Husky Jacks open thread [2022]
Comments
-
There was no push to losevadawg said:I was surprised by how small our OL looked in comparison to both last year and the MSU DL. We’ve shed weight which probably helped our pass protrude to increased speed. But lost push on power blocking for the rush. Just a thought.
-
No sacksPostGameOrangeSlices said:
There was no push to losevadawg said:I was surprised by how small our OL looked in comparison to both last year and the MSU DL. We’ve shed weight which probably helped our pass protrude to increased speed. But lost push on power blocking for the rush. Just a thought.
3 and 0 -
-
Be chinteresting to see McKee this week. AFAIK, he's not mobile, so we might see our pass rush get some sacksGrundleStiltzkin said: -
The OL didn’t appear to have much power last year either.vadawg said:I was surprised by how small our OL looked in comparison to both last year and the MSU DL. We’ve shed weight which probably helped our pass protrude to increased speed. But lost push on power blocking for the rush. Just a thought.
-
-
Holy fuck, Burmeister still hasn't got his reads down.GrundleStiltzkin said: -
Agree. But what I pointed out can’t be a positive going forward with changing that issue.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
The OL didn’t appear to have much power last year either.vadawg said:I was surprised by how small our OL looked in comparison to both last year and the MSU DL. We’ve shed weight which probably helped our pass protrude to increased speed. But lost push on power blocking for the rush. Just a thought.
-
-
@Mosster47 (RIP) true?Doogles said:
Holy fuck, Burmeister still hasn't got his reads down.GrundleStiltzkin said:
