Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
#12: The Disrespect is Unreal
Comments
-
FWIW CBS likes our Dwags this week.
https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/college-football-playoff-rankings-reactions-lsu-overrated-tennessee-underrated-in-penultimate-top-25/
"Underrated: No. 12 Washington
It seems like there's a knee-jerk reaction to assume that all Pac-12 teams are overrated and don't deserve national recognition, and Washington's ranking at No. 12 proves it. The Huskies have the nation's top passer in Michael Penix Jr., a top-10 receiver in Rome Odunze, a top-five scoring offense (40.8 points per game) and the Pac-12's second-best defense in terms of yards per play (5.52).
The loss to No. 17 UCLA is understandable, but the loss the following week to Arizona State is what's holding them back. But Utah -- which is one spot ahead of Washington -- has three losses, one of which was to a Florida team that went 6-6. Kansas State has three pretty solid losses (No. 18 Tulane, No. 3 TCU and No. 20 Texas), but they are still three losses. An argument could even be made that Washington's resume with wins over No. 15 Oregon State and No. 16 Oregon are more impressive than Clemson's signature win over No. 13 Florida State.
Washington deserves to be in the Top 10." -
Maybe playing all our games after midnight east coast time isn't that great of a contract?NoWarningJustDawg said:FWIW CBS likes our Dwags this week.
https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/college-football-playoff-rankings-reactions-lsu-overrated-tennessee-underrated-in-penultimate-top-25/
"Underrated: No. 12 Washington
It seems like there's a knee-jerk reaction to assume that all Pac-12 teams are overrated and don't deserve national recognition, and Washington's ranking at No. 12 proves it. The Huskies have the nation's top passer in Michael Penix Jr., a top-10 receiver in Rome Odunze, a top-five scoring offense (40.8 points per game) and the Pac-12's second-best defense in terms of yards per play (5.52).
The loss to No. 17 UCLA is understandable, but the loss the following week to Arizona State is what's holding them back. But Utah -- which is one spot ahead of Washington -- has three losses, one of which was to a Florida team that went 6-6. Kansas State has three pretty solid losses (No. 18 Tulane, No. 3 TCU and No. 20 Texas), but they are still three losses. An argument could even be made that Washington's resume with wins over No. 15 Oregon State and No. 16 Oregon are more impressive than Clemson's signature win over No. 13 Florida State.
Washington deserves to be in the Top 10." -
Utah and Kansas State will have 4 losses after championship weekend.
It will work itself out, but it's some kind of dumbass logic to have Utah leapfrog UW in rankings after they beat Colorado by a lower margin than us.Tequilla said:UW’s schedule this year was as soft as the Depends that you wear
I don’t think it really matters which is ranked ahead of the other right now because everything tied to UW is dependent on Friday
There are reasonable arguments for Utah to be ranked ahead of UW … this idea that it’s incomprehensible is idiotic
UW’s fan base has gone incredibly soft
Meanwhile we went on the road against a feisty 7win rival and handled business. If the committee is using resume argument, who's got better the final week?
I would get the committees nuts out of your mouth, it's a political body nothing more. -
"UW likely doesn’t win Game #1 in Florida"Tequilla said:
Seriously?RaceBannon said:
Sounds like you can't defend your stupid pointTequilla said:
Utah has a better resume at this point … things changeGreenRiverGatorz said:
Dumb fucking talking point. Tell Utah not to lose to a 6-6 Florida. Or Kansas State to beat someone better than a 7-5 Texas Tech. Who the fuck has Clemson beat?Tequilla said:Don’t lose to a shitty Arizona St team and none of this is a conversation point
Control what you can control
College football is literally built on the concept of evaluating an entire body of work and subjectively ranking teams. And the committee just laid bare how unserious their process is. Might as well let a Facebook poll set the rankings.
