Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Can we offer this Ukranian solider a scholarship?
Comments
-
Congress, in its most-recent appropriation for Ukraine in December, gave $45 billion it expected to bolster Ukraine until September or October. The money was part of a $1.66 trillion government funding package.
However, the munitions and money from that appropriation is being used up at a faster rate than had been expected.
Milley, who met with Congressional leaders on Thursday, said another appropriation will be needed by June to prevent Ukraine from being unable to maintain operations and defend against Russian attacks, sources said.
Congress appropriated roughly $112 billion in military and economic support for Ukraine in four separate spending bills last year, the Washington Examiner reported.
Imagine if Russia didn't suck ass -
Watch how much money the left will have for the next election and mansion purchases.
-
Might look here for your missing surplus.
-
Boss we can only account for 390,000 dollars on our 1,000,000 million dollar outlay.
The process is important for us to do, and it is making us get better. It is not making us get better as fast as we want
You're fired -
-
Russia does suck assRaceBannon said:
So today is Russia sucks ass dayPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Struggling is a strong word. I dont think they are.Bob_C said:
But why are they struggling to supply Ukraine?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The war games issue cited was anti ship missles to be used against ChinaBob_C said:
A quick read says that the stuff being sent over is stuff that is still being produced and not something that is sitting there just waiting to be scrapped.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Actual surplus inventory is easy and fast to move.
"Precision-fired munitions for the long-range HIMARS system are another need, so Lockheed Martin is gearing up to turn out one new rocket every 10 minutes at its plant in Arkansas."
"With the war in Ukraine entering its second year — and the U.S. continuing to provide the embattled country with military aid in the form of rockets, guns and ammunition — the Pentagon is stepping up production of critically-needed supplies."
"And with the U.S. struggling to keep Ukraine supplied in its fight against a decrepit Russian military, there is concern about what could happen if the U.S. were to become involved in a conflict with China."
Not something supplied to Ukraine
Shit is WW1 over there in regards to artillery usage because Russia sucks so much ass they cant even use their air force against a neighbor.
US is increasing shell production, so what
And yet if Uncle Sugar doesn't increase the money now Ukraine will fail
Did you read the article I posted?
A long with the tweet of people you never want to agree with add "you guys (or gals) are too stupid or words to that effect as the sign of a failing argument -
Things the IRS would not let pass.Bob_C said:Might look here for your missing surplus.
-
I once witnessed the great Carl Icahn fire two top executives on the spot over a 95% cycle count of inventory result during an audit committee meeting.RaceBannon said:Boss we can only account for 390,000 dollars on our 1,000,000 million dollar outlay.
The process is important for us to do, and it is making us get better. It is not making us get better as fast as we want
You're fired -
Imagine losing to themPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Russia does suck assRaceBannon said:
So today is Russia sucks ass dayPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Struggling is a strong word. I dont think they are.Bob_C said:
But why are they struggling to supply Ukraine?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The war games issue cited was anti ship missles to be used against ChinaBob_C said:
A quick read says that the stuff being sent over is stuff that is still being produced and not something that is sitting there just waiting to be scrapped.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Actual surplus inventory is easy and fast to move.
"Precision-fired munitions for the long-range HIMARS system are another need, so Lockheed Martin is gearing up to turn out one new rocket every 10 minutes at its plant in Arkansas."
"With the war in Ukraine entering its second year — and the U.S. continuing to provide the embattled country with military aid in the form of rockets, guns and ammunition — the Pentagon is stepping up production of critically-needed supplies."
"And with the U.S. struggling to keep Ukraine supplied in its fight against a decrepit Russian military, there is concern about what could happen if the U.S. were to become involved in a conflict with China."
Not something supplied to Ukraine
Shit is WW1 over there in regards to artillery usage because Russia sucks so much ass they cant even use their air force against a neighbor.
US is increasing shell production, so what
And yet if Uncle Sugar doesn't increase the money now Ukraine will fail
Did you read the article I posted?
