Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
To Chris Peterman's credit
Comments
-
Pete got the benefit of the doubt because he was Pete, but he fucked away a lot of games here.YellowSnow said:
People forget Pete fucked away the 2015 game as well. At a minimum Pete should have been 4-2 against Oregon based on those matchups.UW_Doog_Bot said:
With all the talent Pete had he lost to Meat. Twice.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Deboer needed Henry to be perfect to beat Oregonwhatshouldicareabout said:
Pete had a lot of kickers miss big kicks, esp at BoiseCanadawg said:
I'm not a fan of these oversimplified takes on coaches or players. Good coaches have kickers miss kicks sometimesRaceBannon said:
2018 followed 70-21 and 38-3YellowSnow said:The jury is still out as to whether DeBoer's tenure at UW will best that of Pete's.
But one thing's for sure, a Peterman team (with comparable talent) would have never won that game on Sat.
UW was in position to take control back and shit the bed.
Henry missed the field goal but Petersen lost the game
2018 sucked, but 2019 was inexcusable
Could just be a biproduct of never getting blown out and being in position to win more often than not, but Christ he could have been so much better. -
-
He always won a fuck load of games, which made those losses even worseDoogles said:
Pete got the benefit of the doubt because he was Pete, but he fucked away a lot of games here.YellowSnow said:
People forget Pete fucked away the 2015 game as well. At a minimum Pete should have been 4-2 against Oregon based on those matchups.UW_Doog_Bot said:
With all the talent Pete had he lost to Meat. Twice.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Deboer needed Henry to be perfect to beat Oregonwhatshouldicareabout said:
Pete had a lot of kickers miss big kicks, esp at BoiseCanadawg said:
I'm not a fan of these oversimplified takes on coaches or players. Good coaches have kickers miss kicks sometimesRaceBannon said:
2018 followed 70-21 and 38-3YellowSnow said:The jury is still out as to whether DeBoer's tenure at UW will best that of Pete's.
But one thing's for sure, a Peterman team (with comparable talent) would have never won that game on Sat.
UW was in position to take control back and shit the bed.
Henry missed the field goal but Petersen lost the game
2018 sucked, but 2019 was inexcusable
Could just be a biproduct of never getting blown out and being in position to win more often than not, but Christ he could have been so much better. -
We should have listened the Oracle of Minsk @FirePeteDoogles said:
Pete got the benefit of the doubt because he was Pete, but he fucked away a lot of games here.YellowSnow said:
People forget Pete fucked away the 2015 game as well. At a minimum Pete should have been 4-2 against Oregon based on those matchups.UW_Doog_Bot said:
With all the talent Pete had he lost to Meat. Twice.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Deboer needed Henry to be perfect to beat Oregonwhatshouldicareabout said:
Pete had a lot of kickers miss big kicks, esp at BoiseCanadawg said:
I'm not a fan of these oversimplified takes on coaches or players. Good coaches have kickers miss kicks sometimesRaceBannon said:
2018 followed 70-21 and 38-3YellowSnow said:The jury is still out as to whether DeBoer's tenure at UW will best that of Pete's.
But one thing's for sure, a Peterman team (with comparable talent) would have never won that game on Sat.
UW was in position to take control back and shit the bed.
Henry missed the field goal but Petersen lost the game
2018 sucked, but 2019 was inexcusable
Could just be a biproduct of never getting blown out and being in position to win more often than not, but Christ he could have been so much better. -
Exactly. You can’t fire a guy that wins the pack .333 percent of the time. You just can’t.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
He always won a fuck load of games, which made those losses even worseDoogles said:
Pete got the benefit of the doubt because he was Pete, but he fucked away a lot of games here.YellowSnow said:
People forget Pete fucked away the 2015 game as well. At a minimum Pete should have been 4-2 against Oregon based on those matchups.UW_Doog_Bot said:
With all the talent Pete had he lost to Meat. Twice.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Deboer needed Henry to be perfect to beat Oregonwhatshouldicareabout said:
Pete had a lot of kickers miss big kicks, esp at BoiseCanadawg said:
I'm not a fan of these oversimplified takes on coaches or players. Good coaches have kickers miss kicks sometimesRaceBannon said:
2018 followed 70-21 and 38-3YellowSnow said:The jury is still out as to whether DeBoer's tenure at UW will best that of Pete's.
But one thing's for sure, a Peterman team (with comparable talent) would have never won that game on Sat.
UW was in position to take control back and shit the bed.
Henry missed the field goal but Petersen lost the game
2018 sucked, but 2019 was inexcusable
Could just be a biproduct of never getting blown out and being in position to win more often than not, but Christ he could have been so much better.
Pete under achieved. The replacement was worse.
I don’t know what Stanford does with Smirk. -
YellowSnow said:
I was guilty for sure of wanting to believe in Eason's small strap on. I famously proclaimed in @UW_Doog_Bot 's living room watching the 2019 EWU replay that Skinny was gonna corn hole the Pac and win the Heisman.MikeDamone said:
Penix is a legit Big Penix QB. Unlike the small strap on that @dflea enjoyed a few year ago.YellowSnow said:Live look at @MikeDamone trying to handle the size of Big Dick Penix
Penix still frustrates me at times with the interceptions at inopportune times (the overall ratio is fine) but fuck that guy is clutch at times.
-
I'm kind of in the minority here in that I don't hate Pete at all. I like him and overall he was a giant success.YellowSnow said:
Exactly. You can’t fire a guy that wins the pack .333 percent of the time. You just can’t.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
He always won a fuck load of games, which made those losses even worseDoogles said:
Pete got the benefit of the doubt because he was Pete, but he fucked away a lot of games here.YellowSnow said:
People forget Pete fucked away the 2015 game as well. At a minimum Pete should have been 4-2 against Oregon based on those matchups.UW_Doog_Bot said:
With all the talent Pete had he lost to Meat. Twice.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Deboer needed Henry to be perfect to beat Oregonwhatshouldicareabout said:
Pete had a lot of kickers miss big kicks, esp at BoiseCanadawg said:
I'm not a fan of these oversimplified takes on coaches or players. Good coaches have kickers miss kicks sometimesRaceBannon said:
2018 followed 70-21 and 38-3YellowSnow said:The jury is still out as to whether DeBoer's tenure at UW will best that of Pete's.
But one thing's for sure, a Peterman team (with comparable talent) would have never won that game on Sat.
UW was in position to take control back and shit the bed.
Henry missed the field goal but Petersen lost the game
2018 sucked, but 2019 was inexcusable
Could just be a biproduct of never getting blown out and being in position to win more often than not, but Christ he could have been so much better.
Pete under achieved. The replacement was worse.
I don’t know what Stanford does with Smirk.
2016 was special and without the playoffs, it's a juggernaut UW destroying PSU in the Rose Bowl. Yes we lost to PSU the next year, but '16 UW was an a whole nother level. Getting Bama in Atlanta was a bad draw, but even then the defense held Bama to 17 points.
How his tenure ended, though, was really sour. The whole not being excited for the Rose is borderline criminal. Handing the reigns over to Lake was neutral, people were even optimistic. The moment Donovan was hired was a grave digging move - Pete needed to talk Lake out of that and didn't. -
Pete’s the second best corch in Huskie history.
Case closed. -
He's 3rdBennyBeaver said:Pete’s the second best corch in Huskie history.
Case closed. -
Gil Dobie doesn’t count. Different era, too long ago.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
He's 3rdBennyBeaver said:Pete’s the second best corch in Huskie history.
Case closed.
No one here but @RaceBannon was alive back then. -
2nd is LamboBennyBeaver said:
Gil Dobie doesn’t count. Different era, too long ago.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
He's 3rdBennyBeaver said:Pete’s the second best corch in Huskie history.
Case closed.
No one here but @RaceBannon was alive back then.
