Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Sark doesn't watch Seahawk Games

2»

Comments

  • IMALOSER_
    IMALOSER_ Member Posts: 158

    No fringin kidding. What the hell does a pre-season game have to do with anything?

    Drawing conclusions from this is worthless

    The question is who the fuck would chart a preseason game?

    Maybe you two should take that up with the original poster that thought our Head Coach could learn something from it. No one seemed to have a problem with him using pre-season games when it fit the script.
  • IMALOSER_
    IMALOSER_ Member Posts: 158

    IMALOSER_ said:

    The question you should be asking is why not one person called the original poster out for making a statement that was totally false?

    That's right......he was following the script.

    The best part of the thread was that he was hyping up the Hawks for starting a game just like UW does. Yet, not one of you called him out.

    I point it out........and I'm the problem.

    Because no one pays that close of attention to preseason games and the overall in season trend is well established.

    The Seahawks run to set up the pass. They are a smashmouth team.

    You can't refute any of this.
    Well Established?

    Like in the Playoffs with your season on the line?

    Seahawks vs. Atlanta - 1st Half

    Falcons - 20
    Seahawks -0

    Seahawk Passing Plays - 20
    Seahawk Running Plays - 11


    That sure is a well established game plan. Maybe they should try using it next time their season is on the line.
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,625 Standard Supporter

    Thoughts and prayers go out to HardcoreHusky (RIP).

    T's and P's to HardcoreHusky. I don't know if this board can survive both IrishDoog and IMALOSER.

    It's the same guy. I'm not sure if that makes it better or worse.
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453

    Thoughts and prayers go out to HardcoreHusky (RIP).

    T's and P's to HardcoreHusky. I don't know if this board can survive both IrishDoog and IMALOSER.

    It's the same guy. I'm not sure if that makes it better or worse.
    I know it's the same fucktard and he'll create even more handles to pollute this place.

    When Derek said Harv made dawgboard a cest pool I laughed. Guys like IrishDoog/IMALOSER/Factchecker ruined the board.
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,417 Founders Club

    Thoughts and prayers go out to HardcoreHusky (RIP).

    T's and P's to HardcoreHusky. I don't know if this board can survive both IrishDoog and IMALOSER.

    It's the same guy. I'm not sure if that makes it better or worse.
    I know it's the same fucktard and he'll create even more handles to pollute this place.

    When Derek said Harv made dawgboard a cest pool I laughed. Guys like IrishDoog/IMALOSER/Factchecker ruined the board.
    You obviously weren't looking closely enough at how he trolled said posters
  • HillsboroDuck
    HillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    IMALOSER_ said:

    IMALOSER_ said:

    The question you should be asking is why not one person called the original poster out for making a statement that was totally false?

    That's right......he was following the script.

    The best part of the thread was that he was hyping up the Hawks for starting a game just like UW does. Yet, not one of you called him out.

    I point it out........and I'm the problem.

    Because no one pays that close of attention to preseason games and the overall in season trend is well established.

    The Seahawks run to set up the pass. They are a smashmouth team.

    You can't refute any of this.
    Well Established?

    Like in the Playoffs with your season on the line?

    Seahawks vs. Atlanta - 1st Half

    Falcons - 20
    Seahawks -0

    Seahawk Passing Plays - 20
    Seahawk Running Plays - 11


    That sure is a well established game plan. Maybe they should try using it next time their season is on the line.
    I like to cherry pick one game from a season of 18 and pretend that proves something. I like to do that.

  • IrishDawg22
    IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754

    Thoughts and prayers go out to HardcoreHusky (RIP).

    T's and P's to HardcoreHusky. I don't know if this board can survive both IrishDoog and IMALOSER.

    It's the same guy. I'm not sure if that makes it better or worse.
    Sorry Sherlock.
  • IrishDawg22
    IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754

    Thoughts and prayers go out to HardcoreHusky (RIP).

    T's and P's to HardcoreHusky. I don't know if this board can survive both IrishDoog and IMALOSER.

