Kari Lake tweet this morning
Comments
-
Like I've asked all day long: Explain the massive increase.HHusky said:
And yet it amounts to a pedestrian 62-64% participation rate. 2008 was a little lower. 2012 and 2016 were mid 50sTurdBomber said:
Largest increase in past 2020 years was 8 million who turned out for Obama. Ever seen a more compelling candidate?HHusky said:
Two low voter participation rate elections followed by one that saw relatively high voter participation by recent standards. Voter participation over 60% is too far fetched for TurdForBrains.TurdBomber said:'04 122 million votes
'08 130 million votes
'12 127 million votes
'16 129 million votes
'20 155 million votes
Nothing to see here, say the libtards. It's 2023. Move on.
Yes! In 2020! A geriatric fool from his basement who couldn't draw flies in public trounces Hillary's count by 15 million votes.
81 Million Votes!! Who can reasonably question that? More compelling and popular candidate than Obama!
Wanna buy a bridge? -
8 - 10 % more of the electorate cared enough to vote as compared to 2016.TurdBomber said:
Like I've asked all day long: Explain the massive increase.HHusky said:
And yet it amounts to a pedestrian 62-64% participation rate. 2008 was a little lower. 2012 and 2016 were mid 50sTurdBomber said:
Largest increase in past 2020 years was 8 million who turned out for Obama. Ever seen a more compelling candidate?HHusky said:
Two low voter participation rate elections followed by one that saw relatively high voter participation by recent standards. Voter participation over 60% is too far fetched for TurdForBrains.TurdBomber said:'04 122 million votes
'08 130 million votes
'12 127 million votes
'16 129 million votes
'20 155 million votes
Nothing to see here, say the libtards. It's 2023. Move on.
Yes! In 2020! A geriatric fool from his basement who couldn't draw flies in public trounces Hillary's count by 15 million votes.
81 Million Votes!! Who can reasonably question that? More compelling and popular candidate than Obama!
Wanna buy a bridge?
Like people have been answering you.
All day.
-
Unfortunately, due to vote harvesting in critical states, you'll never be able to prove otherwise with mail-in voting.HHusky said:
8 - 10 % more of the electorate cared enough to have others vote for them as compared to 2016.TurdBomber said:
Like I've asked all day long: Explain the massive increase.HHusky said:
And yet it amounts to a pedestrian 62-64% participation rate. 2008 was a little lower. 2012 and 2016 were mid 50sTurdBomber said:
Largest increase in past 2020 years was 8 million who turned out for Obama. Ever seen a more compelling candidate?HHusky said:
Two low voter participation rate elections followed by one that saw relatively high voter participation by recent standards. Voter participation over 60% is too far fetched for TurdForBrains.TurdBomber said:'04 122 million votes
'08 130 million votes
'12 127 million votes
'16 129 million votes
'20 155 million votes
Nothing to see here, say the libtards. It's 2023. Move on.
Yes! In 2020! A geriatric fool from his basement who couldn't draw flies in public trounces Hillary's count by 15 million votes.
81 Million Votes!! Who can reasonably question that? More compelling and popular candidate than Obama!
Wanna buy a bridge?
Like people have been answering you.
All day.
Which warms your heart, I'm sure. -
All commie all the time. Centrist communist I'm sure.MelloDawg said:
What is my party line? Pretty certain I haven’t declared a party.UW_Doog_Bot said:
This but also.Swaye said:I'm surprised any of you keep arguing with Team Prog over this. They will never change their minds. They WANT no chain of custody. They WANT opportunity for fraud. Just like they are trying to change election laws to lets felons and illegals vote, etc. They have no valid reasons for wanting less verification, thus security, in the system. And because their position is indefensible, I mean who could possibly be against one citizen one verifiable vote, they have forced Jim Crow 2.0 into the lexicon. Same as it's always been. If your position has no basis in fairness, but you can't say that, blame racism. The progs here know that all the legislative efforts to loosen vote security are by design, to ensure Dems get elected. And if you complain about it, you must be a racist.
Republicans are going to have to figure out a way to win in this environment, and then when finally in power do not puss out, stand up to the charges of racism, and fix election laws state by state. See DeSantis, Ron, for ways to do that.
It's obvious these people have no values or principles.
They don't care if they are hypocrites. They don't care if they are liars. They don't care if they've been proven wrong and given a [Citation]. They don't care if they apply moving standards and goalposts. They don't care if something is purely partisan. It's all just a means to an end for people who lack any internal morality.
They are partisans and appartchiks who have internalized the party propaganda as part of their identity. They are demoocrats.
@MelloDawg @HHusky @BearsWiin consistently demonstrate it by parroting the party line. All while maintaining a delusional sense of moral and intellectual superiority. -
So your question wasn’t an honest one. Imagine my surprise.TurdBomber said:
Unfortunately, due to vote harvesting in critical states, you'll never be able to prove otherwise with mail-in voting.HHusky said:
8 - 10 % more of the electorate cared enough to have others vote for them as compared to 2016.TurdBomber said:
Like I've asked all day long: Explain the massive increase.HHusky said:
And yet it amounts to a pedestrian 62-64% participation rate. 2008 was a little lower. 2012 and 2016 were mid 50sTurdBomber said:
Largest increase in past 2020 years was 8 million who turned out for Obama. Ever seen a more compelling candidate?HHusky said:
Two low voter participation rate elections followed by one that saw relatively high voter participation by recent standards. Voter participation over 60% is too far fetched for TurdForBrains.TurdBomber said:'04 122 million votes
'08 130 million votes
'12 127 million votes
'16 129 million votes
'20 155 million votes
Nothing to see here, say the libtards. It's 2023. Move on.
