Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

#MyTulsi .. Door. ASS. Out.

«1

Comments

  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,417 Founders Club

    Bruh.

    You gots to get up earlier than the early bird to beat the Throbber to the punch on #OURTulsi news.

    https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/100843/later-guys-well-bye#latest

    https://youtu.be/rAfwpfUBw1M
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,417 Founders Club
    If diamondgirl1-74 isn't smart enough to tell the difference between the actions of Tulsi and Dan Crenshaw, I can't fuckin help she/her.

    Centrist Fucking Stupid.


  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,003
    edited October 2022
    pawz said:

    If diamondgirl1-74 isn't smart enough to tell the difference between the actions of Tulsi and Dan Crenshaw, I can't fuckin help she/her.

    Centrist Fucking Stupid.


    Did Rogan call her out for attending a WEF event? She needs to put that rumor to bed. Haven't had time to listen to the episode yet. Too little time, so much hookers and blow.

    Klaus Schwab is consistently one of Rogan's targets.

  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,417 Founders Club

    pawz said:

    If diamondgirl1-74 isn't smart enough to tell the difference between the actions of Tulsi and Dan Crenshaw, I can't fuckin help she/her.

    Centrist Fucking Stupid.


    Did Rogan call her out for attending a WEF event? She needs to put that rumor to bed. Haven't had time to listen to the episode yet. Too little time, so much hookers and blow.

    Klaus Schwab is consistently one of Rogan's targets.

    I'm only half-way through. I haven't heard specifically the WEF question, but she is certainly railing against Democrats and them being co-opted by an elite global cabal and wokeism.

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,003
    edited October 2022
    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    If diamondgirl1-74 isn't smart enough to tell the difference between the actions of Tulsi and Dan Crenshaw, I can't fuckin help she/her.

    Centrist Fucking Stupid.


    Did Rogan call her out for attending a WEF event? She needs to put that rumor to bed. Haven't had time to listen to the episode yet. Too little time, so much hookers and blow.

    Klaus Schwab is consistently one of Rogan's targets.

    I'm only half-way through. I haven't heard specifically the WEF question, but she is certainly railing against Democrats and them being co-opted by an elite global cabal and wokeism.

    Red pill best pill

    Still bummed I missed her appearance in Spokane last month.



  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,417 Founders Club
    edited October 2022

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    If diamondgirl1-74 isn't smart enough to tell the difference between the actions of Tulsi and Dan Crenshaw, I can't fuckin help she/her.

    Centrist Fucking Stupid.


    Did Rogan call her out for attending a WEF event? She needs to put that rumor to bed. Haven't had time to listen to the episode yet. Too little time, so much hookers and blow.

    Klaus Schwab is consistently one of Rogan's targets.

    I'm only half-way through. I haven't heard specifically the WEF question, but she is certainly railing against Democrats and them being co-opted by an elite global cabal and wokeism.

    Red pill best pill

    Still bummed I missed her appearance in Spokane last month.



    Wait, what ?!

    I might have made the I-90 run to see her.

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,003
    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    If diamondgirl1-74 isn't smart enough to tell the difference between the actions of Tulsi and Dan Crenshaw, I can't fuckin help she/her.

    Centrist Fucking Stupid.


    Did Rogan call her out for attending a WEF event? She needs to put that rumor to bed. Haven't had time to listen to the episode yet. Too little time, so much hookers and blow.

    Klaus Schwab is consistently one of Rogan's targets.

    I'm only half-way through. I haven't heard specifically the WEF question, but she is certainly railing against Democrats and them being co-opted by an elite global cabal and wokeism.

    Red pill best pill

    Still bummed I missed her appearance in Spokane last month.



    Wait, what ?!

    I might have made the I-90 run to see her.

    Speaker at the WA Policy Center dinner

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,660 Founders Club
    I'll leave it up to OBK to decide
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913

    pawz said:

    If diamondgirl1-74 isn't smart enough to tell the difference between the actions of Tulsi and Dan Crenshaw, I can't fuckin help she/her.

    Centrist Fucking Stupid.


    Did Rogan call her out for attending a WEF event? She needs to put that rumor to bed. Haven't had time to listen to the episode yet. Too little time, so much hookers and blow.

    Klaus Schwab is consistently one of Rogan's targets.

    I would love to attend a WEF event if given the time and resource. Doesn’t mean that I agree with what is going on. But would be curious to absorb what actually goes on at one of them. I’ve done many all day full staff meetings. If I can get through those, I could probably get through a WEF day.
  • Blu82
    Blu82 Member Posts: 1,670

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    If diamondgirl1-74 isn't smart enough to tell the difference between the actions of Tulsi and Dan Crenshaw, I can't fuckin help she/her.

    Centrist Fucking Stupid.


