Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
bet on the Dawgs to win
PostGameOrangeSlices
Member Posts: 27,684
If DeBoer is that dude we beat UCLA rather easily, say 34-17
UW is much better than South Alabama.
Took the dawgs at -3.5
Sorry in advance for the loss.
The game being on Friday night is a bit concerning but the rose bowl is the least intimidating venue in the conference
UW is much better than South Alabama.
Took the dawgs at -3.5
Sorry in advance for the loss.
The game being on Friday night is a bit concerning but the rose bowl is the least intimidating venue in the conference
Comments
-
If DTR works to move the chains and keep UW's offense off the field, it could spell trouble. I would think we'll still win by 3-7 points.
-
I think this new scheme will actually emphasize stopping the mobile qb, instead of the Kwat drop 8 bullshit that was a guaranteed 7+yards every time a Qb tucked and ranDerekJohnson said:If DTR works to move the chains and keep UW's offense off the field, it could spell trouble. I would think we'll still win by 3-7 points.
-
It's more just the lack of atmosphere besides, what, 2k UW fans? A 7:30 kick off and the defense is unproven against a mobile quarterback.
My hope is that because this is UCLA's first real opponent and they just aren't prepared and make it easy for UW. -
I have no doubt our gameplan will be more nuanced than past yearsPostGameOrangeSlices said:
I think this new scheme will actually emphasize stopping the mobile qb, instead of the Kwat drop 8 bullshit that was a guaranteed 7+yards every time a Qb tucked and ranDerekJohnson said:If DTR works to move the chains and keep UW's offense off the field, it could spell trouble. I would think we'll still win by 3-7 points.
-
Make hyphen name beat us through the air. That's my detailed game plan.
-
-
I like the fact that we're already seeing "experts" picking the broons. Keep it coming.
And UWLeah should know there are five reasons why Ucla won't have a big crowd Friday night. So we? have that going for us too, which is nice. -
Never understood this logic, unless you believe in astrology or some shitRaceBannon said:
We? might lose because the 2022 Huskies suck. But we? won't lose because the 2004 Huskies sucked. -
im old enough to remember espn's s&p has sparty winning over us? by 7 points.whlinder said:
#analytics
