A back door Rose Bowl loss as non conference champs who didn’t play in the CCG is gonna be special.
Probably your 5th best season in the last 30 years.
2nd north division crown in 3 years
Why some fucking mountain west piece of shit team is playing USC is baffling
North division crown? Man you guys LOVE making up titles for yourselves.
The reason is tie breakers. Like when you went to the Rose Bowl after the 2000 season because Oregon lost a non conf game.
How would you have done it? Just beat Oregon, nothing else matters?
UW won the North on a tie breaker
UW has a better record than Utah
UW is ranked higher than Utah
Gosh what would I do?
Yeah but still
The only fact in that post is you’re ranked higher. Something that has never settled the CCG participants, But still…
You're right. We should go with what has settled the CCG participants.
Case closed. End of discussion. Nuff said.
In what CCG game do rankings matter?
Are you all on crack? (Crack Cocaine)
I didn't say anything about rankings.
I said select the participants with the criteria they've always been selected by.
Hope that helps.
Right but you wrote “yeah but still” like those were all legitimate points. The only factual bullet in that post was the rankings which don’t set conference champ games, anywhere.
There aren’t divisions anymore. I would have thought you’d want the teams with the best records to be in the championship game but you want it handicapped based on location?
DISAGREE.
I'm sorry you're having a hard time following the thread.
Good luck the rest of the way.
Don’t get frustrated.
You still haven't said why you should be in the CCG over Utah.
I'm not frustrated. This is my third time saying we should select CCG participants the same way we always have. You said they've never been selected based on rankings. I agreed with you. The way they've always been selected has been the right way and would once again provide the best matchup and most deserving teams.
Our dumb AF commissioner changed the rules to avoid this very matchup. Fuck that guy. UW should tell him to have fun watching us in the B1G for that.
Oh, it’s a conspiracy?
The rules changed this year to avoid a team like Utah getting in and get the two best teams in. It backfired. SC v UW is the highest ranked matchup and helps SC for the playoff the way the conference wants.
Kalivkafuck is an idiot. You're still even playing everyone in your division every year.
A back door Rose Bowl loss as non conference champs who didn’t play in the CCG is gonna be special.
Probably your 5th best season in the last 30 years.
2nd north division crown in 3 years
Why some fucking mountain west piece of shit team is playing USC is baffling
North division crown? Man you guys LOVE making up titles for yourselves.
The reason is tie breakers. Like when you went to the Rose Bowl after the 2000 season because Oregon lost a non conf game.
How would you have done it? Just beat Oregon, nothing else matters?
UW won the North on a tie breaker
UW has a better record than Utah
UW is ranked higher than Utah
Gosh what would I do?
Yeah but still
The only fact in that post is you’re ranked higher. Something that has never settled the CCG participants, But still…
You're right. We should go with what has settled the CCG participants.
Case closed. End of discussion. Nuff said.
In what CCG game do rankings matter?
Are you all on crack? (Crack Cocaine)
I didn't say anything about rankings.
I said select the participants with the criteria they've always been selected by.
Hope that helps.
Right but you wrote “yeah but still” like those were all legitimate points. The only factual bullet in that post was the rankings which don’t set conference champ games, anywhere.
There aren’t divisions anymore. I would have thought you’d want the teams with the best records to be in the championship game but you want it handicapped based on location?
DISAGREE.
I'm sorry you're having a hard time following the thread.
Good luck the rest of the way.
Don’t get frustrated.
You still haven't said why you should be in the CCG over Utah.
I'm not frustrated. This is my third time saying we should select CCG participants the same way we always have. You said they've never been selected based on rankings. I agreed with you. The way they've always been selected has been the right way and would once again provide the best matchup and most deserving teams.
I think that maybe you’re thinking that way because it would benefit your school, this year.
When they announced the change did you say “no way, I don’t want the teams with the two best records facing off in the title game. I want one from the top part of the map and one from the bottom?”
A back door Rose Bowl loss as non conference champs who didn’t play in the CCG is gonna be special.
Probably your 5th best season in the last 30 years.
