Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Why has Sark been shielded?

I was reading General Sweatpants post (A+), and it spurred me to start this thread. When Sark arrived at Washington I felt that we would be subjected to all the misques that his learning curve would entail. I referred to his coaching as a training wheels course where eventually he would be free peddling, him having learned the head coaching craft. But when year one became year three and we were stuck in a vortex similar to "Groundhog Day" the movie, I figured he had peaked and it was time to re-boot. And then came the excuses and what grew into a bullet proof shield. Sure, many were grumbling and speaking out, and more as the results remained the same. And the shield became more visible. And then Pat Haden hired Sark away. But why would USC, Pat Haden, the Sports media, and thousands of intelligent and knowledgeable fans across the land shield a mediocre coaching talent like Sark? Has this been a mass hysteria- psychological event we have witnessed, that no amount of shouting out warnings could get through? How could his accomplishments have been taken as anything short of a disaster? Why was this guy shielded and why is he still being shielded?
«13

Comments

  • Vegasdawg
    Vegasdawg Member Posts: 370
    OK, but why has he been shielded? It's not logical to have Sark as head coach of any major college football team. Am I missing something?
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    edited September 2014
    You ask a great question.

    There's a book called "Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds," which gets at the phenomenon you are describing. Me, I think much of this nonsense is rooted in tribalism.
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,381

    Armenian Mafia.

    This, also too, this.
  • Meek
    Meek Member Posts: 7,031
    if you are prepared to suck up to the media and include them, then you're doing all the heavy lifting for them and they will love you for it... until they don't of course. there will always be the odd reporter who tries to really critique a slacker like Sark, but for the networks like ESPN that have to generate content so frequently, they absolutely adore having a guy like Sark and thus will not burn him at the stake... until they do, of course. Sark is obviously a savvy media type who has turned this into a cash cow.
  • Meek
    Meek Member Posts: 7,031
    AZDuck said:

    You ask a great question.

    There's a book called "Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds," which gets at the phenomenon you are describing. Me, I think much of this nonsense is rooted in tribalism.

    i doubt the madness of crowds and daffodil mania and mob mentality has anything to do with this.