Yes! In 2020! A geriatric fool from his basement who couldn't draw flies in public trounces Hillary's count by 15 million votes.
81 Million Votes!! Who can reasonably question that? More compelling and popular candidate than Obama!
Wanna buy a bridge?
Like people have been answering you.
All day.
Which warms your heart, I'm sure. -
I'm sorry mam but you don't qualify as a study.HHusky said:
Higher voter turnout = More votes?UW_Doog_Bot said:
And yet you swallowed "studies show" without [Citation]. Studies...MelloDawg said:
There have been explanations in links provided in this thread. That said, the “fraud cuz a pipe burst in Georgia and something something Venezuela and Dominion and the mules again” explanation is just easier to compute for some.TurdBomber said:
Still haven't explained where 26 million new voters came from in 2022. Why are you ducking the question?MelloDawg said:
Sounds like it would hold up in a court of law to me. Judgment for the plaintiff.TurdBomber said:
Good for you. In person voting is not a concern, like I said, voting by mail and vote harvesting are the issues.AOG said:
Speculation... the facts are that multiple studies have show that voter fraud is very very very rare... and it stands to reason. Who'd risk a felony from a few lousy votes? Personally I had to input my driver's license, they checked my signatureTurdBomber said:Regardless of party, mail in voting and especially vote harvesting invite malarky and shenanigans by breaking the chain of custody and having no means of verifying a ballot was properly filled out by the person's name it bears. No ID, no precinct, signature verification is a joke, so it's mostly based on good faith, which the party who pushed Russian Collusion for 4 years is not entitled to.
If elections aren't secure, there's no way to validate them, and the party in power doesn't indict or investigate itself, so by the time Election Day rolls around, it's too late to challenge without a boatload of cash, volunteers, and a court willing to allow audits, which few are, because it's much easier to throw the problems back into the lap of the legislature and say, "you wanted this, you got it."
Can't anyone explain, like you or @MelloDawg said has been done multiple times, where 26 million new votes came from in 2020. If there's an explanation that bests my speculation, I'd like to hear it, as I haven't yet, despite your confidence and assurances.
How many weeks will pass without an answer from those of you who claim and believe all mail-in-voting elections are squeaky clean and were in 2020 and 2022?
In other news, it’s almost 2023.
Right along party lines.
TugCons can’t be sure. Need an unbiased study.
[Citation Needed] -
Who better to judge honesty than you?HHusky said:
So your question wasn’t an honest one. Imagine my surprise.TurdBomber said:
Unfortunately, due to vote harvesting in critical states, you'll never be able to prove otherwise with mail-in voting.HHusky said:
8 - 10 % more of the electorate cared enough to have others vote for them as compared to 2016.TurdBomber said:
Like I've asked all day long: Explain the massive increase.HHusky said:
And yet it amounts to a pedestrian 62-64% participation rate. 2008 was a little lower. 2012 and 2016 were mid 50sTurdBomber said:
Largest increase in past 2020 years was 8 million who turned out for Obama. Ever seen a more compelling candidate?HHusky said:
Two low voter participation rate elections followed by one that saw relatively high voter participation by recent standards. Voter participation over 60% is too far fetched for TurdForBrains.TurdBomber said:'04 122 million votes
'08 130 million votes
'12 127 million votes
'16 129 million votes
'20 155 million votes
Nothing to see here, say the libtards. It's 2023. Move on.
Yes! In 2020! A geriatric fool from his basement who couldn't draw flies in public trounces Hillary's count by 15 million votes.
81 Million Votes!! Who can reasonably question that? More compelling and popular candidate than Obama!
Wanna buy a bridge?
Like people have been answering you.
All day.
Which warms your heart, I'm sure. -
Daddy got 12 million of the “new” votes, ladies.
Mules?
#QuiteAConspiracy -
20% Increase over 2016, actually.HHusky said:
8 - 10 % more of the electorate cared enough to vote as compared to 2016.TurdBomber said:
Like I've asked all day long: Explain the massive increase.HHusky said:
And yet it amounts to a pedestrian 62-64% participation rate. 2008 was a little lower. 2012 and 2016 were mid 50sTurdBomber said:
Largest increase in past 2020 years was 8 million who turned out for Obama. Ever seen a more compelling candidate?HHusky said:
Two low voter participation rate elections followed by one that saw relatively high voter participation by recent standards. Voter participation over 60% is too far fetched for TurdForBrains.TurdBomber said:'04 122 million votes
'08 130 million votes
'12 127 million votes
'16 129 million votes
'20 155 million votes
Nothing to see here, say the libtards. It's 2023. Move on.
Yes! In 2020! A geriatric fool from his basement who couldn't draw flies in public trounces Hillary's count by 15 million votes.
81 Million Votes!! Who can reasonably question that? More compelling and popular candidate than Obama!
Wanna buy a bridge?
Like people have been answering you.
All day.
Not that it matters anymore than voting security to you. -
There is really a solution to fuckbrainedBomber's election anxiety. His electile dysfunction worries. He wants to know how so many Americans voted. Simple. Go find who voted in 2020 and just add it up yourself. What else is there? He won't read the scholarly number crunching and analysis. So just go and find all the voters
