Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

John Bolton Trump hater on indictment

2

Comments

  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,259 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Reasonable argument. Doesn't address the tax issues.

    What tax issues might that be? I didn't see any tax code charges. Enlighten us.
    Presenting the reimbursement as a fee for legal services has obvious income tax implications.
    So are NDA settlements not tax deductible then?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,601 Standard Supporter
    Bob_C said:



    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Reasonable argument. Doesn't address the tax issues.

    What tax issues might that be? I didn't see any tax code charges. Enlighten us.
    Presenting the reimbursement as a fee for legal services has obvious income tax implications.
    So are NDA settlements not tax deductible then?
    Since she has been ordered to pay Trump 600+K I wouldn't know.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,259 Founders Club
    Sledog said:

    Bob_C said:



    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Reasonable argument. Doesn't address the tax issues.

    What tax issues might that be? I didn't see any tax code charges. Enlighten us.
    Presenting the reimbursement as a fee for legal services has obvious income tax implications.
    So are NDA settlements not tax deductible then?
    Since she has been ordered to pay Trump 600+K I wouldn't know.
    Shhh, it's a trap.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,336
    Bob_C said:



    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Reasonable argument. Doesn't address the tax issues.

    What tax issues might that be? I didn't see any tax code charges. Enlighten us.
    Presenting the reimbursement as a fee for legal services has obvious income tax implications.
    So are NDA settlements not tax deductible then?
    Business expense? I wish I'd thought of that before my audit.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,336
    Sledog said:

    No dodge the guy with no charges based in reality didn't mention the REAL charges you just uncovered.

    What part of "Straight out of yesterday's unsealed filings." was too complicated for you?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Reasonable argument. Doesn't address the tax issues.

    What tax issues might that be? I didn't see any tax code charges. Enlighten us.
    Presenting the reimbursement as a fee for legal services has obvious income tax implications.
    For which you'd normally pay a fine and any unpaid taxes. How did I know that the Dazzler would be defending that craptastic indictment.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,336
    Sledog said:

    Bob_C said:



    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Reasonable argument. Doesn't address the tax issues.

    What tax issues might that be? I didn't see any tax code charges. Enlighten us.
    Presenting the reimbursement as a fee for legal services has obvious income tax implications.
    So are NDA settlements not tax deductible then?
    Since she has been ordered to pay Trump 600+K I wouldn't know.
    He must be great in bed.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    No dodge the guy with no charges based in reality didn't mention the REAL charges you just uncovered.

    What part of "Straight out of yesterday's unsealed filings." was too complicated for you?
    Can you cite for me how this misdemeanor rises to the level of a felony. What's the actual crime Trump has committed here? Cite it for me.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,908 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Reasonable argument. Doesn't address the tax issues.

    What tax issues might that be? I didn't see any tax code charges. Enlighten us.
    Presenting the reimbursement as a fee for legal services has obvious income tax implications.
    Yeah not charged.
    "The participants also took steps that mischaracterized, for tax purposes, the true nature of the payments made in furtherance of the scheme."

    sure
    NDA payments for sexual harassment were deductible in 2017. So, what was the scheme?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,259 Founders Club
    WestlinnDuck said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Reasonable argument. Doesn't address the tax issues.

    What tax issues might that be? I didn't see any tax code charges. Enlighten us.
    Presenting the reimbursement as a fee for legal services has obvious income tax implications.
    Yeah not charged.
    "The participants also took steps that mischaracterized, for tax purposes, the true nature of the payments made in furtherance of the scheme."

    sure
    NDA payments for sexual harassment were deductible in 2017. So, what was the scheme?
    Good work. That was the trap. They aren’t deductible in 2018-current.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter