Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Unhinged Liberal Who KILLED Republican Teenager FREED, GOP Is Doing NOTHING As Terrorist Walks Free

1246789

Comments

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 18,954
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Swaye said:

    I wonder if he would have been released if he killed a black teenager at a BLM rally?

    It just might depend on what he was charged with.
    Fuck off
    thank you for your service

    HHusky said:

    Swaye said:

    I wonder if he would have been released if he killed a black teenager at a BLM rally?

    It just might depend on what he was charged with.
    Fuck off
    Dazzler walks off humming, "There goes my hero, watch him as he goes." Dazzler loves himself some leftard criminals. Now we know that he doesn't support violent crime, it's just not a voting issue for him.
    So, they should just hold him because of your very strong feelings.

    He's been charged and allowed to post a bond. It's the law.
    Yup, it's not like he tried to overthrow our DeMoCrAcY and ended up rotting in a DC hellhole because the Gov't can torture you if they so desire.

    He only killed a kid, allegedly, with his SUV. No biggie.

    Again, Fuck off you hypocrite.
    Write your North Dakota legislator.

    Meantime . . .

    He hasn't been charged with murder.

    Do try to keep up.
    Hey Dazzler you good with those rotting in a DC hellhole not being allowed bail?

    None are charged with MURDER!

    What this kunt act folks.
    The insurrectionists aren't being held pursuant to North Dakota law. If whacky left-wing North Dakota want to have lenient, liberal rules, that's states' rights ain't it?
    This isn't about ND.
    You were for federalism before you were against it.
    An honest person could answer the question.

    Case closed.

    I win, again.
    I have zero issue with the few particularly violent insurrectionists being held without bail. Which is what's happened.

    What have they been charged with to deny them bail? Anything less than MURDER isn't sufficient.

    You are incorrect.

    Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1)(E), detention is permitted if the case involves “any felony . . . that involves the possession or use of a . . . dangerous weapon.”
    Feds get to define dangerous weapon. Not a single gun was confiscated. Not even the one that murdered a female Trump supporter. I guess we almost lost our DeMoCrAcY to flag poles and ?

    Well done Brownshirt.

    Fuck off.
    So, you were totally wrong, but now you have several quibbles to offer.

    I own you.
    I said anything less than Murder isn't sufficient. Where did I say that was the code?
    So, you approve of the SUV driver's release and the state of the law in North Dakota.

    Your quarrel is with the other girls.
    What weapons were used by J6th defendants that rise to the level of no bail? No guns found. Don't worry I'm expecting another deflection. POS.
    Charging documents and public video depict rampaging episodes of violence against 139 officers — attacks involving weapons including batons, metal racks, baseball bats, flagpoles and chemical irritants. Fifty five defendants have been charged with using a dangerous weapon against or seriously injuring officers, including beating one downed man for 16 seconds with a hockey stick, knocking down and dragging others down steps into a crowd of rioters, electro-shocking one with a stun gun and holding a baton against another’s neck.

    That doesn't include the taser one of the detained "patriots" was carrying.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,483
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 18,954
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Sledog said:

    Bullshit.

    You've obviously given this a lot of thought.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Swaye said:

    I wonder if he would have been released if he killed a black teenager at a BLM rally?

    It just might depend on what he was charged with.
    Fuck off
    thank you for your service

    HHusky said:

    Swaye said:

    I wonder if he would have been released if he killed a black teenager at a BLM rally?

    It just might depend on what he was charged with.
    Fuck off
    Dazzler walks off humming, "There goes my hero, watch him as he goes." Dazzler loves himself some leftard criminals. Now we know that he doesn't support violent crime, it's just not a voting issue for him.
    So, they should just hold him because of your very strong feelings.

    He's been charged and allowed to post a bond. It's the law.
    Yup, it's not like he tried to overthrow our DeMoCrAcY and ended up rotting in a DC hellhole because the Gov't can torture you if they so desire.

    He only killed a kid, allegedly, with his SUV. No biggie.

    Again, Fuck off you hypocrite.
    Write your North Dakota legislator.

    Meantime . . .

    He hasn't been charged with murder.

    Do try to keep up.
    Hey Dazzler you good with those rotting in a DC hellhole not being allowed bail?

    None are charged with MURDER!

    What this kunt act folks.
    The insurrectionists aren't being held pursuant to North Dakota law. If whacky left-wing North Dakota want to have lenient, liberal rules, that's states' rights ain't it?
    This isn't about ND.
    You were for federalism before you were against it.
    An honest person could answer the question.

