PM to the coaches

Pass to set up the run. Pass until the other team proves they can either cover the WRs and TEs, or until they prove they can pressure Penix.
Not many teams in America are capable of doing either.
Once the other team is dropping 8 and scared shitless of the vertical passing game, THEN run the ball.
You're welcome.
Comments
-
That's the thing I've been most amazed about thought all this. Other than Cal/Beavs/Texas, every team doesn't think Penix and this offense can continually go over the top of them consistently enough to beat them and they have all been wrong.
I'd drop 7/8 all game and force Penix and Grubb to check down charlie and run it to beat us the whole game. If nothing else your shorten game and possessions on UW which is not KD and his offensive id MO -
No offense intended here, but don’t you think a guy making $2m a year to be an OC just might know more than you?
-
JESUSDawgInNoCal said:No offense intended here, but don’t you think a guy making $2m a year to be an OC just might know more than you?
-
What?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
JESUSDawgInNoCal said:No offense intended here, but don’t you think a guy making $2m a year to be an OC just might know more than you?
-
Nah, it's good to run every now and then to let the OL have fun
-
It's not a Mike Leach air raid.godawgst said:That's the thing I've been most amazed about thought all this. Other than Cal/Beavs/Texas, every team doesn't think Penix and this offense can continually go over the top of them consistently enough to beat them and they have all been wrong.
I'd drop 7/8 all game and force Penix and Grubb to check down charlie and run it to beat us the whole game. If nothing else your shorten game and possessions on UW which is not KD and his offensive id MO
If you drop 8 this offense has way more than 2-3 dink and dunks on a moldy notecard to kill you with.
People forget that Cal featured horrible 3rd down drops by Talapapa that got him benched and vs Beavlet the dumbest fucking pick 6 I've ever seen made the game closer than it was. -
Just lurk more. We're going to redshirt you this year. Get your reads downDawgInNoCal said:No offense intended here, but don’t you think a guy making $2m a year to be an OC just might know more than you?
-
I'm not sure just having everyone bail out would even help opposing defences (hope they're not reading this) because Deboers is also able to get receivers open on crossers and decently enough around the LOS. He specifically talked in the off season about the offence being known now for the explosiveness but in reality it's built around efficiency that sets up the explosive playsgodawgst said:That's the thing I've been most amazed about thought all this. Other than Cal/Beavs/Texas, every team doesn't think Penix and this offense can continually go over the top of them consistently enough to beat them and they have all been wrong.
I'd drop 7/8 all game and force Penix and Grubb to check down charlie and run it to beat us the whole game. If nothing else your shorten game and possessions on UW which is not KD and his offensive id MO -
Obvious troll. Even classic doogman only had a couple of D bags who made statements like that. I suppose this could be one of them, but I doubt it.DawgInNoCal said:No offense intended here, but don’t you think a guy making $2m a year to be an OC just might know more than you?
-
?Canadawg said:
Just lurk more. We're going to redshirt you this year. Get your reads downDawgInNoCal said:No offense intended here, but don’t you think a guy making $2m a year to be an OC just might know more than you?
-
You need to consider the portal. HthDawgInNoCal said:
?Canadawg said:
Just lurk more. We're going to redshirt you this year. Get your reads downDawgInNoCal said:No offense intended here, but don’t you think a guy making $2m a year to be an OC just might know more than you?
-
I’m of the firm opinion @Canadawg that 6 months of lurking is a minimum and 12 moths is preferable.Canadawg said:
Just lurk more. We're going to redshirt you this year. Get your reads downDawgInNoCal said:No offense intended here, but don’t you think a guy making $2m a year to be an OC just might know more than you?
Hell, I lurked for well over a year and I was a 5 Star Recruit. -
PGOS good at everything
-
You and Smalls - at least one turned out good for usYellowSnow said:
I’m of the firm opinion @Canadawg that 6 months of lurking is a minimum and 12 moths is preferable.Canadawg said:
Just lurk more. We're going to redshirt you this year. Get your reads downDawgInNoCal said:No offense intended here, but don’t you think a guy making $2m a year to be an OC just might know more than you?