2nd north division crown in 3 years
Why some fucking mountain west piece of shit team is playing USC is baffling
North division crown? Man you guys LOVE making up titles for yourselves.
The reason is tie breakers. Like when you went to the Rose Bowl after the 2000 season because Oregon lost a non conf game.
How would you have done it? Just beat Oregon, nothing else matters?
UW won the North on a tie breaker
UW has a better record than Utah
UW is ranked higher than Utah
Gosh what would I do?
Yeah but still
The only fact in that post is you’re ranked higher. Something that has never settled the CCG participants, But still…
You're right. We should go with what has settled the CCG participants.
Case closed. End of discussion. Nuff said.
In what CCG game do rankings matter?
Are you all on crack? (Crack Cocaine)
I didn't say anything about rankings.
I said select the participants with the criteria they've always been selected by.
Hope that helps.
Right but you wrote “yeah but still” like those were all legitimate points. The only factual bullet in that post was the rankings which don’t set conference champ games, anywhere.
There aren’t divisions anymore. I would have thought you’d want the teams with the best records to be in the championship game but you want it handicapped based on location?
DISAGREE.
I'm sorry you're having a hard time following the thread.
Good luck the rest of the way.
Don’t get frustrated.
You still haven't said why you should be in the CCG over Utah.
I'm not frustrated. This is my third time saying we should select CCG participants the same way we always have. You said they've never been selected based on rankings. I agreed with you. The way they've always been selected has been the right way and would once again provide the best matchup and most deserving teams.
I think that maybe you’re thinking that way because it would benefit your school, this year.
When they announced the change did you say “no way, I don’t want the teams with the two best records facing off in the title game. I want one from the top part of the map and one from the bottom?”
I also would not object to taking the teams with the best records, good point. Either would be fine. Or taking the team with the best ranking. Plenty of good options to arrive at the superior matchup here.
A back door Rose Bowl loss as non conference champs who didn’t play in the CCG is gonna be special.
Probably your 5th best season in the last 30 years.
2nd north division crown in 3 years
Why some fucking mountain west piece of shit team is playing USC is baffling
North division crown? Man you guys LOVE making up titles for yourselves.
The reason is tie breakers. Like when you went to the Rose Bowl after the 2000 season because Oregon lost a non conf game.
How would you have done it? Just beat Oregon, nothing else matters?
UW won the North on a tie breaker
UW has a better record than Utah
UW is ranked higher than Utah
Gosh what would I do?
Yeah but still
The only fact in that post is you’re ranked higher. Something that has never settled the CCG participants, But still…
You're right. We should go with what has settled the CCG participants.
Case closed. End of discussion. Nuff said.
In what CCG game do rankings matter?
Are you all on crack? (Crack Cocaine)
I didn't say anything about rankings.
I said select the participants with the criteria they've always been selected by.
Hope that helps.
Right but you wrote “yeah but still” like those were all legitimate points. The only factual bullet in that post was the rankings which don’t set conference champ games, anywhere.
There aren’t divisions anymore. I would have thought you’d want the teams with the best records to be in the championship game but you want it handicapped based on location?
DISAGREE.
I'm sorry you're having a hard time following the thread.
Good luck the rest of the way.
Don’t get frustrated.
You still haven't said why you should be in the CCG over Utah.
I'm not frustrated. This is my third time saying we should select CCG participants the same way we always have. You said they've never been selected based on rankings. I agreed with you. The way they've always been selected has been the right way and would once again provide the best matchup and most deserving teams.
I think that maybe you’re thinking that way because it would benefit your school, this year.
When they announced the change did you say “no way, I don’t want the teams with the two best records facing off in the title game. I want one from the top part of the map and one from the bottom?”
I also would not object to taking the teams with the best records, good point. Either would be fine. Or taking the team with the best ranking. Plenty of good options to arrive at the superior matchup here.
So you think the media should vote on who goes in when we have on field results right in front of us?
A back door Rose Bowl loss as non conference champs who didn’t play in the CCG is gonna be special.
Probably your 5th best season in the last 30 years.