A long with the tweet of people you never want to agree with add "you guys (or gals) are too stupid or words to that effect as the sign of a failing argument
@MelloDawg -
Ukraine sucks worse than Russia.RaceBannon said:
Imagine losing to themPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Russia does suck assRaceBannon said:
So today is Russia sucks ass dayPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Struggling is a strong word. I dont think they are.Bob_C said:
But why are they struggling to supply Ukraine?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The war games issue cited was anti ship missles to be used against ChinaBob_C said:
A quick read says that the stuff being sent over is stuff that is still being produced and not something that is sitting there just waiting to be scrapped.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Actual surplus inventory is easy and fast to move.
"Precision-fired munitions for the long-range HIMARS system are another need, so Lockheed Martin is gearing up to turn out one new rocket every 10 minutes at its plant in Arkansas."
"With the war in Ukraine entering its second year — and the U.S. continuing to provide the embattled country with military aid in the form of rockets, guns and ammunition — the Pentagon is stepping up production of critically-needed supplies."
"And with the U.S. struggling to keep Ukraine supplied in its fight against a decrepit Russian military, there is concern about what could happen if the U.S. were to become involved in a conflict with China."
Not something supplied to Ukraine
Shit is WW1 over there in regards to artillery usage because Russia sucks so much ass they cant even use their air force against a neighbor.
US is increasing shell production, so what
And yet if Uncle Sugar doesn't increase the money now Ukraine will fail
Did you read the article I posted?
A long with the tweet of people you never want to agree with add "you guys (or gals) are too stupid or words to that effect as the sign of a failing argument
@MelloDawg
This is like #2 Clemson struggling at an away game at UAB.
Score is tied up going into the 4th.
Saban is helping UAB, though
-
I’ve always suspected you among the densest of dunces on this board. Now we all know it to be true. And that’s an accomplishment with the likes of H JW and Mello.PostGameOrangeSlices said:PurpleThrobber said:
The US can't even pay for it's own problems, why the fuck would you want to get an 'ROI" on a corrupt piece of shit country and their corrupt POS leader?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Smooth brain takes from both of you.
The US, and NATO has spent how many billions, if not trillions, on R&D, weapon production, and all around planning for taking on a foe like Russia?
Now, our surplus stock in the hands of Ex-Soviet block countries is absolutely SHREDDING big bad Russia. It's actually amazing to watch, if you follow it and don't just gargle Tucker's balls on the topic.
We are basically eliminating Russia as a future threat to the world for pennies on the dollar.
Yes, I know Ukraine is corrupt. Yes, I know Burisma is a thing. I don't give a shit.
Russia is getting it's ass fucked by it's younger brother and Uncle Sam is getting a fantastic ROI. Plus, amazing intel on all things Russia - which has proven to be a complete paper tiger incapable of countering HIMARS artillery made by the US in...the 80s.
China is watching this shitshow with concern, too. They would never be able to sniff Taiwan, and they now know it.
If you can't grasp this is way, way, way more dangerous to our national security than Vietnam and Afghanistan, there's not much I can do for you. Backing Putin into a spot where both sides are openly discussing tactical nuclear deployment is unfathomable. But go ahead and virtue signal blue and yellow all you want. Russia and Ukraine conflicts go back centuries. We have no business there.
This is shitty deal for the US and the fucking dementia patient who OK'd blowing up Russia's Nord Stream pipeline is going to be all hunkered down in his underground bunker eating ice cream while the rest of us have to sweat out the Cuban missile crisis Part 2.0. All over covering up his corrupt kid and pandering to all the shady shit the US has been funding in Ukraine.
No thanks. Fuck "ROI". All it takes is that 'paper tiger' to launch a couple dozen nukes and we're all fucked.
Russia isn't going to do a fucking thing with nukes.
If the state of their nukes is anything close to the state of their army, 75% of them probably aren't even functional.
Surplus military equipment from the 80s isn't going to benefit Kent and Kennewick. Might as well give it to Ukraine to help them defend their land from a Kim Grinolds esque dictator.