    Did Rogan call her out for attending a WEF event? She needs to put that rumor to bed. Haven't had time to listen to the episode yet. Too little time, so much hookers and blow.

    Klaus Schwab is consistently one of Rogan's targets.

    I'm only half-way through. I haven't heard specifically the WEF question, but she is certainly railing against Democrats and them being co-opted by an elite global cabal and wokeism.

    Red pill best pill

    Still bummed I missed her appearance in Spokane last month.



    I enjoyed her WPC speech and the opportunity to meet with her in person.
    She definitely has the "it" thing going on.
  • RezMuttJeff
    RezMuttJeff Member Posts: 89
    edited October 2022
    She is an enemy of our Constitutional rights

    I am not even exaggerating here. This woman hates the second amendment. Just take a look at her own campaign site! Tulsi strongly supports a number of gun control measures, including:

    – A federal ban on military-style assault weapons and high capacity magazines

    – Requiring comprehensive pre-purchase background checks

    – Closing the gun-show loophole

    – Making sure that ‘terrorists’ are not allowed to buy guns

    – Tulsi’s support of gun control has led to her rating of 100% by the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, along with an “F” rating from the NRA and a 0% rating from the Hawaii Rifle Association.

    – Tulsi participated in the House sit-in in 2016 when Republicans refused to allow any members to vote on any gun control legislation.

    – In working towards enacting real gun control measures, Tulsi is focusing on bipartisan measures that have a chance of actually becoming passed into law, rather than using the issue as a political football.

    Plus, she was raised in a a cult. I don't buy her shtick.
  • RezMuttJeff
    RezMuttJeff Member Posts: 89
    edited October 2022
    Also, She is a member of CFR. Don’t believe me? Check their membership list. The Council on Foreign Relations is a “globalist” institution that has been involved with almost every presidential candidate in recent history. I remember the only candidate who was not a member of the CFR in the 2008 election was Ron Paul, who talked a better game than Gabbard, but still functioned as controlled opposition.

    https://www.tulsigabbard.org/tulsi-gabbard-on-gun-safety-legislation

    Gabbard isn’t on the CFR list ANYMORE, SHE WAS TAKEN OFF WHEN PEOPLE POINTED THIS OUT. It’s alphabetical and no Gabbard.

    Good thing we have the Internet Wayback Machine to see what the site looked like on June 28th.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20190628215002/https://www.cfr.org/membership/roster.

    It’s obvious that the political establishment needs Gabbard as an anti-war release valve, so that people keep maintaining the false hope that things can be changed for the better through voting harder.

    It’s also obvious that Gabbard’s campaign, the CFR, and/or the entire political establishment is closely watching what is being reported at commonfolk journalist outlets.

  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,417 Founders Club
    edited October 2022

    She is an enemy of our Constitutional rights

    I am not even exaggerating here. This woman hates the second amendment. Just take a look at her own campaign site! Tulsi strongly supports a number of gun control measures, including:

    – A federal ban on military-style assault weapons and high capacity magazines

    – Requiring comprehensive pre-purchase background checks

    – Closing the gun-show loophole

    – Making sure that ‘terrorists’ are not allowed to buy guns

    – Tulsi’s support of gun control has led to her rating of 100% by the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, along with an “F” rating from the NRA and a 0% rating from the Hawaii Rifle Association.

    – Tulsi participated in the House sit-in in 2016 when Republicans refused to allow any members to vote on any gun control legislation.

    – In working towards enacting real gun control measures, Tulsi is focusing on bipartisan measures that have a chance of actually becoming passed into law, rather than using the issue as a political football.

    Plus, she was raised in a a cult. I don't buy her shtick.

    Not the case. She is an ardent supporter of the constitution. Listen to the Rogan interview today. She speaks of constitutional importance at length. She does this over and over and over.


    Th 2A issue has been litigated here before. Things and people change.

    You must have missed her social media post from last week where she was doing fire arms training.




    If you can't handle the ups-and recruiting....
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,417 Founders Club

    Also, She is a member of CFR. Don’t believe me? Check their membership list. The Council on Foreign Relations is a “globalist” institution that has been involved with almost every presidential candidate in recent history. I remember the only candidate who was not a member of the CFR in the 2008 election was Ron Paul, who talked a better game than Gabbard, but still functioned as controlled opposition.

    https://www.tulsigabbard.org/tulsi-gabbard-on-gun-safety-legislation

    Gabbard isn’t on the CFR list ANYMORE, SHE WAS TAKEN OFF WHEN PEOPLE POINTED THIS OUT. It’s alphabetical and no Gabbard.

    Good thing we have the Internet Wayback Machine to see what the site looked like on June 28th.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20190628215002/https://www.cfr.org/membership/roster.