2nd north division crown in 3 years
Why some fucking mountain west piece of shit team is playing USC is baffling
North division crown? Man you guys LOVE making up titles for yourselves.
The reason is tie breakers. Like when you went to the Rose Bowl after the 2000 season because Oregon lost a non conf game.
How would you have done it? Just beat Oregon, nothing else matters?
UW won the North on a tie breaker
UW has a better record than Utah
UW is ranked higher than Utah
Gosh what would I do?
Yeah but still
The only fact in that post is you’re ranked higher. Something that has never settled the CCG participants, But still…
You're right. We should go with what has settled the CCG participants.
Case closed. End of discussion. Nuff said.
In what CCG game do rankings matter?
Are you all on crack? (Crack Cocaine)
I didn't say anything about rankings.
I said select the participants with the criteria they've always been selected by.
Hope that helps.
Right but you wrote “yeah but still” like those were all legitimate points. The only factual bullet in that post was the rankings which don’t set conference champ games, anywhere.
There aren’t divisions anymore. I would have thought you’d want the teams with the best records to be in the championship game but you want it handicapped based on location?
DISAGREE.
I'm sorry you're having a hard time following the thread.
Good luck the rest of the way.
Don’t get frustrated.
You still haven't said why you should be in the CCG over Utah.
I'm not frustrated. This is my third time saying we should select CCG participants the same way we always have. You said they've never been selected based on rankings. I agreed with you. The way they've always been selected has been the right way and would once again provide the best matchup and most deserving teams.
I think that maybe you’re thinking that way because it would benefit your school, this year.
When they announced the change did you say “no way, I don’t want the teams with the two best records facing off in the title game. I want one from the top part of the map and one from the bottom?”
PTSD from getting whacked by Stanford in your glory years most likely effects your opinion on this.
A back door Rose Bowl loss as non conference champs who didn’t play in the CCG is gonna be special.
Probably your 5th best season in the last 30 years.
2nd north division crown in 3 years
Why some fucking mountain west piece of shit team is playing USC is baffling
North division crown? Man you guys LOVE making up titles for yourselves.
The reason is tie breakers. Like when you went to the Rose Bowl after the 2000 season because Oregon lost a non conf game.
How would you have done it? Just beat Oregon, nothing else matters?
UW won the North on a tie breaker
UW has a better record than Utah
UW is ranked higher than Utah
Gosh what would I do?
Yeah but still
The only fact in that post is you’re ranked higher. Something that has never settled the CCG participants, But still…
You're right. We should go with what has settled the CCG participants.
Case closed. End of discussion. Nuff said.
In what CCG game do rankings matter?
Are you all on crack? (Crack Cocaine)
I didn't say anything about rankings.
I said select the participants with the criteria they've always been selected by.
Hope that helps.
Right but you wrote “yeah but still” like those were all legitimate points. The only factual bullet in that post was the rankings which don’t set conference champ games, anywhere.
There aren’t divisions anymore. I would have thought you’d want the teams with the best records to be in the championship game but you want it handicapped based on location?
DISAGREE.
I'm sorry you're having a hard time following the thread.
Good luck the rest of the way.
Don’t get frustrated.
You still haven't said why you should be in the CCG over Utah.
I'm not frustrated. This is my third time saying we should select CCG participants the same way we always have. You said they've never been selected based on rankings. I agreed with you. The way they've always been selected has been the right way and would once again provide the best matchup and most deserving teams.
I think that maybe you’re thinking that way because it would benefit your school, this year.
When they announced the change did you say “no way, I don’t want the teams with the two best records facing off in the title game. I want one from the top part of the map and one from the bottom?”
I also would not object to taking the teams with the best records, good point. Either would be fine. Or taking the team with the best ranking. Plenty of good options to arrive at the superior matchup here.
So you think the media should vote on who goes in when we have on field results right in front of us?
A back door Rose Bowl loss as non conference champs who didn’t play in the CCG is gonna be special.
Probably your 5th best season in the last 30 years.
2nd north division crown in 3 years
Why some fucking mountain west piece of shit team is playing USC is baffling
North division crown? Man you guys LOVE making up titles for yourselves.
