Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Kari Lake tweet this morning

189111314

Comments

  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,096 Standard Supporter
    So, during the worst pandemic in a century and with a dementia patient hiding in his basement, voter turnout was up by 32 million. Okay.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,332

    So, during the worst pandemic in a century and with a dementia patient hiding in his basement, voter turnout was up by 32 million. Okay.

    Apparently Bill thinks Daddy didn’t really receive 74 million votes.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,332
    edited November 2022

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    '04 122 million votes
    '08 130 million votes
    '12 127 million votes
    '16 129 million votes
    '20 155 million votes

    Nothing to see here, say the libtards. It's 2023. Move on.

    Two low voter participation rate elections followed by one that saw relatively high voter participation by recent standards. Voter participation over 60% is too far fetched for TurdForBrains.
    Largest increase in past 2020 years was 8 million who turned out for Obama. Ever seen a more compelling candidate?

    Yes! In 2020! A geriatric fool from his basement who couldn't draw flies in public trounces Hillary's count by 15 million votes.

    81 Million Votes!! Who can reasonably question that? More compelling and popular candidate than Obama!

    Wanna buy a bridge?
    And yet it amounts to a pedestrian 62-64% participation rate. 2008 was a little lower. 2012 and 2016 were mid 50s
    Like I've asked all day long: Explain the massive increase.
    8 - 10 % more of the electorate cared enough to vote as compared to 2016.

    Like people have been answering you.

    All day.
    20% Increase over 2016, actually.

    Not that it matters anymore than voting security to you.
    The two statements, yours and mine, are not in conflict. I blame your middle school for you thinking otherwise.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    '04 122 million votes
    '08 130 million votes
    '12 127 million votes
    '16 129 million votes
    '20 155 million votes

    Nothing to see here, say the libtards. It's 2023. Move on.

    Two low voter participation rate elections followed by one that saw relatively high voter participation by recent standards. Voter participation over 60% is too far fetched for TurdForBrains.
    Largest increase in past 2020 years was 8 million who turned out for Obama. Ever seen a more compelling candidate?

    Yes! In 2020! A geriatric fool from his basement who couldn't draw flies in public trounces Hillary's count by 15 million votes.

    81 Million Votes!! Who can reasonably question that? More compelling and popular candidate than Obama!

    Wanna buy a bridge?
    And yet it amounts to a pedestrian 62-64% participation rate. 2008 was a little lower. 2012 and 2016 were mid 50s
    Like I've asked all day long: Explain the massive increase.
    8 - 10 % more of the electorate cared enough to vote as compared to 2016.

    Like people have been answering you.

    All day.
    20% Increase over 2016, actually.

    Not that it matters anymore than voting security to you.
    The two statements, yours and mine, are not in conflict. I blame your middle school for you thinking otherwise.
    Except you cannot verify or prove yours.
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,096 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    So, during the worst pandemic in a century and with a dementia patient hiding in his basement, voter turnout was up by 32 million. Okay.

    Apparently Bill thinks Daddy didn’t really receive 74 million votes.
    So you have nothing again just like AOC and Mellow
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,332

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    '04 122 million votes
    '08 130 million votes
    '12 127 million votes
    '16 129 million votes
    '20 155 million votes

    Nothing to see here, say the libtards. It's 2023. Move on.

    Two low voter participation rate elections followed by one that saw relatively high voter participation by recent standards. Voter participation over 60% is too far fetched for TurdForBrains.
    Largest increase in past 2020 years was 8 million who turned out for Obama. Ever seen a more compelling candidate?

    Yes! In 2020! A geriatric fool from his basement who couldn't draw flies in public trounces Hillary's count by 15 million votes.

    81 Million Votes!! Who can reasonably question that? More compelling and popular candidate than Obama!

    Wanna buy a bridge?
    And yet it amounts to a pedestrian 62-64% participation rate. 2008 was a little lower. 2012 and 2016 were mid 50s
    Like I've asked all day long: Explain the massive increase.
    8 - 10 % more of the electorate cared enough to vote as compared to 2016.