Stop being a low information snowflake Doog
You’ve lost your fastball from the winners win days
Losing at ASU is significantly worse than any of Utah’s losses
USC’s win against USC is better than UW’s best win
UW likely doesn’t win Game #1 in Florida
All metrics point to Utah being better (to date) than UW
UW will be in the Rose Bowl if USC wins
Getting your panties in a wad on this is small time BS
Is this one of the "metrics" you were talking about? Or is this just hypothetical bullshit you're trying to disguise as an argument? Might want to check the numbers again - my metrics tell me that Penix would have ass-blasted the gators in the swamp. Either way, Utah losing to a limpdick 6-6 Florida team isn't materially different than us losing to a limpdick 5-7 Michigan State. Except the latter didn't happen. The former did.
Utah lost their "marquee" OOC matchup, we won ours. In the only "common opponent" differentiator that mattered, we won at Auzten. They lost.
10-2 > 9-3. Fuck your "metrics".
Now do Kansas State. -
They lost to Florida!!! Checkmate seniorTequilla said:
Utah has a better resume at this point … things changeGreenRiverGatorz said:
Dumb fucking talking point. Tell Utah not to lose to a 6-6 Florida. Or Kansas State to beat someone better than a 7-5 Texas Tech. Who the fuck has Clemson beat?Tequilla said:Don’t lose to a shitty Arizona St team and none of this is a conversation point
Control what you can control
College football is literally built on the concept of evaluating an entire body of work and subjectively ranking teams. And the committee just laid bare how unserious their process is. Might as well let a Facebook poll set the rankings.
Stop being a low information snowflake Doog -
The issue isn’t really that Utah is ahead of uw. It’s that they leapfrogged with a win over colorado of all teams while uw beat a wazzu squad on the road. That’s the issue.
-
Bingo. All of the shit we're squabbling about was true last week. When Utah was ranked below us.AtomicDawg said:The issue isn’t really that Utah is ahead of uw. It’s that they leapfrogged with a win over colorado of all teams while uw beat a wazzu squad on the road. That’s the issue.
The biggest takeaway here is that the CFP committee is completely nonsensical in their selection methodology. In fact there is no methodology. -
The nation is outraged! This has legs! It will not stand!
-
Are the gloves coming off here?Tequilla said:
Seriously?RaceBannon said:
Sounds like you can't defend your stupid pointTequilla said:
Utah has a better resume at this point … things changeGreenRiverGatorz said:
Dumb fucking talking point. Tell Utah not to lose to a 6-6 Florida. Or Kansas State to beat someone better than a 7-5 Texas Tech. Who the fuck has Clemson beat?Tequilla said:Don’t lose to a shitty Arizona St team and none of this is a conversation point
Control what you can control
College football is literally built on the concept of evaluating an entire body of work and subjectively ranking teams. And the committee just laid bare how unserious their process is. Might as well let a Facebook poll set the rankings.
Stop being a low information snowflake Doog
You’ve lost your fastball from the winners win days
Losing at ASU is significantly worse than any of Utah’s losses
USC’s win against USC is better than UW’s best win
UW likely doesn’t win Game #1 in Florida
All metrics point to Utah being better (to date) than UW
UW will be in the Rose Bowl if USC wins
Getting your panties in a wad on this is small time BS -
To reiterate I don't even care about the CFP
I care bout not playing this Friday when the metrics indicate UW should and it would actually draw viewers
And fuck thinking Amazon is going to bail this out. Kill the Pac 12 with fire -
That’s what my jumbled paragraph was trying to sayAtomicDawg said:The issue isn’t really that Utah is ahead of uw. It’s that they leapfrogged with a win over colorado of all teams while uw beat a wazzu squad on the road. That’s the issue.
-
I see it as one more dagger in this shitty mismanaged conference.RaceBannon said:To reiterate I don't even care about the CFP
I care bout not playing this Friday when the metrics indicate UW should and it would actually draw viewers
And fuck thinking Amazon is going to bail this out. Kill the Pac 12 with fire -
No the issue with me is also that they're ahead of UW. Anyone that has watched them knows they're a 5 loss team disguised as a Tier I Pac team this year, and a huge part of that is preseason bullshit.AtomicDawg said:The issue isn’t really that Utah is ahead of uw. It’s that they leapfrogged with a win over colorado of all teams while uw beat a wazzu squad on the road. That’s the issue.