    Case closed.

    I win, again.
    I have zero issue with the few particularly violent insurrectionists being held without bail. Which is what's happened.

    What have they been charged with to deny them bail? Anything less than MURDER isn't sufficient.

    You are incorrect.

    Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1)(E), detention is permitted if the case involves “any felony . . . that involves the possession or use of a . . . dangerous weapon.”
    Feds get to define dangerous weapon. Not a single gun was confiscated. Not even the one that murdered a female Trump supporter. I guess we almost lost our DeMoCrAcY to flag poles and ?

    Well done Brownshirt.

    Fuck off.
    So, you were totally wrong, but now you have several quibbles to offer.

    I own you.
    I said anything less than Murder isn't sufficient. Where did I say that was the code?
    So, you approve of the SUV driver's release and the state of the law in North Dakota.

    Your quarrel is with the other girls.
    What weapons were used by J6th defendants that rise to the level of no bail? No guns found. Don't worry I'm expecting another deflection. POS.
    Charging documents and public video depict rampaging episodes of violence against 139 officers — attacks involving weapons including batons, metal racks, baseball bats, flagpoles and chemical irritants. Fifty five defendants have been charged with using a dangerous weapon against or seriously injuring officers, including beating one downed man for 16 seconds with a hockey stick, knocking down and dragging others down steps into a crowd of rioters, electro-shocking one with a stun gun and holding a baton against another’s neck.

    That doesn't include the taser one of the detained "patriots" was carrying.
    I’d have abandoned this thread a while ago of I were you.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    edited September 2022
    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Swaye said:

    I wonder if he would have been released if he killed a black teenager at a BLM rally?

    It just might depend on what he was charged with.
    Fuck off
    thank you for your service

    HHusky said:

    Swaye said:

    I wonder if he would have been released if he killed a black teenager at a BLM rally?

    It just might depend on what he was charged with.
    Fuck off
    Dazzler walks off humming, "There goes my hero, watch him as he goes." Dazzler loves himself some leftard criminals. Now we know that he doesn't support violent crime, it's just not a voting issue for him.
    So, they should just hold him because of your very strong feelings.

    He's been charged and allowed to post a bond. It's the law.
    Yup, it's not like he tried to overthrow our DeMoCrAcY and ended up rotting in a DC hellhole because the Gov't can torture you if they so desire.

    He only killed a kid, allegedly, with his SUV. No biggie.

    Again, Fuck off you hypocrite.
    Write your North Dakota legislator.

    Meantime . . .

    He hasn't been charged with murder.

    Do try to keep up.
    Hey Dazzler you good with those rotting in a DC hellhole not being allowed bail?

    None are charged with MURDER!

    What this kunt act folks.
    The insurrectionists aren't being held pursuant to North Dakota law. If whacky left-wing North Dakota want to have lenient, liberal rules, that's states' rights ain't it?
    This isn't about ND.
    You were for federalism before you were against it.
    An honest person could answer the question.

    Case closed.

    I win, again.
    I have zero issue with the few particularly violent insurrectionists being held without bail. Which is what's happened.

    What have they been charged with to deny them bail? Anything less than MURDER isn't sufficient.

    You are incorrect.

    Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1)(E), detention is permitted if the case involves “any felony . . . that involves the possession or use of a . . . dangerous weapon.”
    Feds get to define dangerous weapon. Not a single gun was confiscated. Not even the one that murdered a female Trump supporter. I guess we almost lost our DeMoCrAcY to flag poles and ?

    Well done Brownshirt.

    Fuck off.
    So, you were totally wrong, but now you have several quibbles to offer.

    I own you.
    I said anything less than Murder isn't sufficient. Where did I say that was the code?
    So, you approve of the SUV driver's release and the state of the law in North Dakota.

    Your quarrel is with the other girls.
    What weapons were used by J6th defendants that rise to the level of no bail? No guns found. Don't worry I'm expecting another deflection. POS.
    Charging documents and public video depict rampaging episodes of violence against 139 officers — attacks involving weapons including batons, metal racks, baseball bats, flagpoles and chemical irritants. Fifty five defendants have been charged with using a dangerous weapon against or seriously injuring officers, including beating one downed man for 16 seconds with a hockey stick, knocking down and dragging others down steps into a crowd of rioters, electro-shocking one with a stun gun and holding a baton against another’s neck.

