Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Fetterman campaign
Comments
-
I have no illusions about Trump ever winning WA. But the Trump is toxic narrative isn't playing out like DIMS planned thus far. When things are really shitting two years from now, people are not going to give a fuck about J6th or any of the other BS the DIMS throw out there. The housewives will be voting with their pocketbooks. They didn't in 2020 and it cost them. Fat and Happy Trump made them didn't he?Tequilla said:
You do realize that the Dems try to link to Trump because it’s one of the few messaging ideas they have that resonates?46XiJCAB said:Look no further that two races in WA where Trump is the focus of negative ads. You have a war vet in Kent and the wife of a wounded vet in Smiley and both are getting hammered daily as Trump supporting election deniers that are dangers to our DeMoCrAcY!
And both may very well win. So what does it say about the narrative that Trump can't win in 2024 because 2020?
Smiley even being competitive is a huge positive sign that people are pulling their heads out of their asses in Washington
Don’t confuse their performance as a sign that Trump wouldn’t face his own unique backlash here -
-
Now imagine if Fetterman were covered like Trump 24/7hardhat said:
Instead we get yeah he sucked but we're good dog. The media has our back -
I hear if you’re not comfortable with a disabled candidate there’s something wrong with you.
That’s why you must vote for Stacey A. Obesity is a disability. I see them in shopping cart scooters all the time. -
There’s a difference between Trump himself and others trying to link candidates to Trump46XiJCAB said:
I have no illusions about Trump ever winning WA. But the Trump is toxic narrative isn't playing out like DIMS planned thus far. When things are really shitting two years from now, people are not going to give a fuck about J6th or any of the other BS the DIMS throw out there. The housewives will be voting with their pocketbooks. They didn't in 2020 and it cost them. Fat and Happy Trump made them didn't he?Tequilla said:
You do realize that the Dems try to link to Trump because it’s one of the few messaging ideas they have that resonates?46XiJCAB said:Look no further that two races in WA where Trump is the focus of negative ads. You have a war vet in Kent and the wife of a wounded vet in Smiley and both are getting hammered daily as Trump supporting election deniers that are dangers to our DeMoCrAcY!
And both may very well win. So what does it say about the narrative that Trump can't win in 2024 because 2020?
Smiley even being competitive is a huge positive sign that people are pulling their heads out of their asses in Washington
Don’t confuse their performance as a sign that Trump wouldn’t face his own unique backlash here
The states where the links are the closest is where it appears that Republicans are struggling the most -
As of mid September, Trump endorsed candidates are 159-17 in primaries according to https://ballotpedia.org/Endorsements_by_Donald_TrumpTequilla said:
There’s a difference between Trump himself and others trying to link candidates to Trump46XiJCAB said:
I have no illusions about Trump ever winning WA. But the Trump is toxic narrative isn't playing out like DIMS planned thus far. When things are really shitting two years from now, people are not going to give a fuck about J6th or any of the other BS the DIMS throw out there. The housewives will be voting with their pocketbooks. They didn't in 2020 and it cost them. Fat and Happy Trump made them didn't he?Tequilla said:
You do realize that the Dems try to link to Trump because it’s one of the few messaging ideas they have that resonates?46XiJCAB said:Look no further that two races in WA where Trump is the focus of negative ads. You have a war vet in Kent and the wife of a wounded vet in Smiley and both are getting hammered daily as Trump supporting election deniers that are dangers to our DeMoCrAcY!
And both may very well win. So what does it say about the narrative that Trump can't win in 2024 because 2020?
Smiley even being competitive is a huge positive sign that people are pulling their heads out of their asses in Washington
Don’t confuse their performance as a sign that Trump wouldn’t face his own unique backlash here
The states where the links are the closest is where it appears that Republicans are struggling the most
217-19 by this count: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/comprehensive-look-trumps-endorsement-record
Kari Lake is going to roll. Joe Kent is going to roll. Oz now appears to be a winner. Anecdotal.
I agree an argument can be made for RDS being a better candidate. Race is also spot on that the media isn't letting up on any candidate from the right, irregardless.
#winnerswinpotd -
The next GOP front runner will be Hitler just like every other one.
It's stupid to think that a moderate will be treated any differently. Trump was a moderate by every policy measure. Doesn't matter. -
Trump was part of the east coast elite and hobnobbed with the Clintons and Jesse Jackson and the NY liberal elite back before they went leftist batshit crazy
He didn't leave them, they left him
-
And if the shitty candidate Walker survives the smears and attacks and beats the wife beater then the case is fucking closed
-
Other than wanting a GOP seat in the Senate idgaf who wins. That said, the video Walker's kid put out regarding his parental skills was brutal. Fucking brutal.RaceBannon said:And if the shitty candidate Walker survives the smears and attacks and beats the wife beater then the case is fucking closed
-
Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
"Chinned" for the 67 paragraph linePurpleThrobber said:
Everyone knows who you voted for because you showed up the week after the 2020 election along with the others like @BearsWiin (RIP). You'll stick around here for another few days then sulk off like a bitch. We've seen your "observational' pattern before, "fucktard"Tequilla said:
I know who I voted forPurpleThrobber said:
So you voted for a loser in 2020Tequilla said:
I never said how I voted in the 2020 electionPurpleThrobber said:
You voted for 16% inflation and endless war.Tequilla said:
Trump lost to a slightly better version of Fetterman in 2020RaceBannon said:
I hope everyone is having fun for being a bunch of vaginasTequilla said:
Trump wasn’t electable nationally in 2020 and he won’t be in 202 eitherMelloDawg said:
Imagine losing to a guy like Biden then, right?Tequilla said:
Just like Biden was covered in 2020SFGbob said:The debate revealed that he and his campaign and the worthless media that's been covering his campaign have been lying about his condition this entire time.
It was plainly obvious then ...
It is plainly obvious now
Next up DeSantis is unelectable nationally. I think the GOP should go with Liz Cheney
Trump beat Hillary when there was no fake pandemic, fear mongering lockdowns that destroyed the economy and looters burning down cities and threatening more if he won
BUT ouR DemOcracy
All of the signs were there prior to the election to see that coming … particularly if any of you basement dwelling fucktards talked to women who overwhelmingly despise Trump (even those that are right leaning)
I’m not judging anybody … just observing
The idea of Trump running and winning the Republican Primary in 2024 is fucktarded … he’s toxic and unelectable in a general election but go ahead and run that back
I have no idea whether DeSantis will be viewed with the toxicity of Trump (notably by females) but I suspect not
Primary it up and let’s see who emerges on the Republican side
But anybody that thinks Trump can win a general election is fooling themselves
Congrats.
It does amaze me though how so many can’t separate observation from personal opinion
Congrats
Take that weak ass “I don’t recall” bullshit the fuck out of here.
Anybody paying attention knows who I voted for
Saying that Trump wasn’t electable in 2020 was an observation that played itself out
Learn how to separate observation from your own opinion fucktard
Awesome fleenoresque 'observation' two years after the fact, too.
At least you kept it to less than 67 paragraphs.
Ditto -
That's why you never invest personally in any candidatepawz said:
Other than wanting a GOP seat in the Senate idgaf who wins. That said, the video Walker's kid put out regarding his parental skills was brutal. Fucking brutal.RaceBannon said:And if the shitty candidate Walker survives the smears and attacks and beats the wife beater then the case is fucking closed
-
All politicians are scum by default. All that matters is policy.RaceBannon said:
That's why you never invest personally in any candidatepawz said:
Other than wanting a GOP seat in the Senate idgaf who wins. That said, the video Walker's kid put out regarding his parental skills was brutal. Fucking brutal.RaceBannon said:And if the shitty candidate Walker survives the smears and attacks and beats the wife beater then the case is fucking closed
-
The left should have considered this advice before they invested so personally in Donald J Trump.RaceBannon said:
That's why you never invest personally in any candidatepawz said:
Other than wanting a GOP seat in the Senate idgaf who wins. That said, the video Walker's kid put out regarding his parental skills was brutal. Fucking brutal.RaceBannon said:And if the shitty candidate Walker survives the smears and attacks and beats the wife beater then the case is fucking closed
As it is, we?ve lost a lot of emotional twat poaster's in these parts.
