Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
You had to cheer for Max Headroom's son Bo Nix and still went 9-3 and lost to both your rivals
Comments
-
haie said:
After the Flyover Cup ended I turned to my wife and said, "Thank God Oregon is a still a national brand. They'll be okay"
-
Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.WoolleyDoog said:
Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.MikeSeaver said:
You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.hardhat said:
I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"
Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.
Did any of you actually graduate from UW? -
UW won the NorthMikeSeaver said:
Oh that’s right. You don’t believe in standings.RaceBannon said:
Tie?MikeSeaver said:
You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.hardhat said:
I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"
It's worse than I thought here
That's standings bro
Won the head to head
Have a better record
But 👔 -
There is no “North.”RaceBannon said:
UW won the NorthMikeSeaver said:
Oh that’s right. You don’t believe in standings.RaceBannon said:
Tie?MikeSeaver said:
You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.hardhat said:
I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"
It's worse than I thought here
Claiming fake championships are kind of your brand though so I get it.
Print the bumper sticker. -
Now who doesn't believe in standingsMikeSeaver said:
There is no “North.”RaceBannon said:
UW won the NorthMikeSeaver said:
Oh that’s right. You don’t believe in standings.RaceBannon said:
Tie?MikeSeaver said:
You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.hardhat said:
I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"
It's worse than I thought here
Claiming fake championships are kind of your brand though so I get it.
Print the bumper sticker. -
North champs again.MikeSeaver said:
Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.WoolleyDoog said:
Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.MikeSeaver said:
You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.hardhat said:
I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"
Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.
Did any of you actually graduate from UW?
Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.
Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:
Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second. -
Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.WoolleyDoog said:
North champs again.MikeSeaver said:
Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.WoolleyDoog said:
Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.MikeSeaver said:
You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.hardhat said:
I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"
Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.
Did any of you actually graduate from UW?
Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.
Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:
Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.
For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules. -
Still you.RaceBannon said:
Now who doesn't believe in standingsMikeSeaver said:
There is no “North.”RaceBannon said:
UW won the NorthMikeSeaver said:
Oh that’s right. You don’t believe in standings.RaceBannon said:
Tie?MikeSeaver said:
You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.hardhat said:
I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"
It's worse than I thought here
Claiming fake championships are kind of your brand though so I get it.
Print the bumper sticker. -
You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.MikeSeaver said:
Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.WoolleyDoog said:
North champs again.MikeSeaver said:
Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.WoolleyDoog said:
Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.MikeSeaver said:
You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.hardhat said:
I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"
Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.
Did any of you actually graduate from UW?
Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.
Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:
Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.
For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules. -
We’re tied though. Same record. So no.haie said:
You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.MikeSeaver said:
Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.WoolleyDoog said:
North champs again.MikeSeaver said:
Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.WoolleyDoog said:
Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.MikeSeaver said:
You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.hardhat said:
I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"
Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.
Did any of you actually graduate from UW?
Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.
Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:
Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.
For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.
There’s no way you went to UW. Can’t do simple problem solving.
Did you study theater or something?
