He took an extremely hard, hit to the chest and immediately went into cardiac arrest
But I like where you guys are going with he had a shot from two years ago, so that was what did it.
That's not what's happening JW. Speaking just for myself, I'm tired of being lied to and am asking logical questions. Perhaps you're closer to the subject matter than most but I can assure you I only want the truth. You and others who believe the government and want to take fraudulent vaccines are free to do so but you have NO right or authority to tell me what to do. This wasn't Comotio Cardis and yes eltlite athletes across the globe are dropping dead like never before. To deny this is insanity but understandable to one who has lived his whole life believing fobernment is good. It isn't, never has been and never will be.
A gal from our? Women’s row boat team in the late 90s who I knew, dropped dead of a heart attack Mt biking around Tahoe about 10 Years ago. No warming. Just gone.
I miss those simpler times. Freak shit just happened and that was that.
He took an extremely hard, hit to the chest and immediately went into cardiac arrest
But I like where you guys are going with he had a shot from two years ago, so that was what did it.
That's not what's happening JW. Speaking just for myself, I'm tired of being lied to and am asking logical questions. Perhaps you're closer to the subject matter than most but I can assure you I only want the truth. You and others who believe the government and want to take fraudulent vaccines are free to do so but you have NO right or authority to tell me what to do. This wasn't Comotio Cardis and yes eltlite athletes across the globe are dropping dead like never before. To deny this is insanity but understandable to one who has lived his whole life believing fobernment is good. It isn't, never has been and never will be.
A gal from our? Women’s row boat team in the late 90s who I knew, dropped dead of a heart attack Mt biking around Tahoe about 10 Years ago. No warming. Just gone.
I miss those simpler times. Freak shit just happened and that was that.
He took an extremely hard, hit to the chest and immediately went into cardiac arrest
But I like where you guys are going with he had a shot from two years ago, so that was what did it.
That's not what's happening JW. Speaking just for myself, I'm tired of being lied to and am asking logical questions. Perhaps you're closer to the subject matter than most but I can assure you I only want the truth. You and others who believe the government and want to take fraudulent vaccines are free to do so but you have NO right or authority to tell me what to do. This wasn't Comotio Cardis and yes eltlite athletes across the globe are dropping dead like never before. To deny this is insanity but understandable to one who has lived his whole life believing fobernment is good. It isn't, never has been and never will be.
A gal from our? Women’s row boat team in the late 90s who I knew, dropped dead of a heart attack Mt biking around Tahoe about 10 Years ago. No warming. Just gone.
I miss those simpler times. Freak shit just happened and that was that.
Don't bring medical studies and peer reviewed papers into this. The libs don't deal in facts, only emotions.
Is it peer reviewed? It's listed as "letter to editor".
Letter uses absolute values instead of rates. How many athletes were in sports in 1966-2004 versus 2020-2022?
What was the source of statistics for those years? Are they comparable in how they were taken? How reliable are those statistics? Where is the data for 2005-2019?
What types of sports had the highest rate of cardiac injury? What about race?
Great questions. Were any asked of the CV jab trials?
No need to answer.
The fact that Pfizer asked a federal judge to withhold answers for 75 years says it all.
In this case, the author Dr Peter McCullough is the top cardiologist in the country. With over 600 peer-reviewed, published papers on his resume he is head and shoulders above the field. I think it's fair to say he's earned a bit of discretion if those questions aren't perfectly addressed (but likely are given his track record).
I really hope this helps.
They should've been asked and accounted for in the trials. And if people have questions or concerns, then they need to be addressed.
I don't like that Pfizer wants to withhold answers either, but it's how pharma operates and it leads to distrust of medicine in the population.
I don't care if McCullough is the top cardiologist in the country, these are basic questions in epidemiology and biostatistics. How do you do a cohort analysis when the two source populations are different?
Don't bring medical studies and peer reviewed papers into this. The libs don't deal in facts, only emotions.
Is it peer reviewed? It's listed as "letter to editor".
Letter uses absolute values instead of rates. How many athletes were in sports in 1966-2004 versus 2020-2022?
What was the source of statistics for those years? Are they comparable in how they were taken? How reliable are those statistics? Where is the data for 2005-2019?
What types of sports had the highest rate of cardiac injury? What about race?
Great questions. Were any asked of the CV jab trials?
No need to answer.
The fact that Pfizer asked a federal judge to withhold answers for 75 years says it all.
In this case, the author Dr Peter McCullough is the top cardiologist in the country. With over 600 peer-reviewed, published papers on his resume he is head and shoulders above the field. I think it's fair to say he's earned a bit of discretion if those questions aren't perfectly addressed (but likely are given his track record).
I really hope this helps.
They should've been asked and accounted for in the trials. And if people have questions or concerns, then they need to be addressed.
I don't like that Pfizer wants to withhold answers either, but it's how pharma operates and it leads to distrust of medicine in the population.
