When you've lost Butterball
Comments
-
What "conspiracy"? You keep talking about it like you did the Russian conspiracy . No one has yet to see said "conspiracy". Just more of your made-up bullshit to try and eliminate a candidate you hate.
-
I know reading the indictment is a bridge too far for you gals. It answers your question, Atl.
-
So Barr is back in good graces today?
So hard to keep up -
Barr is desperately trying to reverse all the damage that he did to what was once a reasonably good, though mixed, reputation.
-
OkHHusky said:Barr is desperately trying to reverse all the damage that he did to what was once a reasonably good, though mixed, reputation.
I have some bad news for you -
What’s the conspiracy?HHusky said:“Free speech doesn’t give you the right to engage in a fraudulent conspiracy.”
Still sticking by Goldman’s lies, asshole? -
Read the indictment. Smith omitted exculpatory statements by Trump in his speech in clueing “peacefully” going to the Capitol. Flat out took a half-quote and slapped it into an indictment. Lawfare 101 and also misleading the court, not that it matters with this judge.HHusky said:I know reading the indictment is a bridge too far for you gals. It answers your question, Atl.
He’s a corrupt piece of shit like you are who’s been rebuked by SCOTUS and also jurors. Now wonder you adore him, Ethel.
-
ooopsEverettChris said:HHusky said:“Free speech doesn’t give you the right to engage in a fraudulent conspiracy.”
Still sticking by Goldman’s lies, asshole? -
“the narrative I was told”HHusky said:
ooopsEverettChris said:HHusky said:“Free speech doesn’t give you the right to engage in a fraudulent conspiracy.”
Still sticking by Goldman’s lies, asshole?
You’re such a hack. -
don't be a bad sportEverettChris said:
“the narrative I was told”HHusky said:
ooopsEverettChris said:HHusky said:“Free speech doesn’t give you the right to engage in a fraudulent conspiracy.”
Still sticking by Goldman’s lies, asshole?
You’re such a hack.
you're probably good at something . . . maybe -
Barr has said in the past that Trump has the right policies but he’s the wrong guy to actually deliver them.
He ain’t wrong. -
Keep looking46XiJCAB said:Barr has said in the past that Trump has the right policies but he’s the wrong guy to actually deliver them.
He ain’t wrong.
Let us know when you find someone -
The adult in the campaign RDS. But he doesn’t make you tingle. Apparently.RaceBannon said:
Keep looking46XiJCAB said:Barr has said in the past that Trump has the right policies but he’s the wrong guy to actually deliver them.
He ain’t wrong.
Let us know when you find someone -
Is he going to slit my throat?46XiJCAB said:
The adult in the campaign RDS. But he doesn’t make you tingle. Apparently.RaceBannon said:
Keep looking46XiJCAB said:Barr has said in the past that Trump has the right policies but he’s the wrong guy to actually deliver them.
He ain’t wrong.
Let us know when you find someone -
Ronald watched one too many Sopranos’ episodes.RaceBannon said:
Is he going to slit my throat?46XiJCAB said:
The adult in the campaign RDS. But he doesn’t make you tingle. Apparently.RaceBannon said:
Keep looking46XiJCAB said:Barr has said in the past that Trump has the right policies but he’s the wrong guy to actually deliver them.
He ain’t wrong.
Let us know when you find someone -
You sound like a judge or an attorney, or, at the very least, a legal scholar. I’m sure you’re one of those three.EverettChris said:
Read the indictment. Smith omitted exculpatory statements by Trump in his speech in clueing “peacefully” going to the Capitol. Flat out took a half-quote and slapped it into an indictment. Lawfare 101 and also misleading the court, not that it matters with this judge.HHusky said:I know reading the indictment is a bridge too far for you gals. It answers your question, Atl.
He’s a corrupt piece of shit like you are who’s been rebuked by SCOTUS and also jurors. Now wonder you adore him, Ethel. -
You mean like the "indictment" against Trump and Russian collusion? Ukraine?HHusky said:I know reading the indictment is a bridge too far for you gals. It answers your question, Atl.
LOL you are pathetic.
-
Nope.RaceBannon said:
Is he going to slit my throat?46XiJCAB said:
The adult in the campaign RDS. But he doesn’t make you tingle. Apparently.RaceBannon said:
Keep looking46XiJCAB said:Barr has said in the past that Trump has the right policies but he’s the wrong guy to actually deliver them.
He ain’t wrong.
Let us know when you find someone
Unless you're as dumb as a Biden voter, then yes 100% you better believe it. -
The media said so46XiJCAB said:
Nope.RaceBannon said:
Is he going to slit my throat?46XiJCAB said:
The adult in the campaign RDS. But he doesn’t make you tingle. Apparently.RaceBannon said:
Keep looking46XiJCAB said:Barr has said in the past that Trump has the right policies but he’s the wrong guy to actually deliver them.
He ain’t wrong.
Let us know when you find someone
Unless you're as dumb as a Biden voter, then yes 100% you better believe it.
You're the one that swallows everything they put out about Trump
I was told DeSantis would know how to handle it
2 months and he's toast -
Just how many times has Trump lost butter ball? Was it news the first 5 times you shit all over here with the same poast? Does anyone here respect this fat POS deepstater?
-
Did we ever have Butterball?
-
Butterball refused to prosecute Andrew McCabe after a lock solid criminal referral from IG Horowitz and mounds of evidence of perjury. Andy’s punishment was a book deal.Bob_C said:Did we ever have Butterball?
Former FBI official Andrew McCabe has book deal
https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/09/18/former-fbi-official-andrew-mccabe-has-book-deal.html
I suppose it could be argued that a conviction of a Democrat with a DC jury would be impossible because today’s Dems lack all honesty and integrity, but Butterball didn’t even try to see just to show America how insane the Left is these days. -
The Indictment mostly reads as an Op Ed in the Post. The only possible crime committed was tricking people into being false electors. And there’s a to of burden of proof on that. The rest is opinion not fact.
-
But were they real electors? No. Dems have tried to turn electors in previous elections, but they didn't. They took it all the way to the Supreme Court in 2000.Kaepsknee said:The Indictment mostly reads as an Op Ed in the Post. The only possible crime committed was tricking people into being false electors. And there’s a to of burden of proof on that. The rest is opinion not fact.
-
Fuck offRaceBannon said:
The media said so46XiJCAB said:
Nope.RaceBannon said:
Is he going to slit my throat?46XiJCAB said:
The adult in the campaign RDS. But he doesn’t make you tingle. Apparently.RaceBannon said:
Keep looking46XiJCAB said:Barr has said in the past that Trump has the right policies but he’s the wrong guy to actually deliver them.
He ain’t wrong.
Let us know when you find someone
Unless you're as dumb as a Biden voter, then yes 100% you better believe it.
You're the one that swallows everything they put out about Trump
I was told DeSantis would know how to handle it
2 months and he's toast
I told you what Barr said during an interview. He ain’t wrong. -
Admittedly I don’t know much about how there could be false electors. You’re either an elector or you aren’t, right?WestlinnDuck said:
But were they real electors? No. Dems have tried to turn electors in previous elections, but they didn't. They took it all the way to the Supreme Court in 2000.Kaepsknee said:The Indictment mostly reads as an Op Ed in the Post. The only possible crime committed was tricking people into being false electors. And there’s a to of burden of proof on that. The rest is opinion not fact.