Almost sad. But not.
-
The democrats and Newsom cost me my business and a lot of money but I'm not a victim. You adapt and move on. That and obamacare are about the only thing the government has done that got in my way.pawz said:
The left should have considered this advice before they invested so personally in Donald J Trump.RaceBannon said:
That's why you never invest personally in any candidatepawz said:
Other than wanting a GOP seat in the Senate idgaf who wins. That said, the video Walker's kid put out regarding his parental skills was brutal. Fucking brutal.RaceBannon said:And if the shitty candidate Walker survives the smears and attacks and beats the wife beater then the case is fucking closed
As it is, we?ve lost a lot of emotional twat poaster's in these parts.
Almost sad. But not.
It's not even personal. It's strictly business. The left has to be stopped
-
During that same exchange, though, Schumer told Biden — who was standing alongside New York Gov. Kathy Hochul — the Senate Democrats were in "danger" of losing one seat, and the Senate race in Georgia was going "downhill."
Schumer apparently said: "The state where we're going downhill is Georgia. It's hard to believe that they will go for Herschel Walker."
Walker is the Republican challenger to incumbent Sen. Raphael Warnock, D-Ga.
According to Interactive Polls, Walker — who has held strong with polling in recent weeks — has emerged as the clear betting favorite to upend Warnock in the Senate battle. -
I'm really just hoping for Oz and Walker at this point so all the investigations into Biden family corruption can be carried out in both chambers. And the matter of a SCOTUS Judge kicking off unexpectedly. House investigations alone will still be fun though. Hunter Biden 24X7 baby. /popcorn
-
Even #MyTulsi?UW_Doog_Bot said:
All politicians are scum by default. All that matters is policy.RaceBannon said:
That's why you never invest personally in any candidatepawz said:
Other than wanting a GOP seat in the Senate idgaf who wins. That said, the video Walker's kid put out regarding his parental skills was brutal. Fucking brutal.RaceBannon said:And if the shitty candidate Walker survives the smears and attacks and beats the wife beater then the case is fucking closed
-
A lot of focus on these two seats but it looks like Laxalt is going to knock Cortez out of the box in NV.Swaye said:I'm really just hoping for Oz and Walker at this point so all the investigations into Biden family corruption can be carried out in both chambers. And the matter of a SCOTUS Judge kicking off unexpectedly. House investigations alone will still be fun though. Hunter Biden 24X7 baby. /popcorn
It will be the Hispanic vote that decides it as it’s a toss-up right now. Her 18 point lead is now 7 among this group. -
I couldn't hear any of thathardhat said: -
I think I heard, "we're fucked Joey." But I could be wrong.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
I couldn't hear any of thathardhat said: -
Neither could Joe.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
I couldn't hear any of thathardhat said: -
-
We definitely agree on thisRaceBannon said:
That's why you never invest personally in any candidatepawz said:
Other than wanting a GOP seat in the Senate idgaf who wins. That said, the video Walker's kid put out regarding his parental skills was brutal. Fucking brutal.RaceBannon said:And if the shitty candidate Walker survives the smears and attacks and beats the wife beater then the case is fucking closed
-
Should vote based on policy issues and competence. That excludes every dem politician.Tequilla said:
We definitely agree on thisRaceBannon said:
That's why you never invest personally in any candidatepawz said:
Other than wanting a GOP seat in the Senate idgaf who wins. That said, the video Walker's kid put out regarding his parental skills was brutal. Fucking brutal.RaceBannon said:And if the shitty candidate Walker survives the smears and attacks and beats the wife beater then the case is fucking closed
-
I agree that directionally one should always evaluate candidates based on their policy and some level of baseline competence. What candidate that falls under for a given person is up to their value system.WestlinnDuck said:
Should vote based on policy issues and competence. That excludes every dem politician.Tequilla said:
We definitely agree on thisRaceBannon said:
That's why you never invest personally in any candidatepawz said:
Other than wanting a GOP seat in the Senate idgaf who wins. That said, the video Walker's kid put out regarding his parental skills was brutal. Fucking brutal.RaceBannon said:And if the shitty candidate Walker survives the smears and attacks and beats the wife beater then the case is fucking closed
A good example to me with Dems is tied to their view for energy ...
