Ken hates doing this
Comments
-
#2 is hilarious because when people respectfully disagree with Kim or Chris, they get banned
Also, I guess calls for genocides are allowed -
The Throbber respectfully disagrees with Kimmy's six degrees of authoritarianism.whatshouldicareabout said:#2 is hilarious because when people respectfully disagree with Kim or Chris, they get banned
Also, I guess calls for genocides are allowed
Fuck off, Kimmy.
-
Some think it's funny. We don't.
-
Name calling and personal attacks is half of the HH posts
-
The other half is threadjacking. If a thread stays on subject for 5 posts, it's a miracleFireCohen said:Name calling and personal attacks is half of the HH posts
-
"Many subscribers are professionals and only have a few minutes out their day (sic) to get what they are looking for."
Imagine your schedule being that tight and still visiting Ken's message boards -
so what are you allowed to post about there?
-
I saw no mention of “twisters.”🤷♂️
-
Rule 1
Race to iDawg - let people write fuck and we'll rule the internets
Pretty fucking basic -
What does everyone think about Purdue?
-
Brought back memories of this masterpiece: https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/103266/right-on-cue/p1
-
pretty cool how he allows calls for genocide by not saying “no calls for genocide.”
must be nice over there, wouldn’t know, been IP b& for years. -
No mention of rule 7…hmmmm
-
Rule 1 is an important differentiator between us° and the genocidal cesspool that is Dwagmen.whatshouldicareabout said:#2 is hilarious because when people respectfully disagree with Kim or Chris, they get banned
Also, I guess calls for genocides are allowed -
That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard kys you cross-eyed sheep shaggerFireCohen said:Name calling and personal attacks is half of the HH posts
-
Thinking about resubscribing, but want to have the right screen name beforehand.
Possibilities so far:
@LemonPartyTrio
@2inchKim
@FatFartingFetters
-
At this point how many "Times of Year" to clamp down or some shit does that site have?
-
Almost knocked so-called tunnel expert into the tunnel. Just sayin.whlinder said:so what are you allowed to post about there?
-
Can we? ask if Ken is planning to leave his Starter jacket in the new AD's office?
-
I feel sad that so many of you guysm suffered under Kim's Napoleon complex tyranny for so long.
That site sucked.
-
They will make a good rival for Washington. Close to the same levelBob_C said:What does everyone think about Purdue?
-
I don’t. It’s a free country (allegedly).YellowSnow said:I feel sad that so many of you guysm suffered under Kim's Napoleon complex tyranny for so long.
That site sucked. -
Side two of Led Zeppelin IV? Great side but how many skirts does that really lift? I've always wanted to ask.Baseman said: -
Well, I'm grateful for the half brain patriots that broke away to start the site that led to this shit hole. I'd never have become a CFB message board shit post otherwise. Dawgman bored me to tears and I have up after a months.coronabruin said:
I don’t. It’s a free country (allegedly).YellowSnow said:I feel sad that so many of you guysm suffered under Kim's Napoleon complex tyranny for so long.
That site sucked. -
NO ONE does not equal EVERY ONE. Its not even a subset of EVERY ONE.B1GJames said:
They will make a good rival for Washington. Close to the same levelBob_C said:What does everyone think about Purdue?
You are closing in on rarified air - since you are one of the stupidest motherfuckers to ever poast hear. Congrats. -
Doesn't pass the sniff test.dtd said:Some think it's funny. We don't.
-
81?WoolleyDoog said:At this point how many "Times of Year" to clamp down or some shit does that site have?
-
the nice thing about the scout boards was how easy it was to go raid other teams boards.YellowSnow said:I feel sad that so many of you guysm suffered under Kim's Napoleon complex tyranny for so long.
That site sucked.
I got banned from the Minnesota Vikings board once.
simpler tims I suppose.