7 fucking points against a limp dick Oregon. Relies on a tight end basically for offense. Anyone who thinks they're the #2 team in the conference is FS and Lincoln Riley is going to smear their entrails all over Vegas while Whittingham gives his usual blank stare that he would always do when playing UW. -
where is sven to flag this entire thread about rankings. even if these actually sort of matter
-
He’s working on his brandWilburHooksHands said:where is sven to flag this entire thread about rankings. even if these actually sort of matter
-
You’re right it will work itself outDoogles said:Utah and Kansas State will have 4 losses after championship weekend.
It will work itself out, but it's some kind of dumbass logic to have Utah leapfrog UW in rankings after they beat Colorado by a lower margin than us.Tequilla said:UW’s schedule this year was as soft as the Depends that you wear
I don’t think it really matters which is ranked ahead of the other right now because everything tied to UW is dependent on Friday
There are reasonable arguments for Utah to be ranked ahead of UW … this idea that it’s incomprehensible is idiotic
UW’s fan base has gone incredibly soft
Meanwhile we went on the road against a feisty 7win rival and handled business. If the committee is using resume argument, who's got better the final week?
I would get the committees nuts out of your mouth, it's a political body nothing more.
People trying to compare Florida and Arizona St are fooling themselves though -
Losing in the Swamp is way different than winning at home … if you assume they are equal to start withGreenRiverGatorz said:
"UW likely doesn’t win Game #1 in Florida"Tequilla said:
Seriously?RaceBannon said:
Sounds like you can't defend your stupid pointTequilla said:
Utah has a better resume at this point … things changeGreenRiverGatorz said:
Dumb fucking talking point. Tell Utah not to lose to a 6-6 Florida. Or Kansas State to beat someone better than a 7-5 Texas Tech. Who the fuck has Clemson beat?Tequilla said:Don’t lose to a shitty Arizona St team and none of this is a conversation point
Control what you can control
College football is literally built on the concept of evaluating an entire body of work and subjectively ranking teams. And the committee just laid bare how unserious their process is. Might as well let a Facebook poll set the rankings.
Stop being a low information snowflake Doog
You’ve lost your fastball from the winners win days
Losing at ASU is significantly worse than any of Utah’s losses
USC’s win against USC is better than UW’s best win
UW likely doesn’t win Game #1 in Florida
All metrics point to Utah being better (to date) than UW
UW will be in the Rose Bowl if USC wins
Getting your panties in a wad on this is small time BS
Is this one of the "metrics" you were talking about? Or is this just hypothetical bullshit you're trying to disguise as an argument? Might want to check the numbers again - my metrics tell me that Penix would have ass-blasted the gators in the swamp. Either way, Utah losing to a limpdick 6-6 Florida team isn't materially different than us losing to a limpdick 5-7 Michigan State. Except the latter didn't happen. The former did.
Utah lost their "marquee" OOC matchup, we won ours. In the only "common opponent" differentiator that mattered, we won at Auzten. They lost.
10-2 > 9-3. Fuck your "metrics".
Now do Kansas State.
Losing to ASU is a bad loss … is what it is
It’s amazing how Charmin soft Doogs are -
Losing at Florida > Losing at ASU … by a lotFireCohen said:
They lost to Florida!!! Checkmate seniorTequilla said:
Utah has a better resume at this point … things changeGreenRiverGatorz said:
Dumb fucking talking point. Tell Utah not to lose to a 6-6 Florida. Or Kansas State to beat someone better than a 7-5 Texas Tech. Who the fuck has Clemson beat?Tequilla said:Don’t lose to a shitty Arizona St team and none of this is a conversation point
Control what you can control
College football is literally built on the concept of evaluating an entire body of work and subjectively ranking teams. And the committee just laid bare how unserious their process is. Might as well let a Facebook poll set the rankings.
Stop being a low information snowflake Doog -
The Committee is idiotic for doing thatAtomicDawg said:The issue isn’t really that Utah is ahead of uw. It’s that they leapfrogged with a win over colorado of all teams while uw beat a wazzu squad on the road. That’s the issue.
