Keeping it all in perspective

HHusky said:

"JESUS LIVES INSIDE DONALD TRUMP."

Explains the weight issues imo.

Unlike the dementia patient who supports late term abortion and mutilation of children. You voted for a husk of a human and a support staff that hates America. We didn't.

I'm sure you were OUTRAGED

SFGbob said:

I'm sure you were OUTRAGED

Did we call Trump the "Lightbringer"?


Shiva, who is one of three pre-eminent gods in the Hindu religion along with Brahma and Vishnu, is considered the destroyer of the world, which must end, metaphorically speaking, in order to be reborn as a more universalistic place. However, the god's purpose is not to foretell an apocalyptic ending.

Shiva is often manifested as Lord Nataraja, who has multiple arms and balances on one leg, and is viewed as dancing in a representation of the rhythm and harmony of life.

Blueduck said:

HHusky said:

Blueduck said:

I like how the link says lawyer and not Cohen to get clicks.

If you want to report a credible story use someone who's "opinions" are at least credible and unconflicted. (That's actually hard to do today)
That's why the link doesn't read
"Michael Cohen says...."
they know Cohen has credibility issues but they are baiting the reader/viewer in with an objective sounding headline and then BLAMO, they feed you the Narrative.
To be fair, most if not all the media does this to their advantage and they do it because people eat it up without using their brains these days.
Piss poor journalism!
We as an objective and informed audience have to be aware of this fraud and wade through the BS to discern the real truth.

"If you don't read the newspaper, you're uninformed,
If you do, you're misinformed"
Mark Twain

When I was being educated in public school systems we were taught about the dangers of "yellow journalism" and how in the 19th century and early 20th century newspapers used to be advocacy rags and routinely lied to promote their political views. Of course, this was all now fixed and newspapers were to be trusted because our reporters were now graduates of credentialed journalism programs and promoted "objectivity". This was always a lie. Look at the Pulitzer that the NY Times got in the 1930s for lying about the Soviet Union. Twain's quote is as true today with the MSM and it was back in his day.

WestlinnDuck said:

Blueduck said:

HHusky said:

Blueduck said:

I like how the link says lawyer and not Cohen to get clicks.

If you want to report a credible story use someone who's "opinions" are at least credible and unconflicted. (That's actually hard to do today)
That's why the link doesn't read
"Michael Cohen says...."
they know Cohen has credibility issues but they are baiting the reader/viewer in with an objective sounding headline and then BLAMO, they feed you the Narrative.
To be fair, most if not all the media does this to their advantage and they do it because people eat it up without using their brains these days.
Piss poor journalism!
We as an objective and informed audience have to be aware of this fraud and wade through the BS to discern the real truth.

"If you don't read the newspaper, you're uninformed,
If you do, you're misinformed"
Mark Twain

When I was being educated in public school systems we were taught about the dangers of "yellow journalism" and how in the 19th century and early 20th century newspapers used to be advocacy rags and routinely lied to promote their political views. Of course, this was all now fixed and newspapers were to be trusted because our reporters were now graduates of credentialed journalism programs and promoted "objectivity". This was always a lie. Look at the Pulitzer that the NY Times got in the 1930s for lying about the Soviet Union. Twain's quote is as true today with the MSM and it was back in his day.

What went from bad to worst was the 2012 Smith/Mundt modernization act that was snuck into the NDAA with deceptive language.
The US government is now free to openly use all forms of the media to promote Government made News designed for foreign information campaigns and feed it to the American public.
Essentially it made propaganda legal in the US and the government can send the script to outlets to disseminate to the public making them the bullhorn for government agenda.
The media doesn't ask questions anymore, they are state run and have "independent fact checkers" to verify facts of what they are given to report instead of being the independent bull dog fact checkers of our government like they were supposed to be.

Funny coincidence, or not funny, is the timing this was passed in relation to the 2013-14 color revolution and the Ousting of elected Ukrainian president Poroshenko and subsequent annexation of Crimea by Russia

WestlinnDuck said:

creepycoug said:

WestlinnDuck said:

HHusky said:

"JESUS LIVES INSIDE DONALD TRUMP."

