Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Liberty safes

«1

Comments

  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 18,046 Standard Supporter
    More good publicity for Liberty Safe. Apparently the decision makers at the company don't have much of a care about their customer base. I'm sure an Ivy League MBA is involved in this somewhere.

    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/saraharnold/2023/09/08/liberty-safe-company-gave-nearly-half-a-million-dollars-to-gun-control-happy-democrats-n2628174

    Campaign finance documents found an unsurprising connection between Liberty Safe’s parent company and the Democratic Party in an attempt to restrict American’s Second Amendment rights.

    Monomoy Capital Partners, which purchased Liberty Safe in 2021, has contributed more almost half a million dollars to prominent Democrats such as Senators Raphael Warnock (D-GA), John Fetterman (D-PA), and Mark Kelly (D-AZ).

    All of the donations made by the company total over $400,000 to the party that seeks to limit firearms.

    Liberty Safe is the gun safe company that cooperated with the FBI and recently turned over a private, secure passcode used by a January 6 protestor to agents who later raided his home.

    In addition, the company’s current CEO, Justin Hillenbrand, personally donated $4,600 to Former President Barack Obama’s campaign.

    Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk highlighted how little the company values its customers.

    “And we’re supposed to be surprised they betrayed their customers to the FBI as quickly as humanly possible?” Kirk tweeted.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,541
    You gals back the blue . . . allegedly.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 18,046 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    You gals back the blue . . . allegedly.

    We do if there is a true warrant. You suck at this.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,541
    hardhat said:



    HHusky said:

    You gals back the blue . . . allegedly.

    Apple refuses to unlock a mass shooter's iphone, and the left cheers. Now they're cheering the opposite. Partisan retards are a strange bunch.
    Take it up with “the left”, then. Though I’m pretty sure you’re a little confused about the allegiances here.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,541

    HHusky said:

    You gals back the blue . . . allegedly.

    We do if there is a true warrant. You suck at this.
    “We back the blue if they makes us” potd.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 18,046 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    You gals back the blue . . . allegedly.

    We do if there is a true warrant. You suck at this.
    “We back the blue if they makes us” potd.
    Expecting the government to follow the law is now insurrection according to our hypothetical attorney. Hey bank, can I have all transactions in the Washington DC area?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,123 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:



    HHusky said:

    You gals back the blue . . . allegedly.

    Apple refuses to unlock a mass shooter's iphone, and the left cheers. Now they're cheering the opposite. Partisan retards are a strange bunch.
    Take it up with “the left”, then. Though I’m pretty sure you’re a little confused about the allegiances here.
    No confusion

    You're a leftist and a hypocrite and a statist bootlicker

    Clearly
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,541

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    You gals back the blue . . . allegedly.

    We do if there is a true warrant. You suck at this.
    “We back the blue if they makes us” potd.
    Expecting the government to follow the law is now insurrection according to our hypothetical attorney. Hey bank, can I have all transactions in the Washington DC area?
    The government acted illegally here how?

    Use your words.
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,295 Standard Supporter
    Does the warrant compel the manufacturer to give the code, or not?