Hell, I lurked for well over a year and I was a 5 Star Recruit. -
Smalls didn’t want to put in the work that I have. 31.5k posts in 7 yrs.LebamDawg said:
You and Smalls - at least one turned out good for usYellowSnow said:
I’m of the firm opinion @Canadawg that 6 months of lurking is a minimum and 12 moths is preferable.Canadawg said:
Just lurk more. We're going to redshirt you this year. Get your reads downDawgInNoCal said:No offense intended here, but don’t you think a guy making $2m a year to be an OC just might know more than you?
Hell, I lurked for well over a year and I was a 5 Star Recruit. -
brentsFS logical fallacy is ALWAYS specialDawgInNoCal said:No offense intended here, but don’t you think a guy making $2m a year to be an OC just might know more than you?
-
?pawz said:
brentsFS logical fallacy is ALWAYS specialDawgInNoCal said:No offense intended here, but don’t you think a guy making $2m a year to be an OC just might know more than you?
-
I am ALWAYS special. Legendary. Case Closed.pawz said:
brentsFS logical fallacy is ALWAYS specialDawgInNoCal said:No offense intended here, but don’t you think a guy making $2m a year to be an OC just might know more than you?
Bitch how you don’t know meDawgInNoCal said:
?pawz said:
brentsFS logical fallacy is ALWAYS specialDawgInNoCal said:No offense intended here, but don’t you think a guy making $2m a year to be an OC just might know more than you?
-
If Beavlet kicks the 2 fg's in Q1 they win game. If their DB doesn't drop gift wrap 85 yard pick sick down their sideline b4 half they win going away.haie said:
It's not a Mike Leach air raid.godawgst said:That's the thing I've been most amazed about thought all this. Other than Cal/Beavs/Texas, every team doesn't think Penix and this offense can continually go over the top of them consistently enough to beat them and they have all been wrong.
I'd drop 7/8 all game and force Penix and Grubb to check down charlie and run it to beat us the whole game. If nothing else your shorten game and possessions on UW which is not KD and his offensive id MO
If you drop 8 this offense has way more than 2-3 dink and dunks on a moldy notecard to kill you with.
People forget that Cal featured horrible 3rd down drops by Talapapa that got him benched and vs Beavlet the dumbest fucking pick 6 I've ever seen made the game closer than it was.
Had Cal had a QB who was even average in last years Pac12 (top 6 maybe even 8) that game goes to wire.
My point is if I am a DC UW will beat me if dare to make them do so over the top with big chunk plays, so I am going to make them go the field long way, use the back of endzone as another defender inside the 20 and prove they can run inside the tackles with consistency. -
Drop 7/8 all game?godawgst said:That's the thing I've been most amazed about thought all this. Other than Cal/Beavs/Texas, every team doesn't think Penix and this offense can continually go over the top of them consistently enough to beat them and they have all been wrong.
I'd drop 7/8 all game and force Penix and Grubb to check down charlie and run it to beat us the whole game. If nothing else your shorten game and possessions on UW which is not KD and his offensive id MO
Jesus 87% of the time teams drop 7 -
If you are getting out run in the secondary by receivers that have more precise movement and speed AND know what the play design is, it won’t matter if you add one more guy except to give the offense more time to separate. Make a habit of it and the offense just adds more guys into the pattern as well.
The real issue is does the other team have DB’s that can run with our receivers? And can the defense put pressure on the QB… That’s the way to slow this offense down… my take is that the defense needs to be able to do both really well to stop Washington.
Of course every DC [as well as any serious observer] knows this, will be interesting to see how it shakes out as the season progresses. -
Shitpost 2x, the other obvious way to shutdown our offense is to dominate and humiliate our defense with long punishing ball control drives that result in a touchdown, eat up the clock and give our guys on offense too much time to think about it… [doi, of course every coach wants to do that to destroy the other team.]
Is there anybody on our schedule good enough to do all that? pre playoffs I don’t think so… -
YellowSnow said:
I’m of the firm opinion @Canadawg that 6 months of lurking is a minimum and 12 moths is preferable.Canadawg said:
Just lurk more. We're going to redshirt you this year. Get your reads downDawgInNoCal said:No offense intended here, but don’t you think a guy making $2m a year to be an OC just might know more than you?
Hell, I lurked for well over a year and I was a 5 Star Recruit.