This isn’t the first time they’ve done shady stuff to support whatever agenda they have … won’t be the last -
Not reallyMikeDamone said:
Are the gloves coming off here?Tequilla said:
Seriously?RaceBannon said:
Sounds like you can't defend your stupid pointTequilla said:
Utah has a better resume at this point … things changeGreenRiverGatorz said:
Dumb fucking talking point. Tell Utah not to lose to a 6-6 Florida. Or Kansas State to beat someone better than a 7-5 Texas Tech. Who the fuck has Clemson beat?Tequilla said:Don’t lose to a shitty Arizona St team and none of this is a conversation point
Control what you can control
College football is literally built on the concept of evaluating an entire body of work and subjectively ranking teams. And the committee just laid bare how unserious their process is. Might as well let a Facebook poll set the rankings.
Stop being a low information snowflake Doog
You’ve lost your fastball from the winners win days
Losing at ASU is significantly worse than any of Utah’s losses
USC’s win against USC is better than UW’s best win
UW likely doesn’t win Game #1 in Florida
All metrics point to Utah being better (to date) than UW
UW will be in the Rose Bowl if USC wins
Getting your panties in a wad on this is small time BS
Just amused at how many Doogs are losing their shit on something that all reporting indicates doesn’t matter -
This take will go down as an all timer when Utah beats sc.haie said:
No the issue with me is also that they're ahead of UW. Anyone that has watched them knows they're a 5 loss team disguised as a Tier I Pac team this year, and a huge part of that is preseason bullshit.AtomicDawg said:The issue isn’t really that Utah is ahead of uw. It’s that they leapfrogged with a win over colorado of all teams while uw beat a wazzu squad on the road. That’s the issue.
7 fucking points against a limp dick Oregon. Relies on a tight end basically for offense. Anyone who thinks they're the #2 team in the conference is FS and Lincoln Riley is going to smear their entrails all over Vegas while Whittingham gives his usual blank stare that he would always do when playing UW. -
Then we agree. Winning at home is way better than losing at the swamp. To a 6-6 team.Tequilla said:
Losing in the Swamp is way different than winning at home … if you assume they are equal to start withGreenRiverGatorz said:
"UW likely doesn’t win Game #1 in Florida"Tequilla said:
Seriously?RaceBannon said:
Sounds like you can't defend your stupid pointTequilla said:
Utah has a better resume at this point … things changeGreenRiverGatorz said:
Dumb fucking talking point. Tell Utah not to lose to a 6-6 Florida. Or Kansas State to beat someone better than a 7-5 Texas Tech. Who the fuck has Clemson beat?Tequilla said:Don’t lose to a shitty Arizona St team and none of this is a conversation point
Control what you can control
College football is literally built on the concept of evaluating an entire body of work and subjectively ranking teams. And the committee just laid bare how unserious their process is. Might as well let a Facebook poll set the rankings.
Stop being a low information snowflake Doog
You’ve lost your fastball from the winners win days
Losing at ASU is significantly worse than any of Utah’s losses
USC’s win against USC is better than UW’s best win
UW likely doesn’t win Game #1 in Florida
All metrics point to Utah being better (to date) than UW
UW will be in the Rose Bowl if USC wins
Getting your panties in a wad on this is small time BS
Is this one of the "metrics" you were talking about? Or is this just hypothetical bullshit you're trying to disguise as an argument? Might want to check the numbers again - my metrics tell me that Penix would have ass-blasted the gators in the swamp. Either way, Utah losing to a limpdick 6-6 Florida team isn't materially different than us losing to a limpdick 5-7 Michigan State. Except the latter didn't happen. The former did.
Utah lost their "marquee" OOC matchup, we won ours. In the only "common opponent" differentiator that mattered, we won at Auzten. They lost.
10-2 > 9-3. Fuck your "metrics".
Now do Kansas State. -
If Florida were named Kentucky or Mississippi state that loss has no cred. It was a bad loss. Worse than it looked at the time but that never is factored in.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Then we agree. Winning at home is way better than losing at the swamp. To a 6-6 team.Tequilla said:
Losing in the Swamp is way different than winning at home … if you assume they are equal to start withGreenRiverGatorz said:
"UW likely doesn’t win Game #1 in Florida"Tequilla said:
Seriously?RaceBannon said:
Sounds like you can't defend your stupid pointTequilla said:
Utah has a better resume at this point … things changeGreenRiverGatorz said:
Dumb fucking talking point. Tell Utah not to lose to a 6-6 Florida. Or Kansas State to beat someone better than a 7-5 Texas Tech. Who the fuck has Clemson beat?Tequilla said:Don’t lose to a shitty Arizona St team and none of this is a conversation point
Control what you can control
College football is literally built on the concept of evaluating an entire body of work and subjectively ranking teams. And the committee just laid bare how unserious their process is. Might as well let a Facebook poll set the rankings.