Hi pup -
Fuck you. Lambo is the worst thing besides Ty that happened to this program in my life time.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
2nd is LamboBennyBeaver said:
Gil Dobie doesn’t count. Different era, too long ago.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
He's 3rdBennyBeaver said:Pete’s the second best corch in Huskie history.
Case closed.
No one here but @RaceBannon was alive back then.
Hi pup -
whooshAtomicDawg said:
Fuck you. Lambo is the worst thing besides Ty that happened to this program in my life time.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
2nd is LamboBennyBeaver said:
Gil Dobie doesn’t count. Different era, too long ago.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
He's 3rdBennyBeaver said:Pete’s the second best corch in Huskie history.
Case closed.
No one here but @RaceBannon was alive back then.
Hi pup -
Pete was a great coach but his inability to get over the hump and win something big here really makes me all the more bitter about him quitting on the rose Bowel.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I'm kind of in the minority here in that I don't hate Pete at all. I like him and overall he was a giant success.YellowSnow said:
Exactly. You can’t fire a guy that wins the pack .333 percent of the time. You just can’t.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
He always won a fuck load of games, which made those losses even worseDoogles said:
Pete got the benefit of the doubt because he was Pete, but he fucked away a lot of games here.YellowSnow said:
People forget Pete fucked away the 2015 game as well. At a minimum Pete should have been 4-2 against Oregon based on those matchups.UW_Doog_Bot said:
With all the talent Pete had he lost to Meat. Twice.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Deboer needed Henry to be perfect to beat Oregonwhatshouldicareabout said:
Pete had a lot of kickers miss big kicks, esp at BoiseCanadawg said:
I'm not a fan of these oversimplified takes on coaches or players. Good coaches have kickers miss kicks sometimesRaceBannon said:
2018 followed 70-21 and 38-3YellowSnow said:The jury is still out as to whether DeBoer's tenure at UW will best that of Pete's.
But one thing's for sure, a Peterman team (with comparable talent) would have never won that game on Sat.
UW was in position to take control back and shit the bed.
Henry missed the field goal but Petersen lost the game
2018 sucked, but 2019 was inexcusable
Could just be a biproduct of never getting blown out and being in position to win more often than not, but Christ he could have been so much better.
Pete under achieved. The replacement was worse.
I don’t know what Stanford does with Smirk.
2016 was special and without the playoffs, it's a juggernaut UW destroying PSU in the Rose Bowl. Yes we lost to PSU the next year, but '16 UW was an a whole nother level. Getting Bama in Atlanta was a bad draw, but even then the defense held Bama to 17 points.
How his tenure ended, though, was really sour. The whole not being excited for the Rose is borderline criminal. Handing the reigns over to Lake was neutral, people were even optimistic. The moment Donovan was hired was a grave digging move - Pete needed to talk Lake out of that and didn't. -
True, it sucked.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Pete was a great coach but his inability to get over the hump and win something big here really makes me all the more bitter about him quitting on the rose Bowel.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I'm kind of in the minority here in that I don't hate Pete at all. I like him and overall he was a giant success.YellowSnow said:
Exactly. You can’t fire a guy that wins the pack .333 percent of the time. You just can’t.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
He always won a fuck load of games, which made those losses even worseDoogles said:
Pete got the benefit of the doubt because he was Pete, but he fucked away a lot of games here.YellowSnow said:
People forget Pete fucked away the 2015 game as well. At a minimum Pete should have been 4-2 against Oregon based on those matchups.UW_Doog_Bot said:
With all the talent Pete had he lost to Meat. Twice.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Deboer needed Henry to be perfect to beat Oregonwhatshouldicareabout said:
Pete had a lot of kickers miss big kicks, esp at BoiseCanadawg said:
I'm not a fan of these oversimplified takes on coaches or players. Good coaches have kickers miss kicks sometimesRaceBannon said:
2018 followed 70-21 and 38-3YellowSnow said:The jury is still out as to whether DeBoer's tenure at UW will best that of Pete's.
But one thing's for sure, a Peterman team (with comparable talent) would have never won that game on Sat.
UW was in position to take control back and shit the bed.
Henry missed the field goal but Petersen lost the game
2018 sucked, but 2019 was inexcusable
Could just be a biproduct of never getting blown out and being in position to win more often than not, but Christ he could have been so much better.
Pete under achieved. The replacement was worse.
I don’t know what Stanford does with Smirk.
2016 was special and without the playoffs, it's a juggernaut UW destroying PSU in the Rose Bowl. Yes we lost to PSU the next year, but '16 UW was an a whole nother level. Getting Bama in Atlanta was a bad draw, but even then the defense held Bama to 17 points.
How his tenure ended, though, was really sour. The whole not being excited for the Rose is borderline criminal. Handing the reigns over to Lake was neutral, people were even optimistic. The moment Donovan was hired was a grave digging move - Pete needed to talk Lake out of that and didn't.
Just pointing out that for all prior UW coaches that team curb stomp wins a Rose Bowl and maybe even has an argument for a natty
Instead, they got Bama in fucking Atlanta. IDK if Don James is winning that nightmare matchup. -
Dobie and dong James disagree.BennyBeaver said:Pete’s the second best corch in Huskie history.
Case closed.
-
He beat a lot of shitty teams.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
He always won a fuck load of games, which made those losses even worseDoogles said:
Pete got the benefit of the doubt because he was Pete, but he fucked away a lot of games here.YellowSnow said:
People forget Pete fucked away the 2015 game as well. At a minimum Pete should have been 4-2 against Oregon based on those matchups.UW_Doog_Bot said:
With all the talent Pete had he lost to Meat. Twice.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Deboer needed Henry to be perfect to beat Oregonwhatshouldicareabout said:
Pete had a lot of kickers miss big kicks, esp at BoiseCanadawg said:
I'm not a fan of these oversimplified takes on coaches or players. Good coaches have kickers miss kicks sometimesRaceBannon said:
2018 followed 70-21 and 38-3YellowSnow said:The jury is still out as to whether DeBoer's tenure at UW will best that of Pete's.
But one thing's for sure, a Peterman team (with comparable talent) would have never won that game on Sat.
UW was in position to take control back and shit the bed.
Henry missed the field goal but Petersen lost the game
2018 sucked, but 2019 was inexcusable
Could just be a biproduct of never getting blown out and being in position to win more often than not, but Christ he could have been so much better.
Worst era of Pac-10/12 play in decades.
I always used to ask Doogs, ok give me his biggest wins at UW? I'd hear a lot of Stanford, WSU and Utah comments. Get the fuck outta here if those are some of your biggest wins and you are considered an "elite" coach. -
Dont forget 11-1 Boise State! Lmaogmo said:
He beat a lot of shitty teams.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
He always won a fuck load of games, which made those losses even worseDoogles said:
Pete got the benefit of the doubt because he was Pete, but he fucked away a lot of games here.YellowSnow said:
People forget Pete fucked away the 2015 game as well. At a minimum Pete should have been 4-2 against Oregon based on those matchups.UW_Doog_Bot said:
With all the talent Pete had he lost to Meat. Twice.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Deboer needed Henry to be perfect to beat Oregonwhatshouldicareabout said:
Pete had a lot of kickers miss big kicks, esp at BoiseCanadawg said:
I'm not a fan of these oversimplified takes on coaches or players. Good coaches have kickers miss kicks sometimesRaceBannon said:
2018 followed 70-21 and 38-3YellowSnow said:The jury is still out as to whether DeBoer's tenure at UW will best that of Pete's.
But one thing's for sure, a Peterman team (with comparable talent) would have never won that game on Sat.
UW was in position to take control back and shit the bed.
Henry missed the field goal but Petersen lost the game
2018 sucked, but 2019 was inexcusable
Could just be a biproduct of never getting blown out and being in position to win more often than not, but Christ he could have been so much better.
Worst era of Pac-10/12 play in decades.
I always used to ask Doogs, ok give me his biggest wins at UW? I'd hear a lot of Stanford, WSU and Utah comments. Get the fuck outta here if those are some of your biggest wins and you are considered an "elite" coach. -
One thing Peterman never does that I think actually was a very smart move by Deboer was electing to take the opening kick. Being able to get up 7-0 toned down the crowd, kept UW from having to play catch up all game (especially if one thing went bad), and forced Nix to have to play from behind for a while, which he wasn't used to or good at.
Peterman also doesn't get Penix or that level of transfer QB. So there's that too. Which basically cements the loss. -
Peterman lost nearly every big game I can think back on. Then took his ball and went home when things got "stressful". Inserted Lake to do his job for him. If that doesn't describe a cuck not sure what does.
-
The funny thing about Penix is when we have the ball first and ten on our own 2 yard line, I'm not overly worried. Almost any other time in UW history, you're nervous about the offense getting stuffed and punting out of the end zone.chuck said:
He's hard as hell to sack for a guy who isn't all that nimble. It's mainly just awareness and the ability to sling it quickly. Amazingly he tends to quickly sling it to an open receiver more often than not.RaceBannon said:Penix is getting hit more every game. The lack of sacks are on him
Morris would have been sacked 60 times by now
It's the head coach who is saving Huff
Still can't gain a fucking yard
Nix is clever about avoiding sacks too. He had a couple of pretty creative throwaways. Otherwise UW has three sacks in that game. -
He is absolutely nails playing out of UW's endzone. I don’t worry about sacks or mistakes. Instead of cringing and wanting to cover my eyes like I would with every other UW team I've watched, I'm anticipating a big throw and even a 99yard TD one of these times.DerekJohnson said:
The funny thing about Penix is when we have the ball first and ten on our own 2 yard line, I'm not overly worried. Almost any other time in UW history, you're nervous about the offense getting stuffed and punting out of the end zone.chuck said:
He's hard as hell to sack for a guy who isn't all that nimble. It's mainly just awareness and the ability to sling it quickly. Amazingly he tends to quickly sling it to an open receiver more often than not.RaceBannon said:Penix is getting hit more every game. The lack of sacks are on him
Morris would have been sacked 60 times by now
It's the head coach who is saving Huff
Still can't gain a fucking yard
Nix is clever about avoiding sacks too. He had a couple of pretty creative throwaways. Otherwise UW has three sacks in that game. -
100%, fearless ruler.DerekJohnson said:
The funny thing about Penix is when we have the ball first and ten on our own 2 yard line, I'm not overly worried. Almost any other time in UW history, you're nervous about the offense getting stuffed and punting out of the end zone.chuck said:
He's hard as hell to sack for a guy who isn't all that nimble. It's mainly just awareness and the ability to sling it quickly. Amazingly he tends to quickly sling it to an open receiver more often than not.RaceBannon said:Penix is getting hit more every game. The lack of sacks are on him
Morris would have been sacked 60 times by now
It's the head coach who is saving Huff
Still can't gain a fucking yard
Nix is clever about avoiding sacks too. He had a couple of pretty creative throwaways. Otherwise UW has three sacks in that game.
Other examples: Tui and Hobert.
Common denominator? Big dick energy. (My two dads approve of this comment). -
Same with third and long. I really don't miss that feeling like a death sentence.DerekJohnson said:
The funny thing about Penix is when we have the ball first and ten on our own 2 yard line, I'm not overly worried. Almost any other time in UW history, you're nervous about the offense getting stuffed and punting out of the end zone.chuck said:
He's hard as hell to sack for a guy who isn't all that nimble. It's mainly just awareness and the ability to sling it quickly. Amazingly he tends to quickly sling it to an open receiver more often than not.RaceBannon said:Penix is getting hit more every game. The lack of sacks are on him
Morris would have been sacked 60 times by now
It's the head coach who is saving Huff
Still can't gain a fucking yard
Nix is clever about avoiding sacks too. He had a couple of pretty creative throwaways. Otherwise UW has three sacks in that game.