    That doesn't include the taser one of the detained "patriots" was carrying.
    “If you wanted or if you think you need to have weapons to take on the government, you need F-15s and maybe some nuclear weapons." - Joe Biden

    Biden left out hockey sticks.

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 18,954
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Swaye said:

    I wonder if he would have been released if he killed a black teenager at a BLM rally?

    It just might depend on what he was charged with.
    Fuck off
    thank you for your service

    HHusky said:

    Swaye said:

    I wonder if he would have been released if he killed a black teenager at a BLM rally?

    It just might depend on what he was charged with.
    Fuck off
    Dazzler walks off humming, "There goes my hero, watch him as he goes." Dazzler loves himself some leftard criminals. Now we know that he doesn't support violent crime, it's just not a voting issue for him.
    So, they should just hold him because of your very strong feelings.

    He's been charged and allowed to post a bond. It's the law.
    Yup, it's not like he tried to overthrow our DeMoCrAcY and ended up rotting in a DC hellhole because the Gov't can torture you if they so desire.

    He only killed a kid, allegedly, with his SUV. No biggie.

    Again, Fuck off you hypocrite.
    Write your North Dakota legislator.

    Meantime . . .

    He hasn't been charged with murder.

    Do try to keep up.
    Hey Dazzler you good with those rotting in a DC hellhole not being allowed bail?

    None are charged with MURDER!

    What this kunt act folks.
    The insurrectionists aren't being held pursuant to North Dakota law. If whacky left-wing North Dakota want to have lenient, liberal rules, that's states' rights ain't it?
    This isn't about ND.
    You were for federalism before you were against it.
    An honest person could answer the question.

    Case closed.

    I win, again.
    I have zero issue with the few particularly violent insurrectionists being held without bail. Which is what's happened.

    What have they been charged with to deny them bail? Anything less than MURDER isn't sufficient.

    You are incorrect.

    Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1)(E), detention is permitted if the case involves “any felony . . . that involves the possession or use of a . . . dangerous weapon.”
    Feds get to define dangerous weapon. Not a single gun was confiscated. Not even the one that murdered a female Trump supporter. I guess we almost lost our DeMoCrAcY to flag poles and ?

    Well done Brownshirt.

    Fuck off.
    So, you were totally wrong, but now you have several quibbles to offer.

    I own you.
    I said anything less than Murder isn't sufficient. Where did I say that was the code?
    So, you approve of the SUV driver's release and the state of the law in North Dakota.

    Your quarrel is with the other girls.
    What weapons were used by J6th defendants that rise to the level of no bail? No guns found. Don't worry I'm expecting another deflection. POS.
    Charging documents and public video depict rampaging episodes of violence against 139 officers — attacks involving weapons including batons, metal racks, baseball bats, flagpoles and chemical irritants. Fifty five defendants have been charged with using a dangerous weapon against or seriously injuring officers, including beating one downed man for 16 seconds with a hockey stick, knocking down and dragging others down steps into a crowd of rioters, electro-shocking one with a stun gun and holding a baton against another’s neck.

    That doesn't include the taser one of the detained "patriots" was carrying.
    I’d have abandoned this thread a while ago of I were you.
    Don't let me stop you from doing so now.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Swaye said:

    I wonder if he would have been released if he killed a black teenager at a BLM rally?

    It just might depend on what he was charged with.
    Fuck off
    thank you for your service

    HHusky said:

    Swaye said:

    I wonder if he would have been released if he killed a black teenager at a BLM rally?

    It just might depend on what he was charged with.
    Fuck off
    Dazzler walks off humming, "There goes my hero, watch him as he goes." Dazzler loves himself some leftard criminals. Now we know that he doesn't support violent crime, it's just not a voting issue for him.
    So, they should just hold him because of your very strong feelings.

    He's been charged and allowed to post a bond. It's the law.
    Yup, it's not like he tried to overthrow our DeMoCrAcY and ended up rotting in a DC hellhole because the Gov't can torture you if they so desire.

    He only killed a kid, allegedly, with his SUV. No biggie.

    Again, Fuck off you hypocrite.
    Write your North Dakota legislator.

    Meantime . . .

    He hasn't been charged with murder.

    Do try to keep up.
    Hey Dazzler you good with those rotting in a DC hellhole not being allowed bail?

    None are charged with MURDER!

    What this kunt act folks.
    The insurrectionists aren't being held pursuant to North Dakota law. If whacky left-wing North Dakota want to have lenient, liberal rules, that's states' rights ain't it?
    This isn't about ND.
    You were for federalism before you were against it.
    An honest person could answer the question.

    Case closed.

    I win, again.
    I have zero issue with the few particularly violent insurrectionists being held without bail. Which is what's happened.

    What have they been charged with to deny them bail? Anything less than MURDER isn't sufficient.

    You are incorrect.

    Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1)(E), detention is permitted if the case involves “any felony . . . that involves the possession or use of a . . . dangerous weapon.”
    Feds get to define dangerous weapon. Not a single gun was confiscated. Not even the one that murdered a female Trump supporter. I guess we almost lost our DeMoCrAcY to flag poles and ?

    Well done Brownshirt.

    Fuck off.
    So, you were totally wrong, but now you have several quibbles to offer.

    I own you.
    I said anything less than Murder isn't sufficient. Where did I say that was the code?
    So, you approve of the SUV driver's release and the state of the law in North Dakota.

    Your quarrel is with the other girls.
    What weapons were used by J6th defendants that rise to the level of no bail? No guns found. Don't worry I'm expecting another deflection. POS.
    Charging documents and public video depict rampaging episodes of violence against 139 officers — attacks involving weapons including batons, metal racks, baseball bats, flagpoles and chemical irritants. Fifty five defendants have been charged with using a dangerous weapon against or seriously injuring officers, including beating one downed man for 16 seconds with a hockey stick, knocking down and dragging others down steps into a crowd of rioters, electro-shocking one with a stun gun and holding a baton against another’s neck.

    That doesn't include the taser one of the detained "patriots" was carrying.
    I’d have abandoned this thread a while ago of I were you.
    Don't let me stop you from doing so now.
    3 white flags in one thread? We are getting into uncharted territory for you.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,483
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Swaye said:

    I wonder if he would have been released if he killed a black teenager at a BLM rally?

    It just might depend on what he was charged with.
    Fuck off
    thank you for your service

    HHusky said:

    Swaye said:

    I wonder if he would have been released if he killed a black teenager at a BLM rally?

    It just might depend on what he was charged with.
    Fuck off
    Dazzler walks off humming, "There goes my hero, watch him as he goes." Dazzler loves himself some leftard criminals. Now we know that he doesn't support violent crime, it's just not a voting issue for him.
    So, they should just hold him because of your very strong feelings.

    He's been charged and allowed to post a bond. It's the law.
    Yup, it's not like he tried to overthrow our DeMoCrAcY and ended up rotting in a DC hellhole because the Gov't can torture you if they so desire.

    He only killed a kid, allegedly, with his SUV. No biggie.

    Again, Fuck off you hypocrite.
    Write your North Dakota legislator.

    Meantime . . .

    He hasn't been charged with murder.

    Do try to keep up.
    Hey Dazzler you good with those rotting in a DC hellhole not being allowed bail?

    None are charged with MURDER!

    What this kunt act folks.
    The insurrectionists aren't being held pursuant to North Dakota law. If whacky left-wing North Dakota want to have lenient, liberal rules, that's states' rights ain't it?
    This isn't about ND.
    You were for federalism before you were against it.
    An honest person could answer the question.

    Case closed.

    I win, again.
    I have zero issue with the few particularly violent insurrectionists being held without bail. Which is what's happened.

    What have they been charged with to deny them bail? Anything less than MURDER isn't sufficient.

    You are incorrect.

    Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1)(E), detention is permitted if the case involves “any felony . . . that involves the possession or use of a . . . dangerous weapon.”
    Feds get to define dangerous weapon. Not a single gun was confiscated. Not even the one that murdered a female Trump supporter. I guess we almost lost our DeMoCrAcY to flag poles and ?

    Well done Brownshirt.

    Fuck off.
    So, you were totally wrong, but now you have several quibbles to offer.

    I own you.
    I said anything less than Murder isn't sufficient. Where did I say that was the code?
    So, you approve of the SUV driver's release and the state of the law in North Dakota.

    Your quarrel is with the other girls.
    What weapons were used by J6th defendants that rise to the level of no bail? No guns found. Don't worry I'm expecting another deflection. POS.
    Charging documents and public video depict rampaging episodes of violence against 139 officers — attacks involving weapons including batons, metal racks, baseball bats, flagpoles and chemical irritants. Fifty five defendants have been charged with using a dangerous weapon against or seriously injuring officers, including beating one downed man for 16 seconds with a hockey stick, knocking down and dragging others down steps into a crowd of rioters, electro-shocking one with a stun gun and holding a baton against another’s neck.

