Sark doesn't watch Seahawk Games
Comments
-
Hey man, Sark coached for the Raiders.
-
They play good special teams, have a tough defense, the offense is also tough. The players actually get coached up unlike at UW.
The Seahawks also have a good OL coach who coaches up his OL as well. The play calling like I said can be "simplistic" but it's very effective.
If Sark is fired I'd rather he not join the Seahawks coaching staff as he is a terrible play caller. -
At least we have something in common.
-
He'd be fine because Carroll would give him strict guideline to what he could call. Sark would still have to give it to Lynch 20+ times, other backs 5-10, and I doubt Carroll would allow all of the fancy motions/shifts on every play.He_Needs_More_Time said:They play good special teams, have a tough defense, the offense is also tough. The players actually get coached up unlike at UW.
The Seahawks also have a good OL coach who coaches up his OL as well. The play calling like I said can be "simplistic" but it's very effective.
If Sark is fired I'd rather he not join the Seahawks coaching staff as he is a terrible play caller.
Having said that, there are many guys I would prefer over Sark.
-
The Seahawks have an identity, no matter the opponent they run the ball and play defense. The huskies have no identity, in fact it changes every week
-
Hey, the kids played hard!!!1!!dhdawg said:The Seahawks have an identity, no matter the opponent they run the ball and play defense. The huskies have no identity, in fact it changes every week
-
Nothing wrong with "simplistic", it increases the likelihood of perfect execution. I prefer that to seeing a coach "outsmart" himself, something Husky fans have seen far too much of in recent years.He_Needs_More_Time said:They play good special teams, have a tough defense, the offense is also tough. The players actually get coached up unlike at UW.
The Seahawks also have a good OL coach who coaches up his OL as well. The play calling like I said can be "simplistic" but it's very effective.
If Sark is fired I'd rather he not join the Seahawks coaching staff as he is a terrible play caller. -
This was the Chimp Smelly (ROFL) model at whOregon (double ROFL) that doogs call gimmicky.Southerndawg said:
Nothing wrong with "simplistic", it increases the likelihood of perfect execution. I prefer that to seeing a coach "outsmart" himself, something Husky fans have seen far too much of in recent years.He_Needs_More_Time said:They play good special teams, have a tough defense, the offense is also tough. The players actually get coached up unlike at UW.
The Seahawks also have a good OL coach who coaches up his OL as well. The play calling like I said can be "simplistic" but it's very effective.
If Sark is fired I'd rather he not join the Seahawks coaching staff as he is a terrible play caller. -
The same model that Doogs now love because Sark has adopted it as the flavor of the week.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
This was the Chimp Smelly (ROFL) model at whOregon (double ROFL) that doogs call gimmicky.Southerndawg said:
Nothing wrong with "simplistic", it increases the likelihood of perfect execution. I prefer that to seeing a coach "outsmart" himself, something Husky fans have seen far too much of in recent years.He_Needs_More_Time said:They play good special teams, have a tough defense, the offense is also tough. The players actually get coached up unlike at UW.
The Seahawks also have a good OL coach who coaches up his OL as well. The play calling like I said can be "simplistic" but it's very effective.
If Sark is fired I'd rather he not join the Seahawks coaching staff as he is a terrible play caller. -
I fucking hate our fanbase.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The same model that Doogs now love because Sark has adopted it as the flavor of the week.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
This was the Chimp Smelly (ROFL) model at whOregon (double ROFL) that doogs call gimmicky.Southerndawg said:
Nothing wrong with "simplistic", it increases the likelihood of perfect execution. I prefer that to seeing a coach "outsmart" himself, something Husky fans have seen far too much of in recent years.He_Needs_More_Time said:They play good special teams, have a tough defense, the offense is also tough. The players actually get coached up unlike at UW.
The Seahawks also have a good OL coach who coaches up his OL as well. The play calling like I said can be "simplistic" but it's very effective.
If Sark is fired I'd rather he not join the Seahawks coaching staff as he is a terrible play caller. -
Seahawks starting offensive plays from San Diego game.
Series #1
1. Wilson Pass
2. Wilson Pass
3. Run
4. Wilson Pass
5. Punt
Series #2
1. Run
2. Wilson Scramble (Passing Play)
3. Wilson Scramble (Passing Play)
4. Run
5. Run
6. Wilson Pass
7. Wilson Pass
8. Wilson Pass
8 Pass Plays
3 Run Plays
2 Punts
Not sure what you wanted Sark to pick up from watching the Seahawk game. Pretty sure that looks just like every one of our games that you bitch about.
They forced things early and Passsed, Passed, Passed. Exactly opposite of what you just posted.
You are pressing pretty fucking bad, Bro!!!!! -
Thoughts and prayers go out to HardcoreHusky (RIP).
-
Ok, I admit I was wrong but Sark still fucking sucks and is no offensive guru.
-
T's and P's to HardcoreHusky. I don't know if this board can survive both IrishDoog and IMALOSER.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Thoughts and prayers go out to HardcoreHusky (RIP).
-
The question you should be asking is why not one person called the original poster out for making a statement that was totally false?
That's right......he was following the script.
The best part of the thread was that he was hyping up the Hawks for starting a game just like UW does. Yet, not one of you called him out.