Stop being a low information snowflake Doog
You’ve lost your fastball from the winners win days
Losing at ASU is significantly worse than any of Utah’s losses
USC’s win against USC is better than UW’s best win
UW likely doesn’t win Game #1 in Florida
All metrics point to Utah being better (to date) than UW
UW will be in the Rose Bowl if USC wins
Getting your panties in a wad on this is small time BS
Is this one of the "metrics" you were talking about? Or is this just hypothetical bullshit you're trying to disguise as an argument? Might want to check the numbers again - my metrics tell me that Penix would have ass-blasted the gators in the swamp. Either way, Utah losing to a limpdick 6-6 Florida team isn't materially different than us losing to a limpdick 5-7 Michigan State. Except the latter didn't happen. The former did.
Utah lost their "marquee" OOC matchup, we won ours. In the only "common opponent" differentiator that mattered, we won at Auzten. They lost.
10-2 > 9-3. Fuck your "metrics".
Now do Kansas State.
-
It's just irritating for the reason you mentioned in the post before this. They clearly had an agenda. They didnt make much of an effort to hide it either.Tequilla said:
Not reallyMikeDamone said:
Are the gloves coming off here?Tequilla said:
Seriously?RaceBannon said:
Sounds like you can't defend your stupid pointTequilla said:
Utah has a better resume at this point … things changeGreenRiverGatorz said:
Dumb fucking talking point. Tell Utah not to lose to a 6-6 Florida. Or Kansas State to beat someone better than a 7-5 Texas Tech. Who the fuck has Clemson beat?Tequilla said:Don’t lose to a shitty Arizona St team and none of this is a conversation point
Control what you can control
College football is literally built on the concept of evaluating an entire body of work and subjectively ranking teams. And the committee just laid bare how unserious their process is. Might as well let a Facebook poll set the rankings.
Stop being a low information snowflake Doog
You’ve lost your fastball from the winners win days
Losing at ASU is significantly worse than any of Utah’s losses
USC’s win against USC is better than UW’s best win
UW likely doesn’t win Game #1 in Florida
All metrics point to Utah being better (to date) than UW
UW will be in the Rose Bowl if USC wins
Getting your panties in a wad on this is small time BS
Just amused at how many Doogs are losing their shit on something that all reporting indicates doesn’t matter -
You're surprised? Or just amused? It could go no other way on Doog Central.Tequilla said:
Not reallyMikeDamone said:
Are the gloves coming off here?Tequilla said:
Seriously?RaceBannon said:
Sounds like you can't defend your stupid pointTequilla said:
Utah has a better resume at this point … things changeGreenRiverGatorz said:
Dumb fucking talking point. Tell Utah not to lose to a 6-6 Florida. Or Kansas State to beat someone better than a 7-5 Texas Tech. Who the fuck has Clemson beat?Tequilla said:Don’t lose to a shitty Arizona St team and none of this is a conversation point
Control what you can control
College football is literally built on the concept of evaluating an entire body of work and subjectively ranking teams. And the committee just laid bare how unserious their process is. Might as well let a Facebook poll set the rankings.
Stop being a low information snowflake Doog
You’ve lost your fastball from the winners win days
Losing at ASU is significantly worse than any of Utah’s losses
USC’s win against USC is better than UW’s best win
UW likely doesn’t win Game #1 in Florida
All metrics point to Utah being better (to date) than UW
UW will be in the Rose Bowl if USC wins
Getting your panties in a wad on this is small time BS
Just amused at how many Doogs are losing their shit on something that all reporting indicates doesn’t matter -
Make sure you caption the screenshot with "I respect a try hard mountain west program that feasted off of shitty South teams and Clay Helton"AtomicDawg said:
This take will go down as an all timer when Utah beats sc.haie said:
No the issue with me is also that they're ahead of UW. Anyone that has watched them knows they're a 5 loss team disguised as a Tier I Pac team this year, and a huge part of that is preseason bullshit.AtomicDawg said:The issue isn’t really that Utah is ahead of uw. It’s that they leapfrogged with a win over colorado of all teams while uw beat a wazzu squad on the road. That’s the issue.
