OT: Seahawks Special Teams
ST is basically three things. In order: coaching, desire and athleticism. The 'Hawks clearly have all three.
When was the last time the Huskies had a good special teams, let alone great?
Comments
-
I've said before on here I view ST as a sign of coaching. The Seahawks have had good special teams since Carroll has arrived while under Holmgren they were decent but never good.HillsboroDuck said:Love watching these guys fly around, even it's just preseason.
ST is basically three things. In order: coaching, desire and athleticism. The 'Hawks clearly have all three.
When was the last time the Huskies had a good special teams, let alone great?
With the Huskies? When was the last time we had a kick off return go for a TD? How about a punt? Last punt that was blocked? Last FG that was blocked vs a real team(Portland State doesn't count) ?
When was the last time UW won a close game where we looked back and said we won cause of special teams as we had better field position all game?
I honestly don't remember the answer to those questions.
As for our last good special teams? I remember them being good in the Slick Rick era but feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. -
2011 Special Teams Rankings - Pac-12
Kick Off Return - #3
Kick Off Coverage - #10
Net Punting - #2
Punt Return - #6
Not exactly great being the #10 Kick off coverage team, but the rest was respectable. How hard is it to find a guy that can kick the ball into the endzone?
2012 was a particularly crappy Special Teams performance, all around. 2010 Stats are currently not available on Pac-12 site.
Looks like a mixed bag. -
Thanks for disagreeing with us then providing stats to back up our point. I see your shitty posting style from Dawgboard hasn't changed at all.IMALOSER_ said:2011 Special Teams Rankings - Pac-12
Kick Off Return - #3
Kick Off Coverage - #10
Net Punting - #2
Punt Return - #6
Not exactly great being the #10 Kick off coverage team, but the rest was respectable. How hard is it to find a guy that can kick the ball into the endzone?
2012 was a particularly crappy Special Teams performance, all around. 2010 Stats are currently not available on Pac-12 site.
Looks like a mixed bag. -
You must have forgotten 2010 when every other kick off was returned past the 50. I guarantee we were #10 in kick off coverage that year. Other than Folk hitting a few clutch field goals, the special teams have been shit.IMALOSER_ said:2011 Special Teams Rankings - Pac-12
Kick Off Return - #3
Kick Off Coverage - #10
Net Punting - #2
Punt Return - #6
Not exactly great being the #10 Kick off coverage team, but the rest was respectable. How hard is it to find a guy that can kick the ball into the endzone?
2012 was a particularly crappy Special Teams performance, all around. 2010 Stats are currently not available on Pac-12 site.
Looks like a mixed bag.
-
Couldn't find kickoff coverage stats on the NCAA website, but here are the others:RoadDawg55 said:
You must have forgotten 2010 when every other kick off was returned past the 50. I guarantee we were #10 in kick off coverage that year. Other than Folk hitting a few clutch field goals, the special teams have been shit.IMALOSER_ said:2011 Special Teams Rankings - Pac-12
Kick Off Return - #3
Kick Off Coverage - #10
Net Punting - #2
Punt Return - #6
Not exactly great being the #10 Kick off coverage team, but the rest was respectable. How hard is it to find a guy that can kick the ball into the endzone?
2012 was a particularly crappy Special Teams performance, all around. 2010 Stats are currently not available on Pac-12 site.
Looks like a mixed bag.
2009:
KO returns - 9th of 10
Net Punting - 5th
Punt Return - 6th
2010:
KO returns - 10th of 10
Net Punting - 10th
Punt Return - 7th
2011:
See above
2012:
KO returns - 7th of 12
Net Punting - 8th
Punt Return - 12th
Summary:
Sark's Huskies have sucked at Special Teams. Johnny Nansen must have video of Sark with a Joey's waitress or three (allegedly).
Calling it a "mixed bag" is being generous at best. 2011 was a "mixed bag", but Sark's special teams in the other three years have been awful.
-
Where did I disagree or agree with anyone?
I just posted the rankings from two years ago and stated 3 of the 4 categories were respectable.
Then stated 2012 was crappy.
Still looking for where I disagreed with anyone...................
You are pressing really bad. Take a deep breath. -
Perhaps you voting down both my statements is a sign of disagreement, also saying "it's been a mix bag" when it's actually been pretty fucking shitty as sven pointed out.IMALOSER_ said:Where did I disagree or agree with anyone?
I just posted the rankings from two years ago and stated 3 of the 4 categories were respectable.
Then stated 2012 was crappy.
Still looking for where I disagreed with anyone...................
You are pressing really bad. Take a deep breath.
Only 2011 was a "mixed bag" and that year had some glaring bad as in kickoff coverage. -
Since I was discussing the 2011 season and stated two were respectable and one was not great. I assumed you would know that stating it was a mixed bag was discussing the 2011 season.
The top of the page headline states 2011 Special Teams Rankings.
I don't have a problem giving you a thumbs down each time you misrepresent what I have stated. -
"2012 was a particularly crappy Special Teams performance, all around. 2010 Stats are currently not available on Pac-12 site.IMALOSER_ said:Since I was discussing the 2011 season and stated two were respectable and one was not great. I assumed you would know that stating it was a mixed bag was discussing the 2011 season.
The top of the page headline states 2011 Special Teams Rankings.
Looks like a mixed bag."
Too bad you used the mixed bag statement after talking about 2012 and 2010 as well on top of your 2011.
Nice try. -
You are pressing really bad...............

