Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Joe Biden Faces CRIMINAL EXPOSURE In Devon Archer Testimony, Rand Paul Files For Fauci ARREST AGAIN
Comments
-
I don't remember who reported this. But it will either be borne out by the transcript or it won't.Bob_C said:
This is what you made up.HHusky said:
"I would urge Chairman Comer, rather than to continue to send out misinformation about what transpired in the transcribed interview, to actually put out the transcript, which he can do as soon as he wants," Rep. Dan Goldman, D-N.Y., said on CNN.Bob_C said:
Yeah, he made that up.EverettChris said:
Huh? How would Archer have any knowledge of this wild opinion of yours?HHusky said:
Perhaps. Did they also predict Archer would testify that the firing of the Ukranian prosecutor was not in Burima's best interests?Bob_C said:
Seems like what was predicted is what was said today.HHusky said:
Is that all the NYP claimed he was going to say?Bob_C said:
So you were wrong.HHusky said:
on the phoneBob_C said:
Just last week you were saying that Archer wouldn't testify when the NY Post article came out describing how he was going to say Joe was on the phone 20 times.HHusky said:
Race had Archer exonerating Joe all along, right?RaceBannon said:
Click your heels three times when you say that and it might come trueHHusky said:
bombshell
If so, I extend my sincere apologies. Why were you girls even excited about this?
https://nypost.com/2023/07/23/hunter-biden-put-then-vp-dad-joe-on-the-phone-with-business-associates-at-least-2-dozen-times-ex-partner-devon-archer-to-testify/
Flailing about and lying to the end. It’s what Lennie does.
"Because I think anyone who reads that transcript – and I was there, so I can tell you what happened – would come away from that believing that Joe Biden had nothing to do with Hunter Biden’s business dealings, derived no benefit from it, received no money, and did not know about anything that Hunter Biden was doing, nor did he ever discuss it with Hunter Biden or the business associates," he said.
Let's see the transcript, ladies.
Should be easy to prove otherwise.
The usual suspects are trying to make this dud a bombshell. -
The starting position as always with you is that you’re a shameless liar and we go from there.HHusky said:
I don't remember who reported this. But it will either be borne out by the transcript or it won't.Bob_C said:
This is what you made up.HHusky said:
"I would urge Chairman Comer, rather than to continue to send out misinformation about what transpired in the transcribed interview, to actually put out the transcript, which he can do as soon as he wants," Rep. Dan Goldman, D-N.Y., said on CNN.Bob_C said:
Yeah, he made that up.EverettChris said:
Huh? How would Archer have any knowledge of this wild opinion of yours?HHusky said:
Perhaps. Did they also predict Archer would testify that the firing of the Ukranian prosecutor was not in Burima's best interests?Bob_C said:
Seems like what was predicted is what was said today.HHusky said:
Is that all the NYP claimed he was going to say?Bob_C said:
So you were wrong.HHusky said:
on the phoneBob_C said:
Just last week you were saying that Archer wouldn't testify when the NY Post article came out describing how he was going to say Joe was on the phone 20 times.HHusky said:
Race had Archer exonerating Joe all along, right?RaceBannon said:
Click your heels three times when you say that and it might come trueHHusky said:
bombshell
If so, I extend my sincere apologies. Why were you girls even excited about this?
https://nypost.com/2023/07/23/hunter-biden-put-then-vp-dad-joe-on-the-phone-with-business-associates-at-least-2-dozen-times-ex-partner-devon-archer-to-testify/
Flailing about and lying to the end. It’s what Lennie does.
"Because I think anyone who reads that transcript – and I was there, so I can tell you what happened – would come away from that believing that Joe Biden had nothing to do with Hunter Biden’s business dealings, derived no benefit from it, received no money, and did not know about anything that Hunter Biden was doing, nor did he ever discuss it with Hunter Biden or the business associates," he said.
Let's see the transcript, ladies.
Should be easy to prove otherwise.
The usual suspects are trying to make this dud a bombshell. -
I confess I don't think about you as much as you think about me.EverettChris said:
The starting position as always with you is that you’re a shameless liar and we go from there.HHusky said:
I don't remember who reported this. But it will either be borne out by the transcript or it won't.Bob_C said:
This is what you made up.HHusky said:
"I would urge Chairman Comer, rather than to continue to send out misinformation about what transpired in the transcribed interview, to actually put out the transcript, which he can do as soon as he wants," Rep. Dan Goldman, D-N.Y., said on CNN.Bob_C said:
Yeah, he made that up.EverettChris said:
Huh? How would Archer have any knowledge of this wild opinion of yours?HHusky said:
Perhaps. Did they also predict Archer would testify that the firing of the Ukranian prosecutor was not in Burima's best interests?Bob_C said:
Seems like what was predicted is what was said today.HHusky said:
Is that all the NYP claimed he was going to say?Bob_C said:
So you were wrong.HHusky said:
on the phoneBob_C said:
Just last week you were saying that Archer wouldn't testify when the NY Post article came out describing how he was going to say Joe was on the phone 20 times.HHusky said:
Race had Archer exonerating Joe all along, right?RaceBannon said:
Click your heels three times when you say that and it might come trueHHusky said:
bombshell
If so, I extend my sincere apologies. Why were you girls even excited about this?
https://nypost.com/2023/07/23/hunter-biden-put-then-vp-dad-joe-on-the-phone-with-business-associates-at-least-2-dozen-times-ex-partner-devon-archer-to-testify/
Flailing about and lying to the end. It’s what Lennie does.
