Arizona AG refuses to certify election

Sledog said:

AOG said:

The county said that about 17,000 Election Day ballots were involved and had to be counted later instead of at the polling place. Only 16% of the 1.56 million votes cast in Maricopa County were made in-person on Election Day. AP......

I don't see anything that would make a material difference. It is just a ploy to try to make some minor glitch appear to be a scandal. The real problem is that the gop used illegally gerrymandered maps that were ruled illegal but that scotus allowed on the excuse that there was not enough time left to change prior to the election. That is the reason the gop won the House. Four states pulled that scam.

When one realizes it was only around 40K votes in 5 states that stole the election for SloJoe in 2020 you'd realize how clueless you sound. SloJoe won Arizona by just over 10K. So look at the data next time.

The tell is that the dazzler and his fellow dems have no interest in cleaning up the election process so that these "questions" of illegal ballot stuffing are put to rest. Maricopa had two years to clean up their election process and didn't.

Sledog said:

WestlinnDuck said:

Sledog said:

AOG said:

The county said that about 17,000 Election Day ballots were involved and had to be counted later instead of at the polling place. Only 16% of the 1.56 million votes cast in Maricopa County were made in-person on Election Day. AP......

I don't see anything that would make a material difference. It is just a ploy to try to make some minor glitch appear to be a scandal. The real problem is that the gop used illegally gerrymandered maps that were ruled illegal but that scotus allowed on the excuse that there was not enough time left to change prior to the election. That is the reason the gop won the House. Four states pulled that scam.

When one realizes it was only around 40K votes in 5 states that stole the election for SloJoe in 2020 you'd realize how clueless you sound. SloJoe won Arizona by just over 10K. So look at the data next time.

The tell is that the dazzler and his fellow dems have no interest in cleaning up the election process so that these "questions" of illegal ballot stuffing are put to rest. Maricopa had two years to clean up their election process and didn't.

The real problem is that Dims dominate public employment at the city county/level and they run the elections. Built in cheaters.

That's why you to need to take that opportunity away at the state level, like DeSantis did in Florida.

MelloDawg said:

46XiJCAB said:

AOG said:

The county said that about 17,000 Election Day ballots were involved and had to be counted later instead of at the polling place. Only 16% of the 1.56 million votes cast in Maricopa County were made in-person on Election Day. AP......

I don't see anything that would make a material difference. It is just a ploy to try to make some minor glitch appear to be a scandal. The real problem is that the gop used illegally gerrymandered maps that were ruled illegal but that scotus allowed on the excuse that there was not enough time left to change prior to the election. That is the reason the gop won the House. Four states pulled that scam.

“Minor glitch” on Election Day. Not meant to cause any disruption for the group known to vote on Election Day.

Totally normal a tech “glitch” would happen just a day after testing. The knots leftists will tie themselves in to excuse their team cheating. Who runs the election in AZ?

Arizona elections are decentralized, but ok.

There is the tell. Mellow wants an honest election like he wants a closed border.

RaceBannon said:

AOG said:

The county said that about 17,000 Election Day ballots were involved and had to be counted later instead of at the polling place. Only 16% of the 1.56 million votes cast in Maricopa County were made in-person on Election Day. AP......

I don't see anything that would make a material difference. It is just a ploy to try to make some minor glitch appear to be a scandal. The real problem is that the gop used illegally gerrymandered maps that were ruled illegal but that scotus allowed on the excuse that there was not enough time left to change prior to the election. That is the reason the gop won the House. Four states pulled that scam.

Election denier

"election denial," what election denial? The GOP won the House, but it is a tainted win, though, since the winning margin was about the same as the number of free seats gained through using illegally gerrymandered maps which (I think Kavanaugh) ruled permissible. SCOTUS ruled it allowable, so I accept the decision. Why that is, I don't understand since the maps were ruled illegal gerrymandering. If a judge rules illegal behavior legal what can I do?