I don't care if McCullough is the top cardiologist in the country, these are basic questions in epidemiology and biostatistics. How do you do a cohort analysis when the two source populations are different?
In theory, wouldn't a cardiologist be a better source of understanding and identifying side effects that effect the heart than an epidemiologist?
Essentially, this is a database review which is a common form of surveillance to try to identify correlation between exposure and outcome. It doesn't appear to be more than identifying a statistic that an event happened (cardiac arrest) in an athlete (source population) given the vaccine (exposure). There would need to be control for confounding variables (race, age, gender, what sport they played, how long they played, etc.) to isolate how strong the outcome is correlated to the exposure. If the paper were more about reviewing the cases and determining whether a case was legitimately cardiac arrest or some other major cardiac event, then the cardiologist would be a much better fit.
To me, one suggestion I have with the data he presented is that the demographics in the US changed such that there's going to be more background cases of cardiac arrest. It seems to occur more often in blacks and in soccer than say whites and baseball, and I'd wager that the percentage of blacks and soccer has grown since the 1960s to the 2020s. That said, there could be excess cardiac events because of the virus or the vaccine, but it's uncertain with how the data was presented in that letter.
I'm not trying to be a dick because you don't spent much, if any, time in the Tug, but it sure would have been nice had the level of 'integrity' you require been applied on the front-side of the pandemic response and subsequently the jab.
If you know on the front-side that Pharma is a bad-actor, why was it a good idea to allow them Laissez-faire whence problem solving?
Since you are keen on epidemiology and biostatistics, are you familiar with The Great Barrington Declaration and the doctors behind it? They opined we did EVERYTHING wrong.
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya - professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert focusing on infectious diseases and vulnerable populations. Dr. Sunetra Gupta - professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases. Dr. Martin Kulldorff - professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations.
I did not know about the Barrington Declaration, but yeah, prolonged lockdowns had a damaging effect on society, especially around behavioral health and substance abuse.
Translation: I had very strong feelings about masks, lockdowns and vax mandates, but I didn't care to actually understand that I was being lied to and today I really don't care that I was, but yeah, the lockdowns had a damaging effect on society. Which is exactly what the Great Barrington Declaration told us - at least those who cared about the actual science.
Good news on Hamlin today. Can’t speak but wrote a question.
“Who won the game?”
Doc, you won the game of life.
Now watch in predictable amazement how this quote be used to divert people from questioning the actual cause(s) to yet another hero narrative, like is already happening with the Bill's trainer who did CPR on Hamlin. The doctors, nurses, trainers, ambulance driver and Hamlin himself are all heroes, and anyone who detracts from that narrative is a domestic racist terrorist who wants all black NFL players to die of heart attacks.
If you don't expect this reaction by now, you're brain dead.
Good news on Hamlin today. Can’t speak but wrote a question.
“Who won the game?”
Doc, you won the game of life.
Now watch in predictable amazement how this quote be used to divert people from questioning the actual cause(s) to yet another hero narrative, like is already happening with the Bill's trainer who did CPR on Hamlin. The doctors, nurses, trainers, ambulance driver and Hamlin himself are all heroes, and anyone who detracts from that narrative is a domestic racist terrorist who wants all black NFL players to die of heart attacks.
If you don't expect this reaction by now, you're brain dead.
Fuck the probable cause, let's celebrate the life savers. Not that we shouldn't but let's find out the way. But no we can't have that discussion.
Good news on Hamlin today. Can’t speak but wrote a question.
“Who won the game?”
Doc, you won the game of life.
Now watch in predictable amazement how this quote be used to divert people from questioning the actual cause(s) to yet another hero narrative, like is already happening with the Bill's trainer who did CPR on Hamlin. The doctors, nurses, trainers, ambulance driver and Hamlin himself are all heroes, and anyone who detracts from that narrative is a domestic racist terrorist who wants all black NFL players to die of heart attacks.
If you don't expect this reaction by now, you're brain dead.
Fuck the probable cause, let's celebrate the life savers. Not that we shouldn't but let's find out the way. But no we can't have that discussion.
Cause, Schmause. It's irrelevant.
What kind of evil person would even care what caused it.
HE WON THE GAME OF LIFE!
I've got the T-Shirts on order already. Flags and scarves to follow.
Good news on Hamlin today. Can’t speak but wrote a question.
“Who won the game?”
Doc, you won the game of life.
Now watch in predictable amazement how this quote be used to divert people from questioning the actual cause(s) to yet another hero narrative, like is already happening with the Bill's trainer who did CPR on Hamlin. The doctors, nurses, trainers, ambulance driver and Hamlin himself are all heroes, and anyone who detracts from that narrative is a domestic racist terrorist who wants all black NFL players to die of heart attacks.
If you don't expect this reaction by now, you're brain dead.
That narrative started the minute he collapsed. At best there's the, "It's not the right time" rebuke.