    That doesn't include the taser one of the detained "patriots" was carrying.
    I’d have abandoned this thread a while ago of I were you.
    Don't let me stop you from doing so now.
    3 white flags in one thread? We are getting into uncharted territory for you.
    Their just flying tampons Dazzlers snatch hurts!
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 18,954
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Swaye said:

    I wonder if he would have been released if he killed a black teenager at a BLM rally?

    It just might depend on what he was charged with.
    Fuck off
    thank you for your service

    HHusky said:

    Swaye said:

    I wonder if he would have been released if he killed a black teenager at a BLM rally?

    It just might depend on what he was charged with.
    Fuck off
    Dazzler walks off humming, "There goes my hero, watch him as he goes." Dazzler loves himself some leftard criminals. Now we know that he doesn't support violent crime, it's just not a voting issue for him.
    So, they should just hold him because of your very strong feelings.

    He's been charged and allowed to post a bond. It's the law.
    Yup, it's not like he tried to overthrow our DeMoCrAcY and ended up rotting in a DC hellhole because the Gov't can torture you if they so desire.

    He only killed a kid, allegedly, with his SUV. No biggie.

    Again, Fuck off you hypocrite.
    Write your North Dakota legislator.

    Meantime . . .

    He hasn't been charged with murder.

    Do try to keep up.
    Hey Dazzler you good with those rotting in a DC hellhole not being allowed bail?

    None are charged with MURDER!

    What this kunt act folks.
    The insurrectionists aren't being held pursuant to North Dakota law. If whacky left-wing North Dakota want to have lenient, liberal rules, that's states' rights ain't it?
    This isn't about ND.
    You were for federalism before you were against it.
    An honest person could answer the question.

    Case closed.

    I win, again.
    I have zero issue with the few particularly violent insurrectionists being held without bail. Which is what's happened.

    What have they been charged with to deny them bail? Anything less than MURDER isn't sufficient.

    You are incorrect.

    Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1)(E), detention is permitted if the case involves “any felony . . . that involves the possession or use of a . . . dangerous weapon.”
    Feds get to define dangerous weapon. Not a single gun was confiscated. Not even the one that murdered a female Trump supporter. I guess we almost lost our DeMoCrAcY to flag poles and ?

    Well done Brownshirt.

    Fuck off.
    So, you were totally wrong, but now you have several quibbles to offer.

    I own you.
    I said anything less than Murder isn't sufficient. Where did I say that was the code?
    So, you approve of the SUV driver's release and the state of the law in North Dakota.

    Your quarrel is with the other girls.
    What weapons were used by J6th defendants that rise to the level of no bail? No guns found. Don't worry I'm expecting another deflection. POS.
    Charging documents and public video depict rampaging episodes of violence against 139 officers — attacks involving weapons including batons, metal racks, baseball bats, flagpoles and chemical irritants. Fifty five defendants have been charged with using a dangerous weapon against or seriously injuring officers, including beating one downed man for 16 seconds with a hockey stick, knocking down and dragging others down steps into a crowd of rioters, electro-shocking one with a stun gun and holding a baton against another’s neck.

    That doesn't include the taser one of the detained "patriots" was carrying.
    I’d have abandoned this thread a while ago of I were you.
    Don't let me stop you from doing so now.
    3 white flags in one thread? We are getting into uncharted territory for you.
    Their just flying tampons Dazzlers snatch hurts!
    Mall Cop is in his cups, I see.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 18,954
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Swaye said:

    I wonder if he would have been released if he killed a black teenager at a BLM rally?

    It just might depend on what he was charged with.
    Fuck off
    thank you for your service

    HHusky said:

    Swaye said:

    I wonder if he would have been released if he killed a black teenager at a BLM rally?

    It just might depend on what he was charged with.
    Fuck off
    Dazzler walks off humming, "There goes my hero, watch him as he goes." Dazzler loves himself some leftard criminals. Now we know that he doesn't support violent crime, it's just not a voting issue for him.
    So, they should just hold him because of your very strong feelings.

    He's been charged and allowed to post a bond. It's the law.
    Yup, it's not like he tried to overthrow our DeMoCrAcY and ended up rotting in a DC hellhole because the Gov't can torture you if they so desire.

    He only killed a kid, allegedly, with his SUV. No biggie.

    Again, Fuck off you hypocrite.
    Write your North Dakota legislator.

    Meantime . . .

    He hasn't been charged with murder.