Explains the weight issues imo.

Unlike the dementia patient who supports late term abortion and mutilation of children. You voted for a husk of a human and a support staff that hates America. We didn't.

Let's be clear on this: the abortion pill and early term abortion = the mutilation of children.

I wish those of you who are against abortion would quit splitting hairs, intellectual or otherwise.

You needn't qualify your statement. He's supports abortion, which is the mutilation of children. Period. Forget the "late" part. Forget it.

Will disagree. You may think the abortion pill is morally equivalent to aborting a child in the 8th month that jumps in his mother's stomach every time she turns on the vacuum cleaner. I don't and neither do the vast majority of voters, especially educated white women. So, fight the battles you can win and then perhaps live to fight another day. All or nothing leaves you with nothing on this one.

I don't think it. I know it. We are learning and seeing more and more about the early fetus. Look into it. There is a lot more going on there than you might think. While your point about living to fight another day is well taken, this is an issue of the highest moral imperative. While people are running around getting worked up over Tucker's texts, children - real live children with full personhood - are being slaughtered. Sometimes, you gotta have revolution. Ask @Sledog

Blueduck said:

WestlinnDuck said:

Blueduck said:

HHusky said:

Blueduck said:

I like how the link says lawyer and not Cohen to get clicks.

If you want to report a credible story use someone who's "opinions" are at least credible and unconflicted. (That's actually hard to do today)
That's why the link doesn't read
"Michael Cohen says...."
they know Cohen has credibility issues but they are baiting the reader/viewer in with an objective sounding headline and then BLAMO, they feed you the Narrative.
To be fair, most if not all the media does this to their advantage and they do it because people eat it up without using their brains these days.
Piss poor journalism!
We as an objective and informed audience have to be aware of this fraud and wade through the BS to discern the real truth.

"If you don't read the newspaper, you're uninformed,
If you do, you're misinformed"
Mark Twain

When I was being educated in public school systems we were taught about the dangers of "yellow journalism" and how in the 19th century and early 20th century newspapers used to be advocacy rags and routinely lied to promote their political views. Of course, this was all now fixed and newspapers were to be trusted because our reporters were now graduates of credentialed journalism programs and promoted "objectivity". This was always a lie. Look at the Pulitzer that the NY Times got in the 1930s for lying about the Soviet Union. Twain's quote is as true today with the MSM and it was back in his day.

What went from bad to worst was the 2012 Smith/Mundt modernization act that was snuck into the NDAA with deceptive language.
The US government is now free to openly use all forms of the media to promote Government made News designed for foreign information campaigns and feed it to the American public.
Essentially it made propaganda legal in the US and the government can send the script to outlets to disseminate to the public making them the bullhorn for government agenda.
The media doesn't ask questions anymore, they are state run and have "independent fact checkers" to verify facts of what they are given to report instead of being the independent bull dog fact checkers of our government like they were supposed to be.

Funny coincidence, or not funny, is the timing this was passed in relation to the 2013-14 color revolution and the Ousting of elected Ukrainian president Poroshenko and subsequent annexation of Crimea by Russia

Let me think who was president and wanting this shit...

pawz said:

Query for @creepycoug

Genital mutilation of minors? Go.

Against. Bigly.

That shouldn't happen until the person reaches the age of consent and the age to enter into binding contract. Until then, mother knows best. And if she doesn't, then we? know best.

I'm with Douglas Murray on this: there is much we do not know about transgender. Homosexuality, different. We've known about it for eons and we understand it pretty well. Trans is different. We're barely acquainted with it, much less do we understand it. If someone wants to dress like the other and pursue whatever sexual inclination they desire, fire away. It's a free country. But permanent biological alterations? No, you have to be a consenting adult with the power to make binding decisions and you have to have legal capacity. You can't let a crazy person give away an estate and you can't let a crazy person give away his balls. And on that point, there is too much evidence to ignore that trans is tied to mental illness. Now that may be because the person is in the wrong body and all of that - a chicken and egg issue - and we simply don't know that definitively as Murray would say. Murray, btw, is a homosexual.

So, again, against, bigly. It's horrible.