Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Since college football was invented in 2014...
Comments
-
Adding Utah was good for the conference
Colorado? No -
Colorado has a rich tradition and fits in well in terms of academis ( @creepycoug ). Decent sized TV market as well.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Adding Utah was good for the conference
Colorado? No
It's unfortunate that they haven't been able to get back to Colorado of the 90s.
Rick tanked two programs. Sad. You guys paid a steep price for you 2001 Rose Bowl win. -
again, just wait til prime brings back the gang rape.YellowSnow said:
Colorado has a rich tradition and fits in well in terms of academis ( @creepycoug ). Decent sized TV market as well.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Adding Utah was good for the conference
Colorado? No
It's unfortunate that they haven't been able to get back to Colorado of the 90s.
Rick tanked two programs. Sad. You guys paid a steep price for you 2001 Rose Bowl win. -
I wouldn't say Colorado added to academis, but they didn't take anything away. They are firmly second tier academis in the P12.YellowSnow said:
Colorado has a rich tradition and fits in well in terms of academis ( @creepycoug ). Decent sized TV market as well.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Adding Utah was good for the conference
Colorado? No
It's unfortunate that they haven't been able to get back to Colorado of the 90s.
Rick tanked two programs. Sad. You guys paid a steep price for you 2001 Rose Bowl win.
-
UW is 1st tier in 4th place right?creepycoug said:
I wouldn't say Colorado added to academis, but they didn't take anything away. They are firmly second tier academis in the P12.YellowSnow said:
Colorado has a rich tradition and fits in well in terms of academis ( @creepycoug ). Decent sized TV market as well.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Adding Utah was good for the conference
Colorado? No
It's unfortunate that they haven't been able to get back to Colorado of the 90s.
Rick tanked two programs. Sad. You guys paid a steep price for you 2001 Rose Bowl win. -
Colorado was good when Nebraska was good
Big 8 to Big 12 they were competitive
Both have struggled since changing leagues -
Depends on how you want to do the tiers ... err, how many tiers. Again, going by undergraduate selectivity (no who has the best telescopes, which is Arizona by a mile), you have Furd in its own tier, Cal/UCLA and arguably now USC/ then a decent jump to UW then a bunch of schools. Colorado is with a bunch of schools.YellowSnow said:
UW is 1st tier in 4th place right?creepycoug said:
I wouldn't say Colorado added to academis, but they didn't take anything away. They are firmly second tier academis in the P12.YellowSnow said:
Colorado has a rich tradition and fits in well in terms of academis ( @creepycoug ). Decent sized TV market as well.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Adding Utah was good for the conference
Colorado? No
It's unfortunate that they haven't been able to get back to Colorado of the 90s.
Rick tanked two programs. Sad. You guys paid a steep price for you 2001 Rose Bowl win. -
Said it in another thread but Colorado can leave too. Nothing personal, they just aren't west coast schools and I hate them.
Arizona's aren't either but I can begrudgingly accept them and SDSU.
Utah's head coach outlasting everyone who beat him and then left shouldn't impress anyone. -
2008 is the only year Whitless has lost less than 3 games. Since joining the Pac its pretty mediocre which means he sucks here
-
Utah can thank the drecks in the southern half of the conference for any aplomb they think they might possess.
The rest of the conference hasn't helped keep them in check, either.
Utes are pretty tall midgets. Let's call them the dwarves.
