Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

How Bad are the DT's?

245

Comments

  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,499 Standard Supporter
    edited August 2013
    HuskyJW said:

    DT will be an issue......Don't get mad cause you got called out. Just know the fucking positions and the guys that play 'em......it's not that tough....whiny bitches gonna bitch

    I'm gonna bid dawgman adieu (nice word choice faggot, and I'm appealing the $75,000) and complain that there is no football talk on Hardcore Husky.

    I know the positions and our personnel probably a lot better than you do. Evan Hudson will be playing DE in the 3-4 (Banks, Potoae, ect are his competition there, and DT in the 4-3 where he will have the same competition. Banks and Potoae are considered DT's and they play at the same spot.

    In Wilcox's scheme, it changes. For example in the Stanford game, we ran a 4-3 almost the entire game. Agianst the spread teams like Oregon and Arizona, we ran a 3-4. Like I said, a DE in the 3-4 is a 5 tech DT. Same schemes even call them DT, NT, DT for the three down lineman.



    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    RoadDawg55 said:

    HuskyJW said:

    DT will be an issue......Don't get mad cause you got called out. Just know the fucking positions and the guys that play 'em......it's not that tough....whiny bitches gonna bitch

    I'm gonna bid dawgman adieu (nice word choice faggot, and I'm appealing the $75,000) and complain that there is no football talk on Hardcore Husky.

    I know the positions and our personnel probably a lot better than you do. Evan Hudson will be playing DE in the 3-4 (Banks, Potoae, ect are his competition there, and DT in the 4-3 where he will have the same competition. In Wilcox's scheme, it changes. For example in the Stanford game, we ran a 4-3 almost the entire game. Agianst the spread teams like Oregon and Arizona, we ran a 3-4. Like I said, a DE in the 3-4 is a 5 tech DT. Same schemes even call them DT, NT, DT for the three down lineman.



    Appeal denied.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,499 Standard Supporter
    HuskyJW said:

    Don't be mad cause ya got called out.

    Have another drink


    Thanks for the advice, I will have a few more drinks.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Our DL is young. This only Tosh 2nd year to expect them to be like 1991 every year is just plain unrealistic and won't be tolerated here.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,761 Standard Supporter
    IrishDawg22 said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    IrishDawg22 said:

    I know this splitting a fine hair, but he was running at DE, spot previously held down by Crichton.

    And Finau plays DE.

    But can't argue that Potoa'e has been a major disappointment.

    Wrong. In the 4-3, Hudson was playing DT with Shelton. Hudson and Shirley were at End. I assume he will be taking Chrichton's place in the 3-4.

    Are you just going by Jude's blog and they way he listed them? Or do you have video or a article saying different?

    The majority of the games starting Dline looked like this:

    DE Hudson
    DT Shelton
    DE Chrichton
    RE (rush end) Shirley
    Come on guy, surely you know the difference between a 3-4 DE and a 4-3 DE?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622
    Sark's monumental failure with recruiting interior DLs and OLs is mind-blowing.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Passion said:

    Sark's monumental failure with recruiting interior DLs and OLs is mind-blowing.

    Easiest correction I will make all week.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,572
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Passion said:

    Sark's monumental failure with recruiting interior DLs and OLs is mind-blowing.

    Easiest correction I will make all week.
    Disagree. Ty was a failure. Sark on the other hand continues to maintain a C average.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,572
    RaceBannon said:

    greenblood said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Passion said:

    Sark's monumental failure with recruiting interior DLs and OLs is mind-blowing.

    Easiest correction I will make all week.
    Disagree. Ty was a failure. Sark on the other hand continues to maintain a C average.
    C was a failure in my two parent household
    RaceBannon said:

    greenblood said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Passion said:

    Sark's monumental failure with recruiting interior DLs and OLs is mind-blowing.

    Easiest correction I will make all week.
    Disagree. Ty was a failure. Sark on the other hand continues to maintain a C average.
    C was a failure in my two parent household
    As would be with any high achieving family. Unfortunately, UW is supported by the Focker family, where participation badges are proudly displayed. Thus, a C average is always acceptable.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter