Apparently black lives don't matter unless one is killed during a robbery
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/hero-customer-who-shot-armed-robber-houston-taco-joint-ordered-face-grand-jury-soros
https://youtu.be/HrxngFEgIRI
Comments
-
So, the DA wants a Grand Jury to validate his instinct, which is not to charge.
Yawn. -
MustHHusky said:So, the DA wants a Grand Jury to validate his instinct, which is not to charge.
Yawn.
Defend
Everything -
So you careRaceBannon said:
MustHHusky said:So, the DA wants a Grand Jury to validate his instinct, which is not to charge.
Yawn.
Defend
Everything -
The first 8 shots or defensible ... the last one not so much ... Will probably lead to manslaughter, if Perp was of different color, probably Not Guilty...WestlinnDuck said:Our hero was shot to death while robbing a restaurant while out on bond for some non-serious crimes. Geezus. Now, the Soros prosecutor has a serious crime to deal with.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/hero-customer-who-shot-armed-robber-houston-taco-joint-ordered-face-grand-jury-soroshttps://youtu.be/HrxngFEgIRI -
I thought you were boredHHusky said:
So you careRaceBannon said:
MustHHusky said:So, the DA wants a Grand Jury to validate his instinct, which is not to charge.
Yawn.
Defend
Everything
Guess you really do need to defend everything -
Sure. DAs always take non-probable cause cases to the Grand Jury. Actually the Soros DAs do, but they aren't supposed to.HHusky said:So, the DA wants a Grand Jury to validate his instinct, which is not to charge.
Yawn. -
The coup de grace has to be the issue.YouKnowIt said:
The first 8 shots or defensible ... the last one not so much ... Will probably lead to manslaughter, if Perp was of different color, probably Not Guilty...WestlinnDuck said:Our hero was shot to death while robbing a restaurant while out on bond for some non-serious crimes. Geezus. Now, the Soros prosecutor has a serious crime to deal with.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/hero-customer-who-shot-armed-robber-houston-taco-joint-ordered-face-grand-jury-soroshttps://youtu.be/HrxngFEgIRI
The DA wants cover. Imagine anyone being shocked by that.
But if deadly force was justified in the first instance, can you really recommend he be charged when it's essentially all one event without any meaningful interruption?
I don't think he gets indicted. -
The DA has all the facts. This isn't an investigative grand jury. If he DA as the highest county legal official isn't competent enough to come to the conclusion that this was a clean shooting under Texas law, then why have a DA? So, a DA that doesn't think there is probable cause will be arguing before the grand jury that there is probable cause for a criminal indictment. That's justice in the dazzler's leftard world. I agree with your analysis, which is really the most common sense thing you have said in your entire posting history. Congrats. Now back to your usual drivel.HHusky said:
The coup de grace has to be the issue.YouKnowIt said:
The first 8 shots or defensible ... the last one not so much ... Will probably lead to manslaughter, if Perp was of different color, probably Not Guilty...WestlinnDuck said:Our hero was shot to death while robbing a restaurant while out on bond for some non-serious crimes. Geezus. Now, the Soros prosecutor has a serious crime to deal with.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/hero-customer-who-shot-armed-robber-houston-taco-joint-ordered-face-grand-jury-soroshttps://youtu.be/HrxngFEgIRI
The DA wants cover. Imagine anyone being shocked by that.
But if deadly force was justified in the first instance, can you really recommend he be charged when it's essentially all one event without any meaningful interruption?
I don't think he gets indicted. -
Most self defense law only protects you when you are under threat, anything after that would not be considered Self defense...in this case he knows the threat is neutralized (grabs the guys gun), then Fires another round...aka Murder/Manslaughter. Could he say he wasn't sure if the guy had another gun, yes, but I wouldn't want to have a jury decide if they believe me or not...HHusky said:
The coup de grace has to be the issue.YouKnowIt said:
The first 8 shots or defensible ... the last one not so much ... Will probably lead to manslaughter, if Perp was of different color, probably Not Guilty...WestlinnDuck said:Our hero was shot to death while robbing a restaurant while out on bond for some non-serious crimes. Geezus. Now, the Soros prosecutor has a serious crime to deal with.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/hero-customer-who-shot-armed-robber-houston-taco-joint-ordered-face-grand-jury-soroshttps://youtu.be/HrxngFEgIRI
The DA wants cover. Imagine anyone being shocked by that.
But if deadly force was justified in the first instance, can you really recommend he be charged when it's essentially all one event without any meaningful interruption?
I don't think he gets indicted. -
I agree and that's a rational analysis.YouKnowIt said:
Most self defense law only protects you when you are under threat, anything after that would not be considered Self defense...in this case he knows the threat is neutralized (grabs the guys gun), then Fires another round...aka Murder/Manslaughter. Could he say he wasn't sure if the guy had another gun, yes, but I wouldn't want to have a jury decide if they believe me or not...HHusky said:
The coup de grace has to be the issue.YouKnowIt said:
The first 8 shots or defensible ... the last one not so much ... Will probably lead to manslaughter, if Perp was of different color, probably Not Guilty...WestlinnDuck said:Our hero was shot to death while robbing a restaurant while out on bond for some non-serious crimes. Geezus. Now, the Soros prosecutor has a serious crime to deal with.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/hero-customer-who-shot-armed-robber-houston-taco-joint-ordered-face-grand-jury-soroshttps://youtu.be/HrxngFEgIRI
The DA wants cover. Imagine anyone being shocked by that.
But if deadly force was justified in the first instance, can you really recommend he be charged when it's essentially all one event without any meaningful interruption?
I don't think he gets indicted.
But when the deceased created the situation which inevitably leads to an emotional response, I think most jurors are going to have sympathy with the shooter.