    It’s obvious that the political establishment needs Gabbard as an anti-war release valve, so that people keep maintaining the false hope that things can be changed for the better through voting harder.

    It’s also obvious that Gabbard’s campaign, the CFR, and/or the entire political establishment is closely watching what is being reported at commonfolk journalist outlets.

    OBK-level cynicism. Kudos.


  • RezMuttJeff
    RezMuttJeff Member Posts: 89
    Would be cool if Tulsi meant what she says, instead she hangs around at AIPAC, CUFI, the CFR and AEI and votes for massive military budgets while serving up her empty anti-war rhetoric.In 2016 Gabbard received $465,000 from PAC money. Most of the money (55%) came from business PACS, with one of the largest sectors being the defense industry. Her 2016 campaign raised $65,000 from the defense sector. Donations of $10,000 came from the Boeing Corporation PAC and from Lockheed Martin’s PAC. Her own leadership PAC, Time to Unite Lead and Serve with Integrity, received funds from Raytheon.

    So tell me again how Gabbard is supposed to be an anti-war candidate.

  • RezMuttJeff
    RezMuttJeff Member Posts: 89
    Seeing her with other WEF agents is inexcusable, I won’t support her bullshit anytime soon.
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,417 Founders Club

    Would be cool if Tulsi meant what she says, instead she hangs around at AIPAC, CUFI, the CFR and AEI and votes for massive military budgets while serving up her empty anti-war rhetoric.In 2016 Gabbard received $465,000 from PAC money. Most of the money (55%) came from business PACS, with one of the largest sectors being the defense industry. Her 2016 campaign raised $65,000 from the defense sector. Donations of $10,000 came from the Boeing Corporation PAC and from Lockheed Martin’s PAC. Her own leadership PAC, Time to Unite Lead and Serve with Integrity, received funds from Raytheon.

    So tell me again how Gabbard is supposed to be an anti-war candidate.

    Have you spent any time with her on the podcast circuit? It doesn't seem like it.

  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,417 Founders Club
    edited October 2022

    Seeing her with other WEF agents is inexcusable, I won’t support her bullshit anytime soon.

    Dude, her message for years is anti-thetical to WEF mores.

    Did WEF attempt to co-opt her early in her career? No question.

    The substance of her messaging couldn't be categorically further from that. Clearly the attempted co-opt didn't work.


    Side-by-side her speaches the last few years with Trudeau's. Zero overlap. Zero.

  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,622 Founders Club
    I like her, mostly because the leftists hate her.

    That being said, she’s far closer to Bernie on economics than Ron Paul. So I’m out.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    Seeing her with other WEF agents is inexcusable, I won’t support her bullshit anytime soon.

    What policy positions of hers do disagree with?
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Bob_C said:

    I like her, mostly because the leftists hate her.

    That being said, she’s far closer to Bernie on economics than Ron Paul. So I’m out.

    She voted to audit the federal reserve.

    She is kind of a mixed bag on economic policy. But I do think she’s solid on LGTBQ rights?
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,003
    Bob_C said:

    I like her, mostly because the leftists hate her.

    That being said, she’s far closer to Bernie on economics than Ron Paul. So I’m out.

    Don't let perfection get in the way of the good.

    #PawzTulsi is maturing in her positions as she see the dreck of which the globalist corporate fascists are pushing.

    She needs more tim to evolve on her economics.

  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member Posts: 18,026
    pawz said:

    She is an enemy of our Constitutional rights

    I am not even exaggerating here. This woman hates the second amendment. Just take a look at her own campaign site! Tulsi strongly supports a number of gun control measures, including:

    – A federal ban on military-style assault weapons and high capacity magazines

    – Requiring comprehensive pre-purchase background checks

    – Closing the gun-show loophole

    – Making sure that ‘terrorists’ are not allowed to buy guns

    – Tulsi’s support of gun control has led to her rating of 100% by the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, along with an “F” rating from the NRA and a 0% rating from the Hawaii Rifle Association.

    – Tulsi participated in the House sit-in in 2016 when Republicans refused to allow any members to vote on any gun control legislation.

    – In working towards enacting real gun control measures, Tulsi is focusing on bipartisan measures that have a chance of actually becoming passed into law, rather than using the issue as a political football.

    Plus, she was raised in a a cult. I don't buy her shtick.

    Not the case. She is an ardent supporter of the constitution. Listen to the Rogan interview today. She speaks of constitutional importance at length. She does this over and over and over.


    The 2A issue has been litigated here before. Things and people change.

    You must have missed her social media post from last week where she was doing fire arms training.




    If you can't handle the ups-and recruiting....
    Let us know when she, you know, actually changes her stance and comes out as an unapologetic 2A supporter. Until then it's all just window dressing.



    Ftr I do enjoy the meltdown of the Left over this and think the right needs to continue to be "big tent".