So wait, it's illegal to use the coercive power of Government to prevent free speech?
Comments
-
Former White House press secretary Jen Psaki pushed social-media platforms to censor COVID-19 information coming from conservative voices starting in May 2021, a federal judge ruled Wednesday, the Daily Caller reported.
U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty of Louisiana granted an injunction barring President Joe Biden's administration from contacting tech companies to request the censorship of some users.
If the allegations made by plaintiffs are true, the present case arguably involves the most massive attack against free speech in United States' history," the injunction read. "In their attempts to suppress alleged disinformation, the federal government, and particularly the defendants named here, are alleged to have blatantly ignored the First Amendment's right to free speech."
Doughty cited "substantial evidence" of a far-reaching censorship campaign. He wrote the "evidence produced thus far depicts an almost dystopian scenario. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a period perhaps best characterized by widespread doubt and uncertainty, the United States government seems to have assumed a role similar to an Orwellian 'Ministry of Truth'
So hard to see what's prohibited 🚫 -
I remember when the leftards were in a state of shock when Trump called out fake news as Fake News and this was supposed to be the end of free speech in America under the Hitler Trump. But having the government embedded with the social media companies and actually having them censor real accurate news as "disinformation" was just good civics.
-
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^This statement is falseHHusky said:
No one believes you, scudz.pawz said:
I've read it.HHusky said:
I've read the order. You haven't.RaceBannon said:H hates the First Amendment and loves government media
Most fascist pigs do
Good luck distinguishing what's allowed from what's prohibited, Madge. -
Yes, the judge wrote a butt hurt, nutty opinion too, but my comment was on his order. You haven't read it? It's like four pages. Good luck figuring out what it prohibits and what it allows.RaceBannon said:Former White House press secretary Jen Psaki pushed social-media platforms to censor COVID-19 information coming from conservative voices starting in May 2021, a federal judge ruled Wednesday, the Daily Caller reported.
U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty of Louisiana granted an injunction barring President Joe Biden's administration from contacting tech companies to request the censorship of some users.
If the allegations made by plaintiffs are true, the present case arguably involves the most massive attack against free speech in United States' history," the injunction read. "In their attempts to suppress alleged disinformation, the federal government, and particularly the defendants named here, are alleged to have blatantly ignored the First Amendment's right to free speech."
Doughty cited "substantial evidence" of a far-reaching censorship campaign. He wrote the "evidence produced thus far depicts an almost dystopian scenario. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a period perhaps best characterized by widespread doubt and uncertainty, the United States government seems to have assumed a role similar to an Orwellian 'Ministry of Truth'
So hard to see what's prohibited 🚫 -
I don't need luckHHusky said:
Yes, the judge wrote a butt hurt, nutty opinion too, but my comment was on his order. You haven't read it? It's like four pages. Good luck figuring out what it prohibits and what it allows.RaceBannon said:Former White House press secretary Jen Psaki pushed social-media platforms to censor COVID-19 information coming from conservative voices starting in May 2021, a federal judge ruled Wednesday, the Daily Caller reported.
U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty of Louisiana granted an injunction barring President Joe Biden's administration from contacting tech companies to request the censorship of some users.
If the allegations made by plaintiffs are true, the present case arguably involves the most massive attack against free speech in United States' history," the injunction read. "In their attempts to suppress alleged disinformation, the federal government, and particularly the defendants named here, are alleged to have blatantly ignored the First Amendment's right to free speech."
Doughty cited "substantial evidence" of a far-reaching censorship campaign. He wrote the "evidence produced thus far depicts an almost dystopian scenario. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a period perhaps best characterized by widespread doubt and uncertainty, the United States government seems to have assumed a role similar to an Orwellian 'Ministry of Truth'
So hard to see what's prohibited 🚫
Yeah the constitution is so nutty
Fuck off fascist -
I covered exactly what it says. Business as usual. The fascism you support and continue to vote for.HHusky said:
Yes, the judge wrote a butt hurt, nutty opinion too, but my comment was on his order. You haven't read it? It's like four pages. Good luck figuring out what it prohibits and what it allows.RaceBannon said:Former White House press secretary Jen Psaki pushed social-media platforms to censor COVID-19 information coming from conservative voices starting in May 2021, a federal judge ruled Wednesday, the Daily Caller reported.