    It's the same guy. I'm not sure if that makes it better or worse.
    I know it's the same fucktard and he'll create even more handles to pollute this place.

    When Derek said Harv made dawgboard a cest pool I laughed. Guys like IrishDoog/IMALOSER/Factchecker ruined the board.

    Wow, you really are slow.

    If a guy who does not march along like a zombie and actually uses facts/stats to back up his arguments ruins this board, the I am your man.

    Like others you hate the fact that I am not a full Doog or Noog, and can actually think for myself.

    You should try it sometime.
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    edited August 2013
    good teams adjust their game plans, if a team is loading the box of course u pass, the thing with sark is he ditches the run at random
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    edited August 2013
    And it is well established because u have to look to find a game where they didn't pound the rock
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    IMALOSER_ said:

    IMALOSER_ said:

    The question you should be asking is why not one person called the original poster out for making a statement that was totally false?

    That's right......he was following the script.

    The best part of the thread was that he was hyping up the Hawks for starting a game just like UW does. Yet, not one of you called him out.

    I point it out........and I'm the problem.

    Because no one pays that close of attention to preseason games and the overall in season trend is well established.

    The Seahawks run to set up the pass. They are a smashmouth team.

    You can't refute any of this.
    Well Established?

    Like in the Playoffs with your season on the line?

    Seahawks vs. Atlanta - 1st Half

    Falcons - 20
    Seahawks -0

    Seahawk Passing Plays - 20
    Seahawk Running Plays - 11


    That sure is a well established game plan. Maybe they should try using it next time their season is on the line.
    Your point proves 0 in that game Wilson averaged north of 10 ypa, lynch rushed for under 3 ypc. They had to adjust and did. They really started rolling when bevell completely ditched the runnin
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    IMALOSER_ said:

    IMALOSER_ said:

    The question you should be asking is why not one person called the original poster out for making a statement that was totally false?

    That's right......he was following the script.

    The best part of the thread was that he was hyping up the Hawks for starting a game just like UW does. Yet, not one of you called him out.

    I point it out........and I'm the problem.

    Because no one pays that close of attention to preseason games and the overall in season trend is well established.

    The Seahawks run to set up the pass. They are a smashmouth team.

    You can't refute any of this.
    Well Established?

    Like in the Playoffs with your season on the line?

    Seahawks vs. Atlanta - 1st Half

    Falcons - 20
    Seahawks -0

    Seahawk Passing Plays - 20
    Seahawk Running Plays - 11


    That sure is a well established game plan. Maybe they should try using it next time their season is on the line.
    Your point proves 0 in that game Wilson averaged north of 10 ypa, lynch rushed for under 3 ypc. They had to adjust and did. They really started rolling when bevell completely ditched the runnin
  • IMALOSER_
    IMALOSER_ Member Posts: 158
    edited August 2013
    dhdawg said:

    And it is well established because u have to look to find a game where they didn't pound the rock

    Yeah, I looked pretty fucking hard. The last game they played. Feel free to break down each of the first halves of the 2012 season. I have a life.
    dhdawg said:

    IMALOSER_ said:

    IMALOSER_ said:

    The question you should be asking is why not one person called the original poster out for making a statement that was totally false?

    That's right......he was following the script.

    The best part of the thread was that he was hyping up the Hawks for starting a game just like UW does. Yet, not one of you called him out.

    I point it out........and I'm the problem.

    Because no one pays that close of attention to preseason games and the overall in season trend is well established.

    The Seahawks run to set up the pass. They are a smashmouth team.

    You can't refute any of this.
    Well Established?

    Like in the Playoffs with your season on the line?

    Seahawks vs. Atlanta - 1st Half

    Falcons - 20
    Seahawks -0

    Seahawk Passing Plays - 20
    Seahawk Running Plays - 11


    That sure is a well established game plan. Maybe they should try using it next time their season is on the line.
    Your point proves 0 in that game Wilson averaged north of 10 ypa, lynch rushed for under 3 ypc. They had to adjust and did. They really started rolling when bevell completely ditched the runnin
    You say my point proves zero. Then back up my point. So does your post prove zero?