Appeasement has worked so well in dealing with Russia in the past. Georgia, Chechnya, Crimea. You have to draw a line in the sand somewhere
The hard on some people on the right have for Russia is flat out embarrassing. Grow some balls. -
Suck my dick little bitchKaepsknee said:
I’ve always suspected you among the densest of dunces on this board. Now we all know it to be true. And that’s an accomplishment with the likes of H JW and Mello.PostGameOrangeSlices said:PurpleThrobber said:
The US can't even pay for it's own problems, why the fuck would you want to get an 'ROI" on a corrupt piece of shit country and their corrupt POS leader?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Smooth brain takes from both of you.
The US, and NATO has spent how many billions, if not trillions, on R&D, weapon production, and all around planning for taking on a foe like Russia?
Now, our surplus stock in the hands of Ex-Soviet block countries is absolutely SHREDDING big bad Russia. It's actually amazing to watch, if you follow it and don't just gargle Tucker's balls on the topic.
We are basically eliminating Russia as a future threat to the world for pennies on the dollar.
Yes, I know Ukraine is corrupt. Yes, I know Burisma is a thing. I don't give a shit.
Russia is getting it's ass fucked by it's younger brother and Uncle Sam is getting a fantastic ROI. Plus, amazing intel on all things Russia - which has proven to be a complete paper tiger incapable of countering HIMARS artillery made by the US in...the 80s.
China is watching this shitshow with concern, too. They would never be able to sniff Taiwan, and they now know it.
If you can't grasp this is way, way, way more dangerous to our national security than Vietnam and Afghanistan, there's not much I can do for you. Backing Putin into a spot where both sides are openly discussing tactical nuclear deployment is unfathomable. But go ahead and virtue signal blue and yellow all you want. Russia and Ukraine conflicts go back centuries. We have no business there.
This is shitty deal for the US and the fucking dementia patient who OK'd blowing up Russia's Nord Stream pipeline is going to be all hunkered down in his underground bunker eating ice cream while the rest of us have to sweat out the Cuban missile crisis Part 2.0. All over covering up his corrupt kid and pandering to all the shady shit the US has been funding in Ukraine.
No thanks. Fuck "ROI". All it takes is that 'paper tiger' to launch a couple dozen nukes and we're all fucked.
Russia isn't going to do a fucking thing with nukes.
If the state of their nukes is anything close to the state of their army, 75% of them probably aren't even functional.
Surplus military equipment from the 80s isn't going to benefit Kent and Kennewick. Might as well give it to Ukraine to help them defend their land from a Kim Grinolds esque dictator.
Appeasement has worked so well in dealing with Russia in the past. Georgia, Chechnya, Crimea. You have to draw a line in the sand somewhere
The hard on some people on the right have for Russia is flat out embarrassing. Grow some balls.
Enjoy getting nuked by Russia
Or, not -
Better get your boy PGOS
He just fucked it all up for your team. Yeah America your kids need to die here. Fuck off
-
-
We they allowed to clean out their lockers or just gone.Bob_C said:
I once witnessed the great Carl Icahn fire two top executives on the spot over a 95% cycle count of inventory result during an audit committee meeting.RaceBannon said:Boss we can only account for 390,000 dollars on our 1,000,000 million dollar outlay.
The process is important for us to do, and it is making us get better. It is not making us get better as fast as we want
You're fired -
-
We are not about to send American boys 9 or 10 thousand miles away from home to do what Asian boys ought to be doing for themselves.
-
You cheer for the gay Nazi midget. It's like rooting for Cougs in the Apple cup.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Ukraine sucks worse than Russia.RaceBannon said:
Imagine losing to themPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Russia does suck assRaceBannon said:
So today is Russia sucks ass dayPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Struggling is a strong word. I dont think they are.Bob_C said:
But why are they struggling to supply Ukraine?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The war games issue cited was anti ship missles to be used against ChinaBob_C said:
A quick read says that the stuff being sent over is stuff that is still being produced and not something that is sitting there just waiting to be scrapped.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Actual surplus inventory is easy and fast to move.
"Precision-fired munitions for the long-range HIMARS system are another need, so Lockheed Martin is gearing up to turn out one new rocket every 10 minutes at its plant in Arkansas."
"With the war in Ukraine entering its second year — and the U.S. continuing to provide the embattled country with military aid in the form of rockets, guns and ammunition — the Pentagon is stepping up production of critically-needed supplies."
"And with the U.S. struggling to keep Ukraine supplied in its fight against a decrepit Russian military, there is concern about what could happen if the U.S. were to become involved in a conflict with China."
Not something supplied to Ukraine
Shit is WW1 over there in regards to artillery usage because Russia sucks so much ass they cant even use their air force against a neighbor.
US is increasing shell production, so what
And yet if Uncle Sugar doesn't increase the money now Ukraine will fail
Did you read the article I posted?
A long with the tweet of people you never want to agree with add "you guys (or gals) are too stupid or words to that effect as the sign of a failing argument
@MelloDawg
This is like #2 Clemson struggling at an away game at UAB.
Score is tied up going into the 4th.
Saban is helping UAB, though -
Your boy has called for first use of nukes and Americans to die in UkrainePostGameOrangeSlices said:
Ping me when you stop sucking his dick -
-
Fuck that little nazi. He has no standing to even suggest sending US sons and daughters to fight for his corrupt government.LebamDawg said:
-
Fuck this guy. And fuck the chickenhawk apologists for this maniac.
-
zelensky is jewishSledog said:
You cheer for the gay Nazi midget. It's like rooting for Cougs in the Apple cup.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Ukraine sucks worse than Russia.RaceBannon said:
Imagine losing to themPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Russia does suck assRaceBannon said:
So today is Russia sucks ass dayPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Struggling is a strong word. I dont think they are.Bob_C said:
But why are they struggling to supply Ukraine?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The war games issue cited was anti ship missles to be used against ChinaBob_C said:
A quick read says that the stuff being sent over is stuff that is still being produced and not something that is sitting there just waiting to be scrapped.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Actual surplus inventory is easy and fast to move.
"Precision-fired munitions for the long-range HIMARS system are another need, so Lockheed Martin is gearing up to turn out one new rocket every 10 minutes at its plant in Arkansas."
"With the war in Ukraine entering its second year — and the U.S. continuing to provide the embattled country with military aid in the form of rockets, guns and ammunition — the Pentagon is stepping up production of critically-needed supplies."
"And with the U.S. struggling to keep Ukraine supplied in its fight against a decrepit Russian military, there is concern about what could happen if the U.S. were to become involved in a conflict with China."
Not something supplied to Ukraine
Shit is WW1 over there in regards to artillery usage because Russia sucks so much ass they cant even use their air force against a neighbor.
US is increasing shell production, so what
And yet if Uncle Sugar doesn't increase the money now Ukraine will fail
Did you read the article I posted?
A long with the tweet of people you never want to agree with add "you guys (or gals) are too stupid or words to that effect as the sign of a failing argument
@MelloDawg
This is like #2 Clemson struggling at an away game at UAB.
Score is tied up going into the 4th.
Saban is helping UAB, though
you accurately described Putin, though. not that you are smart enough to know
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2023/02/25/ukraine-war-children-deported-russia/11266200002/ -
RaceBannon said:
Your boy has called for first use of nukes and Americans to die in UkrainePostGameOrangeSlices said:
Ping me when you stop sucking his dick
do you guys even watch the shit you post?PurpleThrobber said:
Fuck this guy. And fuck the chickenhawk apologists for this maniac.
He flat out says that if Russia attacks a NATO country, at that point the US is bound by treaty to send troops against Russia. He specifically says the Baltics, which half the Russia dick suckers can't even find on a map.
After all, you lot can't tell the difference between a blown up tank and an "orange tank"
His whole point has been let Ukraine fight and die so that there never comes a conflict between NATO and Russia. He wants weapons.
christ, it's apparently hard. -
It’s almost like I predicted this two days ago.RaceBannon said:Better get your boy PGOS
He just fucked it all up for your team. Yeah America your kids need to die here. Fuck off -
-
Fuck Zelensky. He’s planting false narratives. Putin isn’t going into NATO countries. Domino theory bullshit. And you’re swallowing like a cheap whore.PostGameOrangeSlices said:RaceBannon said:
Your boy has called for first use of nukes and Americans to die in UkrainePostGameOrangeSlices said:
Ping me when you stop sucking his dick
do you guys even watch the shit you post?PurpleThrobber said:
Fuck this guy. And fuck the chickenhawk apologists for this maniac.