I'm all for the idea of evaluating cleaner energy sources and whatnot ... but what I am against is putting an artificial timeline on those ideas that could lead to an outcome where it's "ready or not" with the technology, application, etc.
Solutions to most things aren't linear and require more of a comprehensive solution than most care to admit -
I can't tell you how many people I've spoken to between 2016 and 2020 ...pawz said:
As of mid September, Trump endorsed candidates are 159-17 in primaries according to https://ballotpedia.org/Endorsements_by_Donald_TrumpTequilla said:
There’s a difference between Trump himself and others trying to link candidates to Trump46XiJCAB said:
I have no illusions about Trump ever winning WA. But the Trump is toxic narrative isn't playing out like DIMS planned thus far. When things are really shitting two years from now, people are not going to give a fuck about J6th or any of the other BS the DIMS throw out there. The housewives will be voting with their pocketbooks. They didn't in 2020 and it cost them. Fat and Happy Trump made them didn't he?Tequilla said:
You do realize that the Dems try to link to Trump because it’s one of the few messaging ideas they have that resonates?46XiJCAB said:Look no further that two races in WA where Trump is the focus of negative ads. You have a war vet in Kent and the wife of a wounded vet in Smiley and both are getting hammered daily as Trump supporting election deniers that are dangers to our DeMoCrAcY!
And both may very well win. So what does it say about the narrative that Trump can't win in 2024 because 2020?
Smiley even being competitive is a huge positive sign that people are pulling their heads out of their asses in Washington
Don’t confuse their performance as a sign that Trump wouldn’t face his own unique backlash here
The states where the links are the closest is where it appears that Republicans are struggling the most
217-19 by this count: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/comprehensive-look-trumps-endorsement-record
Kari Lake is going to roll. Joe Kent is going to roll. Oz now appears to be a winner. Anecdotal.
I agree an argument can be made for RDS being a better candidate. Race is also spot on that the media isn't letting up on any candidate from the right, irregardless.
#winnerswinpotd
If you take Trump's name out of the equation, many of the policies and approaches to tackling problems are way more mainstream than people want to admit. Put in the Trump name and it's a full recoil.
What I think you're seeing with the "Trump endorsed" candidates is that their policy ideas are ones that resonate and most people are not necessarily swayed by casual links. Like you mentioned, it's where the links are the strongest (and honestly tied to the weakest of the candidates) in states that are more of a toss up election to election where things are most competitive.
The mistake that the Democrats made in 2020 was thinking that their election win was an overwhelming rubber stamping of everybody behind their agenda. The mistake that the Republicans can make in 2022 would be thinking that their very likely overwhelming win (with a number of Trump endorsed candidates) is a sign that the nation is endorsing Trump. -
The obvious unintended consequence of the insistence of government investing in certain types of clean energy is that a better technology that actually works and is cost effective will get suppressed because of the artificial power of people that got rich off of those inefficient investments.Tequilla said:
I agree that directionally one should always evaluate candidates based on their policy and some level of baseline competence. What candidate that falls under for a given person is up to their value system.WestlinnDuck said:
Should vote based on policy issues and competence. That excludes every dem politician.Tequilla said:
We definitely agree on thisRaceBannon said:
That's why you never invest personally in any candidatepawz said:
Other than wanting a GOP seat in the Senate idgaf who wins. That said, the video Walker's kid put out regarding his parental skills was brutal. Fucking brutal.RaceBannon said:And if the shitty candidate Walker survives the smears and attacks and beats the wife beater then the case is fucking closed
A good example to me with Dems is tied to their view for energy ...
I'm all for the idea of evaluating cleaner energy sources and whatnot ... but what I am against is putting an artificial timeline on those ideas that could lead to an outcome where it's "ready or not" with the technology, application, etc.
Solutions to most things aren't linear and require more of a comprehensive solution than most care to admit
