College Football Live

brchco12 said:

Swaye said:

Mr_Peterman said:

Danny Kanell was talking about SC and how they have no identity. AKA can't sustain drives, 3 and outs, sets his D up to fail because Seven is more concerned with being seen as a genius OC. Kardashian is such a fucktard, first he was a pro style coach and then he tried to be Chip2.0 doing the hurry up when he doesn't know what the fuck he is doing. He is such a fraud wannabe genius, if anything he is Charlie Weis2.0

I know abundance and rant over. @DerekJohnson‌ - Fight (text) On bored would be awesome with a cover photo of @Brentwood_Bob‌

You are right about one thing...Sark's weak ass attempt at Chip 2.0 is downright comical.

I like to setup myself up for excuses by employing a hurry up offense that requires tremendous depth on both sides of the ball, but then piss and moan about how thin I am after sanctions.

Just fucking wait until he gets his guys depth in there!!!!11!!!!!1

Anyone who has tracked Patron long enough knows that the depth argument is complete utter bullshit. Most in america would assume that i'm speaking about actual numbers, but we all know here that regardless of roster size USC will always have depth issues. He could have 53 or 83 players and he'll still have 13 deep at WR, 12 at Rb and 13 Lineman(Offense and defense) on the roster. He just doesn't recruit meat(enter your best joke here). Unless he has a massive change in philosophy, which is doubtful, USC should be well versed in the depth chart argument.

Lastly, does anyone really believe that with all the skill players available to a school like USC that patron will all of a sudden grab for the whiskey? Skeve will be like ryan leaf and a bottle of Oxy. Give me another 5* WR or a 4* OL.....Give me the oxy...err, WR. This isn't going to change regardless of how many scholy's you give him.

Swaye said:

FreeChavez said:

brchco12 said:

Swaye said:

Mr_Peterman said:

Danny Kanell was talking about SC and how they have no identity. AKA can't sustain drives, 3 and outs, sets his D up to fail because Seven is more concerned with being seen as a genius OC. Kardashian is such a fucktard, first he was a pro style coach and then he tried to be Chip2.0 doing the hurry up when he doesn't know what the fuck he is doing. He is such a fraud wannabe genius, if anything he is Charlie Weis2.0

I know abundance and rant over. @DerekJohnson‌ - Fight (text) On bored would be awesome with a cover photo of @Brentwood_Bob‌

You are right about one thing...Sark's weak ass attempt at Chip 2.0 is downright comical.

I like to setup myself up for excuses by employing a hurry up offense that requires tremendous depth on both sides of the ball, but then piss and moan about how thin I am after sanctions.

Just fucking wait until he gets his guys depth in there!!!!11!!!!!1

Anyone who has tracked Patron long enough knows that the depth argument is complete utter bullshit. Most in america would assume that i'm speaking about actual numbers, but we all know here that regardless of roster size USC will always have depth issues. He could have 53 or 83 players and he'll still have 13 deep at WR, 12 at Rb and 13 Lineman(Offense and defense) on the roster. He just doesn't recruit meat(enter your best joke here). Unless he has a massive change in philosophy, which is doubtful, USC should be well versed in the depth chart argument.

Lastly, does anyone really believe that with all the skill players available to a school like USC that patron will all of a sudden grab for the whiskey? Skeve will be like ryan leaf and a bottle of Oxy. Give me another 5* WR or a 4* OL.....Give me the oxy...err, WR. This isn't going to change regardless of how many scholy's you give him.

I'm surprised some out here are surprised. What the fuck do lineman have to do with bubble screens?

So this stupid badge system just told me i needed to do something like @Tequilla‌ @Swaye‌ @dnc‌ @sarkinpinkstockings as a way to encourage discussion. Seems to be a problem on this board but I'll try anything once

FreeChavez said:

Swaye said:

FreeChavez said:

brchco12 said:

Swaye said:

Mr_Peterman said:

Danny Kanell was talking about SC and how they have no identity. AKA can't sustain drives, 3 and outs, sets his D up to fail because Seven is more concerned with being seen as a genius OC. Kardashian is such a fucktard, first he was a pro style coach and then he tried to be Chip2.0 doing the hurry up when he doesn't know what the fuck he is doing. He is such a fraud wannabe genius, if anything he is Charlie Weis2.0

I know abundance and rant over. @DerekJohnson‌ - Fight (text) On bored would be awesome with a cover photo of @Brentwood_Bob‌

You are right about one thing...Sark's weak ass attempt at Chip 2.0 is downright comical.

I like to setup myself up for excuses by employing a hurry up offense that requires tremendous depth on both sides of the ball, but then piss and moan about how thin I am after sanctions.

Just fucking wait until he gets his guys depth in there!!!!11!!!!!1

Anyone who has tracked Patron long enough knows that the depth argument is complete utter bullshit. Most in america would assume that i'm speaking about actual numbers, but we all know here that regardless of roster size USC will always have depth issues. He could have 53 or 83 players and he'll still have 13 deep at WR, 12 at Rb and 13 Lineman(Offense and defense) on the roster. He just doesn't recruit meat(enter your best joke here). Unless he has a massive change in philosophy, which is doubtful, USC should be well versed in the depth chart argument.

Lastly, does anyone really believe that with all the skill players available to a school like USC that patron will all of a sudden grab for the whiskey? Skeve will be like ryan leaf and a bottle of Oxy. Give me another 5* WR or a 4* OL.....Give me the oxy...err, WR. This isn't going to change regardless of how many scholy's you give him.

I'm surprised some out here are surprised. What the fuck do lineman have to do with bubble screens?

So this stupid badge system just told me i needed to do something like @Tequilla‌ @Swaye‌ @dnc‌ @sarkinpinkstockings as a way to encourage discussion. Seems to be a problem on this board but I'll try anything once

Try-sexual?