The reason is tie breakers. Like when you went to the Rose Bowl after the 2000 season because Oregon lost a non conf game.
How would you have done it? Just beat Oregon, nothing else matters?
UW won the North on a tie breaker
UW has a better record than Utah
UW is ranked higher than Utah
Gosh what would I do?
Yeah but still
The only fact in that post is you’re ranked higher. Something that has never settled the CCG participants, But still…
You're right. We should go with what has settled the CCG participants.
Case closed. End of discussion. Nuff said.
In what CCG game do rankings matter?
Are you all on crack? (Crack Cocaine)
I didn't say anything about rankings.
I said select the participants with the criteria they've always been selected by.
Hope that helps.
Right but you wrote “yeah but still” like those were all legitimate points. The only factual bullet in that post was the rankings which don’t set conference champ games, anywhere.
There aren’t divisions anymore. I would have thought you’d want the teams with the best records to be in the championship game but you want it handicapped based on location?
DISAGREE.
I'm sorry you're having a hard time following the thread.
Good luck the rest of the way.
Don’t get frustrated.
You still haven't said why you should be in the CCG over Utah.
I'm not frustrated. This is my third time saying we should select CCG participants the same way we always have. You said they've never been selected based on rankings. I agreed with you. The way they've always been selected has been the right way and would once again provide the best matchup and most deserving teams.
I think that maybe you’re thinking that way because it would benefit your school, this year.
When they announced the change did you say “no way, I don’t want the teams with the two best records facing off in the title game. I want one from the top part of the map and one from the bottom?”
PTSD from getting whacked by Stanford in your glory years most likely effects your opinion on this.
You didn’t play Utah. How is this an argument about UO and Stanford who played each other each season?
A back door Rose Bowl loss as non conference champs who didn’t play in the CCG is gonna be special.
Probably your 5th best season in the last 30 years.
2nd north division crown in 3 years
Why some fucking mountain west piece of shit team is playing USC is baffling
North division crown? Man you guys LOVE making up titles for yourselves.
The reason is tie breakers. Like when you went to the Rose Bowl after the 2000 season because Oregon lost a non conf game.
How would you have done it? Just beat Oregon, nothing else matters?
UW won the North on a tie breaker
UW has a better record than Utah
UW is ranked higher than Utah
Gosh what would I do?
Yeah but still
The only fact in that post is you’re ranked higher. Something that has never settled the CCG participants, But still…
You're right. We should go with what has settled the CCG participants.
Case closed. End of discussion. Nuff said.
In what CCG game do rankings matter?
Are you all on crack? (Crack Cocaine)
I didn't say anything about rankings.
I said select the participants with the criteria they've always been selected by.
Hope that helps.
Right but you wrote “yeah but still” like those were all legitimate points. The only factual bullet in that post was the rankings which don’t set conference champ games, anywhere.
There aren’t divisions anymore. I would have thought you’d want the teams with the best records to be in the championship game but you want it handicapped based on location?
DISAGREE.
I'm sorry you're having a hard time following the thread.
Good luck the rest of the way.
Don’t get frustrated.
You still haven't said why you should be in the CCG over Utah.
I'm not frustrated. This is my third time saying we should select CCG participants the same way we always have. You said they've never been selected based on rankings. I agreed with you. The way they've always been selected has been the right way and would once again provide the best matchup and most deserving teams.
I think that maybe you’re thinking that way because it would benefit your school, this year.
When they announced the change did you say “no way, I don’t want the teams with the two best records facing off in the title game. I want one from the top part of the map and one from the bottom?”
I also would not object to taking the teams with the best records, good point. Either would be fine. Or taking the team with the best ranking. Plenty of good options to arrive at the superior matchup here.
So you think the media should vote on who goes in when we have on field results right in front of us?
Semantic volleyball aside if you're playing schedules based on divisions you should select champion representatives based on said divisions.
This is the problem. The change in selection isn't a bad idea, as it usually will produce the two best teams at the end, but you need to change the scheduling to reflect that.