    Do try to keep up.
    Hey Dazzler you good with those rotting in a DC hellhole not being allowed bail?

    None are charged with MURDER!

    What this kunt act folks.
    The insurrectionists aren't being held pursuant to North Dakota law. If whacky left-wing North Dakota want to have lenient, liberal rules, that's states' rights ain't it?
    This isn't about ND.
    You were for federalism before you were against it.
    An honest person could answer the question.

    Case closed.

    I win, again.
    I have zero issue with the few particularly violent insurrectionists being held without bail. Which is what's happened.

    What have they been charged with to deny them bail? Anything less than MURDER isn't sufficient.

    You are incorrect.

    Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1)(E), detention is permitted if the case involves “any felony . . . that involves the possession or use of a . . . dangerous weapon.”
    Feds get to define dangerous weapon. Not a single gun was confiscated. Not even the one that murdered a female Trump supporter. I guess we almost lost our DeMoCrAcY to flag poles and ?

    Well done Brownshirt.

    Fuck off.
    So, you were totally wrong, but now you have several quibbles to offer.

    I own you.
    I said anything less than Murder isn't sufficient. Where did I say that was the code?
    So, you approve of the SUV driver's release and the state of the law in North Dakota.

    Your quarrel is with the other girls.
    What weapons were used by J6th defendants that rise to the level of no bail? No guns found. Don't worry I'm expecting another deflection. POS.
    Charging documents and public video depict rampaging episodes of violence against 139 officers — attacks involving weapons including batons, metal racks, baseball bats, flagpoles and chemical irritants. Fifty five defendants have been charged with using a dangerous weapon against or seriously injuring officers, including beating one downed man for 16 seconds with a hockey stick, knocking down and dragging others down steps into a crowd of rioters, electro-shocking one with a stun gun and holding a baton against another’s neck.

    That doesn't include the taser one of the detained "patriots" was carrying.
    I’d have abandoned this thread a while ago of I were you.
    Don't let me stop you from doing so now.
    3 white flags in one thread? We are getting into uncharted territory for you.
    This is just a lack of real effort on your part.

    Be better.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    edited September 2022
    HHusky said:



    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Swaye said:

    I wonder if he would have been released if he killed a black teenager at a BLM rally?

    It just might depend on what he was charged with.
    Fuck off
    thank you for your service

    HHusky said:

    Swaye said:

    I wonder if he would have been released if he killed a black teenager at a BLM rally?

    It just might depend on what he was charged with.
    Fuck off
    Dazzler walks off humming, "There goes my hero, watch him as he goes." Dazzler loves himself some leftard criminals. Now we know that he doesn't support violent crime, it's just not a voting issue for him.
    So, they should just hold him because of your very strong feelings.

    He's been charged and allowed to post a bond. It's the law.
    Yup, it's not like he tried to overthrow our DeMoCrAcY and ended up rotting in a DC hellhole because the Gov't can torture you if they so desire.

    He only killed a kid, allegedly, with his SUV. No biggie.

    Again, Fuck off you hypocrite.
    Write your North Dakota legislator.

    Meantime . . .

    He hasn't been charged with murder.

    Do try to keep up.
    Hey Dazzler you good with those rotting in a DC hellhole not being allowed bail?

    None are charged with MURDER!

    What this kunt act folks.
    The insurrectionists aren't being held pursuant to North Dakota law. If whacky left-wing North Dakota want to have lenient, liberal rules, that's states' rights ain't it?
    This isn't about ND.
    You were for federalism before you were against it.
    An honest person could answer the question.

    Case closed.

    I win, again.
    I have zero issue with the few particularly violent insurrectionists being held without bail. Which is what's happened.

    What have they been charged with to deny them bail? Anything less than MURDER isn't sufficient.

    You are incorrect.

    Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1)(E), detention is permitted if the case involves “any felony . . . that involves the possession or use of a . . . dangerous weapon.”
    Feds get to define dangerous weapon. Not a single gun was confiscated. Not even the one that murdered a female Trump supporter. I guess we almost lost our DeMoCrAcY to flag poles and ?

    Well done Brownshirt.

    Fuck off.
    So, you were totally wrong, but now you have several quibbles to offer.

    I own you.
    I said anything less than Murder isn't sufficient. Where did I say that was the code?
    So, you approve of the SUV driver's release and the state of the law in North Dakota.