    Like people have been answering you.

    All day.
    20% Increase over 2016, actually.

    Not that it matters anymore than voting security to you.
    The two statements, yours and mine, are not in conflict. I blame your middle school for you thinking otherwise.
    Except you cannot verify or prove yours.
    So TurdForBrains also questions how Daddy could possibly have received 12 million “new” votes.
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,226 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    '04 122 million votes
    '08 130 million votes
    '12 127 million votes
    '16 129 million votes
    '20 155 million votes

    Nothing to see here, say the libtards. It's 2023. Move on.

    Two low voter participation rate elections followed by one that saw relatively high voter participation by recent standards. Voter participation over 60% is too far fetched for TurdForBrains.
    Largest increase in past 2020 years was 8 million who turned out for Obama. Ever seen a more compelling candidate?

    Yes! In 2020! A geriatric fool from his basement who couldn't draw flies in public trounces Hillary's count by 15 million votes.

    81 Million Votes!! Who can reasonably question that? More compelling and popular candidate than Obama!

    Wanna buy a bridge?
    And yet it amounts to a pedestrian 62-64% participation rate. 2008 was a little lower. 2012 and 2016 were mid 50s
    Like I've asked all day long: Explain the massive increase.
    8 - 10 % more of the electorate cared enough to vote as compared to 2016.

    Like people have been answering you.

    All day.
    20% Increase over 2016, actually.

    Not that it matters anymore than voting security to you.
    The two statements, yours and mine, are not in conflict. I blame your middle school for you thinking otherwise.
    Except you cannot verify or prove yours.
    So TurdForBrains also questions how Daddy could possibly have received 12 million “new” votes.
    I totally open to looking into that too.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,332

    HHusky said:

    So, during the worst pandemic in a century and with a dementia patient hiding in his basement, voter turnout was up by 32 million. Okay.

    Apparently Bill thinks Daddy didn’t really receive 74 million votes.
    So you have nothing again just like AOC and Mellow
    Slow dawning recognition of how stupid your argument is or just slow and stupid?

    You’re inscrutable, Bill.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,435 Founders Club
    Lot of anger from team we won don't even think about questioning it

    A tell
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    '04 122 million votes
    '08 130 million votes
    '12 127 million votes
    '16 129 million votes
    '20 155 million votes

    Nothing to see here, say the libtards. It's 2023. Move on.

    Two low voter participation rate elections followed by one that saw relatively high voter participation by recent standards. Voter participation over 60% is too far fetched for TurdForBrains.
    Largest increase in past 2020 years was 8 million who turned out for Obama. Ever seen a more compelling candidate?

    Yes! In 2020! A geriatric fool from his basement who couldn't draw flies in public trounces Hillary's count by 15 million votes.

    81 Million Votes!! Who can reasonably question that? More compelling and popular candidate than Obama!

    Wanna buy a bridge?
    And yet it amounts to a pedestrian 62-64% participation rate. 2008 was a little lower. 2012 and 2016 were mid 50s
    Like I've asked all day long: Explain the massive increase.
    8 - 10 % more of the electorate cared enough to vote as compared to 2016.

    Like people have been answering you.

    All day.
    20% Increase over 2016, actually.

    Not that it matters anymore than voting security to you.
    The two statements, yours and mine, are not in conflict. I blame your middle school for you thinking otherwise.
    Except you cannot verify or prove yours.
    So TurdForBrains also questions how Daddy could possibly have received 12 million “new” votes.
    Judging from the size of Trump's rallies in 2020 versus 2016, I'm not surprised he received more votes in 2020 than 2016. I'm also not surprised Biden's tally was well above Hillary's, given her lack of appeal.

    12 Million more votes for Trump? 15 Million more for Biden? Yes, I question those numbers. Easy to verify in states that value security and don't vote by mail. Impossible in the states that do. Your favorite states.