-
True that. I lurked for a couple years then still only posted special teams for a while. I suspect the truly special posters are the ones lurking right now not wanting to break through and make an ass of themselves. Meanwhile these bozos don't even know what they don't know.YellowSnow said:
I’m of the firm opinion @Canadawg that 6 months of lurking is a minimum and 12 moths is preferable.Canadawg said:
Just lurk more. We're going to redshirt you this year. Get your reads downDawgInNoCal said:No offense intended here, but don’t you think a guy making $2m a year to be an OC just might know more than you?
Hell, I lurked for well over a year and I was a 5 Star Recruit.
This one seems a bit of a troll though -
I trust the coachesDawgInNoCal said:No offense intended here, but don’t you think a guy making $2m a year to be an OC just might know more than you?
-
Bruh.DawgInNoCal said:No offense intended here, but don’t you think a guy making $2m a year to be an OC just might know more than you?
First foremost, Champ, this place was built on armchair anal-ysts watching gaymes and commenting on their iphone 5 in their dads basement.
Second, buddy, no one is above reproach, even $2 million a year for their offensive minded prowess.
Third, lurk a bit longer, get those offensive prowess reads down boss.
Fourth, be a Sport, don't take the down votes so seriously.
Fifth, no axed you to be Chief, Pal. Be a good little injun / savage / casino worker who sends me full frontal nudz.
You get that all that Friend? Guy, it's not that hard unless you try too hard.
-
He's not your guy, pal.huskyhooligan said:
Bruh.DawgInNoCal said:No offense intended here, but don’t you think a guy making $2m a year to be an OC just might know more than you?
First foremost, Champ, this place was built on armchair anal-ysts watching gaymes and commenting on their iphone 5 in their dads basement.
Second, buddy, no one is above reproach, even $2 million a year for their offensive minded prowess.
Third, lurk a bit longer, get those offensive prowess reads down boss.
Fourth, be a Sport, don't take the down votes so seriously.
Fifth, no axed you to be Chief, Pal. Be a good little injun / savage / casino worker who sends me full frontal nudz.
You get that all that Friend? Guy, it's not that hard unless you try too hard. -
I’ve started a movement!chuck said:
He's not your guy, pal.huskyhooligan said:
Bruh.DawgInNoCal said:No offense intended here, but don’t you think a guy making $2m a year to be an OC just might know more than you?
First foremost, Champ, this place was built on armchair anal-ysts watching gaymes and commenting on their iphone 5 in their dads basement.
Second, buddy, no one is above reproach, even $2 million a year for their offensive minded prowess.
Third, lurk a bit longer, get those offensive prowess reads down boss.
Fourth, be a Sport, don't take the down votes so seriously.
Fifth, no axed you to be Chief, Pal. Be a good little injun / savage / casino worker who sends me full frontal nudz.
You get that all that Friend? Guy, it's not that hard unless you try too hard. -
Way to go champYellowSnow said:
I’ve started a movement!chuck said:
He's not your guy, pal.huskyhooligan said:
Bruh.DawgInNoCal said:No offense intended here, but don’t you think a guy making $2m a year to be an OC just might know more than you?
First foremost, Champ, this place was built on armchair anal-ysts watching gaymes and commenting on their iphone 5 in their dads basement.
Second, buddy, no one is above reproach, even $2 million a year for their offensive minded prowess.
Third, lurk a bit longer, get those offensive prowess reads down boss.
Fourth, be a Sport, don't take the down votes so seriously.
Fifth, no axed you to be Chief, Pal. Be a good little injun / savage / casino worker who sends me full frontal nudz.
You get that all that Friend? Guy, it's not that hard unless you try too hard. -
Hang the bannerRaceBannon said:
Way to go champYellowSnow said:
I’ve started a movement!chuck said:
He's not your guy, pal.huskyhooligan said:
Bruh.DawgInNoCal said:No offense intended here, but don’t you think a guy making $2m a year to be an OC just might know more than you?
First foremost, Champ, this place was built on armchair anal-ysts watching gaymes and commenting on their iphone 5 in their dads basement.
Second, buddy, no one is above reproach, even $2 million a year for their offensive minded prowess.
Third, lurk a bit longer, get those offensive prowess reads down boss.
Fourth, be a Sport, don't take the down votes so seriously.
Fifth, no axed you to be Chief, Pal. Be a good little injun / savage / casino worker who sends me full frontal nudz.
You get that all that Friend? Guy, it's not that hard unless you try too hard.