quotes....we know it's not Don Pellum or Gary Campbell.
My bet is Scott Frost. -
Stanford recruits OKG's. Also those plan b guys ended up in the nfl at a higher rate than that "assistant's" recruits. Buttfucking jude trying to stir pot. Plus he plagiarizmed my shit fucko on miley from yesterday. He comes here
-
The quote didn't come from Jude. It came from Jeremy Crabtree. Reading comprehension 101.
-
Of course Jude comes here. That fucker is lazy and lays on the couch all day waiting to spank it. Like me.
-
Ahhhh FUCK, You are right... Reading is hard for me!ntxduck said:The quote didn't come from Jude. It came from Jeremy Crabtree. Reading comprehension 101.
-
Should have been a dead giveaway not just by reading but by using common sense...Jude? Hit up a source? That takes time man. And effort. Much easier to just copy and paste what a source that someone else took the time to hit up said.
-
LIPO
-
You are right, @ntxduck... I will punish myself by donating 20 sven dollars to an anti-rape charity, because I am against rape.
-
But what if your quarterback is a Heisman Trophy winner, and your back up is pretty much a dumpster fire. It's ok then in certain situations isn't it?CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:You are right, @ntxduck... I will punish myself by donating 20 sven dollars to an anti-rape charity, because I am against rape.
-
Jude actually defended Petermans recruiting. Some you should try reading an article before being critical of it.
-
A lot of rape talk going on in these partsCokeGreaterThanPepsi said:You are right, @ntxduck... I will punish myself by donating 20 sven dollars to an anti-rape charity, because I am against rape.
-
Gotta give Jude credit when due. It was a stupid, unattributed quote that Crabtree cites. So much of that comes under the No Shit heading.allpurpleallgold said:Jude actually defended Petermans recruiting. Some you should try reading an article before being critical of it.
-
The whole premise is BS ...
If you back out the LS commit and extrapolate Petersen's current commits, he's hitting at ~40% of getting 4-star players (using Scout as the main source on this; 2 of his current list on Rivals and 3 on ESPN). If you extrapolate that to a full class of 25, that's ~10 4-star or higher recruits in a class.
As a point of reference, that's Sark's best class (but as we all know a number of them flamed out for whatever reason).
Moreover, I think every Husky fan in their right mind would be very happy with recruiting classes that contained 8-10 4-star or higher players in each class. -
If you can't figure out this is a USC assistant quote not sure who can help you...
-
This seemed to be a given to me also.HoustonHusky said:If you can't figure out this is a USC assistant quote not sure who can help you...
-
I realize that asshat, he inserted into his article because juse knew it would ruffle feathers. And who are you btw?
-
Do you guys actually pay Seattle Times money?
-
Feedly, my friendWilburHooksHands said:Do you guys actually pay Seattle Times money?
-
At some point people will realize that peterman does more with 3* guys who actually play and stick around vs the 4* guys sark brought in and left or never played/developed. These rankings as a whole are ridiculous. Just another way to sell mags and page viewsTequilla said:The whole premise is BS ...
If you back out the LS commit and extrapolate Petersen's current commits, he's hitting at ~40% of getting 4-star players (using Scout as the main source on this; 2 of his current list on Rivals and 3 on ESPN). If you extrapolate that to a full class of 25, that's ~10 4-star or higher recruits in a class.
As a point of reference, that's Sark's best class (but as we all know a number of them flamed out for whatever reason).
Moreover, I think every Husky fan in their right mind would be very happy with recruiting classes that contained 8-10 4-star or higher players in each class. -
This is a mute point. I'm fairly positive come signing day the class will not resemble a BSU class.
-
There are a lot more Stanford OKGs in the NFL than edgy Sark recruits. More BSU OKGs as well.
This failed premise isn't Jood's. But it's a failed premise nonetheless. -
Hearing other Pac-12 assistants be critical of Petersen's recruiting instills me with hope, especially since it sounds like these assistants are going after edgy, national recruits (and probably losing out).
-
I thought "assistant" was a cover for Ektard or F3
-
That is pretty much s direct quote from Kim's posts about CP's recruiting. Assistant coach, my ass
-
Knowing how to put your browser into private mode is your friend.WilburHooksHands said:Do you guys actually pay Seattle Times money?
-
So somebody posted this on doogman and it became a 5 page thread. Here's why:
1) After the original post, there's a page of follow ups discussing how stupid the article is and how it's not based in reality (Pete has signed 9 4^ players since becoming coach). THread should have ended.
2) Somewhere on the 2nd page of the thread ENTER KIM GRINOLDS: "Lot's of experts feel this way. Petersen's recruiting raises some eyebrows. Can his OKG recruiting lead to Pac-12 championships? We'll see. Many have questions and you guys seem to always get defensive when people ask those questions."
3) Eventually F3, of all people, put Kim in his place, but Kim's OKG recruiting acolytes still carried on for 4 more pages