I point it out........and I'm the problem. -
The Seahawks won the game 31-10 throwing the ball 26 times and running the ball 29 times. I don't really get your point.IMALOSER_ said:The question you should be asking is why not one person called the original poster out for making a statement that was totally false?
That's right......he was following the script.
The best part of the thread was that he was hyping up the Hawks for starting a game just like UW does. Yet, not one of you called him out.
I point it out........and I'm the problem.
Only one team in the NFL ran the ball more than they threw.....the Seahawks. -
Read the original post and you will realize you just wasted a lot of time typing that.He_Needs_More_Time said:
The Seahawks won the game 31-10 throwing the ball 26 times and running the ball 29 times. I don't really get your point.IMALOSER_ said:The question you should be asking is why not one person called the original poster out for making a statement that was totally false?
That's right......he was following the script.
The best part of the thread was that he was hyping up the Hawks for starting a game just like UW does. Yet, not one of you called him out.
I point it out........and I'm the problem.
Only one team in the NFL ran the ball more than they threw.....the Seahawks.
I'll help you out with some Cliffsnotes
1. They don't try and force anything early.
2. They run, run, run and when it becomes effective, they run play action and take a few shots down the field.
The original post was discussing how they start the game by using the run to set up the pass. They Hawks did not start the game like that.
Since you are beating your chest about the Hawks running the ball more than they throw.............so did the Huskies last year. -
The question is who the fuck would chart a preseason game?
-
No one called it out because no one gives a fuck about NFL preseason games.IMALOSER_ said:The question you should be asking is why not one person called the original poster out for making a statement that was totally false?
That's right......he was following the script.
The best part of the thread was that he was hyping up the Hawks for starting a game just like UW does. Yet, not one of you called him out.
I point it out........and I'm the problem.
Hope this helps, even though I know it won't. -
Well............This board has officially gone to shit.IMALOSER_ said:Seahawks starting offensive plays from San Diego game.
Series #1
1. Wilson Pass
2. Wilson Pass
3. Run
4. Wilson Pass
5. Punt
Series #2
1. Run
2. Wilson Scramble (Passing Play)
3. Wilson Scramble (Passing Play)
4. Run
5. Run
6. Wilson Pass
7. Wilson Pass
8. Wilson Pass
8 Pass Plays
3 Run Plays
2 Punts
Not sure what you wanted Sark to pick up from watching the Seahawk game. Pretty sure that looks just like every one of our games that you bitch about.
They forced things early and Passsed, Passed, Passed. Exactly opposite of what you just posted.
You are pressing pretty fucking bad, Bro!!!!! -
Because no one pays that close of attention to preseason games and the overall in season trend is well established.IMALOSER_ said:The question you should be asking is why not one person called the original poster out for making a statement that was totally false?
That's right......he was following the script.
The best part of the thread was that he was hyping up the Hawks for starting a game just like UW does. Yet, not one of you called him out.
I point it out........and I'm the problem.
The Seahawks run to set up the pass. They are a smashmouth team.
You can't refute any of this.
-
If you are going to bitch, bitch about the right things:
--Offensive line depth is still shit after 5 years
--cannot protect the QB
--cannot defend the spread
--S/T
--penalties
--game management by head coach
In our freakin' bowl game we ran the ball 38 times, including 8 of our 1st 13 plays and still lost. And overall we had close to a 50-50 mix for the year.
But when your QB is sacked 37 times, that takes away even more run plays.
Run/pass mix is way down on the list of things that NEED to be fixed this year. -
Special Teams is a mixed bagIrishDawg22 said:If you are going to bitch, bitch about the right things:
--Offensive line depth is still shit after 5 years
--cannot protect the QB
--cannot defend the spread
--S/T
--penalties
--game management by head coach
In our freakin' bowl game we ran the ball 38 times, including 8 of our 1st 13 plays and still lost. And overall we had close to a 50-50 mix for the year.
But when your QB is sacked 37 times, that takes away even more run plays.
Run/pass mix is way down on the list of things that NEED to be fixed this year.
-
Travis Coons & Shane Williams-Rhodes disagree.HillsboroDuck said:
Special Teams is a mixed bagIrishDawg22 said:If you are going to bitch, bitch about the right things:
--Offensive line depth is still shit after 5 years
--cannot protect the QB
--cannot defend the spread
--S/T
--penalties
--game management by head coach
In our freakin' bowl game we ran the ball 38 times, including 8 of our 1st 13 plays and still lost. And overall we had close to a 50-50 mix for the year.
But when your QB is sacked 37 times, that takes away even more run plays.
Run/pass mix is way down on the list of things that NEED to be fixed this year. -
When your QB is sacked 37 times it counts as 37 runs in your bogus 50-50 stat
-
But he doesn't love the worst best play caller in America
-
No fringin kidding. What the hell does a pre-season game have to do with anything?
Drawing conclusions from this is worthlessRaceBannon said:The question is who the fuck would chart a preseason game?
-
466 run playsRaceBannon said:When your QB is sacked 37 times it counts as 37 runs in your bogus 50-50 stat
438 pass plays
So back out those 37 sacks, and you get real close to the 50-50 "bogus" stat. HTH
How many times do I need to tell you, leave the football talk to the big boys.
) -
I hope the state is giving you some type of assistance to help you function in society.RaceBannon said:But he doesn't love the worst best play caller in America
You are really slow.
-
Stats are for losers. HTH
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