    Your quarrel is with the other girls.
    What weapons were used by J6th defendants that rise to the level of no bail? No guns found. Don't worry I'm expecting another deflection. POS.
    Charging documents and public video depict rampaging episodes of violence against 139 officers — attacks involving weapons including batons, metal racks, baseball bats, flagpoles and chemical irritants. Fifty five defendants have been charged with using a dangerous weapon against or seriously injuring officers, including beating one downed man for 16 seconds with a hockey stick, knocking down and dragging others down steps into a crowd of rioters, electro-shocking one with a stun gun and holding a baton against another’s neck.

    That doesn't include the taser one of the detained "patriots" was carrying.
    I’d have abandoned this thread a while ago of I were you.
    Don't let me stop you from doing so now.
    3 white flags in one thread? We are getting into uncharted territory for you.
    Their just flying tampons Dazzlers snatch hurts!
    Mall Cop is in his cups, I see.
    We’ve all seen you struggle in most threads, but this is next level.

    Any links to cases that support your desire for applying the law equally? So far it’s been pretty quiet from you on that. Unless you’re outraged that the Charlottesville murderer was unfairly treated.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Swaye said:

    I wonder if he would have been released if he killed a black teenager at a BLM rally?

    It just might depend on what he was charged with.
    Fuck off
    thank you for your service

    HHusky said:

    Swaye said:

    I wonder if he would have been released if he killed a black teenager at a BLM rally?

    It just might depend on what he was charged with.
    Fuck off
    Dazzler walks off humming, "There goes my hero, watch him as he goes." Dazzler loves himself some leftard criminals. Now we know that he doesn't support violent crime, it's just not a voting issue for him.
    So, they should just hold him because of your very strong feelings.

    He's been charged and allowed to post a bond. It's the law.
    Yup, it's not like he tried to overthrow our DeMoCrAcY and ended up rotting in a DC hellhole because the Gov't can torture you if they so desire.

    He only killed a kid, allegedly, with his SUV. No biggie.

    Again, Fuck off you hypocrite.
    Write your North Dakota legislator.

    Meantime . . .

    He hasn't been charged with murder.

    Do try to keep up.
    Hey Dazzler you good with those rotting in a DC hellhole not being allowed bail?

    None are charged with MURDER!

    What this kunt act folks.
    The insurrectionists aren't being held pursuant to North Dakota law. If whacky left-wing North Dakota want to have lenient, liberal rules, that's states' rights ain't it?
    This isn't about ND.
    You were for federalism before you were against it.
    An honest person could answer the question.

    Case closed.

    I win, again.
    I have zero issue with the few particularly violent insurrectionists being held without bail. Which is what's happened.

    What have they been charged with to deny them bail? Anything less than MURDER isn't sufficient.

    You are incorrect.

    Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1)(E), detention is permitted if the case involves “any felony . . . that involves the possession or use of a . . . dangerous weapon.”
    Feds get to define dangerous weapon. Not a single gun was confiscated. Not even the one that murdered a female Trump supporter. I guess we almost lost our DeMoCrAcY to flag poles and ?

    Well done Brownshirt.

    Fuck off.
    So, you were totally wrong, but now you have several quibbles to offer.

    I own you.
    I said anything less than Murder isn't sufficient. Where did I say that was the code?
    So, you approve of the SUV driver's release and the state of the law in North Dakota.

    Your quarrel is with the other girls.
    What weapons were used by J6th defendants that rise to the level of no bail? No guns found. Don't worry I'm expecting another deflection. POS.
    Charging documents and public video depict rampaging episodes of violence against 139 officers — attacks involving weapons including batons, metal racks, baseball bats, flagpoles and chemical irritants. Fifty five defendants have been charged with using a dangerous weapon against or seriously injuring officers, including beating one downed man for 16 seconds with a hockey stick, knocking down and dragging others down steps into a crowd of rioters, electro-shocking one with a stun gun and holding a baton against another’s neck.

    That doesn't include the taser one of the detained "patriots" was carrying.
    I’d have abandoned this thread a while ago of I were you.
    Don't let me stop you from doing so now.
    3 white flags in one thread? We are getting into uncharted territory for you.
    This is just a lack of real effort on your part.

    Be better.
    4 white flags! We are definitely breaking new ground.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    edited September 2022

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Swaye said:

    I wonder if he would have been released if he killed a black teenager at a BLM rally?

    It just might depend on what he was charged with.
    Fuck off
    thank you for your service

    HHusky said:

    Swaye said:

    I wonder if he would have been released if he killed a black teenager at a BLM rally?

