This isn't rocket surgery (LULZ)...
Guess what monkey nuts? 95-12 vs. 36-30. An .888 winning percentage buys you instant credibility. A barely over .500 record buys you a cup of coffee, if you have a buck to go with that useless shitstain of a record. I'm embarrassed I actually had to explain what the difference is between a two time BCS bowl winning coach, and a middling frat boy from SoCal.
If none of this makes sense to you, go back to Doogman, drink a gallon of kerosene, and deep throat a road flare.
Comments
-
This might be one of the best lines ever. Nominated.Swaye said:
If none of this makes sense to you, go back to Doogman, drink a gallon of kerosene, and deep throat a road flare. -
Let me know when Peterman loses a fucking game.
-
Should they also light the road flare? Or just as is? Thanks in advance.Swaye said:My sources are telling me that some fuckasses think it is bullshit that when Sark losses a single game, we all put on the "we told you so" act, while if Peterman losses a game, we will give him the benefit of the doubt. These booftwats claim that is unfair. We have different standards for these two guys.
Guess what monkey nuts? 95-12 vs. 36-30. An .888 winning percentage buys you instant credibility. A barely over .500 record buys you a cup of coffee, if you have a buck to go with that useless shitstain of a record. I'm embarrassed I actually had to explain what the difference is between a two time BCS bowl winning coach, and a middling frat boy from SoCal.
If none of this makes sense to you, go back to Doogman, drink a gallon of kerosene, and deep throat a road flare. -
If you are deep throating it right, the friction will ignite the kerosene.DerekJohnson said:
Should they also light the road flare? Or just as is? Thanks in advance.Swaye said:My sources are telling me that some fuckasses think it is bullshit that when Sark losses a single game, we all put on the "we told you so" act, while if Peterman losses a game, we will give him the benefit of the doubt. These booftwats claim that is unfair. We have different standards for these two guys.
Guess what monkey nuts? 95-12 vs. 36-30. An .888 winning percentage buys you instant credibility. A barely over .500 record buys you a cup of coffee, if you have a buck to go with that useless shitstain of a record. I'm embarrassed I actually had to explain what the difference is between a two time BCS bowl winning coach, and a middling frat boy from SoCal.
If none of this makes sense to you, go back to Doogman, drink a gallon of kerosene, and deep throat a road flare. -
You have to work the shaft to get the flare to pop.
-
H_D stop using your teeth.H_D said:
If you are deep throating it right, the friction will ignite the kerosene.DerekJohnson said:
Should they also light the road flare? Or just as is? Thanks in advance.Swaye said:My sources are telling me that some fuckasses think it is bullshit that when Sark losses a single game, we all put on the "we told you so" act, while if Peterman losses a game, we will give him the benefit of the doubt. These booftwats claim that is unfair. We have different standards for these two guys.
Guess what monkey nuts? 95-12 vs. 36-30. An .888 winning percentage buys you instant credibility. A barely over .500 record buys you a cup of coffee, if you have a buck to go with that useless shitstain of a record. I'm embarrassed I actually had to explain what the difference is between a two time BCS bowl winning coach, and a middling frat boy from SoCal.
If none of this makes sense to you, go back to Doogman, drink a gallon of kerosene, and deep throat a road flare. -
Only on HH will everyone key into the subtle nuances of how the road flare should be fellated to best induce combustion and doog death.
-
We take this kind of shit very seriously.Swaye said:Only on HH will everyone key into the subtle nuances of how the road flare should be fellated to best induce combustion and doog death.
-
Swaye said:
My sources are telling me that some fuckasses think it is bullshit that when Sark losses a single game, we all put on the "we told you so" act, while if Peterman losses a game, we will give him the benefit of the doubt. These booftwats claim that is unfair. We have different standards for these two guys.
Guess what monkey nuts? 95-12 vs. 36-30. An .888 winning percentage buys you instant credibility. A barely over .500 record gets you a job coaching one of the premier college football programs, if you have @PatHadenFS as the AD.buys you a cup of coffee, if you have a buck to go with that useless shitstain of a record. I'm embarrassed I actually had to explain what the difference is between a two time BCS bowl winning coach, and a middling frat boy from SoCal.
If none of this makes sense to you, go back to Doogman, drink a gallon of kerosene, and deep throat a road flare. -
This thread delivers
-