Having divisional round robins and missing two of the other side almost guarantees a clusterfuck more often than not with the common opponent tiebreak.
Semantic volleyball aside if you're playing schedules based on divisions you should select champion representatives based on said divisions.
This is the problem. The change in selection isn't a bad idea, as it usually will produce the two best teams at the end, but you need to change the scheduling to reflect that.
Having divisional round robins and missing two of the other side almost guarantees a clusterfuck more often than not with the common opponent tiebreak.
It wouldn’t change the clusters as it would still be unbalanced.
For instance Oregon was knocked out of the 2000 season Rose Bowl and conf championship because they lost an OOC game to Wisconsin. I know a lot of you were out there lobbying on behalf of Oregon saying “IT SHOULD BE HEAD TO HEAD!” And “THEY’RE BETTER THAN US.” But sometimes it just doesn’t work out in your favor.
A back door Rose Bowl loss as non conference champs who didn’t play in the CCG is gonna be special.
Probably your 5th best season in the last 30 years.
2nd north division crown in 3 years
Why some fucking mountain west piece of shit team is playing USC is baffling
North division crown? Man you guys LOVE making up titles for yourselves.
The reason is tie breakers. Like when you went to the Rose Bowl after the 2000 season because Oregon lost a non conf game.
How would you have done it? Just beat Oregon, nothing else matters?
UW won the North on a tie breaker
UW has a better record than Utah
UW is ranked higher than Utah
Gosh what would I do?
Yeah but still
The only fact in that post is you’re ranked higher. Something that has never settled the CCG participants, But still…
You're right. We should go with what has settled the CCG participants.
Case closed. End of discussion. Nuff said.
In what CCG game do rankings matter?
Are you all on crack? (Crack Cocaine)
I didn't say anything about rankings.
I said select the participants with the criteria they've always been selected by.
Hope that helps.
Right but you wrote “yeah but still” like those were all legitimate points. The only factual bullet in that post was the rankings which don’t set conference champ games, anywhere.
There aren’t divisions anymore. I would have thought you’d want the teams with the best records to be in the championship game but you want it handicapped based on location?
DISAGREE.
I'm sorry you're having a hard time following the thread.
Good luck the rest of the way.
Don’t get frustrated.
You still haven't said why you should be in the CCG over Utah.
I'm not frustrated. This is my third time saying we should select CCG participants the same way we always have. You said they've never been selected based on rankings. I agreed with you. The way they've always been selected has been the right way and would once again provide the best matchup and most deserving teams.
I think that maybe you’re thinking that way because it would benefit your school, this year.
When they announced the change did you say “no way, I don’t want the teams with the two best records facing off in the title game. I want one from the top part of the map and one from the bottom?”
PTSD from getting whacked by Stanford in your glory years most likely effects your opinion on this.
You didn’t play Utah. How is this an argument about UO and Stanford who played each other each season?
World's biggest Utah and ASU fan admits that he doesn't like divisions because it eliminated his team several times when Orygun was at the top.
A back door Rose Bowl loss as non conference champs who didn’t play in the CCG is gonna be special.
Probably your 5th best season in the last 30 years.
2nd north division crown in 3 years
Why some fucking mountain west piece of shit team is playing USC is baffling
North division crown? Man you guys LOVE making up titles for yourselves.
The reason is tie breakers. Like when you went to the Rose Bowl after the 2000 season because Oregon lost a non conf game.
How would you have done it? Just beat Oregon, nothing else matters?
UW won the North on a tie breaker
UW has a better record than Utah
UW is ranked higher than Utah
Gosh what would I do?
Yeah but still
The only fact in that post is you’re ranked higher. Something that has never settled the CCG participants, But still…
You're right. We should go with what has settled the CCG participants.
Case closed. End of discussion. Nuff said.
In what CCG game do rankings matter?
Are you all on crack? (Crack Cocaine)
I didn't say anything about rankings.
I said select the participants with the criteria they've always been selected by.
Hope that helps.
Right but you wrote “yeah but still” like those were all legitimate points. The only factual bullet in that post was the rankings which don’t set conference champ games, anywhere.