U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty of Louisiana granted an injunction barring President Joe Biden's administration from contacting tech companies to request the censorship of some users.
If the allegations made by plaintiffs are true, the present case arguably involves the most massive attack against free speech in United States' history," the injunction read. "In their attempts to suppress alleged disinformation, the federal government, and particularly the defendants named here, are alleged to have blatantly ignored the First Amendment's right to free speech."
Doughty cited "substantial evidence" of a far-reaching censorship campaign. He wrote the "evidence produced thus far depicts an almost dystopian scenario. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a period perhaps best characterized by widespread doubt and uncertainty, the United States government seems to have assumed a role similar to an Orwellian 'Ministry of Truth'
So hard to see what's prohibited 🚫
Congrats, fascist.
-
The injunction is an embarrassment. The judge is off his rocker.pawz said:
I covered exactly what it says. Business as usual. The fascism you support and continue to vote for.HHusky said:
Yes, the judge wrote a butt hurt, nutty opinion too, but my comment was on his order. You haven't read it? It's like four pages. Good luck figuring out what it prohibits and what it allows.RaceBannon said:Former White House press secretary Jen Psaki pushed social-media platforms to censor COVID-19 information coming from conservative voices starting in May 2021, a federal judge ruled Wednesday, the Daily Caller reported.
U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty of Louisiana granted an injunction barring President Joe Biden's administration from contacting tech companies to request the censorship of some users.
If the allegations made by plaintiffs are true, the present case arguably involves the most massive attack against free speech in United States' history," the injunction read. "In their attempts to suppress alleged disinformation, the federal government, and particularly the defendants named here, are alleged to have blatantly ignored the First Amendment's right to free speech."
Doughty cited "substantial evidence" of a far-reaching censorship campaign. He wrote the "evidence produced thus far depicts an almost dystopian scenario. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a period perhaps best characterized by widespread doubt and uncertainty, the United States government seems to have assumed a role similar to an Orwellian 'Ministry of Truth'
So hard to see what's prohibited 🚫
Congrats, fascist.
Where will you be when he gets bitch slapped? -
Your rush down the rabbit hole speaks volumesHHusky said:
The injunction is an embarrassment. The judge is off his rocker.pawz said:
I covered exactly what it says. Business as usual. The fascism you support and continue to vote for.HHusky said:
Yes, the judge wrote a butt hurt, nutty opinion too, but my comment was on his order. You haven't read it? It's like four pages. Good luck figuring out what it prohibits and what it allows.RaceBannon said:Former White House press secretary Jen Psaki pushed social-media platforms to censor COVID-19 information coming from conservative voices starting in May 2021, a federal judge ruled Wednesday, the Daily Caller reported.
U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty of Louisiana granted an injunction barring President Joe Biden's administration from contacting tech companies to request the censorship of some users.
If the allegations made by plaintiffs are true, the present case arguably involves the most massive attack against free speech in United States' history," the injunction read. "In their attempts to suppress alleged disinformation, the federal government, and particularly the defendants named here, are alleged to have blatantly ignored the First Amendment's right to free speech."
Doughty cited "substantial evidence" of a far-reaching censorship campaign. He wrote the "evidence produced thus far depicts an almost dystopian scenario. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a period perhaps best characterized by widespread doubt and uncertainty, the United States government seems to have assumed a role similar to an Orwellian 'Ministry of Truth'
So hard to see what's prohibited 🚫
Congrats, fascist.
Where will you be when he gets bitch slapped?
As does
READ THE REPORT
Get some fresh material Nancy -




