Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Pac-12 Expansion...

For the life of me, I can't come up with 2 teams to add after the departure of SC and UCLA...

You gotta think of other sports as well.

Who makes sense?

Huskies need to LEAVE!
«1

Comments

  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,720 Founders Club
    We need to dump Oregon

    White trash couldn't even afford to fly to Atlanta if they got in...
  • no_uh
    no_uh Member Posts: 769
    SDSU/SMU only because there's some football history, at least one of them has decent academics, and supposed media markets.
  • whlinder
    whlinder Member Posts: 5,270
    NO to SMU. Those cucks supported TCU last night. Don’t ever support your rival.
  • Joey
    Joey Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,260 Founders Club
    The Russian Gangsta is already in Vegas. Don’t be surprised if he pitches UNLV to the other presidents. Not saying I want this, just don’t be surprised.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    Don’t add any schools. In two years the conference will be split up. It’s inevitable.
  • TheHB
    TheHB Member Posts: 6,457

    The Russian Gangsta is already in Vegas. Don’t be surprised if he pitches UNLV to the other presidents. Not saying I want this, just don’t be surprised.

    But can we twist?
  • AEB
    AEB Member Posts: 2,994
    What it should be: Oklahoma & Texas

    What it will be: San Diego St and UC Davis

    Leave
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,720 Founders Club
    AEB said:

    What it should be: Oklahoma & Texas

    What it will be: San Diego St and UC Davis

    Leave

    UNLV even though they suck will get an invite.
  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,331
    They really should get smaller. Drop Stanford and cal as they seem to don’t think and care.
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,990

    They really should get smaller. Drop Stanford and cal as they seem to don’t think and care.

    Also,

    Ute doesn't belong
    Colorado it too far
    UA and ASU are too dry
    OU, Wazzu, and OSU don't have the academics

    There, I fixed the Pac-12
  • Bread
    Bread Member Posts: 4,073
    Seems pretty obvious to me:
    Hawaii and Kwansei Gakuin
  • no_uh
    no_uh Member Posts: 769
    whlinder said:

    NO to SMU. Those cucks supported TCU last night. Don’t ever support your rival.

    Oregon and not UW to B10 confirmed.
  • DawgOfTheAges
    DawgOfTheAges Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,750 Founders Club
    edited January 2023
    Boise and SDSU are the only two schools out there in our footprint that i can think of that actually play football. And then Chris Petersen can go back to coaching at BSU. Perfect. I fixed it.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,069
    Fuck Boise State. Brings nothing.

    SDSU at least has a Cali presence and hot coeds.

    Didn’t say to add SDSU. Don’t twist. But SDSU and UNLV will be the adds. 81% certainty.
  • BleachedAnusDawg
    BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,214 Standard Supporter

    Just keep it the PAC10. We will still be considered a strong conference and be given opportunities to go to the playoffs. Don't need extra teams.

    I've landed here, assuming the PAC is able to get an auto-bid for the playoff. Why make it harder to make the dance? This is the way of the ACC and Big 12 for the past couple decades.
  • Fenderbender123
    Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,989
    TheHB said:

    UW needs to get to the B1G ASAP or go independent.

    If PAC starts adding schleps like SMU and San Diego State, as replacements for USC and Ucla, the Huskies need to be OUT.

    This is my concern, too. It seems like the only schools that could be added would be considered inferior, and make the conference look shittier.

    But if the conference adds no teams and just keeps it as is without USC and UCLA, I'm fine with it.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    whlinder said:

    NO to SMU. Those cucks supported TCU last night. Don’t ever support your rival.

    On the whole they didn’t … they despise TCU and Dykes
  • whlinder
    whlinder Member Posts: 5,270
    Tequilla said:

    whlinder said:

    NO to SMU. Those cucks supported TCU last night. Don’t ever support your rival.

    On the whole they didn’t … they despise TCU and Dykes
    My SMU fren/alum said it was a big debate within SMU circles on whether to support froog. From “they’re our neighbor and similar” to “fuck that we hate them”.

    Even some discussion of replacing SMU flags with TCU ones for the day of the game?