    It just might depend on what he was charged with.
    Fuck off
    Dazzler walks off humming, "There goes my hero, watch him as he goes." Dazzler loves himself some leftard criminals. Now we know that he doesn't support violent crime, it's just not a voting issue for him.
    So, they should just hold him because of your very strong feelings.

    He's been charged and allowed to post a bond. It's the law.
    Yup, it's not like he tried to overthrow our DeMoCrAcY and ended up rotting in a DC hellhole because the Gov't can torture you if they so desire.

    He only killed a kid, allegedly, with his SUV. No biggie.

    Again, Fuck off you hypocrite.
    Write your North Dakota legislator.

    Meantime . . .

    He hasn't been charged with murder.

    Do try to keep up.
    Hey Dazzler you good with those rotting in a DC hellhole not being allowed bail?

    None are charged with MURDER!

    What this kunt act folks.
    The insurrectionists aren't being held pursuant to North Dakota law. If whacky left-wing North Dakota want to have lenient, liberal rules, that's states' rights ain't it?
    This isn't about ND.
    You were for federalism before you were against it.
    An honest person could answer the question.

    Case closed.

    I win, again.
    I have zero issue with the few particularly violent insurrectionists being held without bail. Which is what's happened.

    What have they been charged with to deny them bail? Anything less than MURDER isn't sufficient.

    You are incorrect.

    Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1)(E), detention is permitted if the case involves “any felony . . . that involves the possession or use of a . . . dangerous weapon.”
    Feds get to define dangerous weapon. Not a single gun was confiscated. Not even the one that murdered a female Trump supporter. I guess we almost lost our DeMoCrAcY to flag poles and ?

    Well done Brownshirt.

    Fuck off.
    So, you were totally wrong, but now you have several quibbles to offer.

    I own you.
    I said anything less than Murder isn't sufficient. Where did I say that was the code?
    So, you approve of the SUV driver's release and the state of the law in North Dakota.

    Your quarrel is with the other girls.
    What weapons were used by J6th defendants that rise to the level of no bail? No guns found. Don't worry I'm expecting another deflection. POS.
    Charging documents and public video depict rampaging episodes of violence against 139 officers — attacks involving weapons including batons, metal racks, baseball bats, flagpoles and chemical irritants. Fifty five defendants have been charged with using a dangerous weapon against or seriously injuring officers, including beating one downed man for 16 seconds with a hockey stick, knocking down and dragging others down steps into a crowd of rioters, electro-shocking one with a stun gun and holding a baton against another’s neck.

    That doesn't include the taser one of the detained "patriots" was carrying.
    “If you wanted or if you think you need to have weapons to take on the government, you need F-15s and maybe some nuclear weapons." - Joe Biden

    Biden left out hockey sticks.

    Only two people died that day. Two women supporters of Trump. Flag pole, deadly weapon. Racks? Deadly weapon. Baton, carried by police, deadly weapons.

    Remember when Dazzler was calling for Antifa thugs to be jailed indefinitely for attacking LEO nightly in PDX.

    I was right.
  • HuskyJWHuskyJW Guest, Member Posts: 14,161
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Should have done it with an AR

    Can claim self defense then
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 100,717
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    HuskyJW said:

    Should have done it with an AR

    Can claim self defense then

    Sorry your pedo buddy got shot

    He fucked around and found out
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 13,701
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    HuskyJW said:

    Should have done it with an AR

    Can claim self defense then

    Like the dazzler, JW roots for the pedos and the away team.
  • MelloDawgMelloDawg Member Posts: 6,065
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Sledog said:

    Bullshit.

    What did you see when you were there? Probably just some trespassing, huh?
  • HuskyJWHuskyJW Guest, Member Posts: 14,161
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    edited September 2022

    HuskyJW said:

    Should have done it with an AR

    Can claim self defense then

    Like the dazzler, JW roots for the pedos and the away team.
    Fake news

    Has your daughter killed her self yet at the mere thought of having to spend another five minutes with you?
  • HuskyJWHuskyJW Guest, Member Posts: 14,161
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes

    HuskyJW said:

    Should have done it with an AR

    Can claim self defense then

    Sorry your pedo buddy got shot

    He fucked around and found out
    You don’t know one thing about guns. Stay in your lane princess
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,103
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    HuskyJW said:

    HuskyJW said:

    Should have done it with an AR

    Can claim self defense then

    Sorry your pedo buddy got shot

    He fucked around and found out
    You don’t know one thing about guns. Stay in your lane princess
    Still wearing a mask?
Sign In or Register to comment.