7 fucking points against a limp dick Oregon. Relies on a tight end basically for offense. Anyone who thinks they're the #2 team in the conference is FS and Lincoln Riley is going to smear their entrails all over Vegas while Whittingham gives his usual blank stare that he would always do when playing UW. -
We should just be happy with less like some NW teams
-
I expect it out of many … some here though it’s surprising … don’t twistMikeDamone said:
You're surprised? Or just amused? It could go no other way on Doog Central.Tequilla said:
Not reallyMikeDamone said:
Are the gloves coming off here?Tequilla said:
Seriously?RaceBannon said:
Sounds like you can't defend your stupid pointTequilla said:
Utah has a better resume at this point … things changeGreenRiverGatorz said:
Dumb fucking talking point. Tell Utah not to lose to a 6-6 Florida. Or Kansas State to beat someone better than a 7-5 Texas Tech. Who the fuck has Clemson beat?Tequilla said:Don’t lose to a shitty Arizona St team and none of this is a conversation point
Control what you can control
College football is literally built on the concept of evaluating an entire body of work and subjectively ranking teams. And the committee just laid bare how unserious their process is. Might as well let a Facebook poll set the rankings.
Stop being a low information snowflake Doog
You’ve lost your fastball from the winners win days
Losing at ASU is significantly worse than any of Utah’s losses
USC’s win against USC is better than UW’s best win
UW likely doesn’t win Game #1 in Florida
All metrics point to Utah being better (to date) than UW
UW will be in the Rose Bowl if USC wins
Getting your panties in a wad on this is small time BS
Just amused at how many Doogs are losing their shit on something that all reporting indicates doesn’t matter -
Nobody is saying ASU is a better loss than Florida.Tequilla said:
You’re right it will work itself outDoogles said:Utah and Kansas State will have 4 losses after championship weekend.
It will work itself out, but it's some kind of dumbass logic to have Utah leapfrog UW in rankings after they beat Colorado by a lower margin than us.Tequilla said:UW’s schedule this year was as soft as the Depends that you wear
I don’t think it really matters which is ranked ahead of the other right now because everything tied to UW is dependent on Friday
There are reasonable arguments for Utah to be ranked ahead of UW … this idea that it’s incomprehensible is idiotic
UW’s fan base has gone incredibly soft
Meanwhile we went on the road against a feisty 7win rival and handled business. If the committee is using resume argument, who's got better the final week?
I would get the committees nuts out of your mouth, it's a political body nothing more.
People trying to compare Florida and Arizona St are fooling themselves though
Just calling out the inconsistency of the committees logic. -
How does this explain a sudden change 7 weeks later just this last week?Tequilla said:
Seriously?RaceBannon said:
Sounds like you can't defend your stupid pointTequilla said:
Utah has a better resume at this point … things changeGreenRiverGatorz said:
Dumb fucking talking point. Tell Utah not to lose to a 6-6 Florida. Or Kansas State to beat someone better than a 7-5 Texas Tech. Who the fuck has Clemson beat?Tequilla said:Don’t lose to a shitty Arizona St team and none of this is a conversation point
Control what you can control
College football is literally built on the concept of evaluating an entire body of work and subjectively ranking teams. And the committee just laid bare how unserious their process is. Might as well let a Facebook poll set the rankings.
Stop being a low information snowflake Doog
You’ve lost your fastball from the winners win days
Losing at ASU is significantly worse than any of Utah’s losses
USC’s win against USC is better than UW’s best win
UW likely doesn’t win Game #1 in Florida
All metrics point to Utah being better (to date) than UW
UW will be in the Rose Bowl if USC wins
Getting your panties in a wad on this is small time BS