"Because I think anyone who reads that transcript – and I was there, so I can tell you what happened – would come away from that believing that Joe Biden had nothing to do with Hunter Biden’s business dealings, derived no benefit from it, received no money, and did not know about anything that Hunter Biden was doing, nor did he ever discuss it with Hunter Biden or the business associates," he said.
Let's see the transcript, ladies.
Should be easy to prove otherwise.
The usual suspects are trying to make this dud a bombshell.
living with that guilt -
Thanks for confirming.HHusky said:
I don't remember who reported this. But it will either be borne out by the transcript or it won't.Bob_C said:
This is what you made up.HHusky said:
"I would urge Chairman Comer, rather than to continue to send out misinformation about what transpired in the transcribed interview, to actually put out the transcript, which he can do as soon as he wants," Rep. Dan Goldman, D-N.Y., said on CNN.Bob_C said:
Yeah, he made that up.EverettChris said:
Huh? How would Archer have any knowledge of this wild opinion of yours?HHusky said:
Perhaps. Did they also predict Archer would testify that the firing of the Ukranian prosecutor was not in Burima's best interests?Bob_C said:
Seems like what was predicted is what was said today.HHusky said:
Is that all the NYP claimed he was going to say?Bob_C said:
So you were wrong.HHusky said:
on the phoneBob_C said:
Just last week you were saying that Archer wouldn't testify when the NY Post article came out describing how he was going to say Joe was on the phone 20 times.HHusky said:
Race had Archer exonerating Joe all along, right?RaceBannon said:
Click your heels three times when you say that and it might come trueHHusky said:
bombshell
If so, I extend my sincere apologies. Why were you girls even excited about this?
https://nypost.com/2023/07/23/hunter-biden-put-then-vp-dad-joe-on-the-phone-with-business-associates-at-least-2-dozen-times-ex-partner-devon-archer-to-testify/
Flailing about and lying to the end. It’s what Lennie does.
"Because I think anyone who reads that transcript – and I was there, so I can tell you what happened – would come away from that believing that Joe Biden had nothing to do with Hunter Biden’s business dealings, derived no benefit from it, received no money, and did not know about anything that Hunter Biden was doing, nor did he ever discuss it with Hunter Biden or the business associates," he said.
Let's see the transcript, ladies.
Should be easy to prove otherwise.
The usual suspects are trying to make this dud a bombshell. -
Dishonest, Low IQ trolls on Internet forums such as you fascinate me. I never understand what you get from it other than attention you aren’t getting in your real life.HHusky said:
I confess I don't think about you as much as you think about me.EverettChris said:
The starting position as always with you is that you’re a shameless liar and we go from there.HHusky said:
I don't remember who reported this. But it will either be borne out by the transcript or it won't.Bob_C said:
This is what you made up.HHusky said:
"I would urge Chairman Comer, rather than to continue to send out misinformation about what transpired in the transcribed interview, to actually put out the transcript, which he can do as soon as he wants," Rep. Dan Goldman, D-N.Y., said on CNN.Bob_C said:
Yeah, he made that up.EverettChris said:
Huh? How would Archer have any knowledge of this wild opinion of yours?HHusky said:
Perhaps. Did they also predict Archer would testify that the firing of the Ukranian prosecutor was not in Burima's best interests?Bob_C said:
Seems like what was predicted is what was said today.HHusky said:
Is that all the NYP claimed he was going to say?Bob_C said:
So you were wrong.HHusky said:
on the phoneBob_C said:
Just last week you were saying that Archer wouldn't testify when the NY Post article came out describing how he was going to say Joe was on the phone 20 times.HHusky said:
Race had Archer exonerating Joe all along, right?RaceBannon said:
Click your heels three times when you say that and it might come trueHHusky said:
bombshell
If so, I extend my sincere apologies. Why were you girls even excited about this?
https://nypost.com/2023/07/23/hunter-biden-put-then-vp-dad-joe-on-the-phone-with-business-associates-at-least-2-dozen-times-ex-partner-devon-archer-to-testify/
Flailing about and lying to the end. It’s what Lennie does.
