Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Hardcore Husky Podcast: We'd rather be 2-6 with warts than 6-2 with warts

2

Comments

  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    Will there be any assistant coach changes? What are the big money donors saying?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 13,018
    What is your dream bowl match-up for this season?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 70,304 Founders Club
    whatshouldicareabout said:

    What is your dream bowl match-up for this season?

    pod ended an hour ago. good question though
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,387
    Was there a Jordan perryman appreciation segment?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHBruh
    HHBruh Member Posts: 523
    Answer = Fuck nah
    HHBruh said:

    Chances (50-100%) we(?) were overlooking Cal for bi week and the Beav??

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHBruh
    HHBruh Member Posts: 523
    I suggested we(?) call him Traeger.

    Maybe there should be a segment “smoke of the week” maybe that’s also negative but taken In the spirit in which it’s intended, if you can’t Laff, you’re gonna cry and slit your wrists eventually
    AtomicDawg said:

    Was there a Jordan perryman appreciation segment?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,382
    Houhusky said:

    Can you guys explain how it’s possible that the secondary is so bad that they can’t even intentionally cause a pass interference penalty let alone accidentally get called for one for just getting close to the other teams WRs?

    How is it possible that the secondary is so collectively bad that Asa doesn’t even stand out as a uniquely bad player anymore?

    Wtf do the LBs even do on the defense, I’m so distracted by treager perryman I still don’t know how it’s possible how the LBs slip into another dimension and somehow cover zero parts of the field despite appearing to be on the field on TV?

    Start here: Death row NFL DB factory offering/giving a second-team HS corner a scholarship was the first hint of something amiss. There was a time when a Myles Bryant sort forwent scholarship offers to walk-on at Washington.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,635
    TheHB said:

    +17.5

    That's about right, maybe 14.5 at very best if the D looks somewhat improved against Oregon State after the bye week.

    I acutally don't think Perryman and Powell are THAT bad, it's the D-coaches who keep treating Perryman like he is some shutdown / All Pac-12 corner when he's obviously not even honorable mention. If Perryman is in man coverage against the opposing team's #1 WR, he needs help most of the time.

    If the DL can get pretty good / consistent pressure while rushing 4 against better teams, that will allow the co DCs to drop 7 and mix up coverage looks. Have they even run much Cover 2 or Cover 3? Turner would at least be decent as the deep safety and Perryman and Powell both have good length for the Cover 3. Hampton and Cook run well enough to be the part of the 4 under. I'd prefer to have Eddie O. and Bruener on the field in 3rd and medium and 3rd and long.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,387
    HFNY said:

    TheHB said:

    +17.5

    That's about right, maybe 14.5 at very best if the D looks somewhat improved against Oregon State after the bye week.

    I acutally don't think Perryman and Powell are THAT bad, it's the D-coaches who keep treating Perryman like he is some shutdown / All Pac-12 corner when he's obviously not even honorable mention. If Perryman is in man coverage against the opposing team's #1 WR, he needs help most of the time.

    If the DL can get pretty good / consistent pressure while rushing 4 against better teams, that will allow the co DCs to drop 7 and mix up coverage looks. Have they even run much Cover 2 or Cover 3? Turner would at least be decent as the deep safety and Perryman and Powell both have good length for the Cover 3. Hampton and Cook run well enough to be the part of the 4 under. I'd prefer to have Eddie O. and Bruener on the field in 3rd and medium and 3rd and long.
    Perryman isn’t even the picture on some of the touchdowns he gives up in man coverage.

    Agreed that we should be playing zone though.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 1to392831weretaken
    1to392831weretaken Member Posts: 7,696
    AtomicDawg said:

    HFNY said:

    TheHB said:

    +17.5

    That's about right, maybe 14.5 at very best if the D looks somewhat improved against Oregon State after the bye week.

    I acutally don't think Perryman and Powell are THAT bad, it's the D-coaches who keep treating Perryman like he is some shutdown / All Pac-12 corner when he's obviously not even honorable mention. If Perryman is in man coverage against the opposing team's #1 WR, he needs help most of the time.

    If the DL can get pretty good / consistent pressure while rushing 4 against better teams, that will allow the co DCs to drop 7 and mix up coverage looks. Have they even run much Cover 2 or Cover 3? Turner would at least be decent as the deep safety and Perryman and Powell both have good length for the Cover 3. Hampton and Cook run well enough to be the part of the 4 under. I'd prefer to have Eddie O. and Bruener on the field in 3rd and medium and 3rd and long.
    Perryman isn’t even the picture on some of the touchdowns he gives up in man coverage.

    Agreed that we should be playing zone though.
    @Tequilla for new defensive coordinator?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter