Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

OT: Seahawks Special Teams

Love watching these guys fly around, even it's just preseason.

ST is basically three things. In order: coaching, desire and athleticism. The 'Hawks clearly have all three.

When was the last time the Huskies had a good special teams, let alone great?
«134

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453

    Love watching these guys fly around, even it's just preseason.

    ST is basically three things. In order: coaching, desire and athleticism. The 'Hawks clearly have all three.

    When was the last time the Huskies had a good special teams, let alone great?

    I've said before on here I view ST as a sign of coaching. The Seahawks have had good special teams since Carroll has arrived while under Holmgren they were decent but never good.

    With the Huskies? When was the last time we had a kick off return go for a TD? How about a punt? Last punt that was blocked? Last FG that was blocked vs a real team(Portland State doesn't count) ?

    When was the last time UW won a close game where we looked back and said we won cause of special teams as we had better field position all game?

    I honestly don't remember the answer to those questions.

    As for our last good special teams? I remember them being good in the Slick Rick era but feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
  • IMALOSER_
    IMALOSER_ Member Posts: 158
    2011 Special Teams Rankings - Pac-12

    Kick Off Return - #3
    Kick Off Coverage - #10
    Net Punting - #2
    Punt Return - #6

    Not exactly great being the #10 Kick off coverage team, but the rest was respectable. How hard is it to find a guy that can kick the ball into the endzone?

    2012 was a particularly crappy Special Teams performance, all around. 2010 Stats are currently not available on Pac-12 site.

    Looks like a mixed bag.
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    IMALOSER_ said:

    2011 Special Teams Rankings - Pac-12

    Kick Off Return - #3
    Kick Off Coverage - #10
    Net Punting - #2
    Punt Return - #6

    Not exactly great being the #10 Kick off coverage team, but the rest was respectable. How hard is it to find a guy that can kick the ball into the endzone?

    2012 was a particularly crappy Special Teams performance, all around. 2010 Stats are currently not available on Pac-12 site.

    Looks like a mixed bag.

    Thanks for disagreeing with us then providing stats to back up our point. I see your shitty posting style from Dawgboard hasn't changed at all.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,538 Swaye's Wigwam
    IMALOSER_ said:

    2011 Special Teams Rankings - Pac-12

    Kick Off Return - #3
    Kick Off Coverage - #10
    Net Punting - #2
    Punt Return - #6

    Not exactly great being the #10 Kick off coverage team, but the rest was respectable. How hard is it to find a guy that can kick the ball into the endzone?

    2012 was a particularly crappy Special Teams performance, all around. 2010 Stats are currently not available on Pac-12 site.

    Looks like a mixed bag.

    You must have forgotten 2010 when every other kick off was returned past the 50. I guarantee we were #10 in kick off coverage that year. Other than Folk hitting a few clutch field goals, the special teams have been shit.

  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680



    IMALOSER_ said:

    2011 Special Teams Rankings - Pac-12

    Kick Off Return - #3
    Kick Off Coverage - #10
    Net Punting - #2
    Punt Return - #6

    Not exactly great being the #10 Kick off coverage team, but the rest was respectable. How hard is it to find a guy that can kick the ball into the endzone?

    2012 was a particularly crappy Special Teams performance, all around. 2010 Stats are currently not available on Pac-12 site.

    Looks like a mixed bag.

    You must have forgotten 2010 when every other kick off was returned past the 50. I guarantee we were #10 in kick off coverage that year. Other than Folk hitting a few clutch field goals, the special teams have been shit.

    Couldn't find kickoff coverage stats on the NCAA website, but here are the others:

    2009:
    KO returns - 9th of 10
    Net Punting - 5th
    Punt Return - 6th

    2010:
    KO returns - 10th of 10
    Net Punting - 10th
    Punt Return - 7th

    2011:
    See above

    2012:
    KO returns - 7th of 12
    Net Punting - 8th
    Punt Return - 12th


    Summary:
    Sark's Huskies have sucked at Special Teams. Johnny Nansen must have video of Sark with a Joey's waitress or three (allegedly).

    Calling it a "mixed bag" is being generous at best. 2011 was a "mixed bag", but Sark's special teams in the other three years have been awful.
  • IMALOSER_
    IMALOSER_ Member Posts: 158
    Where did I disagree or agree with anyone?

    I just posted the rankings from two years ago and stated 3 of the 4 categories were respectable.

    Then stated 2012 was crappy.

    Still looking for where I disagreed with anyone...................

    You are pressing really bad. Take a deep breath.
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    IMALOSER_ said:

    Where did I disagree or agree with anyone?

    I just posted the rankings from two years ago and stated 3 of the 4 categories were respectable.

    Then stated 2012 was crappy.

    Still looking for where I disagreed with anyone...................

    You are pressing really bad. Take a deep breath.

    Perhaps you voting down both my statements is a sign of disagreement, also saying "it's been a mix bag" when it's actually been pretty fucking shitty as sven pointed out.

    Only 2011 was a "mixed bag" and that year had some glaring bad as in kickoff coverage.
  • IMALOSER_
    IMALOSER_ Member Posts: 158
    Since I was discussing the 2011 season and stated two were respectable and one was not great. I assumed you would know that stating it was a mixed bag was discussing the 2011 season.

    The top of the page headline states 2011 Special Teams Rankings.

    I don't have a problem giving you a thumbs down each time you misrepresent what I have stated.
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    IMALOSER_ said:

    Since I was discussing the 2011 season and stated two were respectable and one was not great. I assumed you would know that stating it was a mixed bag was discussing the 2011 season.

    The top of the page headline states 2011 Special Teams Rankings.

    "2012 was a particularly crappy Special Teams performance, all around. 2010 Stats are currently not available on Pac-12 site.

    Looks like a mixed bag."

    Too bad you used the mixed bag statement after talking about 2012 and 2010 as well on top of your 2011.

    Nice try.
  • IMALOSER_
    IMALOSER_ Member Posts: 158
    You are pressing really bad...............