"Because I think anyone who reads that transcript – and I was there, so I can tell you what happened – would come away from that believing that Joe Biden had nothing to do with Hunter Biden’s business dealings, derived no benefit from it, received no money, and did not know about anything that Hunter Biden was doing, nor did he ever discuss it with Hunter Biden or the business associates," he said.
Let's see the transcript, ladies.
Should be easy to prove otherwise.
The usual suspects are trying to make this dud a bombshell.
living with that guilt -
I am fascinatingEverettChris said:
Dishonest, Low IQ trolls on Internet forums such as you fascinate me. I never understand what you get from it other than attention you aren’t getting in your real life.HHusky said:
I confess I don't think about you as much as you think about me.EverettChris said:
The starting position as always with you is that you’re a shameless liar and we go from there.HHusky said:
I don't remember who reported this. But it will either be borne out by the transcript or it won't.Bob_C said:
This is what you made up.HHusky said:
"I would urge Chairman Comer, rather than to continue to send out misinformation about what transpired in the transcribed interview, to actually put out the transcript, which he can do as soon as he wants," Rep. Dan Goldman, D-N.Y., said on CNN.Bob_C said:
Yeah, he made that up.EverettChris said:
Huh? How would Archer have any knowledge of this wild opinion of yours?HHusky said:
Perhaps. Did they also predict Archer would testify that the firing of the Ukranian prosecutor was not in Burima's best interests?Bob_C said:
Seems like what was predicted is what was said today.HHusky said:
Is that all the NYP claimed he was going to say?Bob_C said:
So you were wrong.HHusky said:
on the phoneBob_C said:
Just last week you were saying that Archer wouldn't testify when the NY Post article came out describing how he was going to say Joe was on the phone 20 times.HHusky said:
Race had Archer exonerating Joe all along, right?RaceBannon said:
Click your heels three times when you say that and it might come trueHHusky said:
bombshell
If so, I extend my sincere apologies. Why were you girls even excited about this?
https://nypost.com/2023/07/23/hunter-biden-put-then-vp-dad-joe-on-the-phone-with-business-associates-at-least-2-dozen-times-ex-partner-devon-archer-to-testify/
Flailing about and lying to the end. It’s what Lennie does.
"Because I think anyone who reads that transcript – and I was there, so I can tell you what happened – would come away from that believing that Joe Biden had nothing to do with Hunter Biden’s business dealings, derived no benefit from it, received no money, and did not know about anything that Hunter Biden was doing, nor did he ever discuss it with Hunter Biden or the business associates," he said.
Let's see the transcript, ladies.
Should be easy to prove otherwise.
The usual suspects are trying to make this dud a bombshell.
living with that guilt
agreed -
In a tweet summarizing Archer’s testimony, the Republican majority on the House Judiciary Committee claimed that Archer had testified that Burisma was spooked because Shokin was investigating them for corruption. Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.), who was present for the interview, offered a very different assessment when speaking to reporters shortly afterward.
“Burisma believed that they had the prosecutor general Shokin in their pocket, they had control over him,” he said, “and they were concerned that if he was removed from office, that that would be very bad for Burisma.”
But by all means, let's get the transcript and decide who is right. -
That is a full blown lie and an incredibly bad oneHHusky said:In a tweet summarizing Archer’s testimony, the Republican majority on the House Judiciary Committee claimed that Archer had testified that Burisma was spooked because Shokin was investigating them for corruption. Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.), who was present for the interview, offered a very different assessment when speaking to reporters shortly afterward.
“Burisma believed that they had the prosecutor general Shokin in their pocket, they had control over him,” he said, “and they were concerned that if he was removed from office, that that would be very bad for Burisma.”
But by all means, let's get the transcript and decide who is right. -
Race ain't waiting for the transcript. He just knows stuff.RaceBannon said:
That is a full blown lie and an incredibly bad oneHHusky said:In a tweet summarizing Archer’s testimony, the Republican majority on the House Judiciary Committee claimed that Archer had testified that Burisma was spooked because Shokin was investigating them for corruption. Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.), who was present for the interview, offered a very different assessment when speaking to reporters shortly afterward.
“Burisma believed that they had the prosecutor general Shokin in their pocket, they had control over him,” he said, “and they were concerned that if he was removed from office, that that would be very bad for Burisma.”
But by all means, let's get the transcript and decide who is right. -
I know how you guys lie your ass off
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff says he has no regrets insisting there is evidence of collusion between former President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign and Russia.
The California Democrat was challenged this week to defend some of his most controversial comments during the Trump administration, especially after special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation was unable to find a criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia.
Through 2019, Schiff refused to back down, even in the face of Republicans calling for his resignation as intelligence panel chairman, but the issue came up again in an interview with CBS News's chief Washington correspondent, Major Garrett, amid reports he is lobbying Gov. Gavin Newsom to be California's next attorney general and as Democrats gear up for Trump's second impeachment trial next week.