Don't bring medical studies and peer reviewed papers into this. The libs don't deal in facts, only emotions.
Is it peer reviewed? It's listed as "letter to editor".
Letter uses absolute values instead of rates. How many athletes were in sports in 1966-2004 versus 2020-2022?
What was the source of statistics for those years? Are they comparable in how they were taken? How reliable are those statistics? Where is the data for 2005-2019?
What types of sports had the highest rate of cardiac injury? What about race?
Great questions. Were any asked of the CV jab trials?
No need to answer.
The fact that Pfizer asked a federal judge to withhold answers for 75 years says it all.
In this case, the author Dr Peter McCullough is the top cardiologist in the country. With over 600 peer-reviewed, published papers on his resume he is head and shoulders above the field. I think it's fair to say he's earned a bit of discretion if those questions aren't perfectly addressed (but likely are given his track record).
I really hope this helps.
They should've been asked and accounted for in the trials. And if people have questions or concerns, then they need to be addressed.
I don't like that Pfizer wants to withhold answers either, but it's how pharma operates and it leads to distrust of medicine in the population.
I don't care if McCullough is the top cardiologist in the country, these are basic questions in epidemiology and biostatistics. How do you do a cohort analysis when the two source populations are different?
Don't bring medical studies and peer reviewed papers into this. The libs don't deal in facts, only emotions.
Is it peer reviewed? It's listed as "letter to editor".
Letter uses absolute values instead of rates. How many athletes were in sports in 1966-2004 versus 2020-2022?
What was the source of statistics for those years? Are they comparable in how they were taken? How reliable are those statistics? Where is the data for 2005-2019?
What types of sports had the highest rate of cardiac injury? What about race?
Great questions. Were any asked of the CV jab trials?
No need to answer.
The fact that Pfizer asked a federal judge to withhold answers for 75 years says it all.
In this case, the author Dr Peter McCullough is the top cardiologist in the country. With over 600 peer-reviewed, published papers on his resume he is head and shoulders above the field. I think it's fair to say he's earned a bit of discretion if those questions aren't perfectly addressed (but likely are given his track record).
I really hope this helps.
They should've been asked and accounted for in the trials. And if people have questions or concerns, then they need to be addressed.
I don't like that Pfizer wants to withhold answers either, but it's how pharma operates and it leads to distrust of medicine in the population.
I don't care if McCullough is the top cardiologist in the country, these are basic questions in epidemiology and biostatistics. How do you do a cohort analysis when the two source populations are different?
In theory, wouldn't a cardiologist be a better source of understanding and identifying side effects that effect the heart than an epidemiologist?
Essentially, this is a database review which is a common form of surveillance to try to identify correlation between exposure and outcome. It doesn't appear to be more than identifying a statistic that an event happened (cardiac arrest) in an athlete (source population) given the vaccine (exposure). There would need to be control for confounding variables (race, age, gender, what sport they played, how long they played, etc.) to isolate how strong the outcome is correlated to the exposure. If the paper were more about reviewing the cases and determining whether a case was legitimately cardiac arrest or some other major cardiac event, then the cardiologist would be a much better fit.
To me, one suggestion I have with the data he presented is that the demographics in the US changed such that there's going to be more background cases of cardiac arrest. It seems to occur more often in blacks and in soccer than say whites and baseball, and I'd wager that the percentage of blacks and soccer has grown since the 1960s to the 2020s. That said, there could be excess cardiac events because of the virus or the vaccine, but it's uncertain with how the data was presented in that letter.
I'm not trying to be a dick because you don't spent much, if any, time in the Tug, but it sure would have been nice had the level of 'integrity' you require been applied on the front-side of the pandemic response and subsequently the jab.
If you know on the front-side that Pharma is a bad-actor, why was it a good idea to allow them Laissez-faire whence problem solving?
Since you are keen on epidemiology and biostatistics, are you familiar with The Great Barrington Declaration and the doctors behind it? They opined we did EVERYTHING wrong.
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya - professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert focusing on infectious diseases and vulnerable populations. Dr. Sunetra Gupta - professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases. Dr. Martin Kulldorff - professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations.
I did not know about the Barrington Declaration, but yeah, prolonged lockdowns had a damaging effect on society, especially around behavioral health and substance abuse.
The Great Barrington Doctors have issue with force jabbing our nation’s young men.
Comments
Must be close to the target
HuskyJW always right
Put on another mask and STFU
“Who won the game?”
Doc, you won the game of life.
Apparently all the guys are not All In and are asking questions
If you don't expect this reaction by now, you're brain dead.
What kind of evil person would even care what caused it.
HE WON THE GAME OF LIFE!
I've got the T-Shirts on order already. Flags and scarves to follow.
The virtue signaling game is nuanced.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cky_-KROw8d/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
I am most surprised that ESPN did not fold in protest of the violence of FB