My official position...
Comments
-
I have never found anything interesting about CougLJ.He_Needs_More_Time said:
It will be interesting if CougLJ was Harv, it will also be interesting if CougLJ isn't Harv as well.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Hi Harv!CougLJ said:Sark is kind of coach who isn't going to get it done. He will take down the entire Washington Husky football program while doing so. As a coach he just lacks the skill necessary to make a mediocre team go to a great team. Things are looking very ugly in Seattle that is for sure so I guess we should just lean back and watch the train wreck happen.
-
I just roll my eyes
-
That would make a GREAT handleDick_B said:I just roll my eyes
-
Seriously, you wanted Don James fired in 1988? The Dawgfater himself was disappointed enough to publically fire his own team in 1988,......... but really? After taking us to three Rose Bowls and barely four years after the 11-1 Orange Bowl season? Could your understanding of Husky Football have actually had so few layers, even way back then?MikeDamone said:In 1988 I wanted Don James fired. He got to work and shut me up. And I was delighted. I want Sark to win 10 games this year and go on to many years success. I want UW to succeed so I can be wrong. Right now, it doesn't look good,but I want to be wrong. For the love of God and for those that are going to games on crisp fall days with their dad....prove me wrong. It's been a very long 20 years.
Should Sark somehow pull-off a miracle in 2013 and astound us with the level of unexpected success required to become the toast of Seattle as well as Montlake amongst Huskyfans everywhere, will you have the patience to temper your worship of our young beleaguered coach suddenly turned hero until he at least takes us to a couple more Rose Bowls and a Dawg's hairbreath away from a BCS championship win?
-
Welcome to this week Rip Van Tailgaiter!!!Tailgater said:
Seriously, you wanted Don James fired in 1988? The Dawgfater himself was disappointed enough to publically fire his own team in 1988,......... but really? After taking us to three Rose Bowls and barely four years after the 11-1 Orange Bowl season? Could your understanding of Husky Football have actually had so few layers, even way back then?MikeDamone said:In 1988 I wanted Don James fired. He got to work and shut me up. And I was delighted. I want Sark to win 10 games this year and go on to many years success. I want UW to succeed so I can be wrong. Right now, it doesn't look good,but I want to be wrong. For the love of God and for those that are going to games on crisp fall days with their dad....prove me wrong. It's been a very long 20 years.
Should Sark somehow pull-off a miracle in 2013 and astound us with the level of unexpected success required to become the toast of Seattle as well as Montlake amongst Huskyfans everywhere, will you have the patience to temper your worship of our young beleaguered coach suddenly turned hero until he at least takes us to a couple more Rose Bowls and a Dawg's hairbreath away from a BCS championship win?
Yes - After 7-5, 8-3-1, 7-4-1, and 6-5, he had his 4 years of mediocrity. In those 4 years he was 2-2 vs. WSU. He dropped two straight to Oregon back when losing to Oregon was outrageous. He had gotten complacent, stale. His teams were boring. He sat on leads only to end up losing the game. I wasn't the only one who thought perhaps it was time for a change. 4 years...sound familiar?
My worship of Sark? I'm not following you. If Sark wins 9 or more this this year I will say he gets one more year. Less than 9 is door as out.
-
CougLJ said:
I'm the kind of poster who isn't going to get it done. I will take down the entire HardcoreHusky website while doing so. As a poster I just lack the skill necessary to make a mediocre post go to a great post. Things are looking very ugly in HardcoreHusky that is for sure so I guess we should just lean back and watch the train wreck happen.
-
MikeDamone said:Tailgater said:
It's convoluted, so try to keep up. If Sark should morph into a Don James starting in 2013, will you be consistent and STFU......... as you presumably did following 1988.MikeDamone said:
My worship of Sark? I'm not following you. If Sark wins 9 or more this this year I will say he gets one more year. Less than 9 is door as out. -
Tailgater said:MikeDamone said:
Um... Did you read my post? That was the point. But with James I actually didn't stfu until 1990Tailgater said:
It's convoluted, so try to keep up. If Sark should morph into a Don James starting in 2013, will you be consistent and STFU......... as you presumably did following 1988.MikeDamone said:
My worship of Sark? I'm not following you. If Sark wins 9 or more this this year I will say he gets one more year. Less than 9 is door as out.
HTH. -
MikeDamone said:Tailgater said:MikeDamone said:
Um... Did you read my post? That was the point. But with James I actually didn't stfu until 1990Tailgater said:
It's convoluted, so try to keep up. If Sark should morph into a Don James starting in 2013, will you be consistent and STFU......... as you presumably did following 1988.MikeDamone said:
My worship of Sark? I'm not following you. If Sark wins 9 or more this this year I will say he gets one more year. Less than 9 is door as out.
HTH. -
TierbsHsotBoobs said:MikeDamone said:
Huh?Tailgater said:MikeDamone said:
Um... Did you read my post? That was the point. But with James I actually didn't stfu until 1990Tailgater said:
It's convoluted, so try to keep up. If Sark should morph into a Don James starting in 2013, will you be consistent and STFU......... as you presumably did following 1988.MikeDamone said:
My worship of Sark? I'm not following you. If Sark wins 9 or more this this year I will say he gets one more year. Less than 9 is door as out.
HTH.