    Just what I’m hearing no idea if accurate. But even considering that is embarrassing as fuck.
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,388 Founders Club

    TCU, Baylor, Houston and Tech would have been the play. Trade LA for the rest of Texas. Those four teams are all P5 worthy and at least play football and basketball at a competitive level while having access to rich pools of talent. UNLV? SDSU? SMU? Boise? Fuck no. The rest of the P12 can play a non con game at SoFi or the Rose Bowl every other year to offset the loss of the LA schools and keep a presence in LA for recruiting. Seeing that Kliavkov has seemed to miss out on the Texas sweep I'd vote to keep it at ten until the B10 calls and then GTFO.

    interesting thought
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,990

    TCU, Baylor, Houston and Tech would have been the play. Trade LA for the rest of Texas. Those four teams are all P5 worthy and at least play football and basketball at a competitive level while having access to rich pools of talent. UNLV? SDSU? SMU? Boise? Fuck no. The rest of the P12 can play a non con game at SoFi or the Rose Bowl every other year to offset the loss of the LA schools and keep a presence in LA for recruiting. Seeing that Kliavkov has seemed to miss out on the Texas sweep I'd vote to keep it at ten until the B10 calls and then GTFO.

    interesting thought
    I think Vegas wanted to do a kickoff classic type showdown, but LA would work for the Pac-12, too.

    Would also help with UW's noncon scheduling issues
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    whlinder said:

    Tequilla said:

    whlinder said:

    NO to SMU. Those cucks supported TCU last night. Don’t ever support your rival.

    On the whole they didn’t … they despise TCU and Dykes
    My SMU fren/alum said it was a big debate within SMU circles on whether to support froog. From “they’re our neighbor and similar” to “fuck that we hate them”.

    Even some discussion of replacing SMU flags with TCU ones for the day of the game?

    Just what I’m hearing no idea if accurate. But even considering that is embarrassing as fuck.
    I’m sure there are some wimpy SMU people that have accepted their lot in life …

    I’d be shocked if any of those thoughts crossed the minds of those fond of the Pony Express days and believe that SMU can and should be a national brand
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,720 Founders Club
    Tequilla said:

    whlinder said:

    Tequilla said:

    whlinder said:

    NO to SMU. Those cucks supported TCU last night. Don’t ever support your rival.

    On the whole they didn’t … they despise TCU and Dykes
    My SMU fren/alum said it was a big debate within SMU circles on whether to support froog. From “they’re our neighbor and similar” to “fuck that we hate them”.

    Even some discussion of replacing SMU flags with TCU ones for the day of the game?

    Just what I’m hearing no idea if accurate. But even considering that is embarrassing as fuck.
    I’m sure there are some wimpy SMU people that have accepted their lot in life …

    I’d be shocked if any of those thoughts crossed the minds of those fond of the Pony Express days and believe that SMU can and should be a national brand
    JC. Okay @46XHypnoFroog
  • Canadawg
    Canadawg Member Posts: 5,301

    TCU, Baylor, Houston and Tech would have been the play. Trade LA for the rest of Texas. Those four teams are all P5 worthy and at least play football and basketball at a competitive level while having access to rich pools of talent. UNLV? SDSU? SMU? Boise? Fuck no. The rest of the P12 can play a non con game at SoFi or the Rose Bowl every other year to offset the loss of the LA schools and keep a presence in LA for recruiting. Seeing that Kliavkov has seemed to miss out on the Texas sweep I'd vote to keep it at ten until the B10 calls and then GTFO.

    I like the idea of staying at 10 and playing a handful of games at SoFi every year. One kickoff OOC game and another OOC game every year and maybe a rotation of a couple conference games a year. Means 6 PAC teams per year are in LA
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,615 Standard Supporter
    whlinder said:

    Tequilla said:

    whlinder said:

    NO to SMU. Those cucks supported TCU last night. Don’t ever support your rival.

    On the whole they didn’t … they despise TCU and Dykes
    My SMU fren/alum said it was a big debate within SMU circles on whether to support froog. From “they’re our neighbor and similar” to “fuck that we hate them”.

    Even some discussion of replacing SMU flags with TCU ones for the day of the game?

    Just what I’m hearing no idea if accurate. But even considering that is embarrassing as fuck.
    Big difference between quietly telling the people who are watching the game around you that you'll pull for the rivals and going all out with flags and whatnot. I'll root for Coog at times, but I'll usually laugh when they choke.
  • Canadawg
    Canadawg Member Posts: 5,301

    Canadawg said:

    TCU, Baylor, Houston and Tech would have been the play. Trade LA for the rest of Texas. Those four teams are all P5 worthy and at least play football and basketball at a competitive level while having access to rich pools of talent. UNLV? SDSU? SMU? Boise? Fuck no. The rest of the P12 can play a non con game at SoFi or the Rose Bowl every other year to offset the loss of the LA schools and keep a presence in LA for recruiting. Seeing that Kliavkov has seemed to miss out on the Texas sweep I'd vote to keep it at ten until the B10 calls and then GTFO.

    I like the idea of staying at 10 and playing a handful of games at SoFi every year. One kickoff OOC game and another OOC game every year and maybe a rotation of a couple conference games a year. Means 6 PAC teams per year are in LA
    Fuck playing games at SoFi. Play games at the fucking Rose Bowl.
    I just wonder how that would work with UCLA having a contract there