There aren’t divisions anymore. I would have thought you’d want the teams with the best records to be in the championship game but you want it handicapped based on location?
DISAGREE.
I'm sorry you're having a hard time following the thread.
Good luck the rest of the way.
Don’t get frustrated.
You still haven't said why you should be in the CCG over Utah.
I'm not frustrated. This is my third time saying we should select CCG participants the same way we always have. You said they've never been selected based on rankings. I agreed with you. The way they've always been selected has been the right way and would once again provide the best matchup and most deserving teams.
I think that maybe you’re thinking that way because it would benefit your school, this year.
When they announced the change did you say “no way, I don’t want the teams with the two best records facing off in the title game. I want one from the top part of the map and one from the bottom?”
PTSD from getting whacked by Stanford in your glory years most likely effects your opinion on this.
You didn’t play Utah. How is this an argument about UO and Stanford who played each other each season?
World's biggest Utah and ASU fan admits that he doesn't like divisions because it eliminated his team several times when Orygun was at the top.
You can’t read. Must have gotten your doctorate from UO.
A back door Rose Bowl loss as non conference champs who didn’t play in the CCG is gonna be special.
Probably your 5th best season in the last 30 years.
2nd north division crown in 3 years
Why some fucking mountain west piece of shit team is playing USC is baffling
North division crown? Man you guys LOVE making up titles for yourselves.
The reason is tie breakers. Like when you went to the Rose Bowl after the 2000 season because Oregon lost a non conf game.
How would you have done it? Just beat Oregon, nothing else matters?
UW won the North on a tie breaker
UW has a better record than Utah
UW is ranked higher than Utah
Gosh what would I do?
Yeah but still
The only fact in that post is you’re ranked higher. Something that has never settled the CCG participants, But still…
You're right. We should go with what has settled the CCG participants.
Case closed. End of discussion. Nuff said.
In what CCG game do rankings matter?
Are you all on crack? (Crack Cocaine)
I didn't say anything about rankings.
I said select the participants with the criteria they've always been selected by.
Hope that helps.
Right but you wrote “yeah but still” like those were all legitimate points. The only factual bullet in that post was the rankings which don’t set conference champ games, anywhere.
There aren’t divisions anymore. I would have thought you’d want the teams with the best records to be in the championship game but you want it handicapped based on location?
DISAGREE.
I'm sorry you're having a hard time following the thread.
Good luck the rest of the way.
Don’t get frustrated.
You still haven't said why you should be in the CCG over Utah.
I'm not frustrated. This is my third time saying we should select CCG participants the same way we always have. You said they've never been selected based on rankings. I agreed with you. The way they've always been selected has been the right way and would once again provide the best matchup and most deserving teams.
I think that maybe you’re thinking that way because it would benefit your school, this year.
When they announced the change did you say “no way, I don’t want the teams with the two best records facing off in the title game. I want one from the top part of the map and one from the bottom?”
PTSD from getting whacked by Stanford in your glory years most likely effects your opinion on this.
You didn’t play Utah. How is this an argument about UO and Stanford who played each other each season?
World's biggest Utah and ASU fan admits that he doesn't like divisions because it eliminated his team several times when Orygun was at the top.
You can’t read. Must have gotten your doctorate from UO.
Comments
Kalivkafuck is an idiot. You're still even playing everyone in your division every year.
When they announced the change did you say “no way, I don’t want the teams with the two best records facing off in the title game. I want one from the top part of the map and one from the bottom?”
No.
Still waiting to hear why you deserve it over Utah.
Having divisional round robins and missing two of the other side almost guarantees a clusterfuck more often than not with the common opponent tiebreak.
For instance Oregon was knocked out of the 2000 season Rose Bowl and conf championship because they lost an OOC game to Wisconsin. I know a lot of you were out there lobbying on behalf of Oregon saying “IT SHOULD BE HEAD TO HEAD!” And “THEY’RE BETTER THAN US.” But sometimes it just doesn’t work out in your favor.
You can’t read. Must have gotten your doctorate from UO.
deflect
deflect