He flat out says that if Russia attacks a NATO country, at that point the US is bound by treaty to send troops against Russia. He specifically says the Baltics, which half the Russia dick suckers can't even find on a map.
After all, you lot can't tell the difference between a blown up tank and an "orange tank"
His whole point has been let Ukraine fight and die so that there never comes a conflict between NATO and Russia. He wants weapons.
christ, it's apparently hard.
Fuck you too. Chickenhawk. -
Russia isn’t attacking any NATO country. Your boy is ginning up support for more weapons. He reads the polls here. And yes he wants our troops too.PostGameOrangeSlices said:RaceBannon said:
Your boy has called for first use of nukes and Americans to die in UkrainePostGameOrangeSlices said:
Ping me when you stop sucking his dick
do you guys even watch the shit you post?PurpleThrobber said:
Fuck this guy. And fuck the chickenhawk apologists for this maniac.
He flat out says that if Russia attacks a NATO country, at that point the US is bound by treaty to send troops against Russia. He specifically says the Baltics, which half the Russia dick suckers can't even find on a map.
After all, you lot can't tell the difference between a blown up tank and an "orange tank"
His whole point has been let Ukraine fight and die so that there never comes a conflict between NATO and Russia. He wants weapons.
christ, it's apparently hard. -
They probably weren't before, and they sure as shit aren't now because they can't handle UKRAINE of all fucking places.46XiJCAB said:
Russia isn’t attacking any NATO country. Your boy is ginning up support for more weapons. He reads the polls here. And yes he wants our troops too.PostGameOrangeSlices said:RaceBannon said:
Your boy has called for first use of nukes and Americans to die in UkrainePostGameOrangeSlices said:
Ping me when you stop sucking his dick
do you guys even watch the shit you post?PurpleThrobber said:
Fuck this guy. And fuck the chickenhawk apologists for this maniac.
He flat out says that if Russia attacks a NATO country, at that point the US is bound by treaty to send troops against Russia. He specifically says the Baltics, which half the Russia dick suckers can't even find on a map.
After all, you lot can't tell the difference between a blown up tank and an "orange tank"
His whole point has been let Ukraine fight and die so that there never comes a conflict between NATO and Russia. He wants weapons.
christ, it's apparently hard.
You guys really don't get it.
Zelensky is on point. Ukraine has basically prevented Russia from ever even entertaining the idea of war with NATO. Which they would lose quickly and badly.
Never has he once said he wants US troops in Ukraine. In fact, he has said that this is his country's moment to prove itself, like the US did in the Revolutionary war. Google it, Bing it, DuckDuckGo it, NAMBLA.com it, use whatever fucking engine you want.
Rocket science, this is not. -
Fuck off retard. How about those Turkish drones you said weren't in existence?PurpleThrobber said:
Fuck Zelensky. He’s planting false narratives. Putin isn’t going into NATO countries. Domino theory bullshit. And you’re swallowing like a cheap whore.PostGameOrangeSlices said:RaceBannon said:
Your boy has called for first use of nukes and Americans to die in UkrainePostGameOrangeSlices said:
Ping me when you stop sucking his dick
do you guys even watch the shit you post?PurpleThrobber said:
Fuck this guy. And fuck the chickenhawk apologists for this maniac.
He flat out says that if Russia attacks a NATO country, at that point the US is bound by treaty to send troops against Russia. He specifically says the Baltics, which half the Russia dick suckers can't even find on a map.
After all, you lot can't tell the difference between a blown up tank and an "orange tank"
His whole point has been let Ukraine fight and die so that there never comes a conflict between NATO and Russia. He wants weapons.
christ, it's apparently hard.
Fuck you too. Chickenhawk.
Wrong again numbnuts
https://youtu.be